Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 21, Issue 7-8, 2006, Pages 817-855

  Goldrick, Matthew ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COMPREHENSION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33750447043     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960600824112     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Baars, B. J., Motley, J. T., & MacKay, D. (1975). Output editing for lexical status from artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382-391.
2. Basso, A., Taborelli, A., & Vignolo, L. A. (1978). Dissociated disorders of speaking and writing in aphasia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 41, 556-563.
3. Berg, T., & Schade, U. (1992). The role of inhibition in a spreading-activation model of language production I: The psycholinguistic perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 405-434.
4. Best, W. (1996). When racquets are baskets but baskets are biscuits, where do the words come from? A single case study of formal paraphasic errors in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 443-480.
5. Blanken, G. (1990). Formal paraphasias: A single case study. Brain and Language, 38, 534-554.
6. Blanken, G. (1998). Lexicalisation in speech production: Evidence from form-related word substitutions in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 321-360.
7. Bloem, I., & La Heij, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 468-488.
8. Bloem, I., van den Boogaard, S., & La Heij, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 307-323.
9. Bonin, P., Barry, C., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2004). The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks: A never ending story? Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 456-476.
10. Bonin, P., & Fayol, M. (2002). Frequency effects in the written and spoken production of homophonic picture names. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 289-313.
11. Brédart, S., & Valentine, T. (1992). From Monroe to Moreau: An analysis of face naming errors. Cognition, 45, 187-223.
12. Burke, D. M., Locantore, J. K., Austin, A. A., & Chae, B. (2004). Cherry pit primes Brad Pitt: Homophone priming effects on young and older adults' production of proper names. Psychological Science, 15, 164-170.
13. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208.
14. Caramazza, A., Bi, Y., Costa, A., Miozzo, M. (2004). What determines the speed of lexical access: Homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al. (2003). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 278-282.
15. Caramazza, A., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Bi, Y. (2001). The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1430-1450.
16. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1990). Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex, 26, 95-122.
17. Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1283-1296
18. Costa, A., Colomé, A., Gómez, O., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2003). Another look at crosslanguage competition in bilingual speech production: Lexical and phonological factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 167-179.
19. Costa, A., Mahon, B., Savova, V., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Levels of categorization effect: A novel effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 205-233.
20. Cutting, J. C., & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 318-344.
21. Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 111-117.
22. Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. M. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 345-361.
23. DeCaro, S., & Reeves, A. (2002). The use of wordpicture verification to study entry-level object recognition: Further support for view-invariant mechanisms. Memory and Cognition, 30, 811-821.
24. del Viso, S., Igoa, J. M., & García-Albea, J. E. (1991). On the autonomy of phonological encoding: Evidence from slips of the tongue in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 161-185.
25. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
26. Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 313-349.
27. Dell, G. S., & Gordon, J. K. (2003). Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? In N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
28. Dell, G. S., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1991). Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al. (1991). Psychological Review, 98, 604-614.
29. Dell, G. S., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42, 287-314.
30. Dell, G. S., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1994). Inhibition in interactive activation models of linguistic selection and sequencing. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 409-453). San Diego: Academic Press.
31. Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611-629.
32. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M., Martin, M., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838.
33. de Zubicaray, G. I., Wilson, S. J., McMahon, K. L., & Muthiah, S. (2001). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word paradigm: An event-related fMRI study employing overt responses. Human Brain Mapping, 14, 218-227.
34. Farrar IV, W. T., & Van Orden, G. C. (2001). Errors as multistable response options. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 5, 223-265.
35. Ferreira, V. S., & Griffin, Z. M. (2003). Phonological influences on lexical (mis-)selection. Psychological Science, 14, 86-90.
36. Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27-52.
37. Gagnon, D. A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Dell, G. S. & Saffran, E. M. (1997). The origins of formal paraphasias in aphasics' picture naming. Brain and Language, 59, 450-472.
38. Garrett, M. F. (1976). Syntactic processes in sentence production. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 231-255). Amsterdam: North Holland.
39. Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (Vol. I): Speech and talk (pp. 177-220). New York: Academic Press.
40. Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2002). A restricted interaction account (RIA) of spoken word production: The best of both worlds. Aphasiology, 16, 20-55.
41. Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (in press). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition.
42. Gollan, T. H., & Acenas, L.-A. R. (2004). What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and Tagalog-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 246-269.
43. Gordon, J. K. (2002). Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech: Spontaneous and structured contexts. Brain and Language, 82, 113-145.
44. Harley, T. A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-plan-internal speech errors. Cognitive Science, 8, 191-219.
45. Harley, T. A. (1993). Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 291-309.
46. Harley, T. A. (1995). Connectionist models of anomia: A comment on Nickels. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 47-58.
47. Harley, T. A., & Bown, H. E. (1998). What causes a tip-of-the-tongue state? Evidence for lexical neighbourhood effects in speech production. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 151-174.
48. Harley, T. A., & MacAndrew, S. B. G. (1995). Interactive models of lexicalization: Some constraints from speech error, picture naming, and neuropsychological data. In J. P. Levy, D. Bairaktaris, & J. A. Bullinaria (Eds.), Connectionist models of memory and language (pp. 311-331). London: UCL Press.
49. Harley, T. A., & MacAndrew, S. B. G. (2001). Constraints upon word substitution speech errors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 395-417.
50. Hartsuiker, R. J. (2006). Are speech error patterns affected by a monitoring bias? Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 856-891.
51. Hartsuiker, R. J., Corley, M., & Martensen, H. (2005). The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesn't fly: Related beply to Baars et al. (1975). Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 58-70.
52. Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., De Bot, K., & Schreuder, R. (1998). Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 213-229.
53. Hillis, A. E. (2001). The organization of the lexical system. In B. Rapp (Ed.), The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 185-210). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
54. Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 191-243.
55. Humphreys, G. W., Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Fias, W. (1995). Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 961-980.
56. Humphreys, K. R. (2002). Lexical bias in speech errors. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
57. Igoa, J. M. (1996). The relationship between conceptualization and formulation processes in sentence production: Some evidence from Spanish. In M. Carreiras, J. García-Albea, & N. Sebastián-Galles (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 305-351). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
58. Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101-144.
59. Jescheniak, J. D., Hantsch, A., & Schriefers, H. (2005). Context effects on lexical choice and lexical activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 905-920.
60. Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824-843.
61. Jescheniak, J. D., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production: Comments on Caramazza, Costa, et al. (2001) and new experimental data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 432-438.
62. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1998). Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1256-1274.
63. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Priming effects from phonological related distractors in picture-word interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 371-382.
64. Kello, C. T., Plaut, D. C., & MacWhinney, B. (2000). The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: An empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 340-360.
65. Kulke, F., & Blanken, G. (2001). Phonological and syntactic influences on semantic misnamings in aphasia. Aphasiology, 15, 3-15.
66. Laine, M., Tikkala, A., & Juhola, M. (1998). Modelling anomia by the discrete two-stage word production architecture. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 275-294.
67. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41-104.
68. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 223-232.
70. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
71. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991a). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122-142.
72. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991b). Normal and deviant lexical processing: Reply to Dell and O'Seaghdha (1991). Psychological Review, 98, 615-618.
73. Martin, N., Gagnon, D. A., Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., & Saffran, E. M. (1996). Phonological facilitation of semantic errors in normal and aphasic speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 257-282.
74. Martin, N., Dell, G. S., Saffran, E. M., & Schwartz, M. F. (1994). Origins of paraphasias in deep dysphasia: Testing the consequences of a decay impairment to an interactive spreading activation model of lexical retrieval. Brain and Language, 47, 609-660.
75. Martin, N., & Saffran, E. M. (2002). The relationship of input and output phonological processing: An evaluation of models and evidence to support them. Aphasiology, 16, 107-150.
76. Martin, N., Weisberg, R. W., & Saffran, E. M. (1989). Variables influencing the occurrence of naming errors: Implications for models of lexical retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 462-485.
77. Melinger, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2004). Investigating the interplay between semantic and phonological distractor effects in picture naming. Brain and Language, 90, 213-220.
78. Meyer, D. E., & Gordon, P. C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 3-26.
79. Miceli, G., Benvegnú, B., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. (1997). The independence of phonological and orthographic lexical forms: Evidence from aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 35-70.
80. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228-252.
81. Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 555-563.
82. Navarette, E., & Costa, A. (2005). Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 359-377.
83. Nickels, L. (1992). The autocue? Self-generated phonemic cues in the treatment of a disorder of reading and naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 307-317.
84. Nickels, L. (1995). Getting it right? Using aphasic naming errors to evaluate theoretical models of spoken word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 13-45.
85. Nickels, L. & Howard, D. (1995). Phonological errors in aphasic naming: Comprehension, monitoring, and lexicality. Cortex, 31, 209-237.
86. Nooteboom, S. G. (2005a). Lexical bias revisited: Detecting, rejecting, and repairing speech errors in inner speech. Speech Communication, 47, 43-58.
87. Nooteboom, S. G. (2005b). Listening to oneself: Monitoring speech production. In R. Hartsuiker, Y. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (pp. 167-186). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
88. O'Seaghdha, P. G., & Marin, J. W. (1997). Mediated semantic-phonological priming: Calling distant relatives. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 226-252.
89. Page, M. (2000). Connectionist modelling in psychology: A localist manifesto. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 443-467.
90. Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 539-557.
91. Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.
92. Rapp, B., Benzing, L., & Caramazza, A. (1997). The autonomy of lexical orthography. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 71-104.
93. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499.
94. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2004). Feedback by any other name is still interactivity: A reply to Roelofs' comment on Rapp & Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review, 111, 573-578.
95. Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
96. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284.
97. Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88-125.
98. Roelofs, A. (2004a). Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: Comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review, 111, 561-572.
99. Roelofs, A. (2004b). Comprehension-based versus production-internal feedback in planning spoken words: A rejoinder to Rapp and Goldrick (2004). Psychological Review, 111, 579-580.
100. Schade, U., & Berg, T. (1992). The role of inhibition in a spreading-activation model of language production II: The simulation perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 435-462.
101. Schatzman, K. B., & Schiller, N. O. (2004). The word frequency effect in picture naming: Contrasting two hypotheses using homonym pictures. Brain and Language, 90, 160-169.
102. Shelton, J. R., & Weinrich, M. (1997). Further evidence of a dissociation between output phonological and orthographic lexicons: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 105-129.
103. Starreveld, P. (2000). On the interpretation of phonological context effects in word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 497-525.
104. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686-698.
105. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1999). Word substitution errors in the picture-word task. American Journal of Psychology, 112, 521-553.
106. Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
107. Stemberger, J. P. (2004). Neighbourhood effects on error rates in speech production. Brain and Language, 90, 413-422.
108. Taylor, J. K., & Burke, D. M. (2002). Asymmetric aging effects on semantic and phonological processes: Naming in the picture-word interference task. Psychology and Aging, 17, 662-676.
109. Van Orden, G. C., op de Haar, M. A. J., & Bosman, A. M. T. (1997). Complex dynamic systems also predict dissociations, but they do not reduce to autonomous components. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 131-165.
110. Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 442-472.
111. Vitevitch, M. S. (1997). The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech, 40, 211-228.
112. Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 735-747.
113. Vitevitch, M. S., Armbrüster, J., & Chu, S. (2004). Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 514-529.
114. Vitevitch, M. S., & Sommers, M. S. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory and Cognition, 31, 491-504.
115. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1-29.