At the crossroads of growth control; making ribosomal RNA

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 210-217

  Moss, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

CE; CF; Core factor; Core promoter element; HDAC; Histone deacetylase; NORs; Nucleolar organiser regions; PolI; Regulator of nucleolar silencing and telophase exit; RENT; Ribosomal RNA; RNA polymerase I; rRNA; Selectivity factor 1; SL1; TATA box binding protein; TBP

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME RNA;

BIOGENESIS; CANCER INHIBITION; CELL CYCLE; CELL GROWTH; CELL SIZE; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE REPRESSION; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GROWTH REGULATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RIBOSOME; RNA SYNTHESIS; RNA TRANSCRIPTION; YEAST CELL;

CELL SIZE; GENE SILENCING; GROWTH; RNA POLYMERASE I; RNA POLYMERASE II; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; YEASTS;

EID: 1942471135     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2004.02.005     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Wittenberg C., La Valle R. Cell-cycle-regulatory elements and the control of cell differentiation in the budding yeast. Bioessays. 25:2003;856-867.
2. Saucedo L.J., Edgar B.A. Why size matters: altering cell size. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 12:2002;565-571.
3. Ruggero D., Pandolfi P.P. Does the ribosome translate cancer? Nat Rev Cancer. 3:2003;179-192.
4. Rodnina M.V., Wintermeyer W. Peptide bond formation on the ribosome: structure and mechanism. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 13:2003;334-340.
5. Nomura M. Ribosomal RNA genes, RNA polymerases, nucleolar structures, and synthesis of rRNA in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 66:2001;555-565.
6. •].
7. •].
8. •] contain current reviews of the mammalian PolI field, differing in opinions, interpretations and choice of data.
9. Olson M.O.J., Dundr M., Szebeni A. The nucleolus: an old factory with unexpected capabilities. Trends Cell Biol. 10:2000;189-196.
10. Visintin R., Amon A. The nucleolus: the magician's hat for cell cycle tricks. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 12:2000;372-377.
11. Sherr C.J., Weber J.D. The ARF/p53 pathway. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 10:2000;94-99.
12. Tsai R.Y., McKay R.D. A nucleolar mechanism controlling cell proliferation in stem cells and cancer cells. Genes Dev. 16:2002;2991-3003.
13. Stefanovsky V.Y., Pelletier G., Hannan R., Gagnon-Kugler T., Rothblum L.I., Moss T. An immediate response of ribosomal transcription to growth factor stimulation in mammals is mediated by ERK phosphorylation of UBF. Mol Cell. 8:2001;1063-1073 The authors used the technique of metabolic pulse labelling to demonstrate that the endogenous mammalian rRNA genes respond to growth factor stimulation by immediately increasing rRNA production. Transcription was shown to be enhanced three/four-fold within 10 min of EGF or tamoxifen treatment of human and mouse cell cultures. Cells carrying a tamoxifen-responsive Raf fusion, MEK1/2 inhibitors and a dominant negative ERK were all used to demonstrate that activation of the Raf-MEK-ERK cascade was both necessary and sufficient for this effect. UBF was shown to be phosphorylated by ERK both in vitro and in vivo and the sites were mapped. This phosphorylation was shown to be essential for ERK enhancement of rRNA transcription as three independent UBF mutants that prevented its phosphorylation by ERK also blocked ERK enhancement of transcription. Thus, this manuscript changed the contemporarily accepted notion that increased rRNA gene transcription was a very late response to changes in growth rate and it provided a mechanism for growth-factor regulation of rRNA gene transcription.
14. Boukhgalter B., Liu M., Guo A., Tripp M., Tran K., Huynh C., Pape L. Characterization of a fission yeast subunit of an RNA polymerase I essential transcription initiation factor, SpRrn7h/TAF(I)68, that bridges yeast and mammals: association with SpRrn11h and the core ribosomal RNA gene promoter. Gene. 291:2002;187-201.
15. Lin C.W., Moorefield B., Payne J., Aprikian P., Mitomo K., Reeder R.H. A novel 66-kilodalton protein complexes with Rrn6, Rrn7, and TATA-binding protein to promote polymerase I transcription initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 16:1996;6436-6443.
16. Steffan J.S., Keys D.A., Dodd J.A., Nomura M. The role of TBP in rDNA transcription by RNA polymerase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: TBP is required for upstream activation factor-dependent recruitment of core factor. Genes Dev. 10:1996;2551-2563.
17. Aprikian P., Moorefield B., Reeder R.H. New model for the yeast RNA polymerase I transcription cycle. Mol Cell Biol. 21:2001;4847-4855.
18. Bordi L., Cioci F., Camilloni G. In vivo binding and hierarchy of assembly of the yeast RNA polymerase I transcription factors. Mol Biol Cell. 12:2001;753-760.
19. Heix J., Zomerdijk J.C.B.M., Ravanpay A., Tjian R., Grummt I. Cloning of murine RNA polymerase I-specific TAF factors: Conserved interactions between the subunits of the species-specific transcription initiation factor TIF-IB/SL1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:1997;1733-1738.
20. Iben S., Tschochner H., Bier M., Hoogstraten D., Hozak P., Egly J.M., Grummt I. TFIIH plays an essential role in RNA polymerase I transcription. Cell. 109:2002;297-306.
21. Bradsher J., Auriol J., Proietti de Santis L., Iben S., Vonesch J.L., Grummt I., Egly J.M. CSB is a component of RNA pol I transcription. Mol Cell. 10:2002;819-829.
22. Zurita M., Merino C. The transcriptional complexity of the TFIIH complex. Trends Genet. 19:2003;578-584.
23. Stefanovsky V.Y., Pelletier G., Bazett-Jones D.P., Crane-Robinson C., Moss T. DNA looping in the RNA polymerase I enhancesome is the result of non-cooperative in-phase bending by two UBF molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2001;3241-3247.
24. Panov K.I., Friedrich J.K., Zomerdijk J.C. A step subsequent to preinitiation complex assembly at the ribosomal RNA gene promoter is rate limiting for human RNA polymerase I-dependent transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 21:2001;2641-2649.
25. Gadal O., Labarre S., Boschiero C., Thuriaux P. Hmo1, an HMG-box protein, belongs to the yeast ribosomal DNA transcription system. EMBO J. 21:2002;5498-5507.
26. Thomas J.O., Travers A.A. HMG1 and 2, and related 'architectural' DNA-binding proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 26:2001;167-174.
27. O'Sullivan A.C., Sullivan G.J., McStay B. UBF binding in vivo is not restricted to regulatory sequences within the vertebrate ribosomal DNA repeat. Mol Cell Biol. 22:2002;657-668 Using ChIP assays to map the sites of DNA interaction of PolI, SL1 and UBF, these authors very convincingly demonstrated that in mouse, human and Xenopus cells, UBF is distributed rather equally throughout the whole rRNA gene repeat. As expected, PolI was found to be restricted to the 47S sequences and SL1 to the promoter. These data are fully consistent with several studies showing the lack of DNA sequence specificity in UBF-DNA complex formation and with the structural classification of its HMG1-box folds. The manuscript adds considerable weight to the idea that UBF defines an rRNA gene chromatin. Unfortunately, UBF is often erroneously referred to in the literature as a PolI promoter specific factor and often has unrealistic DNA sequence specific binding properties bestowed on it.
28. Conconi A., Widmer R.M., Koller T., Sogo J.M. Two different chromatin structures coexist in ribosomal RNA genes throughout the cell cycle. Cell. 57:1989;753-761 This paper presented the revolutionary idea that a pool of inactive rRNA genes exists in mammalian cells. Subsequent work, reviewed in [29], showed this to be common to most, if not all, eukaryotes. Enhanced accessibility to psoralen has often erroneously been suggested to differentiate active and potentially active genes - that is, those with an 'open' chromatin configuration - on the one hand from epigenetically silenced ones on the other. In fact, enhanced psoralen accessibility occurs only within actively transcribed rRNA gene regions - even untranscribed spacer regions of active genes being indistinguishable from those of inactive genes ([29]; V Stefanovsky, T Moss, unpublished). Thus, psoralen accessibility cannot be used to differentiate an untranscribed but potentially active rRNA gene from an epigenetically silenced one.
29. Lucchini R, Sogo JM: The dynamic structure of ribosomal RNA gene chromatin. In Transcription of Ribosomal Genes by Eukaryotic RNA Polymerase I. Edited by Paule MR: Landes Bioscience; 1998:255-276.
30. Kobayashi T., Heck D.J., Nomura M., Horiuchi T. Expansion and contraction of ribosomal DNA repeats in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: requirement of replication fork blocking (Fob1) protein and the role of RNA polymerase I. Genes Dev. 12:1998;3821-3830.
31. Tartof KD, Hawley RS: bb: bobbed. In The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster, edn 2. Edited by Lindsley DL, Zimm GG: Academic Press; 1992:68-71.
32. French S.L., Osheim Y.N., Cioci F., Nomura M., Beyer A.L. In exponentially growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells, rRNA synthesis is determined by the summed RNA polymerase I loading rate rather than by the number of active genes. Mol Cell Biol. 23:2003;1558-1568.
33. Sandmeier J.J., French S., Osheim Y., Cheung W.L., Gallo C.M., Beyer A.L., Smith J.S. RPD3 is required for the inactivation of yeast ribosomal DNA genes in stationary phase. EMBO J. 21:2002;4959-4968 A key publication showing that, in yeast, transcription regulation and gene inactivation are separate phenomena. Psoralen crosslinking is used to show that little or no change in actively transcribed gene number occurs on PolI transcription down-regulation in the absence of histone deacetylase Rpd3p.
34. Iizuka M., Smith M.M. Functional consequences of histone modifications. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 13:2003;154-160.
35. ••] in that it suggests that Rpd3-directed deacetylation and gene shut-down are required for transcription regulation.
36. ••] showed that in late stationary phase the actively transcribed gene number does reduce very significantly.
37. Pelletier G., Stefanovsky V.Y., Faubladier M., Hirschler-Laszkiewicz I., Savard J., Rothblum L.I., Côté J., Moss T. Competitive recruitment of CBP and Rb-HDAC regulates UBF acetylation and ribosomal transcription. Mol Cell. 6:2000;1059-1066.
38. Rusche L.N., Kirchmaier A.L., Rine J. The establishment, inheritance, and function of silenced chromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Biochem. 72:2003;481-516.
39. Vu L., Siddiqi I., Lee B.S., Josaitis C.A., Nomura M. RNA polymerase switch in transcription of yeast rDNA: role of transcription factor UAF (upstream activation factor) in silencing rDNA transcription by RNA polymerase II. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:1999;4390-4395.
40. ••].
41. ••]. If this is the case, these data also demonstrate that termination of PolI transcription does not occur in the so-called non-transcribed spacer 1 (NTS1), as is presently supposed.
42. Huang J., Moazed D. Association of the RENT complex with nontranscribed and coding regions of rDNA and a regional requirement for the replication fork block protein Fob1 in rDNA silencing. Genes Dev. 17:2003;2162-2176 The authors demonstrate that Sir2p-dependent inhibition of rRNA gene recombination and PolII silencing are independent phenomena and show that both Net1 and Sir2p components of the RENT complex associate with transcriptionally engaged PolI.
43. Gross D.S. Sir proteins as transcriptional silencers. Trends Biochem Sci. 26:2001;685-686.
44. Hoppe G.J., Tanny J.C., Rudner A.D., Gerber S.A., Danaie S., Gygi S.P., Moazed D. Steps in assembly of silent chromatin in yeast: Sir3-independent binding of a Sir2/Sir4 complex to silencers and role for Sir2-dependent deacetylation. Mol Cell Biol. 22:2002;4167-4180.
45. Kadosh D., Struhl K. Histone deacetylase activity of Rpd3 is important for transcriptional repression in vivo. Genes Dev. 12:1998;797-805.
46. Suka N., Carmen A.A., Rundlett S.E., Grunstein M. The regulation of gene activity by histones and the histone deacetylase RPD3. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 63:1998;391-399.
47. Smith J.S., Caputo E., Boeke J.D. A genetic screen for ribosomal DNA silencing defects identifies multiple DNA replication and chromatin-modulating factors. Mol Cell Biol. 19:1999;3184-3197.
48. Smith J.S., Brachmann C.B., Pillus L., Boeke J.D. Distribution of a limited Sir2 protein pool regulates the strength of yeast rDNA silencing and is modulated by Sir4p. Genetics. 149:1998;1205-1219.
49. •].
50. •] the authors use genetic analyses and ChIP assays in yeast to show that the Set1p methylase induces PolII silencing in the rRNA gene locus by methylating histone H3 at lysine 4. This silencing mechanism is independent of silencing by the Sir2p deacetylase. However, when both mechanisms are functional their effect is not at all additive. Indeed, Set1p silencing appears to compete with Sir2p silencing of the rRNA genes.
51. Honjo T., Reeder R.H. Preferential transcription of Xenopus laevis ribosomal RNA in interspecies hybrids between Xenopus laevis and Xenopus mulleri. J Mol Biol. 80:1973;217-228.
52. Sullivan G.J., Bridger J.M., Cuthbert A.P., Newbold R.F., Bickmore W.A., McStay B. Human acrocentric chromosomes with transcriptionally silent nucleolar organizer regions associate with nucleoli. EMBO J. 20:2001;2867-2877.
53. Chen Z.J., Pikaard C.S. Epigenetic silencing of RNA polymerase I transcription: a role for DNA methylation and histone modification in nucleolar dominance. Genes Dev. 11:1997;2124-2136.
54. Grummt I., Pikaard C.S. Epigenetic silencing of RNA polymerase I transcription. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 4:2003;641-649.
55. Macleod D., Bird A. Transcription in oocytes of highly methylated ribosomal DNA from Xenopus laevis sperm. Nature. 306:1983;200-203.
56. Santoro R., Grummt I. Molecular mechanisms mediating methylation- dependent silencing of ribosomal gene transcription. Mol Cell. 8:2001;719-725.
57. Zhou Y., Santoro R., Grummt I. The chromatin remodeling complex NoRC targets HDAC1 to the ribosomal gene promoter and represses RNA polymerase I transcription. EMBO J. 21:2002;4632-4640.
58. ••] the authors first established that methylation of the CpG at -133 in the mouse PolI promoter inactivates transcription in a transient transfection assay. Previous data had shown that the PolI transcription termination factor TTF-I, which binds to a promoter adjacent site (Figure 1), recruits the ISWI-related chromatin remodelling complex NoRC. This complex was shown to contain an HDAC1 histone deacetylase activity and CpG methyl-transferases DNMT1 and 3b were shown by coIP to interact with Tip5, a component of NoRC. Promoter methylation was shown to correlate with hypoacetylation of H4 and with enhanced H3-K9 methylation.
59. McStay B., Reeder R.H. A termination site for Xenopus RNA polymerase I also acts as an element of an adjacent promoter. Cell. 47:1986;913-920.
60. Grummt I., Kuhn A., Bartsch I., Rosenbauer H. A transcription terminator located upstream of the mouse rDNA initiation site affects rRNA synthesis. Cell. 47:1986;901-911.
61. Moss T., Larose A-M., Mitchelson K., Leblanc B. Readthrough enhancement and promoter occlusion on the ribosomal genes of Xenopus laevis. Biochem Cell Biol. 70:1992;324-331.
62. Langst G., Blank T.A., Becker P.B., Grummt I. RNA polymerase I transcription on nucleosomal templates: The transcription termination factor TTF-I induces chromatin remodeling and relieves transcriptional repression. EMBO J. 16:1997;760-768.
63. Meier A., Livingstone-Zatchej M., Thoma F. Repair of active and silenced rDNA in yeast: the contributions of photolyase and transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair. J Biol Chem. 277:2002;11845-11852.
64. Heix J., Vente A., Voit R., Budde A., Michaelidis T.M., Grummt I. Mitotic silencing of human rRNA synthesis: inactivation of the promoter selectivity factor SL1 by cdc2/cyclin B-mediated phosphorylation. EMBO J. 17:1998;7373-7381.
65. Zhai W., Comai L. Repression of RNA polymerase I transcription by the tumor suppressor p53. Mol Cell Biol. 20:2000;5930-5938.
66. Hannan K.M., Hannan R.D., Smith S.D., Jefferson L.S., Lun M., Rothblum L.I. Rb and p130 regulate RNA polymerase I transcription: Rb disrupts the interaction between UBF and SL-1. Oncogene. 19:2000;4988-4999.
67. Voit R., Hoffmann M., Grummt I. Phosphorylation by G1-specific cdk-cyclin complexes activates the nucleolar transcription factor UBF. EMBO J. 18:1999;1891-1899.
68. Hannan K.M., Brandenburger Y., Jenkins A., Sharkey K., Cavanaugh A., Rothblum L., Moss T., Poortinga G., McArthur G.A., Pearson R.B.et al. mTOR-dependent regulation of ribosomal gene transcription requires S6K1 and is mediated by phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal activation domain of the nucleolar transcription factor UBF. Mol Cell Biol. 23:2003;8862-8877 The authors study the role of mTOR in the activation of rRNA gene transcription by serum in NIH3T3 and related cells. Rapamycin inhibition of mTOR and specific inhibition of p70S6 kinase prevent serum activation as measured by the PolI loading density on the rRNA genes. Rapamycin insensitive, constitutively activated p70S6 kinase was shown to rescue transcription activation, whereas a dominant negative p70S6 kinase blocked serum activation. In vitro, PolI transcription was shown to be inhibited in extracts from rapamycin-treated cells. Transcription could be rescued by C-terminally phosphorylated UBF, but not by active Rrn3(TIF-IA). These data showed that serum activation of rRNA gene transcription requires TOR and p70S6 kinase as well as the C-terminal phosphorylation of UBF. The identity of the kinase that C-terminally phosphorylates UBF may be casein kinase II but this remains in doubt.
69. Tuan J.C., Zhai W.G., Comai L. Recruitment of TATA-binding protein-TAF, complex SL1 to the human ribosomal DNA promoter is mediated by the carboxy-terminal activation domain of upstream binding factor (UBF) and is regulated by UBF phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol. 19:1999;2872-2879.
70. Hannan R., Stefanovsky V., Arino T., Rothblum L., Moss T. Cellular regulation of ribosomal DNA transcription: both rat and Xenopus UBF1 stimulate rDNA transcription in 3T3 fibroblasts. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:1999;1205-1213.
71. Brandenburger Y., Arthur J.F., Woodcock E.A., Du X.J., Gao X.M., Autelitano D.J., Rothblum L.I., Hannan R.D. Cardiac hypertrophy in vivo is associated with increased expression of the ribosomal gene transcription factor UBF. FEBS Lett. 548:2003;79-84.
72. Matsui T., Onishi T., Muramatsu M. Nucleolar DNA-dependent RNA polymerase from rat liver. 2. Two forms and their physiological significance. Eur J Biochem. 71:1976;361-368.
73. Paule M.R., Iida C.T., Perna P.J., Harris G.H., Knoll D.A., D'Alessio J.M. In vitro evidence that eukaryotic ribosomal RNA transcription is regulated by modification of RNA polymerase I. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:1984;8161-8180.
74. Bateman E., Paule M.R. Regulation of eukaryotic ribosomal RNA transcription by RNA polymerase modification. Cell. 47:1986;445-450.
75. Tower J., Sollner-Webb B. Transcription of mouse rDNA is regulated by an activated subform of RNA polymerase I. Cell. 50:1987;873-883.
76. Yamamoto R.T., Nogi Y., Dodd J.A., Nomura M. RRN3 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes an essential RNA polymerase I transcription factor which interacts with the polymerase independently of DNA template. EMBO J. 15:1996;3964-3973.
77. Moorefield B., Greene E.A., Reeder R.H. RNA polymerase I transcription factor Rrn3 is functionally conserved between yeast and human. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:2000;4724-4729.
78. Bodem J., Dobreva G., Hoffmann-Rohrer U., Iben S., Zentgraf H., Delius H., Vingron M., Grummt I. TIF-IA, the factor mediating growth-dependent control of ribosomal RNA synthesis, is the mammalian homolog of yeast Rrn3p. EMBO Rep. 1:2000;171-175.
79. Milkereit P., Tschochner H. A specialized form of RNA polymerase I, essential for initiation and growth-dependent regulation of rRNA synthesis, is disrupted during transcription. EMBO J. 17:1998;3692-3703.
80. Peyroche G., Milkereit P., Bischler N., Tschochner H., Schultz P., Sentenac A., Carles C., Riva M. The recruitment of RNA polymerase I on rDNA is mediated by the interaction of the A43 subunit with Rrn3. EMBO J. 19:2000;5473-5482.
81. Miller G., Panov K.I., Friedrich J.K., Trinkle-Mulcahy L., Lamond A.I., Zomerdijk J.C. hRRN3 is essential in the SL1-mediated recruitment of RNA Polymerase I to rRNA gene promoters. EMBO J. 20:2001;1373-1382.
82. Cavanaugh A.H., Hirschler-Laszkiewicz I., Hu Q., Dundr M., Smink T., Misteli T., Rothblum L.I. Rrn3 phosphorylation is a regulatory checkpoint for ribosome biogenesis. J Biol Chem. 277:2002;27423-27432 The authors studied the posttranslational changes in Rrn3 that render it inactive during transcription. Most importantly for the present purposes, in vitro complementation experiments demonstrated that endogenous rat Rrn3 is inactivated by cycloheximide but not dexamethasone treatments and that active Rrn3 could not complement the transcriptionally defective extracts from dexamethasone-treated cells. Thus, a second PolI-associated activity, previously named TFIC, exists in rat and probably other mammals.
83. Hirschler-Laszkiewicz I., Cavanaugh A.H., Mirza A., Lun M., Hu Q., Smink T., Rothblum L.I. Rrn3 becomes inactivated in the process of ribosomal DNA transcription. J Biol Chem. 278:2003;18953-18959.
84. Borukhov S., Severinov K. Role of the RNA polymerase sigma subunit in transcription initiation. Res Microbiol. 153:2002;557-562.
85. Dvir A., Conaway J.W., Conaway R.C. Mechanism of transcription initiation and promoter escape by RNA polymerase II. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 11:2001;209-214.
86. Zhao J., Yuan X., Frodin M., Grummt I. ERK-dependent phosphorylation of the transcription initiation factor TIF-IA is required for RNA polymerase I transcription and cell growth. Mol Cell. 11:2003;405-413.
87. Maller J.L., Schwab M.S., Roberts B.T., Gross S.D., Taieb F.E., Tunquist B.J. The pathway of MAP kinase mediation of CSF arrest in Xenopus oocytes. Biol Cell. 93:2001;27-33.
88. Sugimoto M., Kuo M.L., Roussel M.F., Sherr C.J. Nucleolar Arf tumor suppressor inhibits ribosomal RNA processing. Mol Cell. 11:2003;415-424.
89. Itahana K., Bhat K.P., Jin A., Itahana Y., Hawke D., Kobayashi R., Zhang Y. Tumor suppressor ARF degrades B23, a nucleolar protein Involved in ribosome biogenesis and cell proliferation. Mol Cell. 12:2003;1151-1164.
90. Strohner R., Nemeth A., Nightingale K.P., Grummt I., Becker P.B., Langst G. Recruitment of the nucleolar remodeling complex NoRC establishes ribosomal DNA silencing in chromatin. Mol Cell Biol. 24:2004;1791-1798.