Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 525-536

  Russo, Claudia A M ^a,b   Takezaki, Naoko ^a   Nei, Masatoshi ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

maximum likelihood; maximum parsimony; minimum evolution; molecular phylogeny; mtDNA genes; neighbor joining; vertebrate species

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; DECISION THEORY; DNA RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; VERTEBRATE;

ANURA; CETACEA; DIDELPHIDAE; GALLUS GALLUS; MARMOSA; OSTEICHTHYES; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0030045281     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025613     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. ADACHI, J., and M. HASEGAWA. 1994. MOLPHY: programs for molecular phylogenetics, version 2.2. Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo.
2. ADKINS, R. M., and R. L. HONEYCUTT. 1994. Evolution of the primate cytochrome c oxidase subunit II gene. J. Mol. Evol. 38:215-231.
3. AKAIKE, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. AC-19:716-723.
4. ANDERSON, S., H. L. DEBRULIN, A. R. COULSON, I. C. EPERON, F. SANGER, and I. G. YOUNG. 1982. The complete sequence of bovine mitochondrial DNA: conserved features of the mammalian mitochondrial genome. J. Mol. Biol. 156:683-717.
5. ÁRNASON, Ú., and A. GULLBERG. 1993. Comparison between the complete mtDNA sequences of the blue and fin whale, two species that can hybridize in nature. J. Mol. Evol. 37: 312-322.
6. ÁRNASON, Ú., A. GULLBERG, and B. WIDEGREN. 1991. The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the fin whale, Balaenoptera physalus. J. Mol. Evol. 33:556-568.
7. BIBB, M. J., R. A. VAN ETTEN, C. T. WRIGHT, M. W. WALBERG, and D. A. CLAYTON. 1981. Sequence and gene organization of mouse mitochondrial DNA. Cell 26:167-180.
8. CANTATORE, P., M. ROBERTI, G. PESOLE, A. LUDOVICO, F. MILELLA, M. N. GADALETA, and C. SACCONE. 1994. Evolutionary analysis of cytochrome b sequences in some perciformes: evidence for a slower rate of evolution than in mammals. J. Mol. Evol. 39:589-597.
9. CAO, Y., J. ADACHI, and M. HASEGAWA. 1994. Eutherian phylogeny as inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Jpn. J. Genet. 69:455-472.
10. CAO, Y., J. ADACHI, A. JANKE, S. PÄABO, and M. HASEGAWA. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: instability of a tree based on a single gene. J. Mol. Evol. 39:519-527.
11. CARROLL, R. L. 1988. Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. Freeman, New York.
12. CHANG, Y.-S., E-L. HUANG, and T.-B. Lo. 1994. The complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization of carp (Cyprinus carpio) mitochondrial genome. J. Mol. Evol. 38:138-155.
13. CUMMINGS, M. P., S. P. OTTO, and J. WAKELEY. 1995. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:814-822.
14. DAYHOFF, M. O., R. M. SCHWARTZ, and B. C. ORCUTT. 1978. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. Pp. 345-352 in M. O. DAYHOFF, ed. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, v. 5. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.
15. DESJARDINS, P., and R. MORAIS. 1990. Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome: a novel gene order in higher vertebrates. J. Mol. Biol. 212:599-634.
16. ECK, R. V, and M. O. DAYHOFF. 1966. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. Natl. Biomed. Res. Foundation, Silverspring, Maryland.
17. EDWARDS, A. W. F. 1995. Assessing molecular phylogenies. Science 267:253.
18. FARRIS, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5:417-419.
19. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
20. _. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
21. FUKAMI-KOBAYASHI, K., and Y. TATENO. 1991. Robustness of maximum likelihood tree estimation against different patterns of base substitutions. J. Mol. Evol. 32:79-91.
22. GADALETA, G., G. PEPE, G. DE CANDIA, C. QUAGLIARIELLO, E. SBISÁ. and C. SACCONE. 1989. The complete nucleotide sequence of the Rattus norvegicus mitochondrial genome: cryptic signals revealed by comparative analysis between vertebrates. J. Mol. Evol. 28:497-516.
23. GAUT, B. S., and P. O. LEWIS. 1995. Success of maximum likelihood phylogeny inference in the four-taxon case. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:152-162.
24. GINGERICH, P. D., S. M. RAZA, M. ARIF, M. ANWAR, and X. ZHOU. 1994. New whale from the Eocene of Pakistan and the origin of cetacean swimming. Nature 368:844-847.
25. GINGERICH, P. D., B. H. SMITH, and E. L. SIMONS. 1990. Hind limbs of Eocene Basilosaurus: evidence of feet in whales. Science 249:154-157.
26. GOLDSTEIN, D. B., and D. D. POLLOCK. 1994. Least squares estimation of molecular distance - noise abatement in phylogenetic reconstruction. Theor. Pop. Biol. 45:219-226.
27. GOODMAN, M., A. E. ROMERO-HERRERA, H. DENE, J. CZELUSNIAK, and R. E. TASHIAN. 1982. Amino acid sequence evidence on the phylogeny of primates and other eutherians. Pp. 115-191 in M. GOODMAN, ed. Macromolecular Sequences in Systematic and Evolutionary Biology. Plenum Press, New York.
28. HASEGAWA, M., and M. FUJIWARA. 1993. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, maximum-parsimony, and neighbor-joining methods for estimating protein phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:1-5.
29. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, and T. YANO. 1985. Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160-174.
30. HEDGES, S. B. 1994. Molecular evidence for the origin of birds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2621-2624.
31. HIGGINS, D. G., A. J. BLEASBY, and R. FUCHS. 1992. CLUSTAL V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment. CABIOS 8:189-191.
32. HILLIS, D. M., J. P. HUELSENBACK, and C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 1994. Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. Science 264:671-677.
33. HONEYCUTT, R. L., M. A. NEDBAL, R. M. ADKINS, and L. L. JANECEK. 1995. Mammalian mitochondrial DNA evolution: a comparison of the cytochrome b and cytochrome c oxidase II genes. J. Mol. Evol. 40:260-272.
34. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1995. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44:17-48.
35. JANKE, A., G. FELDMAIER-FUCHS, W. K. THOMAS, A. VON HAESELER, and S. PÄÄBO. 1994. The marsupial mitochondrial genome and the evolution of placental mammals. Genetics 137:243-256.
36. JONES, D. T., W. R. TAYLOR, and J. M. THORNTON. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. CABIOS 8:275-282.
37. KISHINO, H., and M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
38. _. 1990. Converting distance to time: application to human evolution. Methods Enzymol. 183:550-570.
39. KOCHER, T. D., and A. C. WILSON. 1991. Sequence evolution of mitochondrial DNA in human and chimpanzees: control region and a protein-coding region. Pp. 391-413 in S. OsAWA and T. HONJO, eds. Evolution of Life. Springer-Verlag, New York.
40. KUHNER, M. K., and J. FELSENSTEIN. 1994. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:459-468.
41. KUMAR, S., K. TAMURA, and M. NEI. 1993. MEGA: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis, version 1.01. Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Penn.
42. NEI. M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press. New York.
43. _. 1991. Relative efficiencies of different tree-making methods for molecular data. Pp. 90-128 in M. M. MIYAMOTO and J. CRACRAFT, eds. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. Oxford University Press, New York.
44. NEI, M., E TAJIMA, and Y. TATENO. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data. J. Mol. Evol. 19:153-170.
45. NEI, M., and N. TAKEZAKI. 1994. Estimation of genetic distances and phylogenetic trees from DNA analysis. Proc. 5th World Cong. Genet. Appl. Livestock Prod. 21:405-412.
46. NEI, M., N. TAKEZAKI, and T. SITNIKOVA. 1995. Assessing molecular phylogenies. Science 267:253-255.
47. NOVACEK, M. J. 1992. Mammalian phylogeny: shaking the tree. Nature 356:121-125.
48. PENNY, D., and M. D. HENDY. 1985. The use of tree comparison metrics. Syst. Zool. 34:75-82.
49. ROBINSON, D. E, and L. R. FOULDS. 1981. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci. 53:131-147.
50. ROE, B. A., D.-R MA, R. K. WILSON, and J. F.-H WONG. 1985. The complete nucleotide sequence of the Xenopus laevis mitochondrial genome. J. Biol. Chem. 260:9759-9774.
51. RZHETSKY, A., and M. NEI. 1992. A simple method for estimating and testing minimum-evolution trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:945-967.
52. _. 1993. Theoretical foundation of the minimum-evolution method of phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 1073-1095.
53. _. 1994. METREEl a program package for inferring and testing minimum-evolution trees. CABIOS 10:409-412.
54. SAITOU, N., and T. IMANISHI. 1989. Relative efficiencies of the Fitch-Margoliash, maximum-parsimony, maximum-likelihood, minimum-evolution, and neighbor-joining methods of phylogenetic tree construction in obtaining the correct tree. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:514-525.
55. SAITOU, N., and M. NEI. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425.
56. SCHONIGER, M., and A. VON HAESELER. 1993. A simple method to improve the reliability of tree reconstructions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:471-483.
57. SIMON, C., E FRATI, A. BECKENBACH, B. CRESPI, H. LIU, and P. FLOOK. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:651-701.
58. SOURDIS, J., and C. KRIMBAS. 1987. Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence dita. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:159-166.
59. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. University of Illinois, Champaign.
60. TAJIMA, E, and N. TAKEZAKI. 1994 Estimation of evolutionary distance for reconstructing molecular phylogenetic trees. Mol .Biol. Evol. 11:278-286.
61. TATENO, Y., N. TAKEZAKI, and M. NEI. 1994. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:261-277.
62. TZENG, C.-S., C.-E HUI, S.-C. SHEN, and P. C. HUANG. 1992. The complete nucleotide sequence of the Crossostoma lacustre mitochondrial genome: conservation and variations among vertebrates. Nucleic Acid Res. 20:4853-4858.
63. YANG, Z. 1994. Statistical properties of the maximum likelihood method of phylogenetic estimation and comparison with distance matrix methods. Syst. Biol. 43:329-342.
64. _. 1995. Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. PAML, version 1.0. Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Penn.
65. _. 1996. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods. J. Mol. Evol. (in press)
66. YANG, Z., N. GOLDMAN, and A. FRIDAY. 1994. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:316-324.
67. YANG, Z., N. GOLDMAN, and A. FRIDAY. 1995. Maximum likelihood trees from DNA sequences: a peculiar statistical estimation problem. Syst. Biol. 44:384-399.