Bilingual language processing and interference in bilinguals: Evidence from eye tracking and picture naming

Language Learning

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 119-163

  Kaushanskaya, Margarita ^a   Marian, Viorica ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilingualism; Eye tracking; Parallel language activation; Picture naming; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846584078     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00401.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Altarriba, J., Kroll, J., Sholl, A., & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory and Cognition, 24, 477-492.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania. [CD-ROM]
3. Besner, D., & Stolz, J. A. (1999). What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 99-104.
4. Bijeljac-Babic, R., Biardeau, A., & Grainger, J. (1997). Masked orthographic priming in bilingual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25(4), 447-457.
5. Brown, T. L., Gore, C. L., & Carr, T. H. (2002). Visual attention and word recognition in Stroop color naming: Is word recognition "automatic"? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 220-240.
6. Brown, T. L., Gore, C. L., & Pearson, T. (1998). Visual half-field Stroop effect with spatial separation of words and color targets. Brain and Language, 63, 122-142.
7. Brown, T. L., Roos-Gilbert, L., & Carr, T. H. (1995). Automaticity and word perception: Evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1395-1411.
8. Brysbaert, M., Van Dyck, G., & Van de Poel, M. (1999). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence from masked phonological priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 137-148.
9. Caramazza, A., & Costa, A. (2000). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: Does response set matter? Cognition, 75, B51-B64.
10. Colomé, A. (2001). Lexical activation in bilinguals' speech production: Language-specific or language-independent? Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 721-736.
11. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
12. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegel, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
13. Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1283-1296.
14. Costa, A., Colomé, A., & Caramazza, A. (2002). Lexical access in speech production: The bilingual case. Psicologica, 21, 403-437.
15. Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual's two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 365-397.
16. de Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt's speaking model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1-24.
17. de Bot, K., & Schreuder, R. (1993). Word production and the bilingual lexicon. In R. Schreuder & B. Weltens (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp. 191-214). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
18. De Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: Support for non-selective access to bilingual memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A(2), 397-428.
19. Dell, G. S., & O'Sheaghdha, P. G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 42, 287-314.
20. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2002). Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 487-506.
21. Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496-518.
22. Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual visual word recognition. In J. Grainger and A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp.189-225). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
23. Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual visual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 175-197.
24. Ehri, L. C., & Bouchard, R. E. (1980). Performance of bilinguals on a picture-word interference task. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9(3), 285-302.
25. Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamic model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42(5), 621-636.
26. Feldman, L. B., & Turvey, M. T. (1983). Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian is phonologically analytic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 288-298.
27. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 365-382.
28. Gollan, T., Forster, K., & Frost, R. (1997). Translation priming with different scripts: Masked priming with cognates and non-cognates in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1122-1139.
29. Goodman, G. S., Haith, M. M., Guttentag, R. E., & Rao, S. (1985). Automatic processing of word meaning: Intralingual and interlingual interference. Child Development, 56, 103-118.
30. Gottlob, L. R., Goldinger, S. D., Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1999). Reading homographs: Orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 561-574.
31. Green, D. W. (1986). Control, activation, and resource: A framework and a model for the control of speech in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27, 210-223.
32. Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-sematic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67-81.
33. Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual's language modes. In J. L. Nicol (Ed.), One mind two languages (pp. 1-22). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34. Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., de Bot, K., & Schreder, R. (1998). Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? Bilingualism, Language, and Cognition, 1, 213-229.
35. Jared, D., & Kroll, J. F. (2001). Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words? Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 2-31.
36. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Priming effects from phonologically related distractors in picture-word interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A(2), 371-382.
37. Ju, M., & Luce, P. A. (2004). Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science, 15, 314-318.
38. La Heij, W., & van den Hof, E. (1995). Picture-word interference increases with target-set size. Journal of Psychological Research, 58, 119-133.
39. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
40. Liu, W., Inhoff, A. W., Ye, Y., & Wu, C. (2002). Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1213-1227.
41. Lukatela, G., Savic, M., Gligorijevic, B., Ognjenovic, P., & Turvey, M. T. (1978). Bialphabetical lexical decision. Language and Speech, 21, 142-165.
42. Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory and Cognition, 7, 485-495.
43. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk: Vol. 2, The database (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Marian, V., Blumenfeld, K. H., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Proficiency and Experience Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. in press.
45. Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003a). Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 173-193.
46. Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003b). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 97-115.
47. Marian, V., Spivey, M., & Hirsch, J. (2003). Shared and separate systems in bilingual language processing: Converging evidence from eyetracking and brain imaging. Brain and Language, 86, 70-82.
48. Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H., & Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 452-467.
49. Morein-Zamir, S., Henik, A., & Spitzer-Davidson, I. (2002). The importance of irrelevant-dimension variability in the Stroop flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 119-125.
50. Nas, G. (1983). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence for a cooperation between visual and sound based codes during access to a common lexical store. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 526-534.
51. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
52. Poulisse, N., & Bongaerts, T. (1994). First language use in second language production. Applied Linguistics, 15, 36-57.
53. Rayner, K., & Posnansky, C. (1978). Stages of processing in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 64-80.
54. Rayner, K., & Springer, C. J. (1986). Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task. British Journal of Psychology, 77(2), 207-222.
55. Reichle, E. D. (1998). Towards a model of eye-movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
56. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model. Vision Research, 39, 4403-4411.
57. Risko, E. F., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2005). Basic processes in reading: Is visual word recognition obligatory? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 119-124.
58. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
59. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
60. Sharoff, S. (2002). The frequency dictionary for Russian [Data file]. Available from http://www.artint.ru/projects/frqlist/frqlist-en.asp
61. Starr, M. S., & Rainer, K. (2001). Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 156-163.
62. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 869-918.
63. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. E. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 632-634.
64. Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Berger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 727-735.
65. Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., Sneg, R., & Baruch, O. (1996). Unintentional word reading via the phonological route: The Stroop effect with cross-script homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 336-349.
66. Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2000). Visual "word recognition in monolingual and bilingual readers: Experiments and computational modeling. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Nijmegen.
67. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458-483.
68. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). The interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
69. Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 1-25.
70. Wong, K. F. E., & Chen, H.-C. (1999). Orthographic and phonological processing in reading Chinese text: Evidence from eye fixations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 461-480.
71. Zasorina, L.N. (1977). Chastotnyj Slovarj Russkogo Jazyka. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.
72. Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., & Grainger, J. (2000). Visual and phonological codes in letter and word recognition: Evidence from incremental priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 671-692.