Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: Interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 461-479

  Sonnenwald, Diane H ^a   Pierce, Linda G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; DATA REDUCTION; RESPONSE TIME (COMPUTER SYSTEMS);

CONTESTED COLLABORATION; DENSE SOCIAL NETWORKS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0033887807     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00039-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adler P.A., Adler P. Membership roles in research. 1987;Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
2. Allen T.J. Managing the flow of technology. 1977;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Battle Command Battle Laboratory. Battle command: leadership and decision making for war and operations other than war. 1994;Battle Command Battle Laboratory, Fort Leavenworth, KS. (Draft 2.1).
4. Belkin N.J. Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information seeking behavior. Information Retrieval '93: von der Modellierung zur Anwendung. Proceedings of the First Conference of the Gesellschaft fuer Informatik Fachgruppe Information Retrieval. 1993;55-66 Universitaetsverlag Konstanz, Konstanz.
5. Berg B.L. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 1989;Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
6. Byström K. Municipal administrators at work - information needs and seeking in relation to task complexity: a case study amongst municipal official. Vakkari P., Savolainen R., Dervin B. Information seeking in context. 1997;125-146 Taylor Graham, London.
7. Chatman E.A. The information world of retired women. 1992;Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
8. Chatman E.A. The impoverished life-world of outsiders. JASIS. 47:(3):1996;193-206.
9. Staff XXI concept. 1996;Battle Command Battle Lab, Fort Leavenworth, KS.
10. Combat information center (CIC) concept. 1996;Battle Command Battle Lab, Fort Leavenworth, KS.
11. Expanded development of the staff XXI concept: staff XXI reference guide. 1996;Battle Command Battle Lab, Fort Leavenworth, KS.
12. Expanded development of the staff XXI concept: staff XXI suggested mission training plan task assignments. 1996;Battle Command Battle Lab, Fort Leavenworth, KS. Second Draft.
13. Flanagan J.C. The critical incidence technique. Psychological Bulletin. 51:1954;1-22.
14. Fleischman E.A., Zaccarro S.J. Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. Sweezy R.W., Salas E. Teams: their training and performance. 1992;31-56 Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
15. Harrison K. Task analysis for plan for combat operations (Battlefield Function 18). 1995;Peer Review Coordinating Draft, US Army Research Initiative.
16. Staff organizations and operations. 1984;Headquarters Department of the Army, Washington, DC. FM 101-5.
17. Operations. 1986;Headquarters Department of the Army, Washington, DC. (Fm 100-5).
18. Ingwersen P. Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation. 52:(1):1996;3-50.
19. Jarrett P. Task analysis for direct and lead units in execution of battle (Battlefield Function 20). 1995;Peer Review Coordinating Draft, US Army Research Initiative.
20. Kraut R.E., Streeter L.A. Coordination in software development. Communications of the ACM. 38:(3):1995;69-81.
21. Kuhlthau C. Seeking meaning. 1993;Ablex Publishing Co, Greenwich, CT.
22. Lofland J., Lofland L.H. Analyzing social settings. 3rd ed. 1994;Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA.
23. McGlynn R.P., Sutton J.L., Sprague V.L., Demski R.M., Pierce L.G. Development of a team performance task battery to evaluate the command and control vehicle (C2V) crew. 1997;US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. (Contract No. DAAL01-96-P-0875).
24. McIlroy B.J. Task Analysis for direct and lead units during the preparation for the battle (Battlefield Function 19). 1995;Peer Review Coordinating Draft, US Army Research Initiative.
25. Raser J. Simulation and Society. 1969;Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
26. Solomon P. Information behavior in sense making: A three-year case study of work planning. Vakkari P., Savolainen R., Dervin B. Information seeking in context. 1997;290-306 Taylor Graham, London.
27. Sonnenwald D.H., Lievrouw L.A. Collaboration during the design process: a case study of communication, information behavior and project performance. Vakkari P., Savolainen R., Dervin B. Information seeking in context. 1997;179-204 Taylor Graham, London.
28. Sonnenwald D.H. Contested collaboration: a descriptive model of intergroup communication and information system design. Information Processing and Management. 31:(6):1995;859-879.
29. Taylor R.S. Information use environments. Dervin B., Voigt M. Progress in communication sciences. Vol. 10:1991;217-255 ABLEX, Norwood, NJ.
30. Command and staff decision processes. 1995;US Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS. (Student Text 101-5).
31. Battle book. 1992;US Army Field Artillery School, Fort Sill, OK.
32. Force XXI operations. 1994;US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), Fort Monroe, VA. (TRADOC Pam 525-5).
33. Vidulich, M., Dominquez, C., Vogel, E., & McMillan, G. (1994). Situation awareness: papers and annotated bibliography. AL/CF-TR-1994-0085, Air Force Material Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.
34. Wilson P. Information behavior: an interdisciplinary perspective. Vakkari P., Savolainen R., Dervin B. Information seeking in context. 1997;39-50 Taylor Graham, London.