What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 99-104

  Besner, Derek ^a   Stolz, Jennifer A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VOCABULARY;

EID: 0033085017     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03210815     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ANDERSON, J. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.
2. ASHCRAFT, M. H. (1994). Human memory and cognition. New York: Harper Collins.
3. BAUER, B., & BESNER, D. (1997). Processing in the Stroop task: Mental set as a determinant of performance. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 61-68.
4. BESNER, D., & STOLZ, J. A. (in press). Unconsciously controlled processing: The Stroop effect reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
5. BESNER, D., STOLZ, J. A., & BOUTILIER, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 221-225.
6. BRUNN, J. L., & FARAH, M. J. (1991). The relation between spatial attention and reading: Evidence from the neglect syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 59-75.
7. COHEN, J., & HUSTON, T. A. (1994). Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 453-476). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
8. CROWDER, R. G., & WAGNER, R. F. (1992). The psychology of reading. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A Reply to Yantis (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 19, 682-685.
10. JOHNSTON, J. C. (1981). Effects of advance precueing of alternatives on the perception of letters alone and in words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 560-572.
11. JOHNSTON, J. C., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1974). Perception of letters in words: Seek not and ye shall find. Science, 184, 1192-1194.
12. KAHNEMAN, D., & HENIK, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 181-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. LABERGE, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 371-379.
14. LOWE, D. G., & MITTERER, J. O. (1982) Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 684-700.
15. MACLEOD, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
16. MCCANN, R. S., FOLK, C. L., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). The role of spatial attention in visual word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1015-1029.
17. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
18. POSNER, M. I., & SNYDER, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
19. RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. REICHER, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275-280.
21. REISBERG, D. (1997). Cognition: Exploring the science of the mind. New York: Norton.
22. SCHNEIDER, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 206-217.
23. STOLZ, J. A., & BESNER, D. (1996). The role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as non-automatic processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 22, 1166-1177.
24. STOLZ, J. A., & BESNER, D. (in press). Levels of representation in visual word recognition: A dissociation between morphemic and semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
25. STROOP, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-661.
26. TZELGOV, J., HENIK, A., SNEG, R., & BARUCH, O. (1996). Unintentional reading via the phonological route: The Stroop effect with cross script homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 336-349.
27. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICOEUR, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
28. YANTIS, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 676-681.
29. YANTIS, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45-76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.