Prediction of CASP6 structures using automated Robetta protocols

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 61, Issue SUPPL. 7, 2005, Pages 157-166

  Chivian, Dylan ^a   Kim, David E ^a   Malmström, Lars ^a   Schonbrun, Jack ^b   Rohl, Carol A ^c   Baker, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

De novo modeling; Fragment assembly; Homology modeling; Parametric alignment ensemble; Rosetta

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AUTOMATION; CASP6 SYSTEM; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONFERENCE PAPER; INTERNET; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; ROBETTA SERVER; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTERS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DIMERIZATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 30344443955     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20733     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Kinch LN, Wrabl JO, Krishna SS, Majumdar I, Sadreyev RI, Qi Y, Pei J, Cheng H, Grishin NV. CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:395-409.
2. Aloy P, Stark A, Hadley C, Russell RB. Predictions without templates: new folds, secondary structure, and contacts in CASP5. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:436-456.
3. Fischer D, Rychlewski L, Dunbrack Jr. RL, Ortiz AR, Elofsson A. CAFASP3: the third critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:503-516.
4. Chivian D, Kim DE, Malmstrom L, Bradley P, Robertson T, Murphy P, Strauss CE, Bonneau R, Rohl CA, Baker D. Automated prediction of CASP5 structures using the Robetta server. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:524-533.
5. Kim DE, Chivian D, Baker D. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(Web Server issue):W526-531.
6. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
7. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999;34:82-95.
8. Goldberg ME. Tertiary structure of Escherichia coli beta-D-galactosidase. J Mol Biol 1969;46:441-446.
9. Wetlaufer DB. Nucleation, rapid folding, and globular intrachain regions in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973;70:697-701.
10. Richardson JS. The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. Adv Protein Chem 1981;34:167-339.
11. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
12. Schaffer AA, Aravind L, Madden TL, Shavirin S, Spouge JL, Wolf YI, Koonin EV, Altschul SF. Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:2994-3005.
13. Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Li Z, Li W, Godzik A. FFAS03: a server for profile-profile sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33(Web Server issue):W284-8.
14. Rychlewski L, Jaroszewski L, Li W, Godzik A. Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci 2000;9:232-241.
15. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1015-1018.
16. Bateman A, Coin L, Durbin R, Finn RD, Hollich V, Griffiths-Jones S, Khanna A, Marshall M, Moxon S, Sonnhammer EL, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(Database issue):D138-141.
17. Bonneau R, Tsai J, Ruczinski I, Chivian D, Rohl C, Strauss CE, Baker D. Rosetta in CASP4: progress in ab initio protein structure prediction. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:119-126.
18. Bonneau R, Strauss CE, Rohl CA, Chivian D, Bradley P, Malmstrom L, Robertson T, Baker D. De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families. J Mol Biol 2002;322:65-78.
19. Carugo O, Pongor S. A normalized root-mean-square distance for comparing protein three-dimensional structures. Protein Sci 2001;10:1470-1473.
20. Bradley P, Chivian D, Meiler J, Misura KM, Rohl CA, Schief WR, Wedemeyer WJ, Schueler-Furman O, Murphy P, Schonbrun J, et al. Rosetta predictions in CASP5: successes, failures, and prospects for complete automation. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:457-468.
21. Waterman MS. Parametric and ensemble sequence alignment algorithms. Bull Math Biol 1994;56:743-767.
22. Jaroszewski L, Li W, Godzik A. In search for more accurate alignments in the twilight zone. Protein Sci 2002;11:1702-1713.
23. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.
24. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 1998;14:846-856.
25. Meiler J, Mueller M, Zeidler A, Schmaeschke F. JUFO: secondary structure prediction for proteins, http://www.jens-meuer.de/; 2002.
26. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Chivian D, Baker D. Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with rosetta. Proteins 2004;55:656-677.
27. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 2004;383:66-93.
28. John B, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3982-3992.
29. Contreras-Moreira B, Fitzjohn PW, Bates PA. In silico protein recombination: enhancing template and sequence alignment selection for comparative protein modelling. J Mol Biol 2003;328:593-608.
30. Petrey D, Xiang Z, Tang CL, Xie L, Gimpelev M, Mitros T, Soto CS, Goldsmith-Fischman S, Kernytsky A, et al. Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:430-435.
31. Dunbrack RL Jr., Cohen FE. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci 1997;6:1661-1681.
32. Kuhlman B, Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:10383-10388.
33. Canutescu AA, Dunbrack RL Jr., Cyclic coordinate descent: a robotics algorithm for protein loop closure. Protein Sci 2003;12:963-972.
34. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:10915-10919.
35. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
36. McGuffin LJ, Jones DT. Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition. Bioinformatics 2003;19:874-881.
37. Jones DT. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 1999;287:797-815.
38. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 2001;310:243-257.
39. Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJ. Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. J Mol Biol 2000;299:499-520.
40. Fischer D. Hybrid fold recognition: combining sequence derived properties with evolutionary information. Pac Symp Biocomput 2000:119-130.
41. Ginalski K, von Grotthuss M, Grishin NV, Rychlewski L. Detecting distant homology with Meta-BASIC. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(Web Server issue):W576-581.
42. Taylor WR. Protein structural domain identification. Protein Eng 1999;12:203-216.
43. Plewczynski D, Pas J, von Grotthuss M, Rychlewski L. 3D-Hit: fast structural comparison of proteins. Appl Bioinformatics 2002;1:223-225.
44. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370-3374.
45. Ortiz AR, Strauss CE, Olmea O. MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci 2002;11:2606-2621.
46. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.