Visual half-field stroop effects with spatial separation of words and color targets

Brain and Language

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 122-142

  Brown, Tracy L ^a   Gore, Christopher L ^a   Pearson, Tara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT ASHEVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLOR; EYE FIXATION; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0032103331     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1997.1940     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Banich M. T. Interhemispheric processing: Theoretical considerations and empirical approaches. Brain asymmetry. 1995;MIT Press, Cambridge. p. 427-450.
2. Bench C. J., Frith C. D., Grasby P. M., Friston K. J., Paulesu E., Frackowiak R. S. J., Dolan R. L. Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop task. Neuropsychologia. 31:1993;907-922.
3. Brown H. D., Kosslyn S. M. Hemispheric differences in visual object processing: Structural versus allocation theories. Davidson R. J., Hugdahl K. Brain asymmetry. 1995;77-97 MIT Press, Cambridge.
4. Brown T. L. Attentional selection and word processing in Stroop and word search tasks: The role of selection for action. American Journal of Psychology. 109:1996;265-286.
5. Brown T. L., Carr T. H. Automaticity in skill acquisition: Mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 13:1989;686-700.
6. Brown T. L., Roos-Gilbert L., Carr T. H. Automaticity and word perception: Evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 21:1995;1395-1411.
7. Bryden M. P. Perceptual asymmetry in vision: Relation to handedness, eyedness, and speech lateralization. Cortex. 9:1973;418-435.
8. Cohen J. D., Dunbar K., McClelland J. L. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review. 97:1990;332-361.
9. David A. S. Stroop effects within and between the cerebral hemispheres: Studies in normals and acallosals. Neuropsychologia. 30:1992;161-175.
10. Dyer F. N. Interference and facilitation for color naming with separate bilateral presentations of the word and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 99:1973a;314-317.
11. Dyer F. N. The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory & Cognition. 1:1973b;106-120.
12. Franzon M., Hugdahl K. Visual half-field presentations of incongruent color words: Effects of gender and handedness. Cortex. 22:1986;433-445.
13. Franzon M., Hugdahl K. Effects of speed vs. accuracy in vocal reaction time to visual half-field presentations of incongruent (Stroop) color-words. Cortex. 23:1987;615-629.
14. Gatti S. V., Egeth H. E. Failure of spatial selectivity in vision. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 11:1978;181-184.
15. Gazzaniga M. S. The bisected brain. 1970;Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
16. Guiard Y. Effect of processing mode on the degree of motor asymmetry in the manual Stroop test. Cortex. 17:1981;427-433.
17. Hellige J. B., Cox P. J. Effects of concurrent verbal memory on recognition of stimuli from the left and right visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2:1976;210-221.
18. Hellige J. B., Jonsson J. E., Michimata C. Processing from LVF, RVF, and bilateral presentations: Examination of metacontrol and interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition. 7:1988;39-53.
19. Hellige J. B., Michimata C. Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information. Memory & Cognition. 17:1989;770-776.
20. Hellige J. B., Taylor A. K., Eng T. L. Interhemispheric interaction when both hemispheres have access to the same stimulus information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15:1989;711-722.
21. Heron W. Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. American Journal of Psychology. 70:1957;38-48.
22. Hines D. Bilateral tachistoscopic recognition of verbal and non-verbal stimuli. Cortex. 8:1972;315-322.
23. Kahneman D. Attention and effort. 1973;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
24. Kahneman D., Chajczyk D. Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 9:1983;497-509.
25. Kahneman D., Henik A. Perceptual organization and attention. Kubovy M., Pomerantz J. R. Perceptual organization. 1981;181-211 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
26. Kimura D. Spatial localization in left and right visual fields. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 23:1969;445-458.
27. Kosslyn S. M., Flynn R. A., Amsterdam J. B., Wang G. Components of high-level vision: A cognitive neuroscience analysis and accounts of neurological syndromes. Cognition. 34:1990;203-277.
28. Leehey S. C., Cahn A. Lateral asymmetries in the recognition of words, familiar faces and unfamiliar faces. Neuropsychologia. 17:1979;619-627.
29. Logan G. D. On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 5:1979;189-207.
30. Logan G. D. Short-term memory demands of reaction-time tasks that differ in complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 6:1980;375-389.
31. Long G. M., Lyman B. J. Foveal and parafoveal processing of asynchronous Stroop stimuli. British Journal of Psychology. 78:1987;151-162.
32. MacLeod C. M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin. 109:1991;163-203.
33. McKeever W. F., Huling M. D. Lateral dominance in tachistoscopic word recognition performances obtained with bilateral simultaneous input. Neuropsychologia. 9:1971;15-20.
34. Merikle P. M., Gorewich N. J. Spatial selectivity in vision: Field size depends upon noise size. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 14:1979;343-346.
35. Moscovitch M. On the representation of language in the right hemisphere of right-handed people. Brain and Language. 3:1976;47-71.
36. Myers J. L. Fundamentals of experimental design. 1972;Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
37. Pardo J. V., Pardo P. J., Janer K. W., Raichle M. E. The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 87:1990;256-259.
38. Petersen S. E., Fox P. T., Snyder A. Z., Raichle M. E. Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. Science. 249:1990;1041-1044.
39. Schmit V., Davis R. The role of hemispheric specialization in the analysis of Stroop stimuli. Acta Psychologica. 38:1974;149-158.
40. Searleman A. A review of right hemisphere linguistic capabilities. Psychological Review. 84:1977;503-528.
41. Soares C., Grosjean F. Left hemisphere language lateralization in bilinguals and monolinguals. Perception & Psychophysics. 29:1981;599-604.
42. Stroop J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 18:1935;643-662.
43. Tsao Y., Feustel T., Soseos C. Stroop interference in the left and right visual fields. Brain and Language. 8:1979;367-371.
44. Warren L. R., Marsh G. R. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Stroop stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 12:1978;214-216.
45. White M. J. Laterality differences in perception: A review. Psychological Bulletin. 72:1969;387-405.
46. Yee P. L., Hunt E. Individual differences in Stroop dilution: Tests of the attention-capture hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;715-725.