Exploration of phylogenetic data using a global sequence analysis method

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 5, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Chapus, Charles ^a,b   Dufraigne, Christine ^a   Edwards, Scott ^b   Giron, Alain ^a   Fertil, Bernard ^a   Deschavanne, Patrick ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); GAMMAPROTEOBACTERIA;

DNA; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; RAG-1 PROTEIN; RIBOSOME RNA; RNA 16S; RNA 18S;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GAMMAPROTEOBACTERIA; GENETICS; GENOME; HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER; HUMAN; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENE; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA; GAMMAPROTEOBACTERIA; GENE TRANSFER, HORIZONTAL; GENES, PLANT; GENOME; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 18S; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 28844458060     PISSN: 14712148     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-5-63     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Lecointre G, Le Guyader H: Classification phylogénétique du vivant. Paris, Belin; 2001:544.
2. Felsenstein J: Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981, 17:368-376.
3. Li WH: Molecular Evolution. Sinauer edition. Edited by: Sinauer A., Sinauer; 1997:487.
4. Higgins DG, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ: Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments. Methods Enzymol 1996, 266:383-402.
5. Brocchieri L: Phylogenetic inferences from molecular sequences: review and critique. Theor Popul Biol 2001, 59:27-40.
6. Russo CAM, Takezaki N, Nei M: Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:525-536.
7. Billoud B, Guerrucci MA, Masselot M, Deutsch JS: Cirripede phylogeny using a novel approach: molecular morphometrics. Mol Biol Evol 2000, 17:1435-1445.
8. Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Grishin NV, Tatusov RL, Koonin EV: Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades. BMC Evol Biol 2001, 1:8.
9. Korbel JO, Snel B, Huynen MA, Bork P: SHOT: a web server for the construction of genome phylogenies. Trends Genet 2002, 18:158-162.
10. Tekaia F, Lazcano A, Dujon B: The genomic tree as revealed from whole proteome comparisons. Genome Res 1999, 9:550-557.
11. Daubin V, Gouy M, Perrière G: A phylogenetic approach to bacterial phylogeny: evidence of a core of genes sharing a common history. Genome Research 2002, 12:1080-1090.
12. Gupta RS: Protein phylogenies and signature sequences: a reappraisal of evolutionary relationships among Archaebacteria, Eubacteria and Eukaryotes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1998, 62:1435-1491.
13. Rivera MC, Lake JA: Evidence that eukaryotes and eocyte prokaryotes are immediate relatives. Science 1992, 257:74-76.
14. Karlin S, Burge C: Dinucleotide relative abundance extremes: a genomic signature. Trends In Genetics 1995, 11:283-290.
15. Pride DT, Meinersmann RJ, Wassenaar TM, Blaser MJ: Evolutionary implications of microbial genome tetranucleotide frequency biases. Genome Res 2003, 13:145-158.
16. Yu ZG, Jiang P: Distance, correlation and mutual information among portraits of organisms based on complete genomes. Phys Lett A 2001, 286:34-46.
17. Qi J, Wang B, Hao BI: Whole proteome prokaryote phylogeny without sequence alignment: a K-string composition approach. J Mol Evol 2004, 58:1-11.
18. Stuart GW, Moffett K, Leader JJ: A comprehensive vertebrate phylogeny using vector representations of protein sequences from whole genomes. Mol Biol Evol 2002, 19:554-562.
19. Deschavanne PJ, Giron A, Vilain J, Fagot G, Fertil B: Genomic signature: characterization and classification of species assessed by Chaos Game Representation of sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 1999, 16:1391-1399.
20. Deschavanne P, Giron A, Vilain J, Dufraigne C, Fertil B: Genomic signature is preserved in short DNA fragments. BIBE2000 IEEE international Symposium on bio-informatics & biomedical engineering, Washington USA, 8-10 november 2000 2000:161-167.
21. Chapus C, Fertil B, Edwars S, Giron A, Deschavanne P: Classification of species based on DNA style: ; Berlin, Germany. Edited by: Spang R, Béziat P and Vingron M. ; 2003:147-148.
22. Karlin S: Bacterial DNA strand compositional asymmetry. Trends Microbiol 1999, 7:305-308.
23. Karlin S, Mràzek J, Campbell AM: Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications. J Bact 1997, 179:3899-3913.
24. Edwards SV, Fertil B, Giron A, Deschavanne PJ: A genomic schism in birds revealed by phylogenetic analysis of DNA strings. Syst Biol 2002, 51:599-613.
25. Wang Y, Hill K, Singh S, Kari L: The spectrum of genomic signatures: from dinucleotides to chaos game representation. Gene 2005, 346:173-185.
26. Guénoche A, Garreta H: Can We Have Confidence in a Tree Representation?: 2001; Montpelier, France. Volume 2066. Edited by: Gascuel O and Sagot MF. Springer; 2000:45-56.
27. Daubin V, Gouy M, Perriere G: A phylogenomic approach to bacterial phylogeny: evidence of a core of genes sharing a common history. Genome Res 2002, 12:1080-1090.
28. Lerat E, Daubin V, Moran NA: From gene trees to organismal phylogeny in prokaryotes: the case of the g-proteobacteria. PLOS Biology 2003, 1:101-109.
29. Buneman P: Mathematics in the Archeological and Historial Sciences. Edited by: Hobson FR, Kendall DG and Tautu P. Edinburgh, University Press; 1971:387.
30. Robinson DF, Foulds LR: Comparaison of phylogenetic trees. Math Biosci 1981, 53:131-147.
31. Kuhner MK, Felsenstein J: A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol Biol Evol 1994, 11:459-468.
32. Penny D, Hendy MD: The use of tree comparaison metrics. Systematic Zoology 1985, 34:75-82.
33. Kumar S: A stepwise algorithm for finding minimum evolution trees. Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:584-593.
34. Ranwez V, Gascuel O: Quartet-based phylogenetic inference: improvements and limits. Mol Biol Evol 2001, 18:1103-1116.
35. Gascuel O: http://www.lirmm.fr/∼w3ifa/MAAS/USMAAS.html. .
36. Rambaut A, Grassly NC: Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput Appl Biosci 1997, 13:235-238.
37. Gascuel O: Getting a Tree Fast: Neighbor Joining and Distance Based Methods. In Current Protocols in Bioinformatics Edited by: Baxevanis A, Davison D, Page R, Stein L, Stormo G and Petsko G., Wiley & Sons; 2004:6.3.1-6.3.18.
38. Greenhalgh P, Steiner LA: Recombination activating gene 1 (Rag1) in zebrafish and shark. Immunogenetics 1995, 41:54-55.
39. Sibley CG, Ahlquist JA: Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. New Haven, Yale University Press; 1990.
40. Feil EJ, Holmes EC, Bessen DE, Chan MS, Day NP, Enright MC, Goldstein R, Hood DW, Kalia A, Moore CE, Zhou J, Spratt BG: Recombination within natural populations of pathogenic bacteria: short-term empirical estimates and long-term phylogenetic consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98:182-187.
41. Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Wolf PG, Nickrent DL, Chaw SM, Chapman RL: The phylogeny of land plants inferred from 18S rDNA sequences: pushing the limits of rDNA signal? Mol Biol Evol 1999, 16:1774-1784.
42. Chaw SM, Parkinson CL, Cheng Y, Vincent TM, Palmer JD: Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97:4086-4091.
43. Crane PR: Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of the angiosperms. Ann Mo Bot Gard 1985, 72:716-793.
44. Doyle JA: Seed plant phylogeny and the relationshipsof Gnetales. Int J Plant Sci 1996, 157:S3-S39.
45. Doyle JA: Molecules, morphology, fossils, and the relationship of angiosperms and Gnetales. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1998, 9:448-462.
46. Doyle JA, Donoghue MJ: Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of the angiosperms: an experimental cladistic approach. Bot Rev 1986, 52:321-431.
47. Doyle JA, Donoghue MJ, Zimmer EA: Integration of morphological and ribosomal RNA data on the origin of the angiosperms. Ann Mo Bot Gard 1994, 81:419-450.
48. Doyle JA: Phylogeny of vascular plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst Biol 1998, 29:567-569.
49. Källersjö M, Farris JS, Chase W, Bremer B, Fay MF, Humpries CJ, Petersen G, Seberg O, Bremer K: Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538 rbcl DNA sequences reveals upport for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants and flowering plants. Plant Syst Evol 1998, 213:2599-2287.
50. Kenrick P, Crane PR: The origin and early evolution of plants on land. nature 1997, 389:33-39.
51. Manhart JR: Phylogenetic analysis of green plant rbcL sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1994, 3:114-127.
52. Manhart JR: Chloroplast 16S rDNA sequences and phylogeneic relationships of ferns and fern allies. Am Fern J 1995, 85:182-192.
53. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB: Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 2003, 425:798-804.
54. Gray MW, Burger G, Lang BF: Mitochondrial evolution. Science 1999, 283:1476-1481.
55. Dufraigne C, Fertil B, Lespinats S, Giron A, Deschavanne P: Detection and characterization of horizontal transfers in prokaryotes using genomic signature. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:e6.
56. Garcia-Vallve S, Guzman E, Montero MA, Romeu A: HGT-DB: a database of putative horizontally transferred genes in prokaryotic complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 2003, 31:187-189.
57. Nakamura Y, Itoh T, Matsuda H, Gojobori T: Biased biological functions of horizontally transferred genes in prokaryotic genomes. Nature Genetics 2004, 36:760-766.
58. Lanyon SM: Detecting internal inconsistencies in distance data. Systematic Zoology 1985, 34:397-403.
59. Felsenstein J: Cases in wich parsimony or compability methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 1978, 27:401-410.
60. Moran NA, Mira A: The process of genome shrinkage in the obligate symbiont Buchnera aphidicola. Genome Biol 2001, 2:RESEARCH0054.
61. Itoh T, Martin W, Nei M: Acceleration of genomic evolution caused by enhanced mutation rate in endocellular symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:12944-12948.
62. Yu ZG, Anh V, Lau KS: Measure representation and multifracta analysis of complete genomes. Phys Rev E 2001, 64:1-9.
63. Jeffrey HJ: Chaos game representation of gene structure. Nucleic Acids Research 1990, 18:2163-2170.
64. Krause A, Stoye J, Vingron M: The SYSTERS protein sequence cluster set. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:270-272.
65. GIB: http://gib.genes.nig.ac.jp/. .
66. Felsenstein J: PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) 3.6. 2004.
67. Felsenstein J: Confidence limits on phylogenies : an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 4:783-791.
68. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4:406-425.
69. Fitch WM: On the problem of discovery the most parsimonious tree. Am Nat 1977, 111:223-257.
70. Swofford DL: PAUP*, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). 4th edition. , Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts; 2003.