The relationship between food reward and satiation revisited

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 89-95

  Sclafani, Anthony ^a,b   Ackroff, Karen ^a,b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Flavor conditioning; Nutrient infusions; Sham feeding

Indexed keywords

CONDITIONING; DILUTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD PREFERENCE; INGESTION; LEARNING; MOUTH; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; REWARD; SATIETY; TUBE FEEDING;

EID: 3042687670     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.045     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric infusion of ethanol in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 68:2001;327-338
2. Azzara A.V., Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric sugar infusions in rats: maltose is more reinforcing than sucrose. Physiol. Behav. 64:1998;535-541
3. Bárdos G. Behavioral consequences of intestinal distension: aversivity and discomfort. Physiol. Behav. 45:1989;79-85
4. Bárdos G. Fluid intake and behavioral changes in rats associated with the distension of the small and large intestine. Behav. Neurosci. 111:1997;834-844
5. Booth D.A. Food-conditioned eating preferences and aversions with interoceptive elements: conditioned appetites and satieties. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 443:1985;22-41
6. Booth D.A., Lovett D., McSherry G.M. Postingestive modulation of the sweetness preference gradient in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 78:1972;485-512
7. Cabanac M., Lafrance L. Ingestive/aversive response of rats to sweet stimuli. Influence of glucose, oil, and casein hydrolyzate gastric loads. Physiol. Behav. 51:1992;139-143
8. Capaldi E.D. Hunger and conditioned flavor preferences. Capaldi E.D., Powley T.L. Taste, experience, and feeding. 1990;157-169 American Psychological Association, Washington (DC)
9. Collier G., Bolles R. Some determinants of intake of sucrose solutions. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 65:1968;379-383
10. Deutsch J.A., Molina F., Puerto A. Conditioned taste aversion caused by palatable nontoxic nutrients. Behav. Biol. 16:1976;161-174
11. Drucker D.B., Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Nutrient-conditioned flavor preference and acceptance in rats: effects of deprivation state and nonreinforcement. Physiol. Behav. 56:1994;701-707
12. Elizalde G., Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric Polycose infusions: a detailed analysis using an electronic esophagus preparation. Physiol. Behav. 47:1990;63-77
13. Feinle C., Grundy D., Read N.W. Effects of duodenal nutrients on sensory and motor responses of the human stomach to distension. Am. J. Physiol. 273:1997;G721-G726
14. Gyetvai B., Bardos G. Modulation of taste reactivity by intestinal distension in rats. Physiol. Behav. 66:1999;529-535
15. Holman G.L. Intragastric reinforcement effect. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 69:1968;432-441
16. Jacobs H.L. Studies on sugar preference: I. The preference for glucose solutions and its modification by injections of insulin. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 51:1958;304-310
17. Kulkosky P.J. Conditioned food aversions and satiety signals. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 443:1985;330-347
18. Lucas F., Ackroff K., Sclafani A. High-fat diet preference and overeating mediated by postingestive factors in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 275:1998;R1511-R1522
19. Lucas F., Azzara A.V., Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric Polycose in rats: more concentrated Polycose is not always more reinforcing. Physiol. Behav. 63:1998;7-14
20. Lucas F., Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fat infusions in rats. Physiol. Behav. 46:1989;403-412
21. Lucas F., Sclafani A. Capsaicin attenuates feeding suppression but not reinforcement by intestinal nutrients. Am. J. Physiol. 270:1996;R1059-R1064
22. Lucas F., Sclafani A. Differential reinforcing and satiating effects of intragastric fat and carbohydrate infusions in rats. Physiol. Behav. 66:1999;381-388
23. Mehiel R., Bolles R.C. Hedonic shift learning based on calories. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 26:1988;459-462
24. Mehiel R., Bolles R.C. Learned flavor preferences based on calories are independent of initial hedonic value. Anim. Learn Behav. 16:1988;383-387
25. Miller N.E., Kessen M.L. Is distention of the stomach via balloon rewarding or punishing? Am. Psychol. 99:1954;430-431
26. Mueller K., Hsiao S. Current status of cholecystokinin as a short-term satiety hormone. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2:1978;79-87
27. Myers K.P., Sclafani A. Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose: I. Intake acceptance and preference analysis. Physiol. Behav. 74:2001;481-493
28. Myers K.P., Sclafani A. Conditioned acceptance and preference but not altered taste reactivity responses to bitter and sour flavors paired with intragastric glucose infusion. Physiol. Behav. 78:2002;173-183
29. Panksepp J., Meeker R. Effects of insulin and hypothalamic lesions on glucose preference in rats. Katsuki Y., Sato M., Takagi S.F., Oomura Y. Food intake and chemical senses. 1977;343-356 University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo
30. A antagonist, blocks feeding suppression but not reinforcement by intestinal nutrients [abstract]. Appetite. 27:1996;297
31. A antagonist, attenuates the satiating but not the preference conditioning effects of intestinal carbohydrate infusions in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 59:1998;451-457
32. Pérez C., Lucas F., Sclafani A. Increased flavor preference and acceptance conditioned by the postingestive actions of glucose. Physiol. Behav. 64:1998;483-492
33. Pérez C., Sclafani A. Cholecystokinin conditions flavor preferences in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 260:1991;R179-R185
34. Puerto A., Deutsch J.A., Molina F., Roll P. Rapid rewarding effects of intragastric injections. Behav. Biol. 18:1976;123-134
35. Puerto A., Deutsch J.A., Molina F., Roll P.L. Rapid discrimination of rewarding nutrient by the upper gastrointestinal tract. Science. 192:1976;485-487
36. Revusky S.H., Smith M.H. Jr., Chalmers D.V. Flavor preference: effects of ingestion-contingent intravenous saline or glucose. Physiol. Behav. 6:1971;341-343
37. Saper C., Chou T., Elmquist J. The need to feed. Homeostatic and hedonic control of eating. Neuron. 36:2002;199-211
38. Sclafani A. Nutritionally-based learned flavor preferences in rats. Capaldi E.D., Powley T.L. Taste, experience, and feeding. 1990;139-156 American Psychological Association, Washington (DC)
39. Sclafani A. Macronutrient-conditioned flavor preferences. Berthoud H.-R., Seeley R. Neural and metabolic control of macronutrient intake. 1999;93-107 CRC Press, Boca Raton (FL)
40. Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose depend upon training and testing methods: two-bottle tests revisited. Physiol. Behav. 76:2002;633-644
41. Sclafani A., Ackroff K., Schwartz G.J. Selective effects of vagal deafferentation and celiac-superior mesenteric ganglionectomy on the reinforcing and satiating action of intestinal nutrients. Physiol. Behav. 78:2003;285-294
42. Sclafani A., Lucas F. Abdominal vagotomy does not block carbohydrate-conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Physiol. Behav. 60:1996;447-453
43. Sclafani A., Nissenbaum J.W., Ackroff K. Learned preferences for real-fed and sham-fed Polycose in rats: interaction of taste, postingestive reinforcement, and satiety. Physiol. Behav. 56:1994;331-337
44. Smith G.P. The direct and indirect controls of meal size. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 20:1996;41-46
45. Smith G.P. Satiation: from gut to brain. 1998;Oxford University Press, New York
46. Smith G.P. The controls of eating: a shift from nutritional homeostasis to behavioral neuroscience. Nutrition. 16:2000;814-820
47. Smith G.P., Gibbs J. Peripheral physiological determinants of eating and body weight. Fairburn C.G., Brownell K.D. Eating disorders and obesity. 2002;11-15 Guilford Press, New York
48. Smith G.P., Greenberg D., Corp E., Gibbs J. Afferent information in the control of eating. Obesity: towards a molecular approach. 1990;63-79 Alan R. Liss, New York
49. Tordoff M.G. Metabolic basis of learned food preferences. Friedman M.I., Tordoff M.G., Kare M.R. Appetite and nutrition. 1991;239-260 Marcel Dekker, New York
50. Van Vort W., Smith G.P. The relationship between the positive reinforcing and satiating effects of a meal in the rat. Physiol. Behav. 30:1983;279-284
51. Van Vort W., Smith G.P. Sham feeding experience produces a conditioned increase of meal size. Appetite. 9:1987;21-29
52. Warwick Z.S. Dietary fat dose dependently increases spontaneous caloric intake in rat. Obes. Res. 11:2003;859-864
53. Warwick Z.S., Bowen K.J., Synowski S.J. Learned suppression of intake based on anticipated calories: cross-nutrient comparisons. Physiol. Behav. 62:1997;1319-1324
54. Warwick Z.S., Weingarten H.P. Determinants of high-fat diet hyperphagia: experimental dissection of orosensory and postingestive effects. Am. J. Physiol. 269:1995;R30-R37
55. Warwick Z.S., Weingarten H.P. Flavor-postingestive consequence associations incorporate the behaviorally opposing effects of positive reinforcement and anticipated satiety: implications for interpreting two-bottle tests. Physiol. Behav. 60:1996;711-715
56. Weller A., Blass E.M. Cholecystokinin conditioning in rats: ontogenetic determinants. Behav. Neurosci. 104:1990;199-206