On the characterization of protein native state ensembles

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 92, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1503-1511

  Shehu, Amarda ^a   Kavraki, Lydia E ^a,c   Clementi, Cecilia ^b,c  

^a Rice University   (United States)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 33847776838     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.094409     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Kay, L. E. 2005. NMR studies of protein structure and dynamics. J. Magn. Reson. 173:193-207.
2. Karplus, M., and J. Kuriyan. 2005. Molecular dynamics and protein function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:6679-6685.
3. Eisenmesser, E. Z., O. Millet, W. Labeikovsky, D. M. Korzhnev, M. Wolf-Watz, D. A. Bosco, J. J. Skalicky, L. E. Kay, and D. Kern. 2005. Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis. Nature. 438:117-121.
4. Peters, G. H., T. M. Frimurer, and O. H. Olsen. 1999. Molecular dynamics simulations of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B. I. Ligand-induced changes in the protein motions. Biophys. J. 77:505-515.
5. Balabin, I. A., and J. N. Onuchic. 2000. Dynamically controlled protein tunneling paths in photosynthetic reaction centers. Science. 290:114-117.
6. Schnell, J. R., H. J. Dyson, and P. E. Wright. 2004. Structure, dynamics, and catalytic function of dihydrofolate reductase. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33:119-140.
7. Smith, G. R., M. J. E. Sternberg, and P. A. Bates. 2005. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. J. Mol. Biol. 347:1077-1101.
8. Igumenova, T. I., K. K. Frederick, and A. J. Wand. 2006. Characterization of the fast dynamics of protein amino acid side chains using NMR relaxation in solution. Chem. Rev. 106:1672-1699.
9. Lee, A. L., and A. J. Wand. 2006. Microscopic origins of entropy, heat capacity and the glass transition in proteins. Nature. 411:501-504.
10. Lindorff-Larsen, K., R. B. Best, M. A. DePristo, C. M. Dobson, and M. Vendruscolo. 2005. Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics. Nature. 433:128-132.
11. Okamoto, Y. 2004. Generalized-ensemble algorithms: enhanced sampling techniques for Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 22:425-439.
12. Singhal, N., C. D. Snow, and V. S. Pande. 2004. Using path sampling to build better Markovian state models: predicting the folding rate and mechanism of a tryptophan zipper beta hairpin. J. Chem. Phys. 121:415-425.
13. Jayachandran, G., V. Vishal, and V. S. Pande. 2006. Using massively parallel simulation and Markovian models to study protein folding: examining the dynamics of the villin headpiece. J. Chem. Phys. 124:164902-164914.
14. Chen, J., and C. L. Brooks III. 2005. Application of torsion angle molecular dynamics for efficient sampling of protein conformations. J. Comput. Chem. 26:1565-1578.
15. Bahar, I., and A. J. Rader. 2005. Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15:1-7.
16. Tai, K., T. Shen, U. Boerjesson, M. Philippopulos, and J. A. McCammon. 2001. Analysis of a 10-ns molecular dynamics simulation of mouse acetylcholinesterase. Biophys. J. 81:715-724.
17. Jacobs, D. J., A. J. Rader, L. A. Kuhn, and M. F. Thorpe. 2001. Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 44:150-165.
18. Rod, T. H., J. L. Radkiewicz, and C. L. Brooks III. 2003. Correlated motion and the effect of distal mutations in dihydrofolate reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:6980-6985.
19. Daggett, V. 2000. Long timescale simulations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:160-164.
20. Price, D. J., and C. L. Brooks III. 2002. Modern protein force fields behave comparably in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 23:1045-1057.
21. Hansson, T., C. Oostenbrink, and W. F. van Gunsteren. 2002. Molecular dynamics simulations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:190-196.
22. Wrabl, J. O., S. A. Larson, and V. J. Hilser. 2001. Thermodynamic propensities of amino acids in the native state ensemble: implications for fold recognition. Protein Sci. 10:1032-1045.
23. Best, R. B., and M. Vendruscolo. 2004. Determination of ensembles of structures consistent with NMR order parameters. J. Am. Chem. Chem. Soc. 126:8090-8091.
24. Chen, J., H. S. Won, W. Im, H. J. Dyson, and C. L. Brooks III. 2005. Generation of native-like protein structures from limited NMR data, modern force fields and advanced conformational sampling. J. Biomol. NMR. 31:59-64.
25. Shehu, A., C. Clementi, and L. E. Kavraki. 2006. Computing protein conformations from a single structure: modeling protein flexibility at equilibrium. Algorithmica. In press.
26. Shehu, A., C. Clementi, and L. E. Kavraki. 2006. Modeling protein conformational ensembles: From missing loops to equilibrium fluctuations. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 65:164-179.
27. Canutescu, A. A., and R. L. Dunbrack, Jr. 2003. Cyclic Coordinate Descent: a robotics algorithm for protein loop closure. Protein Sci. 12:963-972.
28. Hyberts, S. G., M. S. Goldberg, and G. Wagner. 1992. The solution structure of eglin c based on measurements of many NOEs and coupling constants and its comparison with x-ray structures. Protein Sci. 1:736-751.
29. Morton, C. J., D. J. R. Pugh, E. L. J. Brown, J. D. Kahmann, D. A. Renzoni, and I. D. Campbell. 1996. Solution structure and peptide binding of the SH3 domain from human Fyn. Struct. Fold. Des. 4:705-714.
30. Main, A. L., T. S. Harvey, M. J. Baron, and I. D. Campbell. 1992. The three-dimensional structure of the tenth type III module of fibronectin: an insight into RGD-mediated interactions. Cell. 71:671-678.
31. Johansson, M. U., M. de Château, M. Wikström, S. Forsén, T. Drakenberg, and L. Björck. 1997. Solution structure of the albumin-binding GA module: a versatile bacterial protein domain. J. Mol. Biol. 266:859-865.
32. Berman, H. M., J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliand, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235-242.
33. MacKerell, J. A. D., D. Bashford, M. Bellot, R. L. Dunbrack, Jr., J. D. Evanseck, M. J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, D. Joseph-McCarthy, L. Kuchnir, K. Kuczera, F. T. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom, W. E. Reiher III, B. Roux, B. Schlenkrich, J. C. Smith, R. H. Stote, J. Straub, J. Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera, D. Yin, and M. Karplus. 1998. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102:3586-3616.
34. Lipari, G., and A. Szabo. 1982. Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104:4546-4559.
35. Lipari, G., and A. Szabo. 1982. Protein dynamics and NMR relaxation: comparison of simulations with experiment. Nature. 300:197-198.
36. CN couplings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:8959-8966.
37. Bevington, P. R., and D. K. Robinson. 2002. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, 3rd Ed. D. Bruflodt and S. J. Cotkin, editors. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
38. Clarkson, M. W., and A. L. Lee. 2004. Long-range dynamic effects of point mutations propagate through side chains in the serine protease inhibitor eglin c. Biochemistry. 43:12448-12458.
39. Mittermaier, A., and L. E. Kay. 2004. The response of internal dynamics to hydrophobic core mutations in the SH3 domain from the Fyn tyrosine kinase. Protein Sci. 13:1088-1099.
40. Carr, P. A., H. P. Erickson, and A. G. Palmer III. 1997. Backbone dynamics of homologous fibronectin type III cell adhesion domains from fibronectin and tenascin. Struct. Fold. Des. 5:949-959.
41. Best, R. B., T. J. Rutherford, S. M. V. Freund, and J. Clarke. 2004. Backbone dynamics of homologous fibronectin type III cell adhesion domains from fibronectin and tenascin. Biochemistry. 43:1145-1155.
42. Johansson, M. U., H. Nilson, J. Evenäs, S. Forsén, T. Drakenberg, L. Björck, and M. Wikström. 2002. Differences in backbone dynamics of two homologous bacterial albumin-binding modules: implications for binding specificity and bacterial adaptation. J. Mol. Biol. 316:1036-1099.
43. Frishman, D., and P. Argos. 1995. Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:566-579.
44. Muñoz, V., and L. Serrano. 1997. Development of the multiple sequence approximation within the Agadir model of α-helix formation. Comparison with Zimm-Bragg and Lifson-Roig formalisms. Biopolymers. 41:495-509.
45. Doshi, U. R., and V. Muñoz. 2004. The principles of α-helix formation: explaining complex kinetics with nucleation-elongation theory. J. Phys. Chem. B. 108:8497-8506.
46. Ming, D., and R. Brueschweiler. 2004. Prediction of methyl side-chain dynamics in proteins. J. Biomol. NMR. 29:363-368.
47. Bax, A., G. W. Vuister, S. Grzesiek, F. Delaglio, A. C. Wang, R. Tschudin, and G. Zhu. 1994. Measurement of homo- and heteronuclear J couplings from quantitative J correlation. Meth. Enzymol. 239:79-105.
48. Humphrey, W., A. Dalke, and K. Schulten. 1996. VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14:33-38.