Taxon sampling and seed plant phylogeny

Cladistics

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 485-513

  Rydin, Catarina ^a,b   Källersjö, Mari ^b  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHYLOGENY; PLANT; SEED; TAXONOMY;

GNETALES; SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 0036821739     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0748-3007(02)00104-4     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Arber, E.A.N., Parkin, J., 1908. Studies on the evolution of angiosperms: the relationship of the angiosperms to the Gnetales. Ann. Bot. 22, 489-515.
2. Bailey, I.W., 1944. The development of vessels in angiosperms and its significance in morphological research. Amer. J. Bot. 31, 421-428.
3. Bowe, L.M., Coat, G., de Pamphilis, C.W., 2000. Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales' closest relatives are conifers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4092-4097.
4. Bremer, B., Jansen, R.K., Oxelman, B., Backlund, M., Lantz, H., Kim, K., 1999. More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny - case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Syst. Biol. 48, 413-435.
5. Carlquist, S., 1996. Wood, bark and stem anatomy of Gnetales: a summary. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157, S58-S76.
6. Chaw, S.-M., Parkinson, C.L., Cheng, Y., Vincent, T.M., Palmer, J.D., 2000. Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4086-4091.
7. Crane, P.R., 1985. Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 72, 716-793.
8. Donoghue, M.J., Doyle, J.A., 2000. Seed plant phylogeny: demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? Curr. Biol. 10, R106-R109.
9. Donoghue, M.J., Doyle, J.A., Gauthier, J., Kluge, A.G., Rowe, T., 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 431-460.
10. Doyle, J.A., 1996. Seed plant phylogeny and the relationships of Gnetales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157, S3-S39.
11. Doyle, J.A., Donoghue, M.J., 1986. Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: an experimental cladistic approach. Bot. Rev. 52, 321-431.
12. Doyle, J.A., Donoghue, M.J., 1992. Fossils and seed plant phylogeny reanalyzed. Brittonia 44, 89-106.
13. Farris, J.S., 1972. Inferring phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am. Nat. 106, 645-668.
14. Farris, J.S., 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In: Platnick, N., Funk, V. (Eds.), Advances in Cladistics, vol. 2. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, pp. 7-36.
15. Farris, J.S., 1997. "Xac." Computer program and manual distributed by the author.
16. Farris, J.S., 2001. Support weighting. Cladistics 17, 389-394.
17. Farris, J.S., Albert, V.A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D.L., Kluge, A.G., 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12, 99-124.
18. Felsenstein, J., 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27, 401-410.
19. Felsenstein, J., 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17, 368-376.
20. Gauthier, J., Kluge, A., Rowe, T., 1988. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4, 105-209.
21. Gifford, E.M., Foster, A.S., 1989. Morphology and Evolution of Vascular Plants. Freeman, New York.
22. Goremykin, V., Bobrova, V.K., Pahnke, J., Troitsky, A.V., Antonov, A., Martin, W., 1996. Noncoding sequences from the slowly evolving chloroplast inverted repeat in addition to rbcL data do not support gnetalean affinities with angiosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 383-396.
23. Graham, S.W., Olmstead, R.G., 2000. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1712-1730.
24. Graybeal, A., 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47, 9-17.
25. Hansen, A., Hansmann, S., Samigullin, T., Antonov, A., Martin, W., 1999. Gnetum and the angiosperms: molecular evidence that their shared morphological characters are convergent rather than homologous. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1006-1009.
26. Hart, J.A., 1987. A cladistic analysis of conifers: preliminary results. J. Arnold Arboretum 68, 269-307.
27. Hendy, M.D., Penny, D., 1989. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 38, 297-309.
28. Hillis, D.M., 1998. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Syst. Biol. 47, 3-8.
29. Huelsenbeck, J.P., 1991. When are fossils better than extant taxa in phylogenetic analysis? Syst. Zool. 40, 458-469.
30. Huelsenbeck, J.P., 1995. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44, 17-48.
31. Huelsenbeck, J.P., 1997. Is the Felsenstein zone a fly trap? Syst. Biol. 46, 69-74.
32. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F.R., 2001. MRBAYES: bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754-755.
33. Judd, W.S., Campbell, C.S., Kellogg, E.A., Stevens, P.F., 1999. Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
34. Källersjö, M., Farris, J.S., Chase, M., Bremer, B., Fay, M.F., Humphries, C.J., Petersen, G., Seberg, O., Bremer, K., 1998. Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538 rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants, and flowering plants. Plant Syst. Evol. 213, 259-287.
35. Kenrick, P., Crane, P.R., 1997. The origin and early diversification of land plants: a cladistic study. Random House (Smithsonian Inst. Press), Washington, DC.
36. Kim, J., 1998. Large-scale phylogenies and measuring the performance of phylogenetic estimators. Syst. Biol. 47, 43-60.
37. Kluge, A.G., Farris, J.S., 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 30, 351-370.
38. Lanave, C., Preparata, G., Saccone, C., Serio, G., 1984. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol. 20, 86-93.
39. Li, S., 1996. Phylogenetic tree construction using Markov chain Monte carlo, Ph. D. dissertation. Ohio State University, Columbus.
40. Mau, B., 1996. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte carlo methods, Ph. D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
41. Nickrent, D.L., Parkinson, C.L., Palmer, J.D., Duff, R.J., 2000. Multigene phylogeny of land plants with special reference to Bryophytes and the earliest land plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 1885-1895.
42. Nishiyama, T., Kato, M., 1999. Molecular phylogenetic analysis among bryophytes and tracheophytes based on combined data of plastid coded genes and the 18S rDNA gene. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1027-1036.
43. Nixon, K.C., Crepet, W.L., Stevenson, D., Friis, E.M., 1994. A reevaluation of seed plant phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81, 484-533.
44. Poe, S., Swofford, D.L., 1999. Taxon sampling revisited. Nature 398, 299-300.
45. Posada, D., Crandall, K.A., 1998. Modeltest, testing the models of substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817-818.
46. Pryer, K.M., Schneider, H., Smith, A.R., Cranfill, R., Wolf, P.G., Hunt, J.S., Sipe, S.D., 2001. Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants. Nature 409, 618-622.
47. Qiu, Y.-L., Lee, J., Bernasconi-Quadroni, F., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Zanis, M., Zimmer, E.A., Chen, Z., Savalainen, V., Chase, M.W., 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402, 404-407.
48. Qiu, Y.-L., Lee, J., Bernasconi-Quadroni, F., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Zanis, M., Zimmer, E.A., Chen, Z., Savalainen, V., Chase, M.W., 2000. Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: analyses of five genes from three genomes. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161, S3-S27.
49. Rannala, B., Yang, Z., 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43, 304-311.
50. Raubeson, L.A., Jansen, R.K., 1992. A rare chloroplast-DNA structural mutation is shared by all conifers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 20, 443-482.
51. Raven, P.H., Evert, R.F., Eichhorn, S.E., 1992. Biology of Plants. Worth, New York.
52. Rodriguez, R., Oliver, J.L., Marin, A., Medina, J.R., 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theor. Biol. 142, 485-501.
53. Rosenberg, M.S., Kumar, S., 2001. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10751-10756.
54. Rothwell, G.W., Serbet, R., 1994. Lignophyte phylogeny and the evolution of spermatophytes: a numerical cladistic analysis. Syst. Bot. 19, 443-482.
55. Rydin, C., Källersjö, M., Friis, E.M., 2002. Seed plant relationships and the systematic position of Gnetales based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA: conflicting data, rooting problems, and the monophyly of conifers. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163, 197-214.
56. Sanderson, M.J., Wojciechowski, M.F., Hu, J.M., Sher Khan, T., Brady, S.G., 2000. Error, bias, and long-branch attraction in data for two chloroplast photosystem genes in seed plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 782-797.
57. Soltis, D., Hibsch-Jetter, C., Soltis, P., Chase, M., Farris, J.S., 1997. Molecular phylogenetic relationships among angiosperms: an overview based on rbcL rDNA sequences. In: Iwatsuki, K., Raven, P. (Eds.), Evolution and diversification of land plants. Springer, Berlin, pp. 157-178.
58. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Mort, M.E., Chase, M.W., Savalainen, V., Hoot, S.B., Morton, C.M., 1998. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 47, 32-42.
59. Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E., Wolf, P.G., Nickrent, D.L., Chaw, S.-M., Chapman, R.L., 1999. The phylogeny of land plants inferred from 18S rDNA sequences: pushing the limits of rDNA signal? Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1774-1784.
60. Stefanovic, S., Jager, M., Deutsch, J., Broutin, J., Masselot, M., 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of conifers inferred from partial 28S rRNA gene sequences. Am. J. Bot. 85, 688-697.
61. Stewart, W.N., Rothwell, G.N., 1993. Palaeobotany and the Evolution of Plants. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
62. Swofford, D.L., Olsen, G.J., Waddell, P.J., Hillis, D.M., 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis, D.M., Moritz, C., Mable, B.K. (Eds.), Molecular systematics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp. 407-514.
63. Swofford, D.L., 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
64. Thompson, W.P., 1918. Independent evolution of vessels in Gnetales and angiosperms. Bot. Gaz. 65, 83-90.
65. Winter, K.U., Becker, A., Münster, T., Kim, J.T., Saedler, H., Thiessen, G., 1999. MADS-box genes reveal that gnetophytes are more closely related to conifers than to flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 7342-7347.
66. Yoder, A.D., Irwin, J.A., 1999. Phylogeny of the Lemuridae: Effects of character and taxon sampling on resolution and species relationships within Eulemur. Cladistics 15, 351-361.