A penalty of using anonymous dominant markers (AFLPs, ISSRs, and RAPDs) for phylogenetic inference

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 528-542

  Simmons, Mark P ^a   Zhang, Li Bing ^a   Webb, Colleen T ^a   Müller, Kai ^b  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

AFLP; Anonymous dominant markers; Character coding; ISSR; Presence absence characters; RAPD

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC MARKERS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH;

EID: 33751009146     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Abdalla A.M., Reddy O.U.K., El-Zik K.M., and Pepper A.E. Genetic diversity and relationships of diploid and tetraploid cottons revealed using AFLP. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102 (2001) 222-229
2. Albert V.A. Parsimony and phylogenetics in the genomic age. In: Albert V.A. (Ed). Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford 1-11
3. Albert V.A., Backlund A., Bremer K., Chase M.W., Manhart J.R., Mishler B.D., and Nixon K.C. Functional constraints and rbcL evidence for land plant phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 81 (1994) 534-567
4. Albertson R.C., Markert J.A., Danley P.D., and Kocher T.D. Phylogeny of a rapidly evolving clade: the cichlid fishes of Lake Malawi, East Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 5107-5110
5. Backeljau T., De Bruyn L., De Wolf H., Jordaens K., Van Dongen S., Verhagen R., and Winnepenninckx B. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and parsimony methods. Cladistics 11 (1995) 119-130
6. Badr A., El Shazly H., El Rabey H., and Watson L.E. Systematic relationships in Lathyrus sect. Lathyrus (Fabaceae) based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) data. Can. J. Bot. 80 (2002) 962-969
7. Bakkeren G., Kronstad J.W., and Lévesque C.A. Comparison of AFLP fingerprints and ITS sequences as phylogenetic markers in Ustilaginomycetes. Mycologia 92 (2000) 510-521
8. Beardsley P.M., Yen A., and Olmstead R.G. AFLP phylogeny of Mimulus section Erythranthe and the evolution of hummingbird pollination. Evolution 57 (2003) 1397-1410
9. Black W.C. PCR with arbitrary primers: approach with care. Insect. Mol. Biol. 2 (1993) 1-6
10. Bowditch B.M., Albright D.G., Williams J.G.K., and Braun M.J. Use of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers in comparative genome studies. Meth. Enzymol. 224 (1993) 294-309
11. Bremer K. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42 (1988) 795-803
12. Bremer B. Restriction data from chloroplast DNA for phylogenetic reconstruction: is there only one accurate way of scoring?. Plant Syst. Evol. 175 (1991) 39-54
13. Britten R.J., Rowen L., Williams J., and Cameron R.A. Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003) 4661-4665
14. Brouat C., McKey D., and Douzery E.J.P. Differentiation in a geographical mosaic of plants coevolving with ants: phylogeny of the Leonardoxa africana complex (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae) using amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Mol. Ecol. 13 (2004) 1157-1171
15. Buntjer J.B., Otsen M., Nijman I.J., Kuiper M.T.R., and Lenstra J.A. Phylogeny of bovine species based on AFLP fingerprinting. Heredity 88 (2002) 46-51
16. Buth D.G. The application of electrophoretic data in systematic studies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15 (1984) 501-522
17. Carine M.A., and Scotland R.W. Taxic and transformational homology: different ways of seeing. Cladistics 15 (1999) 121-129
18. Clark A.G., and Lanigan C.M.S. Prospects for estimating nucleotide divergence with RAPDs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10 (1993) 1096-1111
19. Crawford D.J., and Mort M.E. Single-locus molecular markers for inferring relationships at lower taxonomic levels: observations and comments. Taxon 53 (2004) 631-635
20. Davis J.I., Nixon K.C., and Little D.P. The limits of conventional cladistic analysis. In: Albert V.A. (Ed). Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford 119-147
21. De Laet J.E. Parsimony and the problem of inapplicables in sequence data. In: Albert V.A. (Ed). Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford 81-116
22. Demeke T., Adams R.P., and Chibbar R. Potential taxonomic use of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD): a case study in Brassica. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84 (1992) 990-994
23. Dice L.R. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26 (1945) 297-302
24. Doyle J.J. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17 (1992) 144-163
25. Eiadthong W., Yonemori K., Kanzaki S., Sugiura A., Utsunomiya N., and Subhadrabandhu S. Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis for studying genetic relationships among Mangifera species in Thailand. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 125 (2000) 160-164
26. Elgar G. Quality not quantity: the pufferfish genome. Human Mol. Genet. 5 (1996) 1437-1442
27. El-Rabey H.A., Badr A., Schäfer-Pregl R., Martin W., and Salamini F. Speciation and species separation in Hordeum L. (Poaceae) resolved by discontinuous molecular markers. Plant Biol. 4 (2002) 567-575
28. Farris J.S. On the phenetic approach to vertebrate classification. In: Hecht M.K., Goody P.C., and Hecht B.M. (Eds). Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution (1977), Plenum Press, New York 823-850
29. Farris J.S. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In: Platnick N.I., and Funk V.A. (Eds). Advances in Cladistics. Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the Willi Hennig Society vol. 2 (1983), Columbia University Press, New York 1-36
30. Farris J.S. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5 (1989) 417-419
31. Farris J.S., Albert V.A., Källersjö M., Lipscomb D., and Kluge A.G. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12 (1996) 99-124
32. Felsenstein J. Maximum likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Syst. Zool. 22 (1973) 240-249
33. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17 (1981) 368-376
34. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39 (1985) 783-791
35. Felsenstein J. Inferring Phylogenies (2004), Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA
36. Fitch W.M. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20 (1971) 406-416
37. Flavell R.B. Repetitive DNA and chromosome evolution in plants. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 312 (1986) 227-242
38. Forey P.L., and Kitching I.J. Experiments in coding multistate characters. In: Scotland R., and Pennington R.T. (Eds). Homology and Systematics: Coding Characters for Phylogenetic Analysis (2000), Taylor & Francis, London 54-80
39. Freudenstein J.V. Characters, States, and Homology. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 965-973
40. Gillies A.C.M., and Abbott R.J. Evaluation of random amplified polymorphic DNA for species identification and phylogenetic analysis in Stylosanthes (Fabaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 211 (1998) 201-216
41. Goldman D.H., Jansen R.K., van den Berg C., Leitch I.J., Fay M.F., and Chase M.W. Molecular and cytological examination of Calopogon (Orchidaceae, Epidendroideae): circumscription, phylogeny, polyploidy, and possible hybrid speciation. Am. J. Bot. 91 (2004) 707-723
42. Groh S., Zacharias A., Kianian S.F., Penner G.A., Chong J., Rines H.W., and Phillips R.L. Comparative AFLP mapping in two hexaploid oat populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102 (2001) 876-884
43. Gulsen O., and Roose M.L. Lemons: diversity and relationships with selected Citrus genotypes as measured with nuclear genome markers. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126 (2001) 309-317
44. Hansen M., Kraft T., Christiansson M., and Nilsson N.-O. Evaluation of AFLP in Beta. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98 (1999) 845-852
45. Harris S.A. Systematics and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA in the genus Leucaena (Leguminosae, Mimosoideae). Plant Syst. Evol. 197 (1995) 195-208
46. Haymer D.S. Random amplified polymorphic DNAs and microsatellites: what are they, and can they tell us anything we don't already know?. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87 (1994) 717-722
47. Hillis D.M. Homology in molecular biology. In: Hall B.K. (Ed). Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology (1994), Academic Press, Inc., San Diego 339-368
48. Hodkinson T.R., Renvoize S.A., Chonghaile G.N., Stapleton C.M.A., and Chase M.W. A comparison of ITS nuclear rDNA sequence data and AFLP markers for phylogenetic studies in Phyllostachys (Bambusoideae, Poaceae). J. Plant Res. 113 (2000) 259-269
49. Huang J.C., and Sun M. Genetic diversity and relationships of sweetpotato and its wild relatives in Ipomoea series Batatas (Convolvulaceae) as revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and restriction analysis of chloroplast DNA. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100 (2000) 1050-1060
50. Huang J., Corke H., and Sun M. Highly polymorphic AFLP markers as a complementary tool to ITS sequences in assessing genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) and its wild relatives. Genet. Resour. Crop Ev. 49 (2002) 541-550
51. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409 (2001) 860-916
52. Iruela M., Rubio J., Cubero J.I., Gil J., and Millán T. Phylogenetic analysis in the genus Cicer and cultivated chickpea using RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104 (2002) 643-651
53. Jaccard P. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. B. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 44 (1908) 223-270
54. Joshi S.P., Gupta V.S., Aggarwal R.K., Ranjekar P.K., and Brar D.S. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship as revealed by inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism in the genus Oryza. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100 (2000) 1311-1320
55. Kardolus J.P., van Eck H.J., and van den Berg R.G. The potential of AFLPs in biosystematics: a first application in Solanum taxonomy (Solanaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 210 (1998) 87-103
56. Karp A., Seberg A., and Buiatti M. Molecular techniques in the assessment of botanical diversity. Ann. Bot. 78 (1996) 143-149
57. Kluge A.G., and Farris J.S. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of Anurans. Syst. Zool. 18 (1969) 1-32
58. Koopman W.J.M. Phylogenetic signal in AFLP data sets. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 197-217
59. Kutner M.H., Nachtsheim C.J., and Neter J. Applied Linear Statistical Models. fifth ed. (2005), McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston
60. Le Quesne W.J. The uniquely evolved character concept and its cladistic application. Syst. Zool. 23 (1974) 513-517
61. Levinson G., and Gutman G.A. Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 (1987) 203-221
62. Li W.-H. Molecular Evolution (1997), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
63. Loh J.P., Kiew R., Hay A., Kee A., Gan L.H., and Gan Y.-Y. Intergeneric and interspecific relationships in Araceae tribe Caladieae and development of molecular markers using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Ann. Bot. 85 (2000) 371-378
64. Lohe A., and Roberts P. Evolution of satellite DNA sequences in Drosophila. In: Verma R.S. (Ed). Heterochromatin: Molecular and Structural Aspects (1988), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 148-186
65. Maddison W.P. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46 (1997) 523-536
66. McLenachan P.A., Stöckler K., Winkworth R.C., McBreen K., Zauner S., and Lockhart P.J. Markers derived from amplified fragment length polymorphism gels for plant ecology and evolution studies. Mol. Ecol. 9 (2000) 1899-1903
67. Mechanda S.M., Baum B.R., Johnson D.A., and Arnason J.T. Sequence assessment of comigrating AFLP bands in Echinacea-implications for comparative biological studies. Genome 47 (2004) 15-25
68. Meier R. On the inappropriateness of presence/absence recoding for nonadditive multistate characters in computerized cladistic analyses. Zool. Anz. 232 (1994) 201-212
69. Menzies J.G., Bakkeren G., Matheson F., Procunier J.D., and Woods S. Use of inter-simple sequence repeats and amplified fragment length polymorphisms to analyze genetic relationships among small grain-infecting species of Ustilago. Phytopathology 93 (2003) 167-175
70. Mickevich M.F., and Mitter C. Treating polymorphic characters in systematiccs: a phylogenetic treatment of electrophoretic data. In: Funk V.A., and Brooks D.R. (Eds). Advances in Cladistics. Proceedings of the first meeting of the Willi Hennig Society vol. 1 (1981), New York Botanical Garden, New York 45-58
71. Mort M.E., Crawford D.J., Santos-Guerra A., Francisco-Ortega J., Esselman E.J., and Wolfe A.D. Relationships among the Macronesian members of Tolpis (Asteraceae:Lactuceae) based upon analyses of inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Taxon 52 (2003) 511-518
72. Müller K. SeqState-primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. Appl. Bioinformat. 4 (2005) 65-69
73. Nei M., and Li W.-H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 (1979) 5269-5273
74. O'Hanlon P.C., and Peakall R. A simple method for the detection of size homoplasy among amplified fragment length polymorphism fragments. Mol. Ecol. 9 (2000) 815-816
75. Olmstead R.G., and Palmer J.D. Chloroplast DNA systematics: a review of methods and data analysis. Am. J. Bot. 81 (1994) 1205-1224
76. Oxelman B. RAPD patterns, nrDNA ITS sequences and morphological patterns in Silene section Sedoideae (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 201 (1996) 93-116
77. Parsons Y.M., and Shaw K.L. Mapping unexplored genomes: a genetic linkage map of the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. Genetics 162 (2002) 1275-1282
78. Pelser P.B., Gravendeel B., and van der Meijden R. Phylogeny reconstruction in the gap between too little and too much divergence: the closest relatives of Senecio jacobaea (Asteraceae) according to DNA sequences and AFLPs. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29 (2003) 613-628
79. Penny D., and Hendy M.D. The use of tree comparison metrices. Syst. Zool. 34 (1985) 75-82
80. Pharmawati M., Yan G., and McFarlane I.J. Application of RAPD and ISSR markers to analyse molecular relationships in Grevillea (Proteaceae). Aust. Syst. Bot. 17 (2004) 49-61
81. Pimentel R.A., and Riggins R. The nature of cladistic data. Cladistics 3 (1987) 201-209
82. Pleijel F. On character coding for phylogeny reconstruction. Cladistics 11 (1995) 309-315
83. Raina S.N., Rani V., Kojima T., Ogihara Y., Singh K.P., and Devarumath R.M. RAPD and ISSR fingerprints as useful genetic markers for analysis of genetic diversity, varietal identification, and phylogenetic relationships in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars and wild species. Genome 44 (2001) 763-772
84. Rieseberg L.H. Homology among RAPD fragments in interspecific comparisons. Mol. Ecol. 5 (1996) 99-105
85. Robinson D.F., and Foulds L.R. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci. 53 (1981) 131-147
86. Rouppe van der Voort J.N.A.M., van Zandvoort P., van Eck H.J., Folkertsma R.T., Hutten R.C.B., Draaistra J., Gommers F.J., Jacobsen E., Helder J., and Bakker J. Use of allele specificity of comigrating AFLP markers to align genetic maps from different potato genotypes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 255 (1997) 438-447
87. Saitou N., and Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 (1987) 406-425
88. Schierwater B. Arbitrarily amplified DNA in systematics and phylogenetics. Electrophoresis 16 (1995) 1643-1647
89. Schwarzbach A.E., and Ricklefs R.E. The use of molecular data in mangrove plant research. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 9 (2001) 195-201
90. Seberg O., and Petersen G. Constructing phylogenies from discrete data-parsimony methods. In: Karp A., Isaac P.G., and Ingram D.S. (Eds). Molecular Tools for Screening Biodiversity (1998), Chapman & Hall, London 344-352
91. Sharma S.K., Knox M.R., and Ellis T.H.N. AFLP analysis of the diversity and phylogeny of Lens and its comparison with RAPD analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93 (1996) 751-758
92. Simmons M.P., and Freudenstein J.V. Artifacts of coding amino acids and other composite characters for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 18 (2002) 354-365
93. Simmons M.P., and Miya M. Efficiently resolving the basal clades of a phylogenetic tree using Bayesian and parsimony approaches: a case study using mitogenomic data from 100 higher teleost fishes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31 (2004) 351-362
94. Simmons M.P., and Webb C.T. Quantification of the success of phylogenetic inference in simulations. Cladistics 22 (2006) 249-255
95. Simmons M.P., Reeves A., and Davis J.I. Character-state space versus rate of evolution for phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 20 (2004) 191-204
96. Simmons M.P., Zhang L.-B., Webb C.T., and Reeves A. How can third codon positions outperform first and second codon positions in phylogenetic inference? An empirical example from the seed plants. Syst. Biol. 55 (2006) 245-258
97. Skroch P., Tivang J., and Nienhuis J. Analysis of genetic relationships using RAPD marker data. Applications of RAPD technology to plant breeding (1992) 26-30
98. Smith J.L., Scott-Craig J.S., Leadbetter J.R., Bush G.L., Roberts D.L., and Fulbright D.W. Characterization of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) products from Xanthomonas campestris and some comments on the use of RAPD products in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3 (1994) 135-145
99. Sneath P.H.A., and Sokal R.R. Numerical Taxonomy (1973), W.H. Freeman and Co, San Francisco
100. Spooner D.M., Tivang J., Nienhuis J., Miller J.T., Douches D.S., and Contreras M.A. Comparison of four molecular markers in measuring relationships among the wild potato relatives Solanum section Etuberosum (subgenus Potatoe). Theor. Appl. Genet. 92 (1996) 532-540
101. Spooner D.M., Peralta I.E., and Knapp S. Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.]. Taxon 54 (2005) 43-61
102. Stammers M., Harris J., Evans G.M., Hayward M.D., and Forster J.W. Use of random PCR (RAPD) technology to analyse phylogenetic relationships in the Lolium/Festuca complex. Heredity 74 (1995) 19-27
103. Strong E.E., and Lipscomb D. Character coding and inapplicable data. Cladistics 15 (1999) 363-372
104. Swofford D.L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) (2001), Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
105. Swofford D.L., and Olsen G.L. Phylogeny reconstruction. In: Hillis D.M., and Moritz C. (Eds). Molecular Systematics (1990), Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA 411-501
106. Swofford D.L., Waddell P.J., Huelsenbeck J.P., Foster P.G., Lewis P.O., and Rogers J.S. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst. Biol. 50 (2001) 525-539
107. Sullivan J.P., Lavoué S., Arnegard M.E., and Hopkins C.D. AFLPs resolve phylogeny and reveal mitochondrial introgression within a species flock of African electric fish (Mormyroidea: Teleostei). Evolution 58 (2004) 825-841
108. Tautz D., and Renz M. Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucl. Acids Res. 12 (1984) 4127-4138
109. Thomas J.W., Touchman J.W., Blakesley R.W., Bouffard G.G., Beckstrom-Sternberg S.M., et al. Comparative analyses of multi-species sequences from targeted genomic regions. Nature 424 (2003) 788-793
110. Vekemans X., Beauwens T., Lemaire M., and Roldán-Ruiz I. Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Mol. Ecol. 11 (2002) 139-151
111. Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M., Reijans M., van de Lee T., Hornes M., Frijters A., Pot J., Poleman J., Kuiper M., and Zabeau M. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl. Acids Res. 23 (1995) 4407-4414
112. Wambutt R., et al. Progress in Arabidopsis genome sequencing and functional genomics. J. Biotechnol. 78 (2000) 281-292
113. Waugh R., Bonar N., Baird E., Thomas B., Graner A., Hayes P., and Powell W. Homology of AFLP products in three mapping populations of barley. Mol. Gen. Genet. 255 (1997) 311-321
114. Wendel J.F., and Doyle J.J. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. In: Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., and Doyle J.J. (Eds). Molecular Systematics of Plants II DNA Sequencing (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 265-296
115. Wiens J.J. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy?. Syst. Biol. 47 (1998) 625-640
116. Williams C.E., and St. Clair D.A. Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of cultivated and wild accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum. Genome 36 (1993) 619-630
117. Williams J.G.K., Kubelik A.R., Livak K.J., Rafalski J.A., and Tingey S.V. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl. Acids Res. 18 (1990) 6531-6535
118. Wolfe A.D., and Randle C.P. Relationships within and among species of the holoparasitic genus Hyobanche (Orobanchaceae) inferred from ISSR banding patterns and nucleotide sequences. Syst. Bot. 26 (2001) 120-130
119. Yang Z. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Computer Applications in BioSciences: CABIOS 13 (1997) 555-556
120. Yang Z., and Rannala B. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 (1997) 717-724
121. Zhang L.-B., Comes H.P., and Kadereit J.W. Phylogeny and quaternary history of the European montane/alpine endemic Soldanella (Primulaceae) based on ITS and AFLP variation. Am. J. Bot. 88 (2001) 2331-2345
122. Zietkiewicz E., Rafalski A., and Labuda D. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20 (1994) 176-183
123. Zujko-Miller, C., Miller, J.A., 2003. PEST: Precision estimated by sampling traits. Available from: http://www.gwu.edu/~clade/spiders/pestDocs.htm, Program distributed by the authors.