Primary and secondary structure dependence of peptide flexibility assessed by fluorescence-based measurement of end-to-end collision rates

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 50, 2004, Pages 16665-16675

  Huang, Fang ^a   Hudgins, Robert R ^a,c   Nau, Werner M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

^c YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFORMATIONS; DISSOCIATION; EXTRAPOLATION; FLUORESCENCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; QUENCHING; RATE CONSTANTS; VISCOSITY;

2,3-DIAZABICYCLO[2.2.2]OCT-2-ENE (DBO); CONFORMATION COMPLEXITY; MUTATIONS; PROTONATION;

PROTEINS;

GUANIDINE; PEPTIDE; SOLVENT; TRYPTOPHAN; TYROSINE;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BETA CHAIN; DISSOCIATION; FLUORESCENCE; FRICTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; VISCOSITY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BICYCLO COMPOUNDS, HETEROCYCLIC; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; FLUORESCENCE; FLUORESCENT DYES; KINETICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PHOTOLYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; THERMODYNAMICS; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 11444265452     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0466053     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Pain, R. H., Ed. Mechanisms of Protein Folding; 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2000.
2. Eaton, W. A.; Munoz, V.; Hagen, S. J.; Jas, G. S.; Lapidus, L. J.; Henry, E. R.; Hofrichter, J. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2000, 29, 327-359.
3. Brooks, C. L., III. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 447-454.
4. Daggett, V.; Fersht, A. R. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003, 28, 18-25.
5. Zhuang, X.; Rief, M. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2003, 13, 88-97.
6. Volk, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 2605-2621.
7. Baker, D.; Agard, D. A. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 7505-7509.
8. Baskakov, I. V.; Legname, G.; Prusiner, S. B.; Cohen, F. E. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 19687-19690.
9. Cruzeiro-Hansson, L.; Silva, P. A. S. J. Biol. Phys. 2001, 27, S6-S9.
10. Callender, R. H.; Dyer, R. B.; Gilmanshin, R.; Woodruff, W. H. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1998, 49, 173-202.
11. Mayor, U.; Guydosh, N. R.; Johnson, C. M.; Grossmann, J. G.; Sato, S.; Jas. G. S.; Freund, S. M. V.; Alonso, D. O. V.; Daggett, V.; Fersht, A. R. Nature 2003, 421, 863-867.
12. Wang, M.; Tang, Y.; Sato, S.; Vugmeyster, L.; McKnight, C. J.; Raleigh, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6032-6033.
13. Huang, G. S.; Oas, T. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 6878-6882.
14. Hagen, S. J.; Hofrichter, J.; Szabo, A.; Eaton, W. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 11615-11617.
15. Hagen, S. J.; Hofrichter, J.; Eaton, W. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 2352-2365.
16. Munoz, V.; Thompson, P. A.; Hofrichter, J.; Eaton, W. A. Nature 1997, 390, 196-199.
17. Thompson, P. A.; Eaton, W. A.; Hofrichter, J. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 9200-9210.
18. Shastry, M. C. R.; Roder. H. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998, 5, 385-392.
19. Bieri, O.; Wirz, J.; Hellrung, B.; Schutkowski, M.; Drewello, M.; Kiefhaber, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 9597-9601.
20. Lednev, I. K.; Karnoup, A. S.; Sparrow, M. C.; Asher, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4076-4077.
21. Lapidus, L. J.; Eaton, W. A.; Hofrichter, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 7220-7225.
22. Jas, G. S.; Eaton, W. A.; Hofrichter, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 261-272.
23. Hudgins, R. R.; Huang, F.; Gramlich, G.; Nau, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 556-564.
24. Huang, F.; Nau, W. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2269-2272.
25. Yeh, I.-C.; Hummer, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6563-6568.
26. Vijaykumar, S.; Bugg, C. E.; Cook, W. J. J. Mol. Biol. 1987, 194, 531-544.
27. Weber, P. L.; Brown, S. C.; Mueller, L. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 7282-7290.
28. Cox, J. P. L.; Evans, P. A.; Packman, L. C.; Williams, D. H.; Woolfson, D. N. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 234, 483-492.
29. Zerella, R.; Evans, P. A.; Ionides, J. M.; Packman, L. C.; Trotter, B. W.; Mackay, J. P.; Williams, D. H. Protein Sci. 1999, 8, 1320-1331.
30. Bolton, D.; Evans, P. A.; Stott, K.; Broadhurst, R. W. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 314, 773-787.
31. Kitahara, R.; Akasaka, K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 3167-3172.
32. Klimov, D. K.; Thirumalai, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 2544-2549.
33. Wang, H.; Sung, S.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1999-2009.
34. Schwarzinger, S.; Kroon, G. J. A.; Foss, T. R.; Chung, J.; Wright, P. E.; Dyson, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2970-2978.
35. Wishart, D. S.; Sykes, B. D.; Richards, F. M. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 222, 311-333.
36. Peti, W.; Smith, L. J.; Redfield, C.; Schwalbe, H. J. Biomol. NMR 2001, 19, 153-165.
37. αN coupling constants may be a better indicator for secondary structure, which were not determined in the present work.
38. Woody, R. W. Adv. Biophys. Chem. 1992, 2, 37-79.
39. Greenfield, N. J. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 235, 1-10.
40. For consistency, all peptides were labeled with DBO at the C-terminus. A control experiment with the turn-derived peptide DBO-TLTGKY, where the terminal positions of probe and quencher are exchanged but where the peptide backbone remains the same, yielded the same quenching rate constant within error as the YTLTGK-DBO peptide (Table 2), which supports the idea that the measured quenching rates reflect an intrinsic dynamic property of the peptide backbone, namely its flexibility.
41. Kawahara, K.; Tanford, C. J. Biol. Chem. 1966, 241, 3228-3232.
42. Nau, W. M.; Greiner, G.; Rau, H.; Wall, J.; Olivucci, M.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 1579-1584.
43. Cho, C. H.; Urquidi, J.; Singh, S.; Robinson, G. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 1991-1994.
44. Hagen, S. J.; Carswell, C. W.; Sjolander, E. M. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 305, 1161-1171.
45. Nau, W. M.; Huang, F.; Wang, X.; Bakirci, H.; Gramlich, G.; Marquez, C. Chimia 2003, 57, 161-167.
46. Pischel, U.; Zhang, X.; Hellrung, B.; Haselbach, E.; Muller, P.-A.; Nau, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2027-2034.
47. Mathews, C. K.; van Holde, K. E.; Ahern, K. G. Biochemistry; 3rd ed.; Benjamin/Cummings: San Francisco, 2000.
48. Vendruscolo, M.; Pacl, E.; Dobson, C. M.; Karplus, M. Nature 2001, 409, 641-645.
49. Brannigan, J. A.; Wilkinson, A. J. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3, 964-970.
50. Goldenberg, D. P. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 1988, 17, 481-507.
51. Waldburger, C. D.; Jonsson, T.; Sauer, R. T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 2629-2634.
52. Sahoo, H.; Huang, F.; Meyer, R.; Nau, W. M. Unpublished results.
53. Levitt, M. Biochemistry 1978, 17, 4277-4285.
54. Hutchinson, E. G.; Thornton, J. M. Protein Sci. 1994, 3, 2207-2216.
55. Muñoz, V.; Serrano, L. Proteins 1994, 20, 301-311.
56. Koehl, P.; Levitt, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 12524-12529.
57. Wang, X.; Bodunov, E. N.; Nau, W. M. Opt. Spectrosc. 2003, 95, 560-570.
58. diff = 8RT/3η), this sequential treatment allows one to explicitly consider the fact that the attachment of a peptide chain to a probe or quencher will necessarily reduce its diffusion coefficient but not enhance the reaction rate, since the true reaction radius remains confined to the volume around the reactive sites of the probe and quencher itself.
59. The collision radius (a) of 4 Å corresponds approximately to the sum of the van der Waals radii of probe (DBO) and quencher (Trp/Tyr) and is the average distance of van der Waals complexes produced by molecular dynamics simulations (M. Zacharias, D. Roccatano, unpublished results). In addition, the distance between the reactive atoms in the transition states for quenching (see Scheme 3) lies within this range.
60. Liu, G.; Guillet, J. E. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 4292-4298.
61. Neuweiler, H.; Schulz, A.; Boehmer, M.; Enderlein, J.; Sauer, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5324-5330.
62. Vaiana, A. C.; Neuweiler, H.; Schulz, A.; Wolfrum, J.; Sauer, M.; Smith, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14564-14572.
63. Krieger, F.; Fierz, B.; Bieri, O.; Drewello, M.; Kiefnaber, T. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 332, 265-274.
64. Pischel, U.; Huang, F.; Nau, W. M. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2004, 3, 305-310.
65. Nau, W. M.; Wang, X. ChemPhysChem 2002, 3, 393-398.
66. Wagner, P. J.; Klán, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 121, 9626-9635.
67. Paddon-Row, M. N. In Stimulating Concepts in Chemistry; Vögtle, F., Stoddart, J. F., Shibasaki, M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000; pp 267-291.
68. Nau, W. M.; Greiner, G.; Rau, H.; Olivucci, M.; Robb, M. A. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1998, 102, 486-492.
69. Sinicropi, A.; Pischel, U.; Basosi, R.; Nau, W. M.; Olivucci, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4582-4586.
70. Mutter, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 8307-8314.
71. Camacho, C. J.; Thirumalai, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 1277-1281.
72. Zachariasse, K. A.; Macanita, A. L.; Kuehnle, W. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 9356-9365.
73. Mar, A.; Fraser, S.; Winnik, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4941-4943.
74. Wang, X.; Nau, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 808-813.