Systematic relationships in Lathyrus sect. Lathyrus (Fabaceae) based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) data

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 80, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 962-969

  Badr, Abdelfattah ^a,c   Shazly, Hanaa El ^a,d   Rabey, Haddad El ^b   Watson, Linda E ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MENOUFIA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^c Tanta University   (Egypt)

^d Roxy   (Egypt)

Author keywords

AFLP; Fabaceae; Lathyrus; Systematics

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY;

POLYMORPHISMS;

FORESTRY;

TAXONOMY;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; MONOPHYLY; NEIGHBOR JOINING METHOD; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETIC TREE;

EMBRYOPHYTA; FABACEAE; GORGONIA; LATHYRUS;

EID: 0036447069     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/b02-084     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ali, H.B.M., Meister, A., and Schubert, I. 2000. DNA content, rDNA loci, and DAPI bands reflect the phylogenetic distance between Lathyrus species. Genome, 43: 1027-1032.
2. Asmussen, C.B., and Liston, A. 1998. Chloroplast DNA characters, phylogeny, and classification of Lathyrus (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 85: 387-401.
3. Badr, A., El Shazly, H.H., and Abou El Enain, M.M. 2000a. Seed protein diversity and its implications on the relationships in the genus Lathyrus (Fabaceae). Proceedings of the First International Conference on Biological Sciences, Tanta, Egypt. Edited by M. Mona, A. Badr, and A. Sharaf El-Din. Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt. pp. 333-346.
4. Badr, A., Mueller, K., Schaefer-Pregl, R., El Rabey, H., Efgen, S., El Shazly, H.H., Pozzi, C., Rhode, W., and Salamini, F. 2000b. On the origin and domestication history of barley (H. vulgare). Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 499-510.
5. Bässler, M. 1966. Die stellung des subgenus Orobus (L.) barker in der gattung Lathyrus L. und seine systematische gliederung. Feddes Repert. 72: 49-68.
6. Boissier, E. 1872. Orobus and Lathyrus. In Flora Orientalis. Vol. 2. H. Georg, Geneva and Basel. pp. 599-622.
7. Butler, A. 1986. Studies in the seed coat of Lathyrus. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lathyrus and Lathyrism, Pau, France. Edited by A.K. Kaul and D. Combes. Third World Medical Research Foundation, New York. pp. 25-38.
8. Campbell, C.G., Mehra, R.B., Agrawal, S.K., Chen, Y.Z., Abd El Moneim, A.M., Khawaja, H.I.T., Yadov, C.R., Tay, J.U., and Araya, W.A. 1994. Current status and future strategy in breeding grass pea (Lathyrus sativus). Euphytica, 73: 267-175.
9. Croft, A.M., Pang, E.C.K., and Taylor, P.W.J. 1999. Molecular analysis of Lathyrus sativus L. (grass pea) and related species. Euphytica, 107: 167-176.
10. Czefranova, Z. 1971. Conspectus systematis generis Lathyrus L. Novit. Syst. Plant. Vasc. (Leningrad), 8: 191-201.
11. Davies, A.J.S. 1957. Successful crossing in the genus Lathyrus through stylar amputation. Nature (London), 180: 12.
12. Davis, P.H. 1970. Lathyrus. In Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 3. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, U.K. pp. 328-369.
13. Dogan, M., Kence, A., and Tigin, C. 1992. Numerical taxonomic study on Turkish Lathyrus (Leguminosae). Edinb. J. Bot. 49: 333-341.
14. El Rabey, H. 1999. Genetic and Phylogenetic Relationships of Some Egyptian Wild Plants and Their Cultivated Relatives. Ph.D. thesis, Menoufiya University, Menoufiya, Egypt.
15. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39: 783-791.
16. Godron, D.A. 1848. Lathyrus. In Flora de France. Vol. 1. Edited by J.C. Grenier and D.A. Godron. Balliere, Paris. pp. 478-492.
17. Goyder, D.J. 1986. The genus Lathyrus. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lathyrus and Lathyrism, Pau, France. Edited by A.K. Kaul and D. Combes. Third World Medical Research Foundation, New York. pp. 3-7.
18. Heun, M., Schäfer-Pregl, R., Klawan, D., Castagna, R., Accerbi, M., Borghi, B., and Salamini, F. 1997. Site of einkorn wheat domestication identified by DNA fingerprinting. Science (Washington, D.C.), 278: 1312-1314.
19. Jones, C.J., Edwards, K.J., Castaglione, S., Winfield, M.O., Sala, F., van de Wiel, C., Bredemeijer, G., Vosman, B., Matthes, M., Daly, A., Brettschneider, R., Bettini, P., Buiatti, M., Maestri, E., Malcevschi, A., Marmiroli, N., Aert, R., Volckaert, G., Rueda, J., Linacero, R., Vazquez, A., and Karp, A. 1997. Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol. Breed. 3: 381-390.
20. Kardolus, J.P., van Eck, H.J., and van den Berg, R.G. 1998. The potential of AFLPs in biosystematics: A first application in Solanum taxonomy (Solanaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 210: 87-103.
21. Kupicha, F.K. 1983. The infrageneric structure of Lathyrus. Notes R. Bot. Gard. Edinb. 41: 209-244.
22. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum. Vol. 1. Holmiae. Salvius, Stockholm.
23. Martin, W., and Salamini, F. 2000. A meeting at the gene. Biodiversity and natural history. EMBO Rep. 1: 208-210.
24. Plitmann, U., Heyn, C.C., and Weinberger, H. 1986. Comparative taxonomy of some wild species allied to Lathyrus sativus. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lathyrus and Lathyrism, Pau, France. Edited by A.K. Kaul and D. Combes. Third World Medical Research Foundation, New York. pp. 8-21.
25. Przybylska, J., Przybylska, Z.Z., and Krajewski, P. 1999. Diversity of seed albumins in some Lathyrus species related to L. sativus L.: An electrophoretic study. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 46: 261-266.
26. Przybylska, J., Przybylska, Z.Z., and Krajewski, P. 2000. Diversity of seed globulins in Lathyrus sativus L., and some related species. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 47: 239-246.
27. Rohlf, F.J. 1993. NTSYS-pc. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Applied Biostatistics Inc., New York.
28. Saghai-Maroof, M.A., Soliman, K.M., Jorgensen, R.A., and Allard, R.W. 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphism in barley. Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81: 8014-8018.
29. Saitou, N., and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406.
30. Sneath, P.H.A., and Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco, Calif.
31. Sokal, R.R., and Michener, C.D. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 28: 1409-1438.
32. Soltis, D.E., and Soltis, P.S. 2000. Contribution of plant molecular systematics to studies of molecular evolution. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 45-75.
33. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
34. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., Frijters, A., Pot, J., Peleman, J., Kuiper, M., and Zabeau, M. 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.
35. Wolfe, A., and Liston, A. 1998. Contribution of PCR-based methods to plant systematics and evolutionary biology. In Molecular Biology of Plants, II. DNA Sequencing. Edited by D.E. Soltis, P.S. Soltis, and J.J. Doyle. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass. pp. 43-86.
36. Yamamoto, K., and Fujiware, T. 1986. Isozymic variation and interspecific crossability in annual species of the genus Lathyrus L. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lathyrus and Lathyrism, Pau, France. Edited by A.K. Kaul and D. Combes. Third World Medical Research Foundation, New York. pp. 118-129.