Protein identification and expression analysis using mass spectrometry

Trends in Microbiology

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 229-235

  Kolker, Eugene ^a   Higdon, Roger ^a   Hogan, Jason M ^a  

^a BIATECH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

DATA BASE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; IMMOBILIZED METAL AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; LABELING INDEX; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MICROORGANISM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SAMPLING; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 33646518595     PISSN: 0966842X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2006.03.005     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Washburn M.P., et al. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19 (2001) 242-247
2. Aebersold R., and Goodlett D.R. Mass spectrometry in proteomics. Chem. Rev. 101 (2001) 269-295
3. Kolker E., et al. Initial proteome analysis of model microorganism Haemophilus influenzae strain Rd KW20. J. Bacteriol. 185 (2003) 4593-4602
4. Stasyk T., and Huber L.A. Zooming in: fractionation strategies in proteomics. Proteomics 4 (2004) 3704-3716
5. Hart S.R., and Gaskell S.J. LC-tandem MS in proteome characterization. Trends in Anal. Chem. 24 (2005) 566-575
6. Garbis S., et al. Limitations of current proteomics technologies. J. Chromatogr. A. 1077 (2005) 1-18
7. Posewitz M.C., and Tempst P. Immobilized gallium(III) affinity chromatography of phosphopeptides. Anal. Chem. 71 (1999) 2883-2892
8. Mechref Y., and Novotny M.V. Structural investigations of glycoconjugates at high sensitivity. Chem. Rev. 102 (2002) 321-369
9. Shi Y., et al. The role of liquid chromatography in proteomics. J. Chromatogr. A. 1053 (2004) 27-36
10. Peng J., et al. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2 (2003) 43-50
11. MacCoss M.J., and Matthews D.E. Quantitative MS for proteomics: teaching a new dog old tricks. Anal. Chem. 77 (2005) 294A-302A
12. Oda Y., et al. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96 (1999) 6591-6596
13. Ong S.E., et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1 (2002) 376-386
14. Von Haller P.D., et al. The application of new software tools to quantitative protein profiling via isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT) and tandem mass spectrometry: II. Evaluation of tandem mass spectrometry methodologies for large-scale protein analysis, and the application of statistical tools for data analysis and interpretation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2 (2003) 428-442
15. Gygi S.P., et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17 (1999) 994-999
16. 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal. Chem. 73 (2001) 2836-2842
17. Goodlett D.R., et al. Differential stable isotope labeling of peptides for quantitation and de novo sequence derivation. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 15 (2001) 1214-1221
18. Zhang R., and Regnier F.E. Minimizing resolution of isotopically coded peptides in comparative proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1 (2002) 139-147
19. Ross P.L., et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3 (2004) 1154-1169
20. McLuckey S.A., and Wells J.M. Mass analysis at the advent of the 21st century. Chem. Rev. 101 (2001) 571-606
21. Tabb, D.L. et al. (2001) Protein Identification by SEQUEST. In Proteome Research: Mass Spectrometry (Vol. 1) (James, P., ed.), pp. 125-142, Springer
22. Dancik V., et al. De novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry. J. Comput. Biol. 6 (1999) 327-342
23. Sadygov R.G., et al. Code developments to improve the efficiency of automated MS/MS spectra interpretation. J. Proteome Res. 1 (2002) 211-215
24. Colinge J., et al. OLAV: towards high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry data identification. Proteomics 3 (2003) 1454-1463
25. Purvine S., et al. Spectral quality assessment for high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry proteomics. OMICS 8 (2004) 255-265
26. Bern M., et al. Automatic quality assessment of peptide tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20 Suppl. 1 (2004) I49-I54
27. Klammer A.A., et al. Peptide charge state determination for low-resolution tandem mass spectra. Proc. IEEE Comput. Syst. Bioinform. Conf. (2005) 175-185
28. Hogan J.M., et al. Charge state estimation for tandem mass spectrometry proteomics. OMICS 9 (2005) 233-250
29. Eng J.K., et al. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5 (1994) 976-989
30. Perkins D.N., et al. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20 (1999) 3551-3567
31. Craig R., and Beavis R.C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20 (2004) 1466-1467
32. Geer L.Y., et al. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 3 (2004) 958-964
33. Keller A., et al. Experimental protein mixture for validating tandem mass spectral analysis. OMICS 6 (2002) 207-212
34. Tabb D.L., et al. DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1 (2002) 21-26
35. Keller A., et al. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74 (2002) 5383-5392
36. Sadygov R.G., and Yates III J.R. A hypergeometric probability model for protein identification and validation using tandem mass spectral data and protein sequence databases. Anal. Chem. 75 (2003) 3792-3798
37. Anderson D.C., et al. A new algorithm for the evaluation of shotgun peptide sequencing in proteomics: support vector machine classification of peptide MS/MS spectra and SEQUEST scores. J. Proteome Res. 2 (2003) 137-146
38. Razumovskaya J., et al. A computational method for assessing peptide-identification reliability in tandem mass spectrometry analysis with SEQUEST. Proteomics 4 (2004) 961-969
39. Higdon R., et al. LIP index for peptide classification using MS/MS and SEQUEST search via logistic regression. OMICS 8 (2004) 357-369
40. Qian W.J., et al. Comparative proteome analyses of human plasma following in vivo lipopolysaccharide administration using multidimensional separations coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Proteomics 5 (2005) 572-584
41. Moore R.E., et al. Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 13 (2002) 378-386
42. Rudnick P.A., et al. Large scale analysis of MASCOT results using a Mass Accuracy-based THreshold (MATH) effectively improves data interpretation. J. Proteome Res. 4 (2005) 1353-1360
43. Lahti D.W., et al. Identification of mouse brain proteins associated with isoform 3 of metallothionein. Protein Sci. 14 (2005) 1151-1157
44. Rejtar T., et al. Increased identification of peptides by enhanced data processing of high-resolution MALDI TOF/TOF mass spectra prior to database searching. Anal. Chem. 76 (2004) 6017-6028
45. Allet N., et al. In vitro and in silico processes to identify differentially expressed proteins. Proteomics 4 (2004) 2333-2351
46. Higdon R., et al. Randomized sequence databases for tandem mass spectrometry peptide and protein identification. OMICS 9 (2005) 364-379
47. Purvine S., et al. Standard mixtures for proteome studies. OMICS 8 (2004) 79-92
48. Nesvizhskii A.I., and Aebersold R. Analysis, statistical validation and dissemination of large-scale proteomics datasets generated by tandem MS. Drug Discov. Today 9 (2004) 173-181
49. Johnson R.S., et al. Informatics for protein identification by mass spectrometry. Methods 35 (2005) 223-236
50. Nesvizhskii A.I., et al. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75 (2003) 4646-4658
51. Sadygov R.G., et al. Statistical models for protein validation using tandem mass spectral data and protein amino acid sequence databases. Anal. Chem. 76 (2004) 1664-1671
52. Eriksson J., and Fenyo D. Probity: a protein identification algorithm with accurate assignment of the statistical significance of the results. J. Proteome Res. 3 (2004) 32-36
53. Gerber S.A., et al. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 6940-6945
54. Li X.J., et al. Automated statistical analysis of protein abundance ratios from data generated by stable-isotope dilution and tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75 (2003) 6648-6657
55. Han D.K., et al. Quantitative profiling of differentiation-induced microsomal proteins using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 19 (2001) 946-951
56. MacCoss M.J., et al. A correlation algorithm for the automated quantitative analysis of shotgun proteomics data. Anal. Chem. 75 (2003) 6912-6921
57. Pang J.X., et al. Biomarker discovery in urine by proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1 (2002) 161-169
58. Liu H., et al. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 76 (2004) 4193-4201
59. Colinge J., et al. Differential proteomics via probabilistic peptide identification scores. Anal. Chem. 77 (2005) 596-606
60. Florens L., et al. A proteomic view of the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Nature 419 (2002) 520-526
61. Wang W., et al. Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling or spiked standards. Anal. Chem. 75 (2003) 4818-4826
62. Holzman T., and Kolker E. Statistical analysis of global gene expression data: some practical considerations. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 15 (2004) 52-57
63. Li C., and Wong W.H. Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 (2001) 31-36
64. Yang Y.H., et al. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (2002) e15
65. Efron B., et al. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 96 (2001) 1151-1160
66. Smyth G.K. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. (2004) 3
67. Storey J.D., and Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genome wide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 9440-9445
68. Ben-Dor A., et al. Tissue classification with gene expression profiles. J. Comput. Biol. 7 (2000) 559-583
69. Corbin R.W., et al. Toward a protein profile of Escherichia coli: comparison to its transcription profile. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 9232-9237
70. Le Roch K.G., et al. Global analysis of transcript and protein levels across the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Genome Res. 14 (2004) 2308-2318
71. Sam-Yellowe T.Y., et al. A Plasmodium gene family encoding Maurer's cleft membrane proteins: structural properties and expression profiling. Genome Res. 14 (2004) 1052-1059
72. Hall N., et al. A comprehensive survey of the Plasmodium life cycle by genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analyses. Science 307 (2005) 82-86
73. Paton M.G., et al. Structure and expression of a post-transcriptionally regulated malaria gene encoding a surface protein from the sexual stages of Plasmodium berghei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 59 (1993) 263-275
74. Roberts R.J. Identifying protein function - a call for community action. PLoS Biol. 2 (2004) E42
75. Karp P.D. Call for an enzyme genomics initiative. Genome Biol. 5 (2004) 401
76. Kolker E., et al. Global profiling of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1: expression of hypothetical genes and improved functional annotations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 2099-2104
77. Kolker E., et al. Identification and functional analysis of 'hypothetical' genes expressed in Haemophilus influenzae. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (2004) 2353-2361
78. Romine M.F., et al. Validation of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 small proteins by AMT tag-based proteome analysis. OMICS 8 (2004) 239-254
79. Ram R.J., et al. Community of a natural microbial biofilm. Science 308 (2005) 1915-1920
80. Banfield J.F., et al. Proteogenomic approaches for the molecular characterization of natural microbial communities. OMICS 9 (2005) 301-333