A Molecular Phylogeny of the Pheasants and Partridges Suggests That These Lineages Are Not Monophyletic

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 38-54

  Kimball, R T ^a   Braun, E L ^a,b   Zwartjes, P W ^a   Crowe, T M ^c,d   Ligon, J D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR GENOME RESOURCES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^d DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME B; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIRD; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; MITOCHONDRION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BIRDS; CYTOCHROME B GROUP; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MITOCHONDRIA; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID;

EID: 0033072176     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0562     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adachi, J. Hasegawa, M. 1996, MOLPHY: Programs for Molecular Phylogenetics, Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo.
2. Akishinonomiya F., Miyake T., Takada M., Ohno S., Kondo N. The genetic link between the Chinese bamboo partridge (Bambusicola thoracicaGallus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;11053-11056.
3. Arctander P. Comparison of a mitochondrial gene and a corresponding nuclear pseudogene. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 262:1995;13-19.
4. Ausubel F. M., Brent R., Kingston R. E., Moore D. D., Seidman J. G., Smith J. A., Struhl K. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. 1994;Wiley, New York.
5. Beebe C. W. Preliminary pheasant studies. Zoologica. 1:1914;261-285.
6. Bloomer P., Crowe T. M. Francolin phylogenetics: Molecular, morphobehavioral, and combined evidence. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:1998;236-254.
7. Crowe T. M., Crowe A. A. The genusFrancolinus. Proceedings of the International Symposium on African Vertebrates: Systematics, Phylogeny and Evolutionary Ecology. 1985;Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn.
8. Dayhoff M. O., Schwartz R. M., Orcutt B. C. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. Dayhoff M. O. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. 1978;345-352 National Biomedical Research Foundation, Silver Springs.
9. Delacour J. The Pheasants of the World. 1977;Saiga Pub. Co., Ltd, Surrey.
10. Desjardins P., Morais R. Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome: A novel gene order in higher vertebrates. J. Mol. Biol. 212:1990;599-634.
11. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:1985;783-791.
12. Felsenstein, J. 1993, PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
13. Hasegawa M., Kishino H., Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:1985;160-174.
14. Hendy M. D., Penny D. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 38:1989;297-309.
15. Hillis D. M. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature. 383:1996;130-131.
16. Hillis D. M. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Syst. Biol. 47:1998;3-8.
17. Hillis D. M., Bull J. J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;182-192.
18. Howell N. Evolutionary conservation of protein regions in the protonmotive cytochromeb. J. Mol. Evol. 29:1989;157-169.
19. Huelsenbeck J. P., Hillis D. M., Nielsen R. A likelihood-ratio test of monophyly. Syst. Biol. 45:1996;546-558.
20. Jin L., Nei M. Limitations of the evolutionary parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7:1990;82-102.
21. Johnsgard, P. A. 1986, The Pheasants of the World, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
22. Johnsgard, P. A. 1988, The Quails, Partridges, and Francolins of the World, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
23. Kimball R. T., Braun E. L., Ligon J. D. Resolution of the phylogenetic position of the Congo peafowl,Afropavo congensis: Proc. R. Soc. London B. 264:1997;1517-1523.
24. Kishino H., Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:1989;170-179.
25. Kornegay J. R., Kocher T. D., Williams L. A., Wilson A. C. Pathways of lysozyme evolution inferred from the sequences of cytochromeb. J. Mol. Evol. 37:1993;367-379.
26. Kumar S. Patterns of nucleotide substitution in mitochondrial protein coding genes of vertebrates. Genetics. 143:1996;537-548.
27. Laskowski M. J., Fitch W. M. Evolution of avian ovomucoids and of birds. Fernholm B., Bremer K., Jornvall H. The Hierarchy of Life: Molecules and Morphology in Phylogenetic Analysis. 1989;371-387 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
28. Lewis L. A., Mishler B. D., Vilgalys R. Phylogenetic relationships of the liverworts (Hepaticae), a basal embryophyte lineage, inferred from nucleotide sequence data of the chloroplast generbc. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:1997;377-393.
29. Lowe P. R. Some preliminary notes on the anatomy and systematic position ofAfropavo congensis. Delacour J. Proceedings of the 9th International Ornithological Congress. 1938;219-230 Rouen.
30. Maddison W. P. Molecular approaches and the growth of phylogenetic biology. Ferraris J. D., Palumbi S. R. Molecular Zoology: Advances, Strategies, and Protocols. 1996;47-63 Wiley-Liss, New York.
31. Maddison, W. P. Maddison, D. R. 1992, MacClade, Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, MA.
32. Marshall C. R., Raff E. C., Raff R. A. Dollo's law and the death and resurrection of genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;12283-12287.
33. Milinkovitch M. C., LeDuc R. G., Adachi J., Farnir F., Georges M., Hasegawa M. Effects of character weighting and species sampling on phylogeny reconstruction: A case study based on DNA sequence data in Cetaceans. Genetics. 144:1996;1817-1833.
34. Mindell D. P., Thacker C. E. Rates of molecular evolution: Phylogenetic issues and applications. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:1996;279-303.
35. Naylor G. J. P., Collins T. M., Brown W. M. Hydrophobicity and phylogeny. Nature. 373:1995;565-566.
36. Nunn G. B., Cracraft J. Phylogenetic relationships among the major lineages of the birds-of-paradise (Paradisaeidae) using mitochondrial DNA gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5:1996;445-459.
37. Nunn G. B., Cooper J., Jouventin P., Robertson C. J. R., Robertson G. G. Evolutionary relationships among extant albatrosses (Procellariiformes: Diomedeidae) established from complete cytochromeb. Auk. 113:1996;784-801.
38. Purvis A., Bromham L. Estimating the transition/transversion ratio from independent pairwise comparisons with an assumed phylogeny. J. Mol. Evol. 44:1997;112-119.
39. Randi E. A mitochondrial cytochromebAlectoris. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 6:1996;214-227.
40. Randi E., Fusco G., Lorenzini R., Crowe T. M. Phylogenetic relationships and rates of allozyme evolution within the Phasianidae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 19:1991;213-221.
41. Rodrigo A. G., Bergquist P. R., Bergquist P. L. Inadequate support for an evolutionary link between the metazoa and fungi. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;578-584.
42. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:1987;406-425.
43. Sibley C. G., Ahlquist J. E. Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution. 1990;Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.
44. Sorenson M. D., Fleischer R. C. Multiple independent transpositions of mitochondrial DNA control region sequences to the nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;15239-15243.
45. Sorenson M. D., Quinn T. W. Numts: A challenge for avian systematics and population biology. Auk. 115:1998;214-221.
46. Strimmer, K. von Haeseler, A. 1997, PUZZLE, ver. 3.1. Maximum Likelihood Analysis for Nucleotide and Amino Acid Alignments, Zoologisches Institut, Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany.
47. Swofford, D. L. 1993, PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
48. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1994;4673-4680.
49. Verheyen R. Contribution de l'anatomie et a la systematique des Galliformes. Bull. Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belgique. 32:1956;1-24.
50. Wakeley J. The excess of transitions among nucleotide substitutions: New methods of estimating transition bias underscore its significance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:1996;158-163.
51. Yang Z. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: Approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:1994;306-314.
52. Yang Z. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 47:1998;125-133.