An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 952-965

  Hara, Noriko ^a   Solomon, Paul ^b   Kim, Seung Lye ^b   Sonnenwald, Diane H ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; STUDENTS; VIDEO CONFERENCING;

SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 0041672339     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10291     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Allen-Meares, P., & Pugach, M. (1982). Facilitating interdisciplinary collaboration on behalf of handicapped children and youth. Teacher Education and Special Education, 5, 30-36.
2. Atkinson, P., Batchelor, C., & Parsons, E. (1998). Trajectories of collaboration and competition in a medical discovery. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23, 259-284.
3. Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
4. Bruner, C., Kunesh, L.G., & Knuth, R.A. (1992). What does research say about interagency collaboration? Retrieved August 30, 2002, from North Central Regional Educational Laboratory Web site: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw_esys/8agcycol.htm
5. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Cooley, E. (1994). Training interdisciplinary team in communication and decision-making skills. Small Group Research, 25, 5-25.
7. Dirks, K.T., & Ferrin, D.L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12, 450-467.
8. Finholt, T. (1999). Collaboratory life: challenges of Internet-mediated science for chemists. In National Research Council (Ed). Impact of advances in computing and communications technologies on chemical science and technology.
9. Fujimura, J.H. (1987). Constructing "do-able" problems in cancer research: articulating alignment. Social Studies of Science, 17, 257-293.
10. Galison, P. & Hevly, B. (Eds.). (1992). Big science: the growth of large-scale research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Hara, N. (2000). Social construction of knowledge: tales in courtrooms. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Indiana University.
12. Hess, D.J. (1995). Science and technology in a multicultural world: the cultural politics of facts and artifacts. New York: Columbia University Press.
13. rd ASIS Annual Conference (pp. 78-92). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
14. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1998). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. In R. Scott, et al. (Eds). Theory and research on small groups. NY: Plenum Press.
15. Kagan, S.L. (1991). United we stand: collaboration for child care and early education service. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Kanter, R.M. (1994). Collaborative advantage: successful partnerships manage the relationship, not just the deal. Harvard Business Review, July-Aug, 96-108.
17. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1306-1320.
18. Kraut, R.E., Egido, C., & Galegher, J. (1990). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. In J. Galegher, R.E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 149-172). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. Mattessich, P., & Monsey B. (1992). Collaboration: what makes it work. St. Paul, Minnesota: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
23. Mintzberg, H., Jorgensen, J., Dougherty, D. & Westley, F. (1996). Some surprising things about collaboration: knowing how people connect makes it work better. Organizational Dynamics, Spring, 60-71.
24. Montoya-Weiss, M.M., Massey, A.P., & Song, M. (2001). Getting it together: temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1251-1262.
25. National Research Council. (1993). National collaboratories: applying information technology for scientific research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Olson, G., & Olson, J. (2001). Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction, 15, 139-179.
27. Sandstrom, A.R., & Sandstrom, P.E. (1995). The use and misuse of anthropological methods in library and information science research. Library Quarterly, 65, 161-199.
28. Schrage, M. (1995). No more teams: mastering the dynamics of creative collaboration. New York: Currency and Doubleday.
29. Silverman, D. (1994). Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
30. Simonin, B.L. (1997). The importance of collaborative know-how: an empirical test of the learning organization. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1150-1174.
31. Slavin, R.E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429-445.
32. Solomon, P. (1997). Discovering information behavior in sense making: II. The social. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 1109-1126.
33. Sonnenwald, D.H. (1995). Contested collaboration: a descriptive model of intergroup communication in information system design. Information Processing and Management, 31, 859-877.
34. Sonnenwald, D.H. (1996). Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Design Studies, 17, 277-301.
35. Sonnenwald, D.H. (1999). Challenges in corporate and university R&D collaboration. INFORMS (Institute for Operations Research and Management Science) Annual Conference, Cincinnati, OH.
36. Sonnenwald, D.H., Solomon, P., Hara, N., Bolliger, R., & Cox, T. (2002). Collaboration in the large: using video conferencing to facilitate large group interaction. In A. Gunasekaran, O. Khalil, & S.M. Rahman (Eds.) Knowledge and information technology: human and social perspectives (pp. 115-136). NY: Idea Publishing Group.
37. Sonnert, G. (1995). What makes a good scientist? Determinants of peer evaluation among biologists. Social Studies of Science, 25, 35-55.
38. Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Stevens, M.J., & Campion, M.A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirement for teamwork: implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20, 503-530.
40. Stokes, D.E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
41. Suchman, L. (1996). Constituting shared workspaces. In Y. Engeström, & D. Middleton (Eds). Cognition and communication at work (pp. 35-60). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York, McGraw-Hill.
45. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: the world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Tushman, M.L. (1978). Technical communication in R & D laboratories: the impact of project work characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 624-645.
47. Van Maanen, J. (1973). Observations on the making of policemen. Human Organization, 32, 407-418.
48. Walsh, J.P., & Bayma, T. (1996). Computer networks and scientific work. Social Studies of Science, 26, 661-703.
49. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Weinberg, A.M. (1961, July 21). Impact of large-scale science on the United States. Science, 134, 161-164.
51. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.