Semantic and Phonological Codes Interact in Single Word Production

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 345-361

  Damian, Markus F ^a,b   Martin, Randi C ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; HUMANS; PHONETICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0033094826     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.345     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814.
2. Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234-254.
3. Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. (1975). Output editing for lexical status from artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382-391.
4. Best, W. (1996). When racquets are baskets but baskets are biscuits, where do the words come from? A single case study of formal paraphasic errors in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 443-480.
5. Blanken, G. (1990). Formal paraphasias: A single case study. Brain and Language, 38, 534-554.
6. Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The "tip of the tongue" phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325-337.
7. Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the "tip-of-the-tongue" phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309-343.
8. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic environment for designing psychological experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25, 257-271.
9. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonassen, L. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI (pp. 535-555). London: Academic Press.
10. Cutting, J. C., & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 318-344.
11. Damian, M. F., Bowers, J. S., & Katz, M. A. (1997). Are semantic effects in the picture-word interference procedure lexical or conceptual? Manuscript submitted for publication.
12. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
13. Dell, G. S., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1991). Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al. (1991). Psychological Review, 98, 604-614.
14. Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611-629.
15. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1996). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838.
16. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). Neighborhood frequency and density effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 696-714.
18. Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 9 (pp. 133-177). New York: Academic Press.
19. Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640-654.
20. Goldinger, S. D., Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 501-518.
21. Goldinger, S. D., Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., & Marcario, J. K. (1992). Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: The roles of competition and bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1211-1238.
22. Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., Weintraub, S., & Ackerman, N. (1976). The "tip of the tongue" phenomenon in aphasia. Cortex, 12, 145-153.
23. Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 228-244.
24. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
25. Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 191-198.
26. Harley, T. A. (1993). Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 291-309.
27. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67-104.
28. Johnson, N. F., & Pugh, K. R. (1994). A cohort model of visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 240-346.
29. Kempen, G., & Huijbers, P. (1983). The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition, 14, 185-209.
30. Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 285-294.
31. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41-104.
32. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (in press). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
34. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122-142.
35. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology. Memory & Cognition, 18, 128-152.
36. Lupker, S. J. (1982). The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 349-367.
37. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 148-172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1-71.
39. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
40. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
41. Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1146-1160.
42. Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveld, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 2, 309-321.
43. Motley, M. T., Camden, C. T., & Baars, B. J. (1982). Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 578-594.
44. Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 539-557.
46. Posnansky, C. J., & Rayner, K. (1977). Visual-feature and response components in a picture-word interference task with beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 24, 440-469.
47. Posnansky, C. J., & Rayner, K. (1978). Visual vs. phonemic contributions to the importance of the initial letter in word identification. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 188-190.
48. Radeau, M., Morais, J., & Dewier, A. (1989). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition: Task effects. Memory & Cognition, 17, 525-535.
49. Rayner, K., & Posnansky, C. J. (1978). Stages of processing in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 64-80.
50. Rayner, K., & Springer, C. J. (1986). Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 207-222.
51. Roelofs, A. (1992a). Lemma retrieval in speaking: A theory, computer simulations, and empirical data (NICI Tech. Rep. No. 92-08). Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
52. Roelofs, A. (1992b). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
53. Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1996). Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 246-251.
54. Rosinksi, R. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Kukish, K. S. (1975). Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. Child Development, 46, 247-253.
55. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
56. Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 876-900.
57. Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65-76.
58. Slowiaczek, L. M., Nusbaum, H. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1987). Phonological priming in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 64-75.
59. Slowiaczek, L. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1986). Effects of phonological similarity on priming in auditory lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 14, 230-237.
60. Snodgrass, J. G., & Mintzer, M. (1993). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Memory & Cognition, 21, 247-266.
61. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
62. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686-698.
63. Starreveld, P.A., & La Heij, W. (1996a). The locus of orthographic-phonological facilitation: Reply to Roelofs, Meyer, and Levelt (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 252-255.
64. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996b). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 869-918.
65. Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive model of language production. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
67. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
68. van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1997). Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 787-806.
69. Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T., & Garrett, M. F. (1997). Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, 8, 314-317.