A comparative karyological study of the blue-breasted quail (Coturnix chinensis, Phasianidae) and California quail (Callipepla californica, Odontophoridae)

Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 82-90

  Shibusawa, M ^a   Nishida Umehara, C ^a   Tsudzuki, M ^b   Masabanda, J ^c   Griffin, D K ^c   Matsuda, Y ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME MAP; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; CLADISTICS; DNA PROBE; FEMALE; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUAIL;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CHROMOSOME BANDING; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; COTURNIX; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; KARYOTYPING; PHYLOGENY; QUAIL;

CALLIPEPLA; CALLIPEPLA CALIFORNICA; COTURNIX; COTURNIX CHINENSIS; COTURNIX JAPONICA; GALLIFORMES; GALLUS GALLUS; ODONTOPHORIDAE; PHASIANIDAE;

EID: 3042685229     PISSN: 14248581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000078569     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Belterman RHR, De Boer LEM: A karyological study of 55 species of birds, including karyotypes of 39 species new to cytology. Genetica 65:39-82 (1984).
2. Carter NP, Ferguson-Smith MA, Perryman MT, Telenius H, Pelmear AH, Leversha MA, Glancy MT, Wood SL, Cook K, Dyson HM: Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics. J Med Genet 29:299-307 (1992).
3. DeBry RW, Seldin MF: Human/mouse homology relationships. Genomics 33:337-351 (1996).
4. de la Sena CA, Nestor KE: Variability of C-banding patterns in Japanese quail chromosomes. Genome 34:993-997 (1991).
5. Griffin DK, Haberman F, Masabanda J, O'Brien P, Bagga M, Sazanov A, Smith J, Burt DW, Ferguson-Smith M, Wienberg J: Micro- and macrochromosome paints generated by flow cytometry and microdissection: tools for mapping the chicken genome. Cytogenet Cell Genet 87:278-281 (1999).
6. Kansaku N, Shimada K, Ohkubo T, Saito N, Suzuki T, Matsuda Y, Zadwony D: Molecular cloning of chicken vasoactive intestinal polypeptide receptor complementary DNA, tissue distribution and chromosomal localization. Biol Reprod 64:1575-1581 (2001).
7. Kimball RT, Braun EL, Zwartjes PW, Crowe TM, Ligon JD: A molecular phylogeny of the pheasants and partridges suggests that these lineages are not monophyletic. Mol Phylogenet Evol 11:38-54 (1999).
8. Kuroda Y, Arai N, Arita M, Teranishi M, Hori T, Harata M, Mizuno S: Absence of Z-chromosome inactivation for five genes in male chickens. Chromosome Res 9:457-468 (2001).
9. Kuroiwa A, Watanabe T, Hishigaki H, Takahashi E, Namikawa T, Matsuda Y: Comparative FISH mapping of mouse and rat homologues of twenty-five human X-linked genes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 81:208-212 (1998).
10. Kuroiwa A, Yokomine T, Sasaki H, Tsudzuki M, Tanaka K, Namikawa T, Matsuda Y: Biallelic expression of Z-linked genes in male chickens. Cytogenet Genome Res 99:310-314 (2002).
11. McQueen HA, McBride D, Miele G, Bird AP, Clinton M: Dosage compensation in birds. Curr Biol 11:253-257 (2001).
12. O'Brien SJ, Wienberg J, Lyons LA: Comparative genomics: lessons from cats. Trends Genet 13:393-399 (1997).
13. Ogura K, Matsumoto K, Kuroiwa A, Isobe T, Otoguro T, Jurecic V, Baldini A, Matsuda Y, Ogura T: Cloning and chromosomal mapping of human and chicken Iroquois (IRX) genes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 92:320-325 (2001).
14. Sasaki M: High resolution G-band karyotypes of the domestic fowl and the Japanese quail. Chrom Inform Serv 31:26-28 (1981).
15. Schmid M, Nanda I, Guttenbach M, Steinlein C, Hoehn H, Schartl M, Haaf T, Weigend S, Fries R, Buerstedde J-M, Wimmers K, Burt DW, Smith J, A'Hara S, Law A, Griffin DK, Bumstead N, Kaufman J, Thomson PA, Burke T, Groenen MAM, Crooijmans RPMA, Vignal A, Fillon V, Morisson M, Pitel F, Tixier-Boichard M, Ladjali-Mohammedi K, Hillel J, Mäki-Tanila A, Cheng HH, Delany ME, Burnside J, Mizuno S: First report on chicken genes and chromosomes 2000. Cytogenet Cell Genet 90:169-218 (2000).
16. Serikawa T, Cui Z, Yokoi N, Kuramoto T, Kondo Y, Kitada K, Guénet J-L: A comparative genetic map of rat, mouse and human genomes. Exp Anim 47:1-9 (1998).
17. Shetty S, Griffin DK, Graves JAM: Comparative painting reveals strong chromosome homology over 80 million years of bird evolution. Chrom Res 7:289-295 (1999).
18. Shibusawa M, Minai S, Nishida-Umehara C, Suzuki T, Mano T, Yamada K, Namikawa T, Matsuda Y: A comparative cytogenetic study of chromosome homology between chicken and Japanese quail. Cytogenet Cell Genet 95:103-109 (2001).
19. Shibusawa M, Nishida-Umehara C, Masabanda J, Griffin DK, Isobe T, Matsuda Y: Chromosome rearrangements between chicken and guinea fowl defined by comparative chromosome painting and FISH mapping of DNA clones. Cytogenet Cell Genet 98:225-230 (2002).
20. Shoffner RN: Chromosomes in birds, in Busch H (ed): The Cell Nucleus, pp 223-261 (Academic Press, New York 1974).
21. Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE: Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A study in molecular evolution (Yale University Press, New Haven 1990).
22. Sibley CG, Monroe BL Jr: Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World (Yale University Press, New Haven 1990).
23. Stock AD, Bunch TD: The evolutionary implications of chromosome banding pattern homologies in the bird order Galliformes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 34:136-148 (1982).
24. Sumner AT: A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75:304-306 (1972).
25. Suzuki T, Kansaku N, Kurosaki T, Shimada K, Zadworny D, Koide M, Mano T, Namikawa T, Matsuda Y: Comparative FISH mapping on Z chromosomes of chicken and Japanese quail. Cytogenet Cell Genet 87:22-26 (1999a).
26. Suzuki T, Kurosaki T, Shimada K, Kansaku N, Kuhnlein U, Zadworny D, Agata K, Hashimoto A, Koide M, Koike M, Takata M, Kuroiwa A, Minai S, Namikawa T, Matsuda Y: Cytogenetic mapping of 31 functional genes on chicken chromosomes by direct R-banding FISH. Cytogenet Cell Genet 87:32-40 (1999b).
27. Wienberg J, Stanyon R: Chromosome painting in mammals as an approach to comparative genomics. Curr Opin Genet Dev 5:792-797 (1995).