Parametric phylogenetics?

Systematic Biology

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 817-829

  Sanderson, Michael J ^a   Kim, Junhyong ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0034351397     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351500750049860     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. ADACHI, J., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1996. Instability of quartet analyses of molecular sequence data by the maximum likelihood method: the Cetacea/Artiodactyla relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 6:72-76.
2. ADLEMAN, L. M. 1998. Computing with DNA. Sci. Am. 279:54-61.
3. BAKKE, E., AND A. VON HAESELER. 1999. Distance measures in terms of substitution process. Theor. Popul. Biol. 55:166-175.
4. BARNETT, V. 1999. Comparative statistical inference, 3rd edition. Wiley, New York.
5. BOGART, K. P. 1990. Introductory combinatorics, 2nd edition. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, San Diego.
6. BRUNO, W. J., AND A. L. HALPERN. 1999. Topological bias and inconsistency of maximum likelihood using wrong models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:564-566.
7. BUCKLAND, S. T., K. P. BURNHAM, AND N. H. AUGUSTIN. 1997. Model selection: An integral part of inference. Biometrics 53:603-618.
8. BURNHAM, K. P., AND D. R. ANDERSON. 1998. Model selection and inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York.
9. CHANG, J. T. 1996a. Full reconstruction of Markov models on evolutionary trees: Identifiability and consistency. Math. Biosci. 137:51-73.
10. CHANG, J. T. 1996b. Inconsistency of evolutionary tree topology reconstruction methods when substitution rates vary across characters. Math. Biosci. 134:189-215.
11. COVER, T. M., AND J. A. THOMAS. 1991. Elements of information theory. Wiley, New York.
12. CUNNINGHAM, C. W., H. ZHU, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1998. Best-fit maximum-likelihood models for phylogenetic inference: empirical tests with known phylogenies. Evolution 52:978-987.
13. DOPAZO, J., AND J. M. CARAZO. 1997. Phylogenetic reconstruction using an unsupervised growing neural network that adopts the topology of a phylogenetic tree. J. Mol. Evol. 44:226-233.
14. EDWARDS, A. W. F. 1992. Likelihood, 2nd edition. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore.
15. EDWARDS, A. W. F. 1995. Assessing molecular phylogenies. Science 267:253.
16. FARRIS, J. S. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. Pages 7-36 in Advances in cladistics, volume 2 (N. Platnick and V. Funk, eds.). Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
17. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. A likelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 16:183-196.
18. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1983. Statistical inference of phylogenies. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 146:246-272.
19. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: Inference and reliability. Annu. Rev. Genet. 22:521-565.
20. FELSENSTEIN, J., AND E. SOBER. 1986. Parsimony and likelihood: An exchange. Syst. Zool. 35:617-626.
21. FUKAMI-KOBAYASHI, Y., AND Y. TATENO. 1991. Robustness of maximum likelihood estimation against different patterns of base substitutions. J. Mol. Evol. 32:79-91.
22. GAREY, M. R., AND D. S. JOHNSON. 1979. Computers and intractability. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
23. GAUT, B. S., AND P. O. LEWIS. 1995. Success of maximum likelihood phylogeny inference in the four-taxon case. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:152-162.
24. GILLESPIE, J. H. 1991. The causes of molecular evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, London.
25. GOLDMAN, N. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of phylogenetic trees, with special reference to a Poisson process model of DNA substitution and to parsimony analyses. Syst. Zool. 39:345-361.
26. GOLDMAN, N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36:182-198.
27. GOLDMAN, N., J. L. THORNE, AND D. T. JONES. 1998. Assessing the impact of secondary structure and solvent accessibility on protein evolution. Genetics 149:445-458.
28. HÄRDLE, W. 1990. Applied nonparametric regression. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
29. HILLIS, D. M. 1996. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383:130-131.
30. HILLIS, D. M., J. P. HUELSENBECK, AND C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 1994. Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. Science 264:671-677.
31. HUBER, P. J. 1981. Robust statistics. Wiley, New York.
32. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1995. The robustness of two phylogenetic methods: Four-taxon simulations reveal a slight superiority of maximum likelihood over neighbor-joining. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:843-849.
33. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1998. Systematic bias in phylogenetic analysis: Is the Strepsiptera problem solved? Syst. Biol. 47:519-537.
34. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1997. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:437-466.
35. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND R. NIELSEN. 1999. Variation in the pattern of nucleotide substitution across sites. J. Mol. Evol. 48:86-93.
36. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND B. RANNALA. 1997. Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science 276:227-232.
37. JERMIIN, L. S., G. J. OLSEN, K. L. MENGERSEN, AND S. EASTEAL. 1997. Majority-rule consensus of phylogenetic trees obtained by maximum-likelihood analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1296-1302.
38. KÄLLERSJÖ, M., J. S. FARRIS, M. W. CHASE, B. BREMER, M. F. FAY, C. J. HUMPHRIES, G. PETERSEN, O. SEBERG, AND K. BREMER. 1998. Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538 rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants and flowering plants. Plant. Syst. Evol. 213:259-287.
39. KISHINO, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
40. KITCHING, I. J., P. L. FOREY, C. J. HUMPHRIES, AND D. M. WILLIAMS. 1998. Cladistics: The theory and practice of parsimony analysis, 2nd edition. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
41. KRAJEWSKI, C., M. G. FAIN, L. BUCKLEY, AND D. G. KING. 1999. Dynamically heterogeneous partitions and phylogenetic inference: an evaluation of analytical strategies within cytochrome b and ND6 gene sequences in cranes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13:302-313.
42. KUHNER, M. K., AND J. FELSENSTEIN. 1994. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:459-468.
43. LARGET, B., AND D. L. SIMON. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759.
44. LEHMANN, E. L. 1983. Theory of point estimation. Wiley and Son, New York.
45. LEITNER, T., AND W. M. FITCH. 1999. The phylogenetics of known transmission histories. Pages 315-345 in The evolution of HIV (K. A. Crandall, ed.). Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore.
46. LEWIS, L. A., B. D. MISHLER, AND R. VILGALYS. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the liverworts (Hepaticae), a basal embryophyte lineage, inferred from nucleotide sequence data of the chloroplast gene rbcL. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:377-393.
47. LEWIS, P. O. 1998a. Maximum likelihood as an alternative to parsimony for inferring phylogeny using nucleotide sequence data. Pages 132-163 in Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing (D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle, eds.). Kluwer, Boston.
48. LEWIS, P. O. 1998b. A genetic algorithm for maximum-likelihood phylogeny inference using nucleotide sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:277-283.
49. LI, W.-H. 1997. Molecular evolution. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
50. MADDISON, D. R., M. D. BAKER, AND K. A. OBER. 1999. Phylogeny of carabid beetles as inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Syst. Entomol. 24:103-138.
51. MILLER, A. J. 1990. Subset selection in regression. Chapman and Hall, New York.
52. NAYLOR, G. J. P., AND W. M. BROWN. 1998. Amphioxys mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny, and the limits of inference based on on comparisons of sequences. Syst. Biol. 47:61-76.
53. NEI, M. 1991. Relative efficiencies of different tree-making methods for molecular data. Pages 90-128 in Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences (M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
54. NEI, M., N. TAKEZAKI, AND T. SITNOKOVA. 1995. Assessing molecular phylogenies. Science 267:253-254.
55. NEYMAN, J. 1971. Molecular studies of evolution: A source of novel statistical problems. Pages 1-27 in Statistical decision theory (S. S. Gupta and J. Yaeckel, eds.). Academic Press, New York.
56. NOETHER, G. E. 1967. Elements of nonparametric statistics. J. Wiley and Sons, New York.
57. PAGE, R. D. M. 1996. On consensus, confidence, and "total evidence". Cladistics 12:83-92.
58. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
59. PRESS, W. H., B. P. FLANNERY, S. A. TEUKOLSKY, AND W. T. VETTERLING. 1988. Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
60. RAMABAUT, A., AND N. C. GRASSLY. 1997. Seq-Gen: An application for the Monte-Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238.
61. REEVES, J. H. 1992. Heterogeneity in the substitution process of amino acid sites of proteins coded for by mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 35:17-31.
62. RIJK, P., Y. VAN DE PEER, AND R. DE WACHTER. 1998. The rRNA WWW server. Univ. Antwerp, The Netherlands.
63. ROGERS, J. S., AND D. L. SWOFFORD. 1998. A fast method for approximating maximum likelihoods of phylogenetic trees from nucleotide sequences. Syst. Biol. 47:77-89.
64. ROGERS, J. S., AND D. L. SWOFFORD. 1999. Multiple local maxima for likelihoods of phylogenetic trees: A simulation study. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1079-1085.
65. ROYALL, R. 1997. Statistical evidence. Chapman and Hall, New York.
66. RUSSO, C. A. M., N. TAKEZAKI, AND M. NEI. 1996. Efficiencies of different genes and tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:525-536.
67. RZHETSKY, A., AND M. NEI. 1993. Theoretical foundation of the minimum-evolution method of phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1073-1095.
68. RZHETSKY, A., AND T. SITNIKOVA. 1996. When is it safe to use an oversimplified substitution model in tree-making? Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1255-1265.
69. SAITOU, N., AND M. NEI. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425.
70. SANDERSON, M. J. 1997. A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1218-1231.
71. SCHADT, E. E., J. S. SINSHEIMER, AND K. LANGE. 1998. Computational advances in maximum likelihood methods for molecular phylogeny. Genome Res. 8:222-233.
72. SCHERVISH, M. J. 1995. Theory of statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
73. SCHÖNIGER, M., AND A. VON HAESELER. 1994. A stochastic model for the evolution of autocorrelated DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3:240-247.
74. SIDDALL, M. E. 1998. Success of parsimony in the four-taxon case: Long branch repulsion by likelihood in the Farris zone. Cladistics 14:209-220.
75. SIDDALL, M. E., AND A. G. KLUGE. 1997. Probabilism and phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 13:313-336.
76. SIDDALL, M. E., AND M. F. WHITING. 1999. Long-branch abstractions. Cladistics 15:9-24.
77. SIDOW, A. 1994. Parsimony or statistics? Nature 367:26-27.
78. SOBER, E. 1988. Reconstructing the past. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
79. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, M. E. MORT, M. W. CHASE, V. SAVOLAINEN, S. B. HOOT, AND C. M. MORTON. 1998. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: An empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 47:32-42.
80. STEEL, M. 1994. The maximum likelihood point for a phylogenetic tree is not unique. Syst. Biol. 43:560-564.
81. STEEL, M., L. A. SZEKELY, AND M. D. HENDY. 1994. Reconstructing trees when sequence sites evolve at variable rates. J. Comp. Biol. 1:153-163.
82. SULLIVAN, J., AND D. L. SWOFFORD. 1997. Are guinea pigs rodents? The importance of adequate models in molecular phylogenetics. J. Mammal. Evol. 4:77-86.
83. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1999. PAUP* 4.0 vers. b2. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other methods. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
84. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. K. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogeny reconstruction. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics, 2nd edition (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
85. TATENO, Y., N. TAKEZAKI, AND M. NEI. 1994. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, neighbor-joing, and maximum parsimony methods when the substitution rate varies with site. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:261-277.
86. THORNE, J. L., H. KISHINO, AND I. S. PAINTER. 1998. Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1647-1657.
87. TILLIER, E. R. M. 1994. Maximum likelihood with multi-parameter models of substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39:409-417.
88. TILLIER, E. R. M., AND R. A. COLLINS. 1995. Neighbor-joining and maximum likelihood with RNA sequences: addressing the inter-dependence of sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:7-15.
89. TUFFLEY, C., AND M. STEEL. 1997. Links between maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony under a simple model of site substitution. Bull. Math. Biol. 59:581-607.
90. WATERMAN, M. S., T. F. SMITH, M. SINGH, AND W. A. BEYER. 1977. Additive evolutionary trees. J. Theor. Biol. 64:199-213.
91. WENZEL, J. W., AND J. CARPENTER. 1994. Comparing methods: adaptive traits and tests of adaptation. Pages 79-101 in Phylogeny and ecology (P. Eggleton and R. Vane-Wright, eds.). Academic Press, London.
92. WOLFOWITZ, J. 1942. Additive partition functions and a class of statistical hypotheses. Ann. Math. Statist. 13:247-279.
93. YANG, Z. 1994a. Statistical properties of the maximum likelihood method of phylogenetic estimation and comparison with distance matrix methods. Syst. Biol. 43:329-342.
94. YANG, Z. 1994b. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39:105-111.
95. YANG, Z. 1996a. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods. J. Mol. Evol. 42:294-307.
96. YANG, Z. 1996b. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:367-372.
97. YANG, Z. 1997. How often do wrong models produce better phylogenies? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:105-108.
98. YANG, Z., N. GOLDMAN, AND A. FRIDAY. 1994. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:316-324.