Replication fork progression is impaired by transcription in hyperrecombinant yeast cells lacking a functional THO complex

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 3327-3334

  Wellinger, Ralf E ^a   Prado, Félix ^a   Aguilera, Andrés ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA GALACTOSIDASE; DNA; GENE PRODUCT; MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN LEU2; PROTEIN THO; RAD52 PROTEIN; RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOGENESIS; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPLICATION; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC STABILITY; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA METABOLISM; RNA TRANSCRIPTION; YEAST CELL;

DNA REPLICATION; DNA, FUNGAL; MUTATION; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

ANIMALIA; EUKARYOTA;

EID: 33645823661     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.26.8.3327-3334.2006     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aguilera, A. 2002. The connection between transcription and genomic instability. EMBO J. 21:195-201.
2. Aguilera, A., and H. L. Klein. 1988. Genetic control of intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 1. Isolation and genetic characterization of hyper-recombination mutations. Genetics 119:779-790.
3. Brewer, B. J., and W. L. Fangman. 1988. A replication fork barrier at the 3′ end of yeast ribosomal RNA genes. Cell 55:637-643.
4. Chavez, S., and A. Aguilera. 1997. The yeast HPR1 gene has a functional role in transcriptional elongation that uncovers a novel source of genome instability. Genes Dev. 11:3459-3470.
5. Chavez, S., T. Beilharz, A. G. Rondon, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, J. Q. Svejstrup, T. Lithgow, and A. Aguilera. 2000. A protein complex containing Tho2, Hpr1, Mft1 and a novel protein, Thp2, connects transcription elongation with mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 19:5824-5834.
6. Chávez, S., M. García-Rubio, F. Prado, and A. Aguilera. 2001. Hpr1 is preferentially required for transcription of either long or G+C-rich DNA sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:7054-7064.
7. Courcelle, J., and P. C. Hanawalt. 2003. RecA-dependent recovery of arrested DNA replication forks. Annu. Rev. Genet. 37:611-646.
8. Cox, M. M. 2001. Recombinational DNA repair of damaged replication forks in Escherichia coli: questions. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35:53-82.
9. Deshpande, A. M., and C. S. Newlon. 1996. DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription. Science 272:1030-1033.
10. Gallardo, M., and A. Aguilera. 2001. A new hyperrecombination mutation identifies a novel yeast gene, THP1, connecting transcription elongation with mitotic recombination. Genetics 157:79-89.
11. Greenfeder, S. A., and C. S. Newlon. 1992. Replication forks pause at yeast centromeres. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:4056-4066.
12. Gruber, M., R. E. Wellinger, and J. M. Sogo. 2000. Architecture of the replication fork stalled at the 3′ end of yeast ribosomal genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5777-5787.
13. Guo, S., M. A. Hakimi, D. Baillat, X. Chen, M. J. Farber, A. J. Klein-Szanto, N. S. Cooch, A. K. Godwin, and R. Shiekhattar. 2005. Linking transcriptional elongation and messenger RNA export to metastatic breast cancers. Cancer Res. 65:3011-3016.
14. Hereford, L. M., M. A. Osley, T. R. Ludwig II, and C. S. McLaughlin. 1981. Cell-cycle regulation of yeast histone mRNA. Cell 24:367-375.
15. Huertas, P., and A. Aguilera. 2003. Cotranscriptionally formed DNA:RNA hybrids mediate transcription elongation impairment and transcription-associated recombination. Mol. Cell 12:711-721.
16. Hyrien, O. 2000. Mechanisms and consequences of replication fork arrest. Biochimie 82:5-17.
17. Ivessa, A. S., B. A. Lenzmeier, J. B. Bessler, L. K. Goudsouzian, S. L. Schnakenberg, and V. A. Zakian. 2003. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicase Rrm3p facilitates replication past nonhistone protein-DNA complexes. Mol. Cell 12:1525-1536.
18. Ivessa, A. S., J. Q. Zhou, V. P. Schulz, E. K. Monson, and V. A. Zakian. 2002. Saccharomyces Rrm3p, a 5′ to 3′ DNA helicase that promotes replication fork progression through telomeric and subtelomeric DNA. Genes Dev. 16:1383-1396.
19. Jimeno, S., A. G. Rondon, R. Luna, and A. Aguilera. 2002. The yeast THO complex and mRNA export factors link RNA metabolism with transcription and genome instability. EMBO J. 21:3526-3535.
20. Kelly, T. J., and G. W. Brown. 2000. Regulation of chromosome replication. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69:829-880.
21. Kobayashi, T., and T. Horiuchi. 1996. A yeast gene product, Fob1 protein, required for both replication fork blocking and recombinational hotspot activities. Genes Cells 1:465-474.
22. Lambert, S., and A. M. Carr. 2005. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers. Biochimie 87:591-602.
23. Lambert, S., A. Watson, D. M. Sheedy, B. Martin, and A. M. Carr. 2005. Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier. Cell 121:689-702.
24. Lea, D. E., and C. A. Coulson. 1949. The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 49:264-285.
25. Li, X., and J. L. Manley. 2005. Inactivation of the SR protein splicing factor ASF/SF2 results in genomic instability. Cell 122:365-378.
26. Li, Y., X. Wang, X. Zhang, and D. W. Goodrich. 2005. Human hHpr1/p84/Thoc1 regulates transcriptional elongation and physically links RNA polymerase II and RNA processing factors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:4023-4033.
27. Lisby, M., R. Rothstein, and U. H. Mortensen. 2001. Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:8276-8282.
28. Lopes, M., C. Cotta-Ramusino, A. Pellicioli, G. Liberi, P. Plevani, M. Muzi-Falconi, C. S. Newlon, and M. Foiani. 2001. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412:557-561.
29. Luna, R., S. Jimeno, M. Marin, P. Huertas, M. Garcia-Rubio, and A. Aguilera. 2005. Interdependence between transcription and mRNP processing and export, and its impact on genetic stability. Mol. Cell 18:711-722.
30. Maher, M., F. Cong, D. Kindelberger, K. Nasmyth, and S. Dalton. 1995. Cell cycle-regulated transcription of the CLB2 gene is dependent on Mcm1 and a ternary complex factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:3129-3137.
31. Mason, P. B., and K. Struhl. 2003. The FACT complex travels with elongating RNA polymerase II and is important for the fidelity of transcriptional initiation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:8323-8333.
32. McGlynn, P., and R. G. Lloyd. 2002. Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:859-870.
33. Merker, R. J., and H. L. Klein. 2002. Role of transcription in plasmid maintenance in the hpr1Δ mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:8763-8773.
34. Michel, B., G. Grompone, M. J. Flores, and V. Bidnenko. 2004. Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 12783-12788.
35. Prado, F., and A. Aguilera. 2005. Impairment of replication fork progression mediates RNA polII transcription-associated recombination. EMBO J. 24: 1267-1276.
36. Prado, F., J. I. Piruat, and A. Aguilera. 1997. Recombination between DNA repeats in yeast hpr1delta cells is linked to transcription elongation. EMBO J. 16:2826-2835.
37. Rothstein, R., B. Michel, and S. Gangloff. 2000. Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break." Genes Dev. 14:1-10.
38. Samarsky, D. A., G. Ferbeyre, E. Bertrand, R. H. Singer, R. Cedergren, and M. J. Fournier. 1999. A small nucleolar RNA:ribozyme hybrid cleaves a nucleolar RNA target in vivo with near-perfect efficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:6609-6614.
39. Santos-Rosa, H., and A. Aguilera. 1994. Increase in incidence of chromosome instability and non-conservative recombination between repeats in Saccharomyces cerevisiae hpr1 delta strains. Mol. Gen. Genet. 245:224-236.
40. Strasser, K., S. Masuda, P. Mason, J. Pfannstiel, M. Oppizzi, S. Rodriguez-Navarro, A. G. Rondon, A. Aguilera, K. Struhl, R. Reed, and E. Hurt. 2002. TREX is a conserved complex coupling transcription with messenger RNA export. Nature 417:304-308.
41. Takeuchi, Y., T. Horiuchi, and T. Kobayashi. 2003. Transcription- dependent recombination and the role of fork collision in yeast rDNA. Genes Dev. 17:1497-1506.
42. Thoma, F., L. W. Bergman, and R. T. Simpson. 1984. Nuclease digestion of circular TRP1ARS1 chromatin reveals positioned nucleosomes separated by nuclease-sensitive regions. J. Mol. Biol. 177:715-733.
43. Thomas, B. J., and R. Rothstein. 1989. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 56:619-630.
44. Wang, Y., M. Vujcic, and D. Kowalski. 2001. DNA replication forks pause at silent origins near the HML locus in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:4938-4948.
45. Wellinger, R. E., P. Schär, and J. M. Sogo. 2003. Rad52-independent accumulation of joint circular minichromosomes during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:6363-6372.
46. Zenklusen, D., P. Vinciguerra, J.-C. Wyss, and F. Stutz. 2002. Stable mRNP formation and export require cotranscriptional recruitment of the mRNA export factors Yra1p and Sub2p by Hpr1p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:8241-8253.
47. Zou, L., and S. J. Elledge. 2003. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300:1542-1548.