Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose in rats: More concentrated polycose is not always more reinforcing

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 7-14

  Lucas, François ^a   Azzara, Anthony V ^a   Sclafani, Anthony ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Caloric density; Carbohydrates; Postingestive reinforcement; Satiety

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE POLYMER;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; FLAVOR; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SATIETY;

EID: 0030666499     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9384(97)00364-8     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric infusions of dilute Polycose solutions. Physiol. Behav. 55:1994;957-962.
2. Ackroff K., Vigorito M., Sclafani A. Fat appetite in rats The response of infant and adult rats to nutritive and nonnutritive oil emulsions . Appetite. 15:1990;171-188.
3. Arbour K. J., Wilkie D. M. Rodents' (Rattus, Mesocricetus, and Meriones) use of learned caloric information in diet selection. J. Comp. Psychol. 102:1988;177-181.
4. Bolles R. C., Hayward L., Crandall C. Conditioned taste preferences based on caloric density. J. Exp. Psychol. [Anim. Behav. Proc.]. 7:1981;59-69.
5. Booth D. A. Conditioned satiety in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 81:1972;457-471.
6. Booth D. A., Lovett D., McSherry G. M. Postingestive modulation of the sweetness preference gradient in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 78:1972;485-512.
7. Capaldi E. D., Owens J., Palmer K. A. Effects of food deprivation on learning and expression of flavor preferences conditioned by saccharin or sucrose. Anim. Learn. Behav. 22:1994;173-180.
8. Collier G., Bolles R. Some determinants of intake of sucrose solutions. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 65:1968;379-383.
9. Davis J. D. The effectiveness of some sugars in stimulating licking behavior in the rat. Physiol. Behav. 11:1973;39-45.
10. Davis J. D., Smith G. P. Learning to sham feed Behavioral adjustments to loss of physiological postingestive stimuli . Am. J. Physiol. 259:1990;R1228-R1235.
11. Drucker D. B., Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Nutrient-conditioned flavor preference and acceptance in rats Effects of deprivation state and nonreinforcement . Physiol. Behav. 56:1994;701-707.
12. Drucker D. B., Sclafani A. The role of gastric and postgastric sites in glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Physiol. Behav. 61:1997;351-358.
13. Elizalde G., Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric Polycose A detailed analysis using an electronic esophagus preparation . Physiol. Behav. 47:1990;63-77.
14. Gibson E. L., Booth D. A. Acquired protein appetite in rats Dependence on a protein-specific state . Experientia. 42:1986;1003-1004.
15. Hamilton C. L. Rat's preference for high fat diets. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 58:1964;459-460.
16. Hayward L. The role of oral and postingestive cues in the conditioning of taste preferences based on differing caloric density and caloric outcome in weanling and mature rats. Anim. Learn. Behav. 11:1983;325-331.
17. Lucas F., Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fat infusions in rats. Physiol. Behav. 46:1989;403-412.
18. Marlin N. A. Early exposure to sugars influences the sugar preference of the adult rat. Physiol. Behav. 31:1983;619-623.
19. Mehiel R., Bolles R. C. Learned flavor preferences based on caloric outcome. Anim. Learn. Behav. 12:1984;421-427.
20. Mindell S., Smith G. P., Greenberg D. Corn oil and mineral oil stimulate sham-feeding in rats. Physiol. Behav. 48:1990;283-287.
21. Nissenbaum J. W., Sclafani A. Sham-feeding response of rats to Polycose and sucrose. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 11:1987;215-222.
22. Pérez C., Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Carbohydrate- and protein-conditioned flavor preferences Effects of nutrient preloads . Physiol. Behav. 59:1996;467-474.
23. Pérez, C.; Sclafani, A. Glucose-conditioned flavor preference and acceptance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Ingestive Behavior. Baltimore, MD, July 1997.
24. Post D. M. Detection of differences in nutrient concentrations by eastern woodrats (Neotoma floridana). J. Mamm. 74:1993;493-497.
25. Sclafani A. Carbohydrate taste, appetite, and obesity An overview . Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 11:1987;131-153.
26. Sclafani A. How food preferences are learned - laboratory animal models. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 54:1995;419-427.
27. Sclafani A., Ackroff K. Glucose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats Taste versus postingestive conditioning . Physiol. Behav. 56:1994;399-405.
28. Sclafani A., Cardieri C., Tucker K., Blusk D., Ackroff K. Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 265:1993;R320-R325.
29. Sclafani A., Nissenbaum J. W. Robust conditioned flavor preference produced by intragastric starch infusions in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 255:1988;R672-R675.
30. Sclafani A., Nissenbaum J. W., Ackroff K. Learned preferences for real-fed and sham-fed Polycose in rats Interaction of taste, postingestive reinforcement, and satiety . Physiol. Behav. 56:1994;331-337.
31. Sclafani A., Nissenbaum J. W., Vigorito M. Starch preference in rats. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 11:1987;253-262.
32. Smith J. C., Foster D. F. Some determinants of intake of glucose + saccharin solutions. Physiol. Behav. 25:1980;127-133.
33. Warwick, Z. S.; Jarkowiec, K.; Grabill, L. K., III. Flavor-cued anticipated satiety: Cross-nutrient comparisons (Abstr.). Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 22:452; 1996.
34. Warwick Z. S., Weingarten H. P. Dissociation of palatability and caloric effects in learned flavor preferences. Physiol. Behav. 55:1994;501-504.
35. Warwick Z. S., Weingarten H. P. Flavor-postingestive consequence associations incorporate the behaviorally opposing effects of positive reinforcement and anticipated satiety Implications for interpreting two-bottle tests . Physiol. Behav. 60:1996;711-715.
36. Weingarten H. P., Kulikovsky O. T. Taste-to-postingestive consequence conditioning Is the rise in sham feeding with repeated experience a learning phenomenon? Physiol. Behav. 45:1989;471-476.
37. Woods S. C. The eating paradox How we tolerate food . Psychol. Rev. 98:1991;488-505.