Sequence assessment of comigrating AFLP™ bands in Echinacea - Implications for comparative biological studies

Genome

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 15-25

  Mechanda, Subbaiah M ^a,b   Baum, Bernard R ^a   Johnson, Douglas A ^b   Arnason, John T ^b  

^a AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

AFLP markers; False homologies

Indexed keywords

PRIMER DNA;

ARTICLE; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; ECHINACEA; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

BASE SEQUENCE; CANADA; DNA PRIMERS; ECHINACEA; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID; UNITED STATES;

EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 1942424151     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/g03-094     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Badr, A., El Shazly, H., El Rabey, H., and Watson, L.E. 2002. Systematic relationships in Lathyrus sect. Lathyrus (Fabaceae) based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) data. Can. J. Bot. 80: 962-969.
2. Baum, B.R., Mechanda, S.M., Livesey, J.F., Binns, S.E., and Arnason, J.T. 2001. Predicting quantitative phytochemical markers in single Echinacea plants or clones from their DNA fingerprints. Phytochemistry, 56: 543-549.
3. Brahmasandra, S.N., Burke, D.T., Mastrangelo, C.H., and Burns, M.A. 2001. Mobility, diffusion and dispersion of single-stranded DNA in sequencing gels. Electrophoresis, 22: 1046-1062.
4. Bremer, B. 1991. Restriction data from cpDNA for phylogenetic reconstruction: is there only one accurate way of scoring? Plant Syst. Evol. 175: 39-54.
5. Chalhoub, B.A., Thibault, S., Laucou, V., Rameau, C., Höfte, H., and Cousin, R. 1997. Siver staining and recovery of AFLP™ amplification products on large denaturing polyacrylamide gels. Biotechniques, 22: 216-220.
6. Clark, A.G., and Lanigan, C.M.S. 1993. Prospects for estimating nucleotide divergence with RAPDs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 1096-1111.
7. Doyle, J.J., and Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
8. Ipek, M., and Simon, P. 2003. Sequence characterization of polymorphic AFLP fragments in garlic (Allium sativum L.). Plant and Animal Genome, Final Abstracts Guide, San Diego, Calif. Poster 685. p. 245.
9. Lamboy, W. 1994. Computing genetic distance similarity coefficient from RAPD data, the effects of PCR artifacts. PCR Methods Appl. 4: 31-37.
10. Meksem, K., Ruben, E., Hyten, D., Triwitayakorn, K., and Lightfoot, D.A. 2001. Conversion of AFLP bands into high-throughput DNA markers. Mol. Gen. Genet. 265: 207-214.
11. Mueller, U.G., and LaReesa Wolfenbarger, L. 1999. AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 389-394.
12. Nicholas, K.B., and Nicholas, H.B., Jr. 1997. Genedoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. Multiple sequence alignment and shading utility, version 2.6.002. Available from http://www.psc.edu/biomed/ genedoc [accessed 2000].
13. Patterson, C. 1988. Homology in classical molecular biology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5: 603-625.
14. Powell, W., Morgante, M., Andre, C., Hanafey, M., Vogel, M.J., Tingey, S.V., and Rafalski, A. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellites) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol. Breed. 2: 225-235.
15. Robinson, J.P., and Harris, S.A. 1999. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms and microsatellites: a phylogenetic perspective. In Which DNA marker for which purpose? Chap. 12. Final Compendium of the Research Project Development, optimization and validation of molecular tools for assessment of biodiversity in forest trees in the European Union. Edited by E.M. Gillet. DGXII Biotechnology FW IV Research Programme Molecular Tools for Biodiversity. Available from http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/y/1999/whichmarker/index.htm [accessed 1999].
16. Rouppe van der Voort, J.N.A.M., van Zandvoort, P., van Eck, H.J., Folkerstma, R.T., Hutten, R.C.B., Draaistra, J., Gommers, F.J., Jacobsen, E., Helder, J., and Bakker, J. 1997. Use of allele specificity of comigrating AFLP markers to align genetic maps from different potato genotypes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 255: 438-447.
17. Rousseau, J., Drouin, G., and Slater, J.W. 2000. Gel electrophoretic mobility of single stranded DNA: the two reptation field-dependent factors. Electrophoresis, 21: 1464-1470.
18. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F., and Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. 3 vols. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.
19. Savelkoul, P.H.M., Aarts, H.J.M., de Haas, J., Dijkshoorn, L., Duim, B., Otsen, M., Rademaker, J.L.W., Schouls, L., and Lenstra, J.A. 1999. Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis: the state of an art. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3083-3091.
20. Shan, X., Blake, T.K., and Talbert, L.E. 1999. Conversion of AFLP markers to sequence-specific PCR markers in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 1072-1078.
21. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibbons, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighing, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.
22. Virk, P.S., Newbury, H.J., Jackson, M.T., and Ford-Lloyd, B.V. 2000. Are mapped markers more useful for assessing genetic diversity? Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 607-613.
23. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., Freijters, A., Pot, J., Peleman, J., Kuiper, M., and Zabeau, M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 21: 4407-4414.
24. Wong, A., Forbes, M.R., and Smith, M.L. 2001. Characterization of AFLP markers in damselflies: prevalence of codominant markers and implications for population genetic applications. Genome, 44: 677-684.
25. Zande, L. van de, and Bijlsma, R. 1995. Limitations of the RAPD technique in phylogeny reconstruction in Drosophila. J. Evol. Biol. 8: 645-656.