The role of justice in team member satisfaction with the leader and attachment to the team

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 316-325

  Phillips, Jean M ^a   Douthitt, Elizabeth A ^b   Hyland, Mary Anne M ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MALE; ORGANIZATION; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SATISFACTION; SOCIAL JUSTICE; STUDENT;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; MALE; ORGANIZATIONAL AFFILIATION; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL JUSTICE; STUDENTS;

EID: 85047683654     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.316     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural justice and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177-197.
2. Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Barrett-Howard, E., & Tyler, T. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 50, 296-304.
5. Bass, B. M. (1981). Stogdill's handbook of leadership (rev. ed.). New York: Free Press.
6. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
7. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43-55.
8. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1, 160-169.
9. Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1988). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and group resistance to disruption. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 10, 199-213.
10. Brehmer, B., & Hagafors, R. (1986). Use of experts in complex decision making: A paradigm for the study of staff work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 181-195.
11. Brockner, J., Siegel, P. A., Daly, J. P., Tyler, T., & Martin, C. (1997). When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 558-583.
12. Conlon, D. E., & Ross, W. H. (1997). Appearances do count: The effects of outcomes and explanations on disputant fairness judgments and supervisory evaluations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 5-31.
13. Davis, J. H. (1992). Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Select examples, 1950-1990. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 3-38.
14. Drake, B., & Mitchell, T. (1977). The effects of vertical and horizontal power on individual motivation and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 573-591.
15. Durham, C. C., Knight, D., & Locke, E. A. (1997). Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 203-231.
16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543-576.
17. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18. Folger, R., & Greenberg, G. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 3, 141-183.
19. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. K. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
20. Folger, R., & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531-546.
21. Gilliland, S. W. (1992). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective (test fairness). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
22. Gilliland, S. W. (1994). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691-701.
23. Greenberg, J. (1987). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 55-61.
24. Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Greenberg, J., & Tyler, T. R. (1987). Why procedural justice in organizations? Social Justice Research, 1, 127-142.
26. Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26, 497-520.
27. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30. Hendrix, W. H., Robbins, T., Miller, J., & Summers, T. P. (1998). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on factors predictive of turnover. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 611-632.
31. Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 292-316.
32. 2 simulation. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance, assessment, and measurement: Theory, research and applications (pp. 111-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Jackofsky, E. F. (1984). Turnover and job performance: An integrated process model. Academy of Management Review, 9, 74-83.
34. Jones, E. E. (1964). Ingratiation. New York: Meredith.
35. Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams. New York: HarperCollins Business.
36. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1993). Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 502-526.
37. Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 60-84.
38. Landy, F. J., Barnes, J. L., & Murphy, K. R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 751-754.
39. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
40. Locke, E. A., & Schweiger, D. M. (1979). Participation in decision making: One more look. In B. M. Shaw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 265-339). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
42. Miller, K. I., & Monge, P. R. (1986). Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 727-753.
43. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 15, 210-227.
44. Phillips, J. M. (1999). Antecedents of leader utilization of staff input in decision making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 215-242.
45. Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 51-71.
46. Seashore, S. E., Lawler, E. E., Mirvis, P., & Camman, C. (Eds.). (1982). Observing and measuring organizational change: A guide to field practice. New York: Wiley.
47. Shapiro, D. L. (1993). Reconciling theoretical differences among procedural justice research by re-evaluating what it means to have one's views "considered": Implications for third party managers. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 51-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49. Sundstrom, E., DeMeuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
50. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Thompson, W. C. (1993). Research on jury decision making: The state of the science. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 203-218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52, 333-344.
53. Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642-655.
54. Tyler, T., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
55. Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A., & Spodick, N. (1985). Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72-81.
56. Wagner, J. A., III, & Gooding, R. Z. (1987). Shared influence and organizational behavior: A meta-analysis of situational variables expected to moderate participation-outcomes relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 524-541.
57. Widmeyer, W. N., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (1985). The measurement of cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. London, Ontario, Canada: Sports Dynamics.
58. Zeffane, R. M. (1994). Correlates of job satisfaction and their implications for work redesign: A focus on the Australian telecommunications industry. Public Personnel Management, 23, 61-75.