Biomolecular applications of Poisson-Boltzmann methods

Reviews in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 21, Issue , 2005, Pages 349-379

  Baker, Nathan A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750053883     PISSN: 10693599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/0471720895.ch5     Document Type: Review

References (157)

1. J. M. Wang, P. Cieplak, and P. A. Kollman, J. Comput. Chem., 21, 1049 (2000). How Well Does a Restrained Electrostatic Potential (RESP) Model Perform in Calculating Conformational Energies of Organic and Biological Molecules?
2. C. I. Bayly, P. Cieplak, W. D. Cornell, and P. A. Kollman, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 10269 (1993). A Well-Behaved Electrostatic Potential Based Method Using Charge Restraints for Deriving Atomic Charges-the RESP Model.
3. A. Grossfield, P. Ren, and J. W. Ponder, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125, 15671 (2003). Ion Solvation Thermodynamics from Simulation with a Polarizable Force Field.
4. P. Ren and J. W. Ponder, J. Comput. Chem., 23, 1497 (2002). Consistent Treatment of Inter- and Intramolecular Polarization in Molecular Mechanics Calculations.
5. A. D. MacKerell, Jr. in Computational Biochemistry and Biophysics, O. M. Becker, A. D. J. MacKerell, B. Roux, and M. Watanabe, Eds., Marcel-Dekker: New York, 2001, p. 7. Atomistic Models and Force Fields.
6. A. R. Leach, Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications, Prentice Hall, Harlow, England, 2001.
7. T. Schlick, Molecular Modeling and Simulation: An Interdisciplinary Guide, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.
8. G. Lamm, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 19, K. B. Lipkowitz, R. Larter, and T. R. Cundari, Eds., Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2003, pp. 147-365. The Poisson-Boltzmann Equation.
9. W. Nonner, D. Gillespe, D. Henderson, and D. Eisenberg, J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 6427 (2001). Ion Accumulation in a Biological Calcium Channel: Effects of Solvent and Confining Pressure.
10. S. M. Bhattacharyya, Z.-G. Wang, and A. H. Zewail, J. Phys. Chem. B, 107, 13218 (2003). Dynamics of Water Near a Protein Surface.
11. F. Figueirido, G. S. Delbuono, and R. M. Levy, Biophys. Chem., 51, 235 (1994). Molecular Mechanics and Electrostatic Effects.
12. J.-H. Lin, N. A. Baker, and J. A. McCammon, Biophys. J., 83, 1374 (2002). Bridging the Implicit and Explicit Solvent Approaches for Membrane Electrostatics.
13. C. Holm, P. Kekicheff, and R. Podgornik, Eds., Electrostatic Effects in Soft Matter and Biophysics, NATO Science Series. Vol. 46, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, 2001.
14. T. Simonson, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 11, 243 (2001). Macromolecular Electrostatics: Continuum Models and Their Growing Pains.
15. B. Roux, in Computational Biochemistry and Biophysics, O. M. Becker, A. D. MacKerell, Jr., B. Roux, and M. Watanabe, Eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001, p. 133. Implicit Solvent Models.
16. J. O. Bockris, and A. K. N. Reddy, Modern Electrochemistry: Ionics, Plenum Press, New York, 1998.
17. A. D. MacKerell, Jr. and L. Nilsson, in Computational Biochemistry and Biophysics, O. M. Becker, A. D. MacKerell, Jr., B. Roux, and M. Watanabe, Eds., Marcel Dekker: New York, 2001, pp. 441-463. Nucleic Acid Simulations.
18. G. Hummer, L. R. Pratt, and A. E. Garcia, J. Chem. Phys., 107, 9275 (1997). Ion Sizes and Finite-size Corrections for Ionic-solvation Free Energies.
19. I. G. Tironi, R. Sperb, P. E. Smith, and W. F. van Gunsteren, J. Chem. Phys., 102, 5451 (1995). A Generalized Reaction Field Method for Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
20. N. A. Baker, P. H. Hunenberger, and J. A. McCammon, J. Chem. Phys., 110, 10679 (1999). Polarization Around an Ion in a Dielectric Continuum with Truncated Electrostatic Interactions.
21. H. S. Ashbaugh and M. E. Paulaitis, J. Phys. Chem. B, 102, 5029 (1998). A Molecular/Continuum Thermodynamic Model of Hydration.
22. M. Schaefer and M. Karplus, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 1578 (1996). A Comprehensive Analytical Treatment of Continuum Electrostatics.
23. W. C. Still, A. Tempczyk, R. C. Hawley, and T. Hendrickson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 6127 (1990). Semianalytical Treatment of Solvation for Molecular Mechanics and Dynamics.
24. B. N. Dominy and C. L. Brooks III, J. Phys. Chem. B, 103, 3765 (1999). Development of a Generalized Born Model Parameterization for Proteins and Nucleic Acids.
25. D. Bashford and D. A. Case, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 51, 129 (2000). Generalized Born Models of Macromolecular Solvation Effects.
26. K. Osapay, W. S. Young, D. Bashford, C. L. Brooks III, and D. A. Case, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 2698 (1996). Dielectric Continuum Models for Hydration Effects on Peptide Conformational Transitions.
27. A. Onufriev, D. A. Case, and D. Bashford, J. Comput. Chem., 23, 1297 (2002). Effective Born Radii in the Generalized Born Approximation: The Importance of Being Perfect.
28. M. Born, Z. Phys., 1, 45 (1920). Volumen und Hydratationswarme der Ionen.
29. L. David, R. Luo, and M. K. Gilson, J. Comput. Chem., 21, 295 (2000). Comparison of Generalized Born and Poisson Models: Energetics and Dynamics of HIV Protease.
30. R. Luo, M. S. Head, J. Moult, and M. K. Gilson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 6138 (1998). pK(a) Shifts in Small Molecules and HIV Protease: Electrostatics and Conformation.
31. J. A. Given and M. K. Gilson, Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet., 33, 475 (1998). A Hierarchical Method for Generating Low-energy Conformers of a Protein-ligand Complex.
32. M. Feig, A. Onufriev, M. S. Lee, W. Im, D. A. Case, and C. L. Brooks III, J. Comput. Chem., 25, 265 (2003). Performance Comparison of Generalized Born and Poisson Methods in the Calculation of Electrostatic Solvation Energies for Protein Structures.
33. J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of Simple Liquids, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 2000.
34. F. Stillinger, J. Solution Chem., 2, 141 (1973). Structure in Aqueous Solutions of Nonpolar Solutes from the Standpoint of Scaled-particle Theory.
35. R. A. Pierotti, Chem. Rev., 76, 717 (1976). A Scaled Particle Theory of Aqueous and Nonaqeous Solutions.
36. T. Simonson and A. T. Brunger, J. Phys. Chem., 98, 4683 (1994). Solvation Free Energies Estimated From Macroscopic Continuum Theory: An Accuracy Assessment.
37. K. A. Sharp, A. Nicholls, R. F. Fine, and B. Honig, Science, 252, 106 (1991). Reconciling the Magnitude of the Microscopic and Macroscopic Hydrophobic Effects.
38. C. Chothia, Nature, 248, 338 (1974). Hydrophobic Bonding and Accessible Surface Area in Proteins.
39. L. Wesson, and D. Eisenberg, Protein Sci., 1, 227 (1992). Atomic Solvation Parameters Applied to Molecular Dynamics of Proteins in Solution.
40. D. Eisenberg and A. D. McLachlan, Nature, 319, 199 (1986). Solvation Energy in Protein Folding and Binding.
41. D.M. Huang and D. Chandler, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA, 97, 8324 (2000). Temperature and Length Scale Dependence of Hydrophobic Effects and their Possible Implications for Protein Folding.
42. G. Hummer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121, 6299 (1999). Hydrophobic Force Field as a Molecular Alternative to Surface-area Models.
43. L. R. Pratt, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 53, 409 (2002). Molecular Theory of Hydrophobic Effects: "She is too Mean to Have Her Name Repeated".
44. N. A. Baker and J. A. McCammon, in Structural Bioinformatics, H. Weissig, Ed., Wiley, New York, 2002, pp. 427-440. Electrostatic Interactions.
45. M. E. Davis and J. A. McCammon, Chem. Rev., 94, 7684 (1990). Electrostatics in Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics.
46. B. Honig and A. Nicholls, Science, 268, 1144 (1995). Classical Electrostatics in Biology and Chemistry.
47. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Wiley, New York, 1975.
48. B. Lee and F. M. Richards, J. Mol. Biol., 55, 379 (1971). The Interpretation of Protein Structures: Estimation of Static Accessibility.
49. M. L. Connolly, J. Mol. Graph., 11, 139 (1993). The Molecular Surface Package.
50. W. Im, D. Beglov, and B. Roux, Comput. Phys. Commun., 111, 59 (1998). Continuum Solvation Model: Electrostatic Forces From Numerical Solutions to the Poisson-Boltzmann Equation.
51. C. L. Bajaj, V. Pasucci, R. J. Holt, and A. N. Netravali, Discete Appl. Math., 127, 23 (2003). Dynamic Maintenance and Visualization of Molecular Surfaces.
52. J. A. Grant, B. T. Pickup, and A. Nicholls, J. Comput. Chem., 22, 608 (2001). A Smooth Permittivity Function for Poisson-Boltzmann Solvation Methods.
53. K. A. Sharp and B. Honig, J. Phys. Chem., 94, 7684 (1990). Calculating Total Electrostatic Energies with the Nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann Equation.
54. F. Fogolari and J. M. Briggs, Chem. Phys. Lett., 281, 135 (1997). On the Variational Approach to Poisson-Boltzmann Free Energies.
55. A. M. Micu, B. Bagheri, A. V. Ilin, L. R. Scott, and B. M. Pettitt, J. Comput. Phys., 136, 263 (1997). Numerical Considerations in the Computation of the Electrostatic Free Energy of Interaction within the Poisson-Boltzmann Theory.
56. M. K. Gilson, M. E. Davis, B. A. Luty, and J. A. McCammon, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 3591 (1993). Computation of Electrostatic Forces on Solvated Molecules using the Poisson-Boltzmann Equation.
57. M. J. Holst and F. Saied, J. Comput. Chem., 16, 337 (1995). Numerical Solution of the Nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann Equation: Developing More Robust and Efficient Methods.
58. M. E. Davis, J. D. Madura, B. A. Luty, and J. A. McCammon, Comput. Phys. Commun., 62, 187 (1991). Electrostatics and Diffusion of Molecules in Solution-Simulations with the University-of-Houston-Brownian Dynamics Program.
59. W. Rocchia, S. Sridharan, A. Nicholls, E. Alexov, A. Chiabrera, and B. Honig, J. Comput. Chem., 23, 128 (2002). Rapid Grid-based Construction of the Molecular Surface and the use of Induced Surface Charge to Calculate Reaction Field Energies: Applications to the Molecular Systems and Geometric Objects.
60. M. E. Davis and J. A. McCammon, J. Comput. Chem., 12, 909 (1991). Dielectric Boundary Smoothing in Finite Difference Solutions of the Poisson Equation: An Approach to Improve Accuracy and Convergence.
61. M. K. Gilson and B. Honig, Nature, 330, 84 (1987). Calculation of Electrostatic Potentials in an Enzyme Active Site.
62. K. A. Sharp and B. Honig, Ann. Rev. Biophys., 19, 301 (1990). Electrostatic Interactions in Macromolecules-Theory and Applications.
63. H. X. Zhou, Biophys. J., 65, 955 (1993). Boundary Element Solution of Macromolecular Electrostatics: Interaction Energy between two Proteins.
64. R. J. Zauhar and R. S. Morgan, J. Mol. Biol., 186, 815 (1985). A New Method for Computing the Macromolecular Electric Potential.
65. O. Axelsson and V. A. Barker, Finite Element Solution of Boundary Value Problems. Theory and Computation, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California, 1984.
66. D. Braess, Finite Elements. Theory, Fast Solvers, and Applications in Solid Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1997.
67. S. C. Brenner and L. R. Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, Springer, New York, 2002.
68. M. J. Holst, N. A. Baker, and F. Wang, J. Comput. Chem., 21, 1319 (2000). Adaptive Multilevel Finite Element Solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann Equation. I. Algorithms and Examples.
69. N. A. Baker, M. J. Holst, and F. Wang, J. Comput. Chem., 21, 1343 (2000). Adaptive Multilevel Finite Element Solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann Equation. II. Refinement at Solvent-accessible Surfaces in Biomolecular Systems.
70. N. A. Baker, D. Sept, M. J. Holst, and J. A. McCammon, IBM J. Res. Develop., 45, 427 (2001). The Adaptive Multilevel Finite Element Solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann Equation on Massively Parallel Computers.
71. C. M. Cortis and R. A. Friesner, J. Comput. Chem., 18, 1591 (1997). Numerical Solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann Equation using Tetrahedral Finite-element Meshes.
72. C. M. Cortis and R. A. Friesner, J. Comput. Chem., 18, 1570 (1997). An Automatic Three-dimensional Finite Element Mesh Generation System for the Poisson-Boltzmann Equation.
73. W. Hackbusch, Multi-grid Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1985.
74. W. L. Briggs, A Multigrid Tutorial, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1987.
75. M. J. Holst, Adv. Comput. Math., 15, 139 (2001). Adaptive Numerical Treatment of Elliptic Systems on Manifolds.
76. N. A. Baker, D. Sept, S. Joseph, M. J. Holst, and J. A. McCammon, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 98, 10037 (2001). Electrostatics of Nanosystems: Application to Microtubules and the Ribosome.
77. R. E. Bank, and M. J. Holst, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 22, 1411 (2000). A New Paradigm for Parallel Adaptive Meshing Algorithms.
78. D. K. Ross, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 29, 699 (1975). The Interaction Energy, Field Strength and Force Acting on a Pair of Dielectric Spheres Embedded in a Dielectric Medium.
79. J. Q. Feng, Phys. Rev. E, 62, 2891 (2000). Electrostatic Interaction between two Charged Dielectric Spheres in Contact.
80. N. V. Sushkin and G. D. J. Phillies, J. Chem. Phys., 103, 4600 (1995). Charged Dielectric Spheres in Electrolyte Solutions: Induced Dipole and Counterion Exclusion Effects.
81. C. F. Wong, P. H. Hunenberger, P. Akamine, N. Narayana, T. Diller, J. A. McCammon, S. Taylor, and N. H. Xuong, J. Med. Chem., 44, 1530 (2001). Computational Analysis of PKA-balanol Interactions.
82. D. Murray, N. Ben-Tal, B. Honig, and S. McLaughlin, Structure, 5, 985 (1997). Electrostatic Interaction of Myristoylated Proteins with Membranes: Simple Physics, Complicated Biology.
83. D. Sept, N. A. Baker, and J. A. McCammon, Protein Sci., 12, 2257 (2003). The Physical Basis of Microtubule Structure and Stability.
84. C. Ma, N. A. Baker, S. Joseph, and J. A. McCammon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 1438 (2002). Binding of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics to the Small Ribosomal Subunit: A Continuum Electrostatics Investigation.
85. D. A. Case, D. A. Pearlmann, J. W. Caldwell, J. Wang, W. S. Ross, C. Simmerling, T. Darden, K. M. Merz, R. V. Stanton, A. Cheng, J. J. Vincent, M. Crowley, V. Tsui, H. Gohlke, R. Radmer, Y. Duan, J. Pitera, I. Massova, G. L. Seibel, U. C. Singh, P. Weiner, and P. A. Kollman, AMBER 7 User's Manual, University of California. (2002). Available: 〈http://amber.scripps.edu/ doc7/amber.pdf〉.
86. D. A. Pearlmann, D. A. Case, J. W. Caldwell, W. S. Ross, T. E. Cheatham, 3rd, S. DeBolt, D. Ferguson, G. L. Seibel, and P. A. Kollman, Comput. Phys. Commun., 91, 1 (1995). AMBER, A Package of Computer Programs for Applying Molecular Mechanics, Normal Mode Analysis, Molecular Dynamics, and Free Energy Calculations to Simulate the Structural and Energetic Properties of Molecules.
87. Z. Radic and P. Taylor, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 4622 (2001). Interaction Kinetics of Reversible Inhibitors and Substrates with Acetylcholinesterase and its Fasciculin 2 Complex.
88. A. H. Elcock, D. Sept, and J. A. McCammon, J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 1504 (2001). Computer Simulation of Protein-Protein Interactions.
89. I. Massova and P. A. Kollman, Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 18, 113 (2000). Combined Molecular Mechanical and Continuum Solvent Approach (MM-PBSA/GBSA) to Predict Ligand Binding.
90. J. Wang, P. Morin, W. Wang, and P. A. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 5221 (2001). Use of MM-PBSA in Reproducing the Binding Free Energies to HIV-1 RT of TIBO Derivatives and Predicting the Binding Mode to HIV-1 RT of Efavirenz by Docking and MM-PBSA.
91. P. A. Kollman, I. Massova, C. Reyes, B. Kuhn, S. Huo, L. Chong, M. Lee, T. Lee, Y. Duan, W. Wang, O. Donini, P. Cieplak, J. Srinivasan, D. A. Case, and T. E. Cheatham, 3rd, Acc. Chem. Res., 33, 889 (2000). Calculating Structures and Free Energies of Complex Molecules: Combining Molecular Mechanics and Continuum Models.
92. J. E. Nielsen and G. Vriend, Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet., 43, 403 (2001). Optimizing the Hydrogen-bond Network in Poisson-Boltzmann Equation-based pK(a) Calculations.
93. M. J. Ondrechen, J. G. Clifton, and D. Ringe, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 98, 12473 (2001). THEMATlCS: A Simple Computational Predictor of Enzyme Function from Structure.
94. A. Onufriev, D. A. Case, and G. M. Ullmann, Biochemistry, 40, 3413 (2001). A Novel View of pH Titration in Biomolecules.
95. C. Tanford and J. G. Kirkwood, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 79, 5333 (1957). Theory of Protein Titration Curves. I. General Equations for Impenetrable Spheres.
96. H. W. T. van Vlijmen, M. Schaefer, and M. Karplus, Proteins: Struct. Fund. Genet., 33, 145 (1998). Improving the Accuracy of Protein pK(a) Calculations: Conformational Averaging versus the Average Structure.
97. A. S. Yang, M. R. Gunner, R. Sampogna, K. A. Sharp, and B. Honig, Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet., 15, 252 (1993). On the Calculation of Pk(a)s in Proteins.
98. A. S. Yang and B. Honig, J. Mol. Biol., 231, 459 (1993). On the pH Dependence of Protein Stability.
99. A. S. Yang and B. Honig, J. Mol. Biol., 237, 602 (1994). Structural Origins of pH and Ionic Strength Effects on Protein Stability-Acid Denaturation of Sperm Whale Apomyoglobin.
100. J. Antosiewicz, J. M. Briggs, A. H. Elcock, M. K. Gilson, and J. A. McCammon, J. Comput. Chem., 17, 1633 (1996). Computing Ionization States of Proteins with a Detailed Charge Model.
101. J. Antosiewicz, J. A. McCammon, and M. K. Gilson, Biochemistry, 35, 7819 (1996). The Determinants of pK(a)s in Proteins.
102. D. Bashford and M. Karplus, Biochemistry, 29, 10219 (1990). pKa's of Ionizable Groups in Proteins: Atomic Detail from a Continuum Electrostatic Model.
103. J. E. Nielsen, K. V. Andersen, B. Honig, R. W. W. Hooft, G. Klebe, G. Vriend, and R. C. Wade, Protein Eng., 12, 657 (1999). Improving Macromolecular Electrostatics Calculations.
104. M. Schaefer, M. Sommer, and M. Karplus, J. Phys. Chem., B, 101, 1663 (1997). pH-Dependence of Protein Stability: Absolute Electrostatic Free Energy Differences between Conformations.
105. H. Oberoi and N. M. Allewell, Biophys. J., 65, 48 (1993). Multigrid Solution of the Nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann Equation and Calculation of Titration Curves.
106. D. Morikis, A. H. Elcock, P. A. Jennings, and J. A. McCammon, Protein Sci., 10, 2379 (2001). Proton Transfer Dynamics of GART: The pH-dependent Catalytic Mechanism Examined by Electrostatic Calculations.
107. M. Ramanadham, L. C. Sieker, and L. H. Jensen, Acta Crystallogr. B, 46, 63 (1990). Refinement of Triclinic Lysozyme. II. The Method of Stereochemically Restrained Least Squares.
108. J. E. Nielsen and J. A. McCammon, Protein Sci., 12, 313 (2003). On the Evaluation and Optimization of Protein X-ray Structures for pKa Calculations.
109. D. J. Vocadlo, G. J. Davies, R. Laine, and S. G. Withers, Nature, 412, 835 (2001). Catalysis by Hen Egg-white Lysozyme Proceeds via a Covalent Intermediate.
110. R. Luo, L. David, and M. K. Gilson, J. Comput. Chem., 23, 1244 (2002). Accelerated Poisson-Boltzmann Calculations for Static and Dynamic Systems.
111. Q. Lu and R. Luo, J. Chem. Phys., 119, 11035 (2003). A Poisson-Boltzmann Dynamics Method with Nonperiodic Boundary Condition.
112. A. H. Elcock, J. Mol. Biol., 312, 885 (2001). Prediction of Functionally Important Residues Based Solely on the Computed Energetics of Protein Structure.
113. Z. Y. Zhu and S. Karlin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 93, 8350 (1996). Clusters of Charged Residues in Protein Three-dimensional Structures.
114. D. Murray, A. Arbuzova, G. Hangyas-Mihalyne, A. Gambhir, N. Ben-Tal, B. Honig, and S. McLaughlin, Biophys. J., 77, 3176 (1999). Electrostatic Properties of Membranes Containing Acidic Lipids and Adsorbed Basic Peptides: Theory and Experiment.
115. D. Murray and B. Honig, Mol. Cell., 9, 145 (2002). Electrostatic Control of the Membrane Targeting of C2 Domains.
116. D. Murray, L. H. Matsumoto, C. A. Buser, J. Tsang, C. T. Sigal, N. Ben-Tal, B. Honig, M. D. Resh, and S. McLaughlin, Biochemistry, 37, 2145 (1998). Electrostatics and the Membrane Association of Src: Theory and Experiment.
117. D. Murray, S. McLaughlin, and B. Honig, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 45153 (2001). The Role of Electrostatic Interactions in the Regulation of the Membrane Association of G Protein Beta Gamma Heterodimers.
118. K. Diraviyam, R. V. Stahelin, W. Cho, and D. Murray, J. Mol. Biol., 328, 721 (2003). Computer Modeling of the Membrane Interaction of FYVE Domains.
119. L. Lo Conte, C. Chothia, and J. Janin, J. Mol. Biol., 285, 2177 (1999). The Atomic Structure of Protein-protein Recognition Sites.
120. J. Janin and C. Chothia, J. Biol. Chem., 265, 16027 (1990). The Structure of Protein-protein Recognition Sites.
121. D. Xu, S. L. Lin, and R. Nussinov J. Mol. Biol., 265, 68 (1997). Protein Binding versus Protein Folding: The Role of Hydrophilic Bridges in Protein Associations.
122. V. A. Roberts, H. C. Freeman, A. J. Olson, J. A. Tainer, and E. D. Getzoff, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 13431 (1991). Electrostatic Orientation of the Electron-transfer Complex between Plastocyanin and Cytochrome c.
123. J. Novotny and K. A. Sharp, Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 58, 203 (1992). Electrostatic Fields in Antibodies and Antibody/antigen Complexes.
124. A. J. McCoy, V. Chandana Epa, and P. M. Colman, J. Mol. Biol., 268, 570 (1997). Electrostatic Complementarity at Protein/protein Interfaces.
125. S. A. Botti, C. E. Felder, J. L. Sussman, and I. Silman, Protein Eng., 11, 415 (1998). Electrotactins: A Class of Adhesion Proteins with Conserved Electrostatic and Structural Motifs.
126. C. E. Felder, S. A. Botti, S. Lifson, I. Silman, and J. L. Sussman, J. Mol. Graph. Model., 15, 318 (1997). External and Internal Electrostatic Potentials of Cholinesterase Models.
127. E. Demchuk, T. Mueller, H. Oschkinat, W. Sebald, and R. C. Wade, Protein Sci., 3, 920 (1994). Receptor Binding Properties of Four-helix-bundle Growth Factors Deduced from Electrostatic Analysis.
128. L. T. Chong, S. E. Dempster, Z. S. Hendsch, L. P. Lee, and B. Tidor, Protein Sci., 7, 206 (1998). Computation of Electrostatic Complements to Proteins: A Case of Charge Stabilized Binding.
129. T. Sulea and E. O. Purisima, Biophys. J., 84, 2883 (2003). Profiling Charge Complementarity and Selectivity for Binding at the Protein Surface.
130. N. Sinha, S. Mohan, C. A. Lipschultz, and S. J. Smith-Gill, Biophys. J., 83, 2946 (2002). Differences in Electrostatic Properties at Antibody-antigen Binding Sites: Implications for Specificity and Cross-reactivity.
131. B. Ma, T. Elkayam, H. Wolfson, and R. Nussinov, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 100, 5772 (2003). Protein-protein Interactions: Structurally Conserved Residues Distinguish between Binding Sites and Exposed Protein Surfaces.
132. K. Kinoshita, J. Furui, and H. Nakamura, J. Struct. Funct. Genom., 2, 9 (2002). Identification of Protein's Functions from a Molecular Surface Database, eF-site.
133. N. Blomberg, R. R. Gabdoulline, M. Nilges, and R. C. Wade, Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet., 37, 379 (1999). Classification of Protein Sequences by Homology Modeling and Quantitative Analysis of Electrostatic Similarity.
134. R. C. Wade, R. R. Gabdoulline, and B. A. Luty, Proteins, 31, 406 (1998). Species Dependence of Enzyme-substrate Encounter Rates for Triose Phosphate Isomerases.
135. R. C. Wade, R. R. Gabdoulline, S. K. Ludemann, and V. Lounnas, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 95, 5942 (1998). Electrostatic Steering and Ionic Tethering in Enzyme-ligand Binding: Insights from Simulations.
136. R. C. Wade, R. R. Gabdoulline, and F. De Rienzo, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 83, 122 (2001). Protein Interaction Property Similarity Analysis.
137. L. P. Lee and B. Tidor, Protein Sci., 10, 362 (2001). Optimization of Binding Electrostatics: Charge Complementarity in the Barnase-Barstar Protein Complex.
138. L. P. Lee and B. Tidor, J. Chem. Phys., 106, 8681 (1997). Optimization of Electrostatic Binding Free Energy.
139. E. Kangas and B. Tidor, Phys. Rev. E, 59, 5958 (1999). Charge Optimization Leads to Favorable Electrostatic Binding Free Energy.
140. A. M. Richard, J. Comput. Chem., 12, 959 (1991). Quantitative Comparison of Molecular Electrostatic Potentials for Structure-activity Studies.
141. C. Burt, W. G. Richards, and P. Huxley, J. Comput. Chem., 11, 1139 (1990). The Application of Molecular Similarity Calculations.
142. A. C. Good, E. E. Hodgkin, and W. G. Richards, J. Comput.-Aided Molec. Design, 6, 513 (1992). Similarity Screening of Molecular Data Sets.
143. D. R. Livesay, P. Jambeck, A. Rojnuckarin, and S. Subramaniam, Biochemistry, 42, 3464 (2003). Conservation of Electrostatic Properties within Enzyme Families and Superfamilies.
144. H. M. Berman, T. N. Bhat, P. E. Bourne, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, H. Weissig, and J. Westbrook, Nat. Struct. Biol., 7 Suppl., 957 (2000). The Protein Data Bank and the Challenge of Structural Genomics.
145. S. K. Burley, S. C. Almo, J. B. Bonanno, M. Capel, M. R. Chance, T. Gaasterland, D. Lin, A. Sali, F. W. Studier, and S. Swaminathan, Nat. Genet., 23, 151 (1999). Structural Genomics: Beyond the Human Genome Project.
146. D. Zhang, R. Konecny, N. A. Baker, and J. A. McCammon, Biopolymers, 75, 325 (2004). Electrostatic Interactions between RNA and Protein Capsid in Cowpea Chlorotic Mottle Virus Simulated by a Coarse-grain RNA Model and Monte Carlo Approach.
147. L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, Butterworth-Heinenann, Boston, Massachusetts, 1982.
148. E. J. W. Verwey and J. T. G. Overbeek, Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids, Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, New York, 1999.
149. Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver (APBS). 1999-2003. Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri. Available: http://agave.wustl.edu/apbs/
150. A. Nicholls and B. Honig, J. Comput. Chem., 12, 435 (1991). A Rapid Finite Difference Algorithm, Utilizing Successive Over-relaxation to Solve the Poisson-Boltzmann Equation.
151. A. Nicholls, K. A. Sharp, and B. Honig, Proteins, 11, 281 (1991). Protein Folding and Association: Insights from the Interfacial and Thermodynamic Properties of Hydrocarbons.
152. D. Bashford, in Scientific Computing in Object-Oriented Parallel Environments, Y. Ishikawa, R. R. Oldehoeft, J. V. W. Reynders, and M. Tholburn, Eds., Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1997, pp. 133-140. An Object-oriented Programming Suite for Electrostatic Effects in Biological Molecules.
153. J. D. Madura, J. M. Briggs, R. C. Wade, M. E. Davis, B. A. Luty, A. V. Ilin, J. Antosiewicz, M. K. Gilson, B. Bagheri, L. R. Scott, and J. A. McCammon, Comput. Phys. Commun., 91, 57 (1995). Electrostatics and Diffusion of Molecules in Solution-Simulations with the University of Houston Brownian Dynamics Program.
154. G. Vacek, J. K. Perry, and J.-M. Langlois, Chem. Phys. Lett., 310, 189 (1999). Advanced Inital-guess Algorithm for Self-consistent-field Calculations on Organometallic Systems.
155. B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus, J. Comput. Chem., 4, 187 (1983). CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, and Dynamics Calculations.
156. A. D. MacKerell, Jr., B. R. Brooks, C. L. Brooks III, L. Nilsson, B. Roux, Y. Won, and M. Karplus, in The Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, P. v. R. Schleyer, Ed. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom, 1998, p. 271. CHARMM: The Energy Function and its Parameterization with an Overview of the Program.
157. Y. Bourne, P. Taylor, and P. Marchot, Cell, 83, 503 (1995). Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition by Fasciculin: Crystal Structure of the Complex.