A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 855-871

  Cronin, Blaise ^a   Shaw, Debora ^a   La Barre, Kathryn ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

COAUTHORSHIP COLLABORATION; SOCIOCOGNITIVE STRUCTURES; SUBAUTHORSHIP COLLABORATION;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 0038817735     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10278     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bazerman, C. (1984). Modern evolution of the experimental report in physics: Spectroscopic articles in Physical Review, 1893-1980. Social Studies of Science, 14(2), 163-196.
2. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison. WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Beaver, D. de B., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65-84.
4. Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2000). Collaboration networks in science. In B. Cronin & H.B. Atkins, (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 197-213). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. & ASIS.
5. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford. Blackwell.
6. Collins, R. (1988). The sociology of philosophies. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
7. Croll, R.P. (1984). The noncontributing author: An issue of credit and responsibility. Perspectives in biology and medicine, 27(3), 401-407.
8. Cronin, B. (1995). The scholar's courtesy: The role of acknowledgement in the primary communication process. London: Taylor Graham.
9. Cronin, B. (2001), Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558-569.
10. Cronin, B., Davenport, E., & Martinson, A. (1997). Women's studies: Bibliometric and content analysis of the formative years. Journal of Documentation, 53(2), 123-138.
11. Cronin, B., & Shaw, D. (1999). Citation, funding acknowledgement and author nationality relationships in four information science journals. Journal of Documentation, 55(4), 404-408.
12. Cronin, B., & Shaw, D. (2002). Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(14), 1267-1270.
13. Cronin, B., & Weaver-Wozniak, S. (1993). Online access to acknowledgements. In Proceedings of the National Online Meeting, New York, May 1993 (pp. 93-98). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
14. Davenport, E., & Cronin, B. (2001). Who dunnit? Metatags and hyperauthorship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(9), 770-773.
15. Davis, C.H., & Cronin, B. (1993). Acknowledgments and intellectual indebtedness: A bibliometric conjecture. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(10), 1993, 590-592.
16. Eaton, J.W. (1951). Social processes of professional teamwork. American Sociological Review, 16(5), 707-713.
17. Edmonds, D., & Eidinow, J. (2001) Wittgenstein's poker: The story of a ten-minute argument between two great philosophers. London: Faber and Faber.
18. Epstein, J. (1983). Dedications and acknowledgments. Publishers Weekly, 224, 43-45.
19. Garvey, W.D., & Griffith, B.C. (1972). Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology. Information Storage & Retrieval, 8(3), 123-136.
20. Gelman, S.R., & Gibelman, M. (1999). A quest for citations? An analysis of and commentary on the trend toward multiple authorship. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(2), 203-213.
21. Gifford, R. (1988). Book dedications: A new measure of scholarly indebtedness. Scholarly Publishing, 19(4), 221-226.
22. Gilroy, P. (2002, July 26). Cultural studies and the crisis in Britain's universities. The Chronicle of Higher Education, B20.
23. Glänzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50(3), 461-473.
24. Hartley, J. (2003). Single authors are not alone: Colleagues often help, Scholarly Publishing, 34 (in press).
25. Heffner, A.G. (1981). Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines. Scientometrics, 3(1), 5-12.
26. Hoder-Salmon, M. (1978). Collecting scholar's (sic) wives. Feminist Studies, 4(3), 107-114.
27. Hollander, P. (2002). Acknowledgments: An academic ritual. Academic Questions, 15(1), 63-76.
28. Hyland, K. (2000), Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing, London: Longman.
29. Karz, B., & Katz, L.S. (Eds.) (2000) Magazines for libraries (10th ed.), New Providence, NJ: Bowker.
30. Katz J.S., & Martin, B.R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
31. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17(1), 101-126.
32. McCain K.W. (1991). Communication, competition, and secrecy: The production and dissemination of research-related information in genetics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(4), 491-516.
33. Merton, R.K. (2000). On the Garfield input to the sociology of science: A retrospective collage. In B, Cronin & H.B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 337-360). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. & ASIS.
34. Mullins N.C. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. London: Harper & Row.
35. Narin, F., Hamilton, K.S. & Olivastro, D. (2001). The development of science indicators in the United States. In B. Cronin & H.B. Atkins, (Eds.). The web of knowledge: A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 337-360). Medford. NJ: Information Today, Inc. & ASIS.
36. Patel, N. (1973). Collaboration in the professional growth of American sociology. Social Science Information, 12(6), 77-92.
37. Posner, R.A. (2001). Public intellectuals: A study of decline, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Rennie, D., & Flanagin, A. (1994). Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264(6), 1857.
39. Shapin, S. (1995). A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Strauss, A. (1985). Work and the division of labour. The Sociological Quarterly, 26(1). 1-19.
41. Tarnow, E. (2002). Coauthorship in physics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(2), 175-190.
42. Van House, N.A. (2002). Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information. Social Epistemology, 16(1), 99-114.
43. Wertheimer, M. (1987). A brief history of psychology (3rd ed.), New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
44. White, H.D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 84-106). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45. White, H.D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 87-108.
46. Wray, K.B. (2002). The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science, 69(1), 150-168.
47. Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States, New York: Free Press.