Devazepide, a CCK(A) antagonist, attenuates the satiating but not the preference conditioning effects of intestinal carbohydrate infusions in rats

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 451-457

  Pérez, Catalina ^a   Lucas, François ^a   Sclafani, Anthony ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditioning; Flavor; Intraduodenal infusions; Polycose CCK; Preference; Satiation

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; CHOLECYSTOKININ OCTAPEPTIDE; CHOLECYSTOKININ RECEPTOR; CHOLECYSTOKININ RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DEVAZEPIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDING; FEMALE; FLAVOR; INTRAPERITONEAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SATIETY; TRAINING;

EID: 0032006521     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(97)00439-5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ackroff K., Sclafani A., Axen K. V. Diabetic rats prefer glucose-paired flavors over fructose-paired flavors. Appetite. 28:1997;73-83.
2. Corwin R. L., Gibbs J., Smith G. P. Increased food intake after type A but not type B cholecystokinin receptor blockade. Physiol. Behav. 50:1991;255-258.
3. Davis J. D., Campbell C. S. Chronic, intrajugular, intraportal, gastric, and duodenal cannulae for the rat. Singh D., Avery D. D. Physiological techniques in behavioral research. 1975;163-177 Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Monterey.
4. Drucker D. B., Sclafani A. The role of gastric and postgastric sites in glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Physiol. Behav. 61:1997;351-358.
5. Fedorchak P. M., Bolles R. C. Nutritive expectancies mediate cholecystokinin's suppression-of-intake effect. Behav. Neurosci. 102:1988;451-455.
6. Gowans S. E., Weingarten H. P. Elevations of plasma glucose do not support taste-to-postingestive consequence learning. Am. J. Physiol. 261:1991;R1409-R1417.
7. Lucas F., Sclafani A. Capsaicin attenuates feeding suppression but not reinforcement by intestinal nutrients. Am. J. Physiol. 270:1996;R1059-R1064.
8. Mather P., Nicolaidis S., Booth D. A. Compensatory and conditioned feeding responses to scheduled glucose infusions in the rat. Nature. 273:1978;461-463.
9. Mehiel R. Hedonic-shift conditioning with calories. Bolles R. C. The hedonics of taste. 1991;107-126 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. Mehiel R., Bolles R. C. Hedonic shift learning based on calories. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 26:1988;459-462.
11. Mehiel R., Bolles R. C. Learned flavor preferences based on calories are independent of initial hedonic value. Anim. Learn. Behav. 16:1988;383-387.
12. Pérez C., Lucas F., Sclafani A. Carbohydrate, fat and protein condition similar flavor preferences in rats using an oral-delay conditioning procedure. Physiol. Behav. 57:1995;549-554.
13. A antagonist, blocks feeding suppression but not reinforcement by intestinal nutrients (Abstract). Appetite. 27:1996;297.
14. Pérez C., Sclafani A. Cholecystokinin conditions flavor preferences in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 260:1991;R179-R185.
15. Reidelberger R. D., O'Rourke M. F. Potent cholecystokinin antagonist L 364718 stimulates food intake in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 257:1989;R1512-R1518.
16. Reidelberger R. D., Varga G., Solomon T. E. Effects of selective cholecystokinin antagonists L364,718 and L365,260 on food intake in rats. Peptides. 12:1991;1215-1221.
17. Ritter R. C., Ladenheim E. E. Capsaicin pretreatment attenuates suppression of food intake by cholecystokinin. Am. J. Physiol. 248:1985;R501-R504.
18. Sclafani A. Conditioned food preferences. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 29:1991;256-260.
19. Sclafani A., Lucas F. Abdominal vagotomy does not block carbohydrate-conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Physiol. Behav. 60:1996;447-453.
20. Smith G. P. The satiating effect of cholecystokinin and bombesin-like peptides. Smith G. P. The structure and mechanisms of satiation. 1997;Oxford University Press, New York.
21. Strohmayer A. J., Greenberg D. Devazepide alters meal patterns in lean, but not obese, male Zucker Rats. Physiol. Behav. 56:1994;1037-1039.
22. Tordoff M. G., Friedman M. I. Hepatic-portal glucose infusions decrease food intake and increase food preference. Am. J. Physiol. 251:1986;R192-R196.
23. Vanderweele D. A., Oetting Deems R. Insulin, sham feeding, real feeding, glucostasis, and flavor preferences in the rat. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 575:1989;582-584.
24. Weijnen J. A. W. M. Lick sensors as tools in behavioral and neuroscience research. Physiol. Behav. 46:1989;923-928.
25. Weller A., Blass E. M. Cholecystokinin conditioning in rats. Ontogenetic determinants Behav. Neurosci. 104:1990;199-206.
26. Woltman T., Castellanos D. A., Reidelberger R. D. Role of cholecystokinin in the anorexia produced by duodenal delivery of oleic acid in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 269:1995;R1420-R1433.
27. Yox D. P., Brenner L., Ritter R. C. CCK-receptor antagonists attenuate suppression of sham feeding by intestinal nutrients. Am. J. Physiol. 262:1992;R554-R561.
28. Yox D. P., Stokesberry H., Ritter R. C. Vagotomy attenuates suppression of sham feeding induced by intestinal nutrients. Am. J. Physiol. 260:1991;R503-R508.