Sensitivity of Phylogeny Estimation to Taxonomic Sampling

Systematic Biology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 18-31

  Poe, Steven ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Modeling; Multiple regression; Phylogeny estimation; Taxonomic sampling

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INVERTEBRATE; MAMMAL; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; VERTEBRATE;

ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; INVERTEBRATES; MAMMALS; PHYLOGENY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELECTION BIAS; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 0032023887     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351598261003     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. ABACUS CONCEPTS, INC. 1992. StatView 4.0. Berkeley, CA.
2. ANSCOMBE, F. J. 1973. Graphs in statistical analysis. Am. Statist. 27:17-21.
3. ARNOLD, E. N. 1989. Towards a phylogeny and biogeography of the Lacertidae: Relationships within an Old-World family of lizards derived from morphology. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.) 55:209-257.
4. BAVERSTOCK, P., AND C. MORITZ. 1996. Project Design. Pages 17-27 in Molecular systematics, 2nd edition (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
5. BREMER, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10:295-304.
6. CARPENTER, K. E. 1990. A phylogenetic analysis of the Caesionidae (Perciformes: Lutjanoidea). Copeia 1990:692-717.
7. COLLESS, D. H. 1982. Review of Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, by E. O. Wiley. Syst. Zool. 31:100-104.
8. COOK, R. D., AND S. WEISBERG. 1983. Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. Biometrika 70:1-10.
9. Cox, P. B., AND L. E. URBATSCH. 1990. A phylogenetic analysis of the coneflower genera (Asteraceae: Heliantheae). Syst. Bot. 15:394-402.
10. DE PINNA, M. C. 1992. A new subfamily of Trichomycteridae (Teleostei, Siluriformes), lower loricarioid relationships and a discussion of the impact of additional taxa for phylogenetic analysis. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 106:175-229.
11. DILLON, W. R., AND M. GOLDSTEIN. 1984. Multivariate analysis: Methods and applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
12. DONOGHUE, M. J., J. DOYLE, J. GAUTHIER, A. G. KLUGE, AND T. ROWE. 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 431-160.
13. DOYLE, J., AND M. DONOGHUE. 1987. The importance of fossils in elucidating seed plant phylogeny and macroevolution. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 50:63-95.
14. FARRIS, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5:417-119.
15. FUTUYMA, D. J., AND S. S. MCCAFFERTY. 1990. Phylogeny and the evolution of host plant associations in the leaf beetle Ophraella (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Evolution 44:1885-1913.
16. GARDNER, S. L. 1991. Phyletic coevolution between subterranean rodents of the genus Ctenomys (Rodentia: Hystricognathi) and nematodes of the genus Paraspidodera (Heterakoidea: Aspidoderidae) in the Neotropics: Temporal and evolutionary implications. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 102:169-201.
17. GATESY, J., R. DESALLE, AND W. C. WHEELER. 1993. Alignment-ambiguous nucleotide sites and the exclusion of systematic data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2: 152-157.
18. GAUTHIER, J., A. G. KLUGE, AND T. ROWE. 1988. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4:105-209.
19. GERAADS, D. 1992. Phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Bovini (Mammalia: Artiodactyla). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 104:193-207.
20. HENDY, M. C., AND D. PENNY. 1989. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 38:297-309.
21. HILLIS, D. M. 1995. Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 44:3-16.
22. HILLIS, D. M. 1996. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383:130-131.
23. HILLIS, D. M., AND R. DE SÁ. 1988. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the Rana palmipes group (Salientia: Ranidae). Herp. Monog. 2:1-26.
24. HILLIS, D. M., J. J. BULL, M. E. WHITE, M. R. BADGETT, AND I. J. MOLINEUX. 1992. Experimental phylogenetics: Generation of a known phylogeny. Science 255:589-592.
25. HUELSENBECK, J. 1991. When are fossils better than extant taxa in phylogenetic analysis? Syst. Zool. 40: 458-169.
26. HUELSENBECK, J. 1995. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44:17-48.
27. IVERSON, J. B. 1991. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the evolution of modern kinosternine turtles. Herp. Monog. 5:1-27.
28. KIM, J. 1996. General inconsistency conditions for maximum parsimony: Effects of branch lengths and increasing numbers of taxa. Syst. Biol. 45:363-374.
29. KRAJEWSKI, C., AND J. W. FETZNER, JR. 1994. Phylogeny of cranes (Gruiformes: Gruidae) based on cytochrome-B DNA sequences. Auk 111:351-365.
30. LECOINTRE, G., H. PHILIPPE, H. L. VAN LE, H. LE GUYADER. 1993. Species sampling has a major impact on phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2: 205-224.
31. MAYDEN, R. L., W. J. RAINBOTH, AND D. G. BUTH. 1991. Phylogenetic systematics of the cyprinid genera Mylopharodon and Ptychocheilus: Comparative morphometry. Copeia 1991:819-834.
32. MORRONE, J. M. 1994. Systematics, cladistics, and biogeography of the Andean weevil genera Macrostyphlus, Adioristidius, Puranius, and Amathynetoides, new genus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Amer. Mus. Nov. 3104:1-63.
33. NETER, J., W. WASSERMAN, AND M. KUTNER. 1983. Applied linear regression models. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois.
34. NORELL, M., AND K. DE QUEIROZ. 1991. The earliest iguanine lizard (Reptilia: Squamata) and its bearing on iguanine phylogeny. Am. Mus. Nov. 2997:1-16.
35. PENNY, D., AND M. D. HENDY. 1985. Testing methods of evolutionary tree reconstruction. Cladistics 1:266-272.
36. POE, S. In press. The effect of taxonomic sampling on phylogeny estimation: Test case of a known phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol.
37. RANKER, T. A. 1990. Phylogenetic systematics of neotropical Hemionitis and Bommeria (Adiantaceae) based on morphology, allozymes, and flavonoids. Syst. Bot. 15:442-453.
38. ROSENBERG, G. 1996. Independent evolution of terrestriality in Atlantic truncatellid gastropods. Evolution 50:682-693.
39. SALLES, L. O. 1992. Felid phylogenetics: Extant taxa and skull morphology (Felidae, Aeluroidea). Amer. Mus. Nov. 3047:1-67.
40. SANG, T., D. J. CRAWFORD, AND T. F. STUESSY. 1995. ITS sequences and the phylogeny of the genus Robinsonia (Asteraceae). Syst. Bot. 20:55-64.
41. SCHULTZ, J. W. 1990. Evolutionary morphology and phylogeny of Arachnida. Cladistics 6:1-38.
42. SHAFFFER, J. B., J. M. CLARK, AND F. KRAUS. 1991. When molecules and morphology clash: A phylogenetic analysis of North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Syst. Zool. 40:284-303.
43. SIDDALL, M. 1996. Another monophyly index: Revisiting the jackknife. Cladistics 11:33-56.
44. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1981. Biometry, 2nd edition. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
45. STARK, J. 1993. A revision of the neotropical genus Dagus Cresson (Diptera: Ephydridae). Am. Mus. Nov. 3080:1-21.
46. SYTSMA, K. J., AND L. D. GOTTLIEB. 1986. Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Clarkia sect. Peripetasma (Onagraceae). Evolution 40:1248-1261.
47. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
48. TRUEB, L., AND D. C. CANNATELLA. 1986. Systematics, morphology, and phylogeny of genus Pipa (Anura: Pipidae). Herpetologica 42:412-449.
49. VRBA, E. S., J. R. VAISNYS, J. E. GATESY, R. DESALLE, AND K. Y. WEI. 1994. Analysis of paedomorphosis using allometric characters: The example of Reduncini antelopes (Bovidae, Mammalia). Syst. Biol. 43: 92-116.
50. WEISBERG, S. 1985. Applied linear regression, 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
51. WELLER, S- G., W. L. WAGNER, AND A. K. SAKAI. 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of Schiedea and Alsinidendron (Caryophyllaceae: Alsinoideae): Implications for the evolution of breeding systems. Syst. Bot. 20: 315-337.
52. WHEELER, W. 1992. Extinction, sampling, and molecular phylogenetics. Pages 205-215 in Extinction and phylogeny (M. J. Novacek and Q. D. Wheeler, eds.). Columbia University Press, New York.
53. WIENS, J. J. 1993. Phylogenetic systematics of the tree lizards (genus Urosaurus). Herpetologica 49:399-420.
54. WIENS, J. J., AND T. W. REEDER. 1995. Combining data sets with different numbers of taxa for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 44:548-558.
55. WIENS, J. J., AND T. TITUS. 1991. A phylogenetic analysis of Spea (Anura: Pelobatidae). Herpetologica 47: 21-28.
56. WILD, E. R. 1994. New genus of Amazonian microhylid frog with a phylogenetic analysis of New World genera. Copeia 1994:837-849.
57. WINTERBOTTOM, R. 1990. The Trimmatom nanus species complex (Actinopterygii, Goviidae): Phylogeny and progenetic heterochrony. Syst. Zool. 39:253-265.
58. WOLFRAM, S. 1991. Mathematica, 2nd edition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.