Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.]

Taxon

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 43-61

  Spooner, David M ^a   Peralta, Iris E ^b,c   Knapp, Sandra ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO   (Argentina)

^c LABORATORIO DE ENTOMOLOGÍA   (Argentina)

^d DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AFLP; Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism; Congruence tests; Lycopersicon; Phylogeny; Solanaceae; Solanum section Lycopersicon; Tomato

Indexed keywords

PHYLOGENETICS;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM; SOLANUM HABROCHAITES; SOLANUM OCHRANTHUM;

EID: 15944380110     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/25065301     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alvarez, A. E., van de Wiel, C. C. M., Smulders, M. J. M., & Vosman, B. 2001. Use of microsatellites to evaluate genetic diversity and species relationships in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 1283-1292.
2. Bamberg, J. B., Martin, M. W., Schartner, J. J. & Spooner, D. M. 1996. Inventory of Tuber-bearing Solanum Species. Potato Introd. Stn., NRSP-6, Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin.
3. Beardsley, P. M., Yen, A. & Olmstead, R. G. 2003. AFLP phylogeny of Mimulus section Erythranthe and the evolution of hummingbird pollination. Evolution 57: 1397-1410.
4. Bohs, L. In press. Major clades in Solanum based on ndhF sequence data. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.
5. Bohs, L. & Olmstead, R. G. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships in Solanum (Solanaceae) based on ndhF sequences. Syst. Bot. 22: 5-17.
6. Bohs, L. & Olmstead, R. G. 1999. Solanum phylogeny inferred from chloroplast DNA sequence data. Pp. 97-110 in: Nee, M., Symon, D. E., Lester, R. N. & Jessop, J. P. (eds.), Solanaceae IV, Advances in Biology and Utilization. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
7. Breto, M. P., Asins, M. J. & Carbonell, E. A. 1993. Genetic variability in Lycopersicon species and their genetic relationships. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 113-120.
8. Brummitt, R. K. 2002. How to chop a tree. Taxon 51: 31-41.
9. Child, A. 1990. A synopsis of Solanum subgenus Potatoe (G. Don) D'Arcy (Tuberarium (Dun.) Bitter s.l.). Feddes Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 101: 209-235.
10. Darwin, S. C., Knapp, S. & Peralta, I. E. 2003. Tomatoes in the Galápagos Islands: morphology of native and introduced species of Solanum section Lycopersicon (Solanaceae). Syst. Biodiv. 1: 29-54.
11. De Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 27-31.
12. Despres, L., Gielly, L., Redoutet, B. & Taberlet, P. 2003. Using AFLP to resolve phylogenetic relationships in a morphologically diversified plant species complex when nuclear and chloroplast sequences fail to reveal variability. Molec. Phylo. Evol. 27: 185-196.
13. Doyle, J. J. & Doyle, J. L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19:11-15.
14. Esquinas Alcazar, J. T. 1981. Genetic resources of tomatoes and wild relatives. Rep. Inter. Board Pl. Genet. Res. No. AGP. IBPGR-80-103. International Board for Plant Genetic resources, Rome.
15. Farris, J. S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19: 83-92.
16. Farris, J. S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A. G. & Bult, C. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
17. Futuyma, D. J. 1998. Evolutionary Biology, ed. 3. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
18. Hay, A., Craft, J. & Tsiantis, M. 2004. Plant hormones and homeoboxes: bridging the gap? BioEssays 26: 395-404.
19. Hipp, A. L., Hall, J. C. & Sytsma, K. J. 2004. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 53: 81-89.
20. Hoot, S. B., Kadereit, J. W., Blattner, F. R., Jork, K. B., Schwarzbach, A. E. & Crane, P. R. 1997. Data congruence and phylogeny of Papaveraceae s.l. based on four data sets: atpB and rbcL sequences, trnK restriction sites, and morphological characters. Syst. Bot. 22: 575-590.
21. Jukes, T. H. & Cantor, R. C. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pp. 21-123 in: Munro, H. N. (ed.), Mammalian Protein Metabolism. Academic Press, New York.
22. Kardolus, J. P., van Eck, H. J. & van den Berg, R. G. 1998. The potential of AFLPs in biosystematics: a first application in Solanum taxonomy (Solanaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 210: 87-103.
23. Koopman, W. J. M., Zevenbergen, M. J. & van den Berg, R. G. 2001. Species relationships in Lactuca s.l. (Lactuceae, Asteraceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprints. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 1881-1887.
24. Lapointe, F.-J. & Legendre, P. 1992. Statistical significance of the matrix correlation coefficient for comparing independent phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 41: 378-384.
25. Lara-Cabrera, S. I. & Spooner, D. M. 2004. Taxonomy of North and Central American diploid wild potato (Solanum sect. Petota) species: AFLP data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 248: 129-142.
26. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum, ed. 1. Holmiae, Stockholm.
27. Luckwill, L. C. 1943. The genus Lycopersicon: an historical, biological, and taxonomical survey of the wild and cultivated tomatoes. Aberdeen Univ. Stud. 120: 1-44.
28. Mace, E. S., Gebhardt, C. G. & Lester, R. N. 1999a. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships in the tribe Datureae (Solanaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 634-641.
29. Mace, E. S., Lester, R. N. & Gebhardt, C. G. 1999b. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among the cultivated eggplant, Solanum melongena L., and wild relatives (Solanaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 626-633.
30. Mantel, N. A. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27: 209-220.
31. Marshall, J. A., Knapp, S., Davey, M. R., Power, J. B., Cocking, E. C., Bennett, M. D. & Cox, A. V. 2001. Molecular systematics of Solanum section Lycopersicum (Lycopersicon) using the nuclear ITS rDNA region. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 1216-1222.
32. McClean, P. E. & Hanson, M. R. 1986. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence among Lycopersicon and related Solanum species. Genetics 112: 649-667.
33. Milbourne, D., Meyer, R., Bradshaw, J. E., Baird, E., Bonar, N., Provan, J., Powell, W. & Waugh, R. 1997. Comparison of PCR-based marker systems for the analysis of genetic relationships in cultivated potato. Molec. Breed. 3: 127-136.
34. Miller, J. C. & Tanksley, S. D. 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 437-448.
35. Müller, C. H. 1940. A revision of the genus Lycopersicon. U.S.D.A. Misc. Publ. 382: 1-28 + 10 pl.
36. Nei, M. & Li, W.-H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76: 5269-5273.
37. Nuez, F., Provens, J. & Blanca, J. M. 2004. Relationships, origin, and diversity of Galapagos tomatoes: implications for the conservation of natural populations. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 86-99.
38. Olmstead, R. G. & Palmer, J. D. 1994. Chloroplast DNA and systematics: a review of methods and data analysis. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 1205-1224.
39. Olmstead, R. G. & Palmer, J. D. 1997. Implications for phylogeny, classification, and biogeography of Solanum from cpDNA restriction site variation. Syst. Bot. 22: 19-29.
40. Olmstead, R. G., Sweere, J. A., Spangler, R. E., Bohs, L. & Palmer, J. D. 1999. Phylogeny and provisional classification of the Solanaceae based on chloroplast DNA. Pp. 111-137 in: Nee, M., Symon, D. E., Lester, R. N. & Jessop, J. P. (eds.), Solanaceae IV, Advances in Biology and Utilization. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
41. Palmer, J. D. & Zamir, D. 1982. Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Lycopersicon. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79: 5006-5010.
42. Peralta, I. E., Knapp, S. & Spooner, D. M. In press. New species of wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon: Solanaceae) from northern Peru. Syst. Bot.
43. Peralta, I. E. & Spooner, D. M. 2001. GBSS1 gene phylogeny of wild tomatoes [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst. subsection Lycopersicon]. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 1888-1902.
44. Peralta, I. E. & Spooner, D. M. In press. Relationships and morphological characterization of wild tomatoes [Solanum L. Section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst. subsection Lycopersicon]. Monogr. Syst. Bot., Missouri Bot. Gard.
45. Powell, W., Morgante, M., Andre, C., Hanafey, M., Vogel, J., Tingey, S. & Rafalsky, A. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Molec. Breed. 2: 225-238.
46. Rick, C. M. 1958. The role of natural hybridization in the derivation of cultivated tomato of western South America. Econ. Bot. 12: 346-367.
47. Rick, C. M. 1963. Barriers to interbreeding in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Evolution 17: 216-232.
48. Rick, C. M. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. Pp. 667-677 in: Hawkes, J. G., Lester, R. N. & Skelding, A. D. (eds.), The Biology and Taxonomy of Solanaceae. Academic Press, New York.
49. Rick, C. M. 1982a. The potential of exotic germplasm for tomato improvement. Pp. 1-28 in: Vasil, I. K., Scowcroft, W. R. & Frey, K. J. (eds.), Plant Improvement and Somatic Cell Genetics. Academic Press, New York.
50. Rick, C. M. 1982b. Genetic relationships between self-incompatibility and floral traits in the tomato species. Biol. Zentralb. 101: 185-198.
51. Rick, C. M. 1984. Evolution of mating systems: evidence from allozyme variation. Pp. 215-221 in: Chopra, V. L., Joshi, B. C., Sharma, R. P. & Bansal, H. C. (eds.), Genetics: New Frontiers. Proceedings of the XV International Congress of Genetics, vol. 4. Applied Genetics, Bowker, Epping, Essex.
52. Rick, C. M. 1986a. Reproductive isolation in the Lycopersicon peruvianum complex. Pp. 477-495 in: D'Arcy, W. G. (ed.), Solanaceae, Biology and Systematics. Colombia Univ. Press, New York.
53. Rick, C. M. 1986b. Germplasm resources in the wild tomato species. Acta Hort. 190: 39-47.
54. Rohlf, F. J. 1997. NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.0. Exeter Software, Setauket, New York.
55. Russell, J. R., Fuller, J. D., Macaulay, M., Hatz, B. G., Jahoor, A., Powell, W. & Waugh, R. 1997. Direct comparison of levels of genetic variation among barley accessions detected by RFLPs, AFLPs, SSRs and RAPDs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 714-722.
56. Spooner, D. M., Anderson, G. J. & Jansen, R. K. 1993. Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes, and pepinos (Solanaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 80: 676-688.
57. Spooner, D. & Lara-Cabrera, S. 2001. Sistemática molecular y evolución de plantas cultivadas. Pp. 57-114 in: Hernández, H. M., García-Aldrete, A., Alvarez, F. & Ulloa, M. (eds.), Enfoques Contemporáneos para el Estudio de la Biodiversidad. Instituto de Biología, UNAM/ Fondo de Cultura Económica, Mexico City, Mexico.
58. Stevens, M. A. & Rick, C. M. 1986. Genetics and breeding. Pp. 35-109 in: Atherton, J. G. & Rudich J. (eds.), The Tomato Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement. Chapman and Hall, London.
59. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 4.0b8. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
60. Tanksley, S. D. & McCouch, S. R. 1997. Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063-1066.
61. Taylor, I. B. 1986. Biosystematics of the tomato. Pp. 1-34 in: Atherton, J. G. & Rudich J. (eds.), The Tomato Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement. Chapman and Hall, London.
62. Van den Berg, R. G., Bryan, G., Del Rio, A. & Spooner, D. M. 2002. Reduction of species in the wild potato Solanum section Petota series Longipedicellata: AFLP, RAPD and chloroplast SSR data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 1109-1114.
63. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., Frijters, A., Pot, J., Peleman, J., Kuiper, M. & Zabeau, M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl. Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.
64. Wendel, J. F. & Doyle, J. J. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. Pp. 265-296 in: Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S. & Doyle, J. J. (eds.), Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA Sequencing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
65. Yoder, A. D., Irwin, J. A. & Payseur, B. A. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50: 408-424.