Word substitution errors in a speeded picture-word task

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 521-553

  Starreveld, Peter A ^a   La Heij, Wido ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0033250109     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1423649     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Baars, B. J. (1980). On eliciting predictable speech errors in the laboratory. In V. A. Fromkin (E.d.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp. 307-318). New York: Academic Press.
2. Baars, B. J. Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382-391.
3. Brennen, T., David, D., Fluchaire, I., & Pellat, J. (1996). Naming faces and objects without comprehension: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 93-110.
4. Briggs, P., & Underwood, G. (1982). Phonological coding in good and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 93-112.
5. Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The "tip-of-the-tongue" phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325-337.
6. Burnage, G. (1990). CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: CELEX.
7. Butterworth, B. (1989). Lexical access in speech production. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process. London: MIT Press.
8. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
9. Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611-629.
10. Dell, G. S. Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838.
11. Fay, D., & Cutler, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 505-520.
12. Flores d'Arcais, G. B., & Schreuder, R. (1987). Semantic activation during object naming. Psychological Research, 49, 153-159.
13. Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27-52.
14. Fromkin, V. A. (Ed.). (1973). Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague: Mouton.
15. Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 133-177). New York: Academic Press.
16. Garrett, M. F. (1976). Syntactic processes in sentence production. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 231-256). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
17. Garrett, M. F. (1992). Lexical retrieval processes: Semantic field effects. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts (pp. 377-395). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Giusberti, F., Tabossi, P., & Gavallero, C. (1985). Errori linguistici e lapsus Freudiani [Linguistic errors and Freudian slips]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 12, 73-84.
19. Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640-654.
20. Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects on Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
21. Harley, T. A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-plan-internal speech errors. Cognitive Science, 8, 191-219.
22. Harley, T. A. (1990). Environmental contamination of normal speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 45-72.
23. Harley, T. A. (1993). Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 291-309.
24. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67-103.
25. Huttenlocher, J., & Kubicek, L. F. (1983). The source of relatedness effects on naming latency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 486-496.
26. Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824-843.
27. Jones, G. V., & Langford, S. (1987). Phonological blocking in the tip of the tongue state. Cognition, 26, 115-122.
28. Kempen, G., & Huijbers, P. (1983). The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition, 14, 41-104.
29. Kremin, H. (1986). Spared naming without comprehension. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2, 131-150.
30. Kroll, J. F., & Potter, M. C. (1984). Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 39-66.
31. La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16, 400-410.
32. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41-104.
33. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1-22.
35. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T. & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122-142.
36. Lindsay, D. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 219-234.
37. Loftus, G. R. (1978). On interpretation of interactions. Memory & Cognition, 6, 312-319.
38. Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485-495.
39. Lupker, S. J. (1982). The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 349-367.
40. Lupker, S. J. (1985). Relatedness effects in word and picture naming: Parallels, differences, and structural implications. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 109-142). London: Erlbaum.
41. MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive, skills. New York: Springer.
42. Martin, N., Gagnon, D. A., Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., & Saffran, E. M. (1996). Phonological facilitation of semantic errors in normal and aphasic speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 257-282.
43. Martin, N., Weisberg, R. W., & Saffran, E. M. (1989). Variables influencing the occurrence of naming errors: Implications for models of lexical retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 462-485.
44. McFarland, C. E., Jr., & Sandy, J. T. (1982). Automatic and conscious processing in retarded and nonretarded adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 20-38.
45. Meringer, R., & Mayer, K. (1895). Versprechen und Verlesen: Eine psychologisch-linguistische Studie [Making speech and reading errors: A psychological-linguistic study]. Stuttgart: Göschensche Verlagsbuchhandlung. (Reissued, with introductory essay by A. Cutler & D. A. Fay, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1978)
46. Meyer, A. S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 477-496.
47. Meyer, A. S., & Bock, K. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? Memory & Cognition, 20, 715-726.
48. Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1146-1160.
49. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1997). Retrieval of lexical-syntactic features in tip-of-the-tongue states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1410-1423.
50. Nooteboom, S. G. (1969). The tongue slips into patterns. In A. G. Sciarone, A. J. van Essen, & A. A. van Raad (Eds.), NOMEN, Leyden studies in linguistics and phonetics (pp. 114-132). The Hague: Mouton.
51. Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 273-281.
52. Perfect, T. J., & Hanley, J. R. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Do experimenter-presented interlopers have any effect? Cognition, 45, 55-75.
53. Posnansky, C. J., & Rayner, K. (1977). Visual-feature and response components in a picture-word interference task with beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 24, 440-460.
54. Potter, M. C., & Faulconer, B. A. (1975). Time to understand pictures and words. Nature, 253, 437-438.
55. Ratcliff, G., & Newcombe, F. (1982). Object recognition: Some deductions from the clinical evidence. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 147-171). London: Academic Press.
56. Rayner, K., & Posnansky, C. (1978). Stages of processing in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 64-80.
57. Rayner, K., & Springer, C. J. (1986). Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 207-222.
58. Reason, J., & Lucas, D. (1984). Using cognitive diaries to investigate naturally occurring memory blocks. In J. E. Harris & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Everyday memory, actions, and absent-mindedness (pp. 53-70). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
59. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys G. W. (1987). Picture naming. In G. W. Humphreys & M. J. Riddoch (Eds.), Visual object processing: A cognitive neuropsychological approach (pp. 107-143). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
60. Roelofs, A. (1992a). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
61. Roelofs, A. (1992b). Lemma retrieval in speaking: A theory, computer simulations, and empirical data. Doctoral dissertation (NICI Technical Report No. 92-08), University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
62. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284.
63. Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1996). Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 246-251.
64. Rosinski, R. R. (1977). Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 48, 643-647.
65. Rossi, M., & Defare, E. P. (1995). Lapsus linguae: Word errors or phonological errors? International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 11, 5-38.
66. Santee, J. L., & Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 489-501.
67. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
68. Shallice, T., & McGill, J. (1978). The origins of mixed errors. In J. Requin (Ed.), Attention and performance VII (pp. 193-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686-698.
70. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996a). The locus of orthographic-phonological facilitation: Reply to Roelofs, Meyer, and Levelt (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 252-255.
71. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996b). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 896-918.
72. Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 143-186). London: Erlbaum.
73. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
74. Theios, J., & Amrhein P. C. (1989). Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: Reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons. Psychological Review, 96, 5-24.
75. Underwood, G. (1976). Semantic interference from unattended printed words. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 327-338.
76. Underwood, G., & Briggs, P. (1984). The development of word recognition processes. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 243-255.
77. Vitkovitch, M., & Humphreys, G. W. (1991). Perseverant responding in speeded naming of pictures: It's in the links. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 664-680.
78. Vitkovitch, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (1993). On naming a giraffe a zebra: Picture naming errors across different object categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 243-259.
79. Wingfield, A. (1967). Perceptual and response hierarchies in object identification. Acta Psychologica, 26, 216-226.
80. Wingfield, A. (1968). Effects of frequency on identification and naming of objects. American Journal of Psychology, 81, 226-234.
81. Zwitserlood, P. (1994). Access to phonological-form representations in language comprehension and production. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 83-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.