Fuel for litigation? Links between procedural justice and multisource feedback

Journal of Managerial Issues

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 530-546

  Gillespie, Treena L ^a   Parry, Richard O ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847078374     PISSN: 10453695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adams, J. S. 1963. "Toward an Understanding of Inequity." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67: 422-436.
2. Antonioni, D. and H. Park. 2001. "The Relationship Between Rater Affect and Three Sources of 360-degree Feedback Ratings." Journal of Management 27: 479-495.
3. Atkins, P. and R. Wood. 2002. "Self- Versus Others' Ratings as Predictors of Assessment Center Ratings: Validation Evidence for 360-degree Feedback Progratos." Personnel Psychology 55: 871-904.
4. Atwater, L., C. Ostroff, F. Yammarino and J. Fleenor. 1998. "Self-Other Agreement: Does It Really Matter?" Personnel Psychology 51: 577-598.
5. Atkins, P., P. Roush and A. Fischthal. 1995. "The Influence of Upward Feedback on Self- and Follower Ratings of Leadership." Personnel Psychology 48: 35-59.
6. Atkins, P., D. Waldman, D. Atwater and P. Cartier. 2000. "An Upward Feedback Field Experiment: Supervisors' Cynicism, Reactions, and Commitment to Subordinates." Personnel Psychology 53: 275-297.
7. Bates, R. 2002. "Liking and Similarity as Predictors of Multi-source Ratings." Personnel Review 31: 540-552.
8. Becton, J. and M. Schraeder. 2004. "Participant Input into Rater Selection: Potential Effects on the Quality and Acceptance of Ratings in the Context of 360-degree Feedback." Public Personnel Management 33: 23-32.
9. Bernardin, H, S. Dahmus and G. Redmon. 1993. "Attitudes of First-line Supervisors toward Subordinate Appraisals." Human Resource Management 32: 315-324.
10. Bernerdin, H, and C. Tyler. 2001. "Legal and Ethical Issues in Multisource Feedback." Chapter in The Handbook of Multisource Feedback. Eds. D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck and A. H. Church. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. pp. 447-462.
11. Bies, R. and J. Moag. 1986. "Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria for Fairness." Chapter in Research on Negotiation in Organizations. Eds. R.J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard and M. H.Bazerman. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. pp. 43-55.
12. Bies, R. and T. M. Tripp. 1996. "Beyond Distrust: Getting Even and the Need for Revenge." Chapter in Trust in Organizations. Eds. R. Kramer and T. Tyler. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 246-260.
13. Bies, R. and T. R. Tyler. 1993. "The 'Litigation Explosion' in Organizations: A Test of Alternative Psychological Explanations," Organizational Science 4: 352-366.
14. Borman, W. C. 1974. "The Ratings of Individuals in Organizations: An Alternate Approach." Organizational Behavior and Human Perormance 12: 105-124.
15. Bracken, D. and C. Timmreck. 1999. "Guidelines for Multisource Feedback When Used for Decision Making." The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist (TIP) 36: 64-74.
16. Bracken, D., C. Timmreck and A. Church. 2001. "History and Development of Multiple-source Feedback as a Methodology." Handbook of Multisource Feedback. Eds. D. Bracken, C. Timmreck and A. Church. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. pp. 3-14.
17. Brito v. Zia Co., 478 F. 2d 1200 (10th Cir.), 1973.
18. Brockner, J. and B. Wiesenfeld. 1996. "An Integrative Framework for Explaining Reactions to Decisions: Interactive Effects of Outcomes and Procedures." Psychological Bulletin 120: 189-208.
19. Brutus, S., J. Fleenor and C. McCauley. 1999. "Demographic and Personality Predictors of Congruence in Multisource Ratings." Journal of Management Development 18: 417-435.
20. Cohen-Charash, Y. and P. Spector. 2001. "The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-analysis." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86: 278-321.
21. Colquitt, J., D. Conlon, M. Wesson, C. Porter and K. Ng. 2001. "Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research." Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 425-445.
22. Conger, J. and G. Toegel. 2003. "Action Learning and Multi-rater Feedback as Leadership Development Interventions: Popular but Poorly Deployed." Journal of Change Management 3: 332-348.
23. DeNisi, A. and A. Kluger. 2000. "Feedback Effectiveness: Can 360 degree Appraisals Be Improved?" Academy of Management Executive 14: 129-139.
24. Diaz v. Pan American World Airways, 404 U.S. 950, 1971.
25. Dunford, B. and D. Devine. 1998. "Employment At-will and Employee Discharge: AJustice Perspective on Legal Action Following Termination." Personnel Psychology 51: 903-934.
26. Eisenberger, R, R. Huntington, S. Hutchison and D. Sowa. 1986. "Perceived Organizational Support." Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 500-507.
27. Erdogan, B., M. Kraimer and R. Liden. 2001. "Procedural Justice as a Two-di-mensional Construct: An Examination in the Performance Appraisal Context." The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 37: 205-221.
28. Fletcher, C. 2001. "Performance Appraisal and Management: The Developing Research Agenda."Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 74: 473-487.
29. Folger, R., M. Konovsky and R. Cropanzano. 1992. "A Due Process Metaphor for Performance Appraisal." Chapter in Research in Organizational Behavior. Eds. B. Staw and L. L. Cummings. Greenwich, CT:JAI. pp. 129-177.
30. Ghorpade, J. 2000. "Managing Five Paradoxes of 360-degree Feedback." Academy of Management Executive 14: 140-150.
31. Goldman, B., E. Paddock and R. Cropanzano. 2004. "A Transformational Model of Legal-claiming." Journal of Managerial Issues 16 (4): 417-441.
32. Green, B. 2002. "Listening to Leaders: Feedback on 360-degree Feedback One Year Later." Organization Development Journal 20: 8-16.
33. Harris, M. and J. Schaubroeck. 1988. "A Meta-analysis of Self-supervisor, Self-peer, and Peer-supervisor Ratings." Personnd Psychology 41: 43-61.
34. Inderrieden, E., R. Allen and T. Keaveny. 2004. "Managerial Discretion in the Use of Self-ratings in an Appraisal System: The Antecedents and Consequences." Journal of Managerial Issues 16 (4): 460-482.
35. Jackson, J. and M. Greller. 1998. "Decision Elements for Using 360 Degree Feedback." Human Resource Planning 21: 18-28.
36. Johnson, J. and K. Ferstl. 1999. "The Effects of Interrater and Self-Other Agreement on Performance Improvement Following Upward Feedback." Personnel Psychology 52: 271-303.
37. Judge, T. and G. Ferris. 1993. "Social Context of Performance Evaluation Decisions." Academy of Management Journal 36: 80-105.
38. Latham, G. and K. Wexley. 1982. Increasing Productivity through Performance Appraisal. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
39. Leventhal, G. S. 1980. "What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships." In Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research. Eds. K. Gergen, M. Greenberg and R. Willis. New York, NY: Plenum. pp. 27-55.
40. Lind, E. and T. Tyler. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York, NY: Plenum.
41. London, M., A. Wohlers and P. Gallagher. 1990. "360-degree Feedback Surveys: A Source of Feedback to Guide Management Development." Journal of Management Development 9: 17-31.
42. Mabey, C. 2001. "Closing the Circle: Participant Views of a 360 Degree Feedback Programme." Human Resource Management Journal 11: 41-53.
43. Maurer, T., D. Mitchell and F. Barbeite. 2002. "Predictors of Attitudes toward a 360-degree Feedback System and Involvement in Post-feedback Management Development Activity." Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 75: 87-107.
44. Maurer, T. and J. Palmer. 1999. "Management Development Intentions Following Feedback: Role of Perceived Outcomes, Social Pressures, and Control." The Journal of Management 18: 733-751.
45. Meyer, J. and C. Smith. 2000. "HRM Practices and Organizational Commitment: Test of a Mediation Model." Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 17:319-331.
46. Miller, D. T. 2001. "Disrespect and the Experience of Injustice." Annual Review of Psychology 52: 627-553.
47. Murphy, K. and J. Cleveland. 1991. Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
48. Ostroff, C., L. Atwater and B. Feinberg. 2004. "Understanding Self-Other Agreement: A Look at Rater and Ratee Characteristics, Context, and Outcomes." Personnel Psychology 57: 333-375.
49. Price-Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 1989.
50. Rogers, E., C. Rogers and W. Metlay. 2002. "Improving the Payoff from 360-degree Feedback." Human Resource Planning 25: 44-54.
51. Shapiro, D., E. Butmer and B. Barry. 1994. "Explanations for Rejection Decisions: What Factors Enhance Their Perceived Adequacy and Moderate Their Enhancement of Justice Perceptions." Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 58: 346-368.
52. Thibaut, J. and L. Walker. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Toegel, G. and J. Conger. 2003. "360-degree Assessment: Time for Reinvention." Academy of Management Learning and Education 2: 297-311.
54. Tornow, W. W. 1993. "Perceptions or Reality: Is Multiple-perspective Measurement a Means or an End?" Human Resource Management 32: 221-230.
55. Varma, A., A. DeNisi and L. Peters. 1996. "Interpersonal Affect and Performance Appraisal: A Field Study." Personnel Psychology 49: 341-360.
56. Waldman, D. and L. Atwater. 2001. "Attitudinal and Behavioral Outcomes of an Upward Feedback Process." Group and Organization Management 26: 189-205.
57. Waldman, D. and D. Antonioni. 1998. "Has 360-degree Feedback Gone Amok?" Academy of Management Executive 12: 86-94.
58. Walker, A. and J. Smither. 1999. "A Five Year Study of Upward Feedback: What Managers Do with Their Results Matters." Personnel Psychology 52: 393-423.
59. Werner, J. and M. Bolino. 1997. "Explaining U.S. Courts of Appeals Decisions Involving Performance Appraisal: Accuracy, Fairness, and Validation." Personnel Psychology 50: 1-24.
60. Westerman, J. and J. Rosse. 1997. "Reducing the Threat of Rater Nonparticipation in 360-degree Feedback Systems: An Exploratory Examination of Antecedents to Participation in Upward Ratings." Group and Organization Management 22: 288-310.