Attitudinal and Behavioral Outcomes of an Upward Feedback Process

Group and Organization Management

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 189-205

  Waldman, David A ^a,b   Atwater, Leanne E ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WEST   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035591243     PISSN: 10596011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1059601101262004     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Antonioni, D. (1994). The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings. Personnel Psychology, 47, 349-356.
2. Antonioni, D. (1996). Designing an effective 360 degree feedback appraisal process. Organizational Dynamics, 25(2), 24-38.
3. Ashford, S., & Cummings, L. (1983). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 32, 370-398.
4. Atwater, L. E., Roush, P., & Fischthal, A. (1995). The influence of upward feedback on self and follower ratings of leadership. Personnel Psychology, 48, 35-59.
5. Atwater, L. E., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, D., & Cartier, P. (2000). An upward feedback field experiment: Supervisors' cynicism, reactions, and commitment to subordinates. Personnel Psychology, 53, 275-297.
6. Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, R. W. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent Publishing.
7. Bretz, R. D., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18, 321-352.
8. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
9. Harris, M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43-61.
10. Hazucha, J., Hezlett, S., & Schneider, R. (1993). The impact of 360 degree feedback on management skills development. Human Resource Management, 32, 325-351.
11. Herold, D., & Parsons, C. (1985). Assessing the feedback environment in work organizations: Development of the Job Feedback Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 290-306.
12. Ilgen, D., Fisher, C., & Taylor, S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371.
13. Kluger, A., & DiNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback intervention on performance. A historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 179, 254-284.
14. Latham, G. P. (1986). Job performance and appraisal. In C. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), Review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 117-155). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
15. Latham, G. P., Irvine, D., Skarlicki, D., & Seigel, J. P. (1993). The increasing importance of performance appraisals to employee effectiveness in organizational setting in North America. In C. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), Review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 87-132). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
16. Maurer, T., & Tarulli, B. (1994, April). Addressing acceptance of upward and peer performance appraisal systems. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN.
17. Mohrman, A. M., Jr., Resnick-West, S. M., & Lawler, E. E., III. (1990). Designing performance appraisal systems: Aligning appraisals and organizational realities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Morran, D., & Stockton, R. (1980). Effect of self-concept on group member reception of positive and negative feedback. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27, 260-267.
19. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Pearce, J. L., & Porter, L. W. (1986). Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 211-218.
21. Smither, J., London, M., Vasilopoulos, N., Reilly, R., Millsap, R., & Salveminim, N. (1995). An examination of the effects of an upward feedback program overtime. Personnel Psychology, 48, 1-33.
22. Smither, J., Wohlers, A., & London, M. (1995). A field study of reactions to normative versus individualized upward feedback. Group & Organization Management, 20, 61-89.
23. Taylor, S., Fisher, C., & Ilgen, D. (1984). Individuals' reactions to performance feedback in organizations. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 2, 81-124.
24. Waldman, D. A., & Atwater, L. E. (1998). The power of 360 degree feedback. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
25. Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Antonioni, D. (1998). Has 360 degree feedback gone amok? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 86-94.
26. Walker, A. G., & Smither, J. W. (1999). A five-year study of upward feedback: What managers do with their results matters. Personnel Psychology, 52, 393-423.