AFLP phylogeny of Mimulus section Erythranthe and the evolution of hummingbird pollination

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1397-1410

  Beardsley, Paul M ^a   Yen, Alan ^a   Olmstead, Richard G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Amplified fragment length polymorphisms; Erythranthe; External transcribed spacer; Hummingbird pollination; Internal transcribed spacer; Mimulus

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; FLORAL TRAIT; PHYLOGENY; POLLINATION; ZOOPHILY;

ANIMALS; BIRDS; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; FLOWERS; GEOGRAPHY; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MIMULUS; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; POLLEN; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

ANIMALIA; COROLLA; EMBRYOPHYTA; INSECTA; MIMULUS PARISHII;

EID: 0037626674     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00347.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Argue, C. L. 1980. Pollen morphology in the genus Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae) and its taxonomic significance. Am. J. Bot. 67:68-87.
2. Avise, J. C. 1994. Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York.
3. Baldwin, B. G. 1992. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:3-16.
4. Baldwin, B. G., and S. Markos. 1998. Phylogenetic utility of the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S-26S rDNA: Congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10:449-463.
5. Baldwin, B. G., M. J. Sanderson, J. M. Porter, M. F. Wojciechowski, C. S. Campbell, and M. J. Donoghue. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. MO. Bot. Gard. 82:247-277.
6. Beardsley, P. M., and R. G. Olmstead. 2002. Redefining Phrymaceae: the placement of Mimulus, tribe Mimuleae, and Phryma, Am. J. Bot. 89:1093-1102.
7. Bleiweiss, R. 2001. Mimicry on the QT(L): genetics of speciation in Mimulus. Evolution 55:1706-1709.
8. Bradshaw, H. D., Jr., S. M. Wilbert, K. G. Otto, and D. W, Schemske. 1995. Genetic mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Nature 376:762-765.
9. Bradshaw, H. D., Jr., K. G. Otto, B. E. Frewen, J. K. McKay, and D. W. Schemske. 1998. Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two plant species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). Genetics 149:367-382.
10. Brown, J. H., and A. Kodrick-Brown. 1979. Convergence, competition, and mimicry in a temperate community of humming-bird-pollinated flowers. Ecology 60:1022-1035.
11. Bruneau, A. 1997. Evolution and homology of bird pollination syndromes in Erythrina (Leguminosae). Am. J. Bot. 84:54-71.
12. Caicedo, A. L., O. Gaitan, M. C. Duque, O. Toro Chica, D. G. Debouck, and J. Thome. 1999. AFLP fingerprinting of Phaseolus lunatus L. and related wild species from South America. Crop Sci. 39:1497-1507.
13. Cunningham, C. W., K. E. Omland, and T. H. Oakley. 1998. Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical reappraisal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:361-366.
14. Doyle, J. J., and J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid isolation procedure for small quantities of leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19:11-15.
15. Edwards, A. W. F. 1972. Likelihood. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
16. Farris, J. S., M. Kallersjö, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
17. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
18. Ganders, F. R., M. Berbee, and M. Pirseyedi. 2000. ITS base sequence phylogeny in Bidens (Asteraceae): evidence for the continental relatives of Hawaiian and Marquesan Bidens. Syst. Bot. 25:122-133.
19. Ghebrehiwet, M., B. Bremer, and M. Thulin. 2000. Phylogeny of tribe Antirrhineae (Scrophulariaceae) based on morphological data and ndhF sequence data. Plant Syst. Evol. 220:223-239.
20. Givnish, T. J., T. M. Evans, M. L. Zjhra, T. B. Patterson, P. E. Berry, and K. J. Sytsma. 2000. Molecular evolution, adaptive radiation, and geographic diversification in the amphiatlantic family Rapateaceae: Evidence from ndhF sequences and morphology. Evolution 54:1915-1937.
21. Grant, A. L. 1924. A monograph of the genus Mimulus. Ann. MO. Bot. Gard. 11:99-389.
22. Grant, K. A. 1966. A hypothesis concerning the prevalence of red coloration in California hummingbird flowers. Am. Nat. 100:85-97.
23. Grant, K. A., and V. Grant. 1968. Hummingbirds and their flowers. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
24. Greene, E. L. 1885. Studies in the botany of California and parts adjacent. I. Bull. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1:66-127.
25. Hiesey, W. M., M. A. Nobs, and O. Bjorkman. 1971. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ. 628:1-213.
26. Hill, M., H. Witsenboer, M. Zabeau, P. Vos, R. Kesseli, and R. Michelmore. 1996. PCR-based fingerprinting using AFLPs as a tool for studying genetic relationships in Lactuca spp. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:1202-1210.
27. Hodges, S. A. 1997. A rapid radiation via a key innovation in Aquilegia. Pp. 391-405 in T. Givnish and K. Sytsma, eds. Molecular evolution and adaptive radiations, Cambridge Press, Cambridge, U.K.
28. Kearney, T. H. and R. H. Peebles. 1960. Arizona flora. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
29. Maddison, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 40:315-328.
30. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Ver. 3.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
31. McDade, L. A. 1992. Pollinator relationships, biogeography, and phylogenetics. Bioscience 42:21-26.
32. Mueller, U. G., and L. L. Wolfenbarger. 1999. AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:389-394.
33. Nei, M., and W. H. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 76:5269-5273.
34. O'Kane, S. L., Jr., and B. A. Schaal. 1998. Phylogenetics of Lopezia (Onagraceae): Evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction sites. Syst. Bot. 23:5-20.
35. Olmstead, R. G., C. W. dePamphilis, A. D. Wolfe, N. D. Young, W. J. Elisens, and P. A. Reeves. 2001. Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae. Am. J. Bot. 88:348-361.
36. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 255:37-45.
37. _. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48:612-622.
38. Percival, M. S. 1979. Floral biology. Pergamon, Oxford, U.K.
39. Schemske, D. W., and H. D. Bradshaw, Jr. 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:11910-11915.
40. Sharma, S. K., M. R. Knox, T. H. N. Ellis. 1996. AFLP analysis of the diversity and phylogeny of Lens and its comparison with RAPD analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:751-758.
41. Stebbins, G. L. 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms. I. Pollination mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1:307-326.
42. _. 1989. Adaptive shifts toward hummingbird pollination. Pp. 39-60 in J. H. Bock and Y. B. Linhart, eds. The evolutionary ecology of plants. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
43. Sutherland, S. D., and R. K. Vickery, Jr. 1993. On the relative importance of floral color, shape, and nectar rewards in attracting pollinators to Mimulus. Great Basin Nat. 53:107-117.
44. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. * Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
45. Thompson, D. M. 1993. Mimulus. Pp.1037-1051 in J. C. Hickman, ed. The Jepson manual. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
46. Vickery, R. K. Jr. 1969. Crossing barriers in Mimulus. J. Jpn. Genet. 44(suppl 1):325-336.
47. _. 1978. Case studies in the evolution of species complexes in Mimulus. Evol. Biol. 11:404-506.
48. _. 1995. Speciation in Mimulus, or, can a simple flower color mutant lead to species divergence? Great Basin Nat. 55:177-180.
49. Vickery, R. K., Jr., and D. G. Anderson. 1967. Experimental hybridizations in the genus Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). VI. Section Erythranthe. Proc. Utah Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 44:321-333.
50. Vickery, R. K., Jr., and S. D. Sutherland. 1994. Variance and replenishment of nectar in wild and greenhouse populations of Mimulus. Great Basin Nat. 54:212-227.
51. Vickery, R. K., Jr., and B. M. Wullstein. 1987. Comparison of six approaches to the classification of Mimulus sect. Erythranthe (Scropulariaceae). Syst. Bot. 12:339-364.
52. Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Homes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.
53. Weller, S. G., and A. K. Sakai. 1999. Using phylogenetic approaches for the analysis of plant breeding system evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:167-199.
54. Wolfe, A. D., and A. Liston. 1998. Contributions of PCR-based methods to plant systematics and evolutionary biology. Pp. 43-86 in D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle, eds. Molecular systematics of plants II DNA sequencing. Kluwer, Boston, MA.
55. Xu, F., and M. Sun. 2001. Comparative analysis of phylogenetic relationships of grain amaranths and their wild relatives (Amaranthus; Amaranthaceae) using internal transcribed spacer, amplified fragment length polymorphism, and double-primer fluorescent intersimple sequence repeat markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 21:372-387.
56. Xu, R. Q., N. Tomooka, and D. A. Vaughan. 2000. AFLP markers for characterizing the Azuki bean complex. Crop. Sci. 40:808-815.
57. Zhang, L-B., H. P. Comes, and J. W. Kadereit. 2001. Phylogeny and quaternary history of the European montane/alpine endemic Soldanella (Primulaceae) based on ITS and AFLP variation. Am. J. Bot. 88:2331-2345.