The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 393-429

  Tabak, Iris ^a   Baumgartner, Eric ^b  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b Inquirium ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10844286203     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci2204_2     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Aikenhead, G. (1989). Scientific literacy and the twenty-first century. In B. S. Randhawa (Ed.), Understanding literacy and cognition: Theory, research and application (Vol. 7, pp. 245-254). New York: Plenum.
2. Au, K. H., & Mason, J. M. (1981). Social organization factors in learning to read: The balance of rights hypothesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 115-151.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. Ball, D., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is - or might be - the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8.
5. Baumgartner, E. (2000). Science by design: How teachers support scientific inquiry through design projects. (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(11), 4327 A.
6. Bekerman, Z., Burbules, N. C., & Silberman-Keller, D. (Eds.), (in press). Learning in places: The informal education reader. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
7. Bekerman, Z., & Silberman-Keller, D. (in press). Non-formal pedagogy: Epistemology, rhetoric and practice. Education and Society.
8. Brandes, A. A. (1996). Elementary school children's images of science. In M. Resnick (Ed.). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 37-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.
9. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
10. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2001). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education, 11, 353-400.
12. Cazden, C. B. (1979). Peekaboo as an instructional model: Discourse development at home and at school (Papers and Reports on Child Language Development PRCLD No. 17). Stanford. CA: Stanford University, Department of Linguistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 191274)
13. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. Cazden, C. B., & Beck, S. W. (2003). Classroom discourse. In S. R. Goldman (Ed.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 165-197). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
16. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 2-33.
17. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004/this issue). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students' relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 467-498.
20. Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 916-937.
21. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-9.
22. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
23. Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: MacMillan.
25. Erickson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In J. Preissle (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 201-225). San Diego, CA: Academic.
26. Forman, E. A., & Ansell, E. (2002). Orchestrating the multiple voices and inscriptions of a mathematics classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 251-274.
27. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
28. Grant, P. R. (1986). Ecology and evolution of Darwin's finches. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Greenfield, P. M. (1984). A theory of teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In J. Lave (Ed.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 117-138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 485-529.
31. Hawkins, J., & Pea, R. D. (1987). Tools for bridging the cultures of everyday and scientific thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 291-307.
32. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 431-473.
33. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Wertsch, J. V. (1999). The use of cultural tools: Mastery and appropriation. In I. Sigel (Ed.), Development of mental representation: Theories and applications (pp. 415-435). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
34. Hicks, D. (1996). Contextual inquiries: A discourse-oriented study of classroom learning. In D. Hicks (Ed.). Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 104-144). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 379-432.
36. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "Doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757-792.
37. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C. Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredericks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313-350.
38. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., O'Loughlin, M., Schauble, L., Leadbeater, B., & Yotive, W. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego, CA: Academic.
39. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
40. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organisation in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Michaels, S. (2002. April). Seeing science and re-seeing the world - Through talk. Paper presented at the 2002 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
43. Minstrell, J. (2001). The role of the teacher in making sense of classroom experiences and effecting better learning. In D. Klahr (Ed.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 121-149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44. Mitchell, J. C. (1984). Typicality and the case study. In R. F. Ellen (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 237-241). San Diego, CA: Academic.
45. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
46. O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 318-335.
47. O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63-103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 370-373.
49. Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2002). Designing collaborative learning contexts. Theory Into Practice, 41, 26-32.
50. Pea, R. D. (1992). Augmenting the discourse of learning with computer-based learning environments. In L. Verschaffel (Ed.), Computer-based learning environments and problem-solving (pp. 313-343). New York: Springer-Verlag.
51. Philips, S. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence. In C. Cazden (Ed.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. 370-394). New York: Teachers College Press.
52. Polinan, J. L. (2001, April). Historical learning and identity development on the borders of school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle. WA.
53. Polman. J. L. (2004/this issue). Dialogic activity structures for project-based learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 431-466.
54. Polman, J. L., & Pea, R. D. (2001). Transformative communication as a cultural tool for guiding inquiry science. Science Education, 85, 223-238.
55. Reif, F., & Larkin, J. H. (1991). Cognition in scientific and everyday domains: Comparison and learning implications. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 733-760.
56. Resnick, L. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13-20.
57. Rogoff, B. (1993). Children's guided participation and participatory appropriation in sociocultural activity. In K. W. Fischer (Ed.), Development in context; Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 121-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
58. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Affordances of computers in teacher-student interactions: The case of interactive physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 329-347.
59. Ryokai, K., Vaucelle, C., & Cassell, J. (2003). Virtual peers as partners in storytelling and literacy learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 195-208.
60. Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 5-52.
61. Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Shulze, S., & John, J. (1995). Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 131-166.
62. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers (Vol. 5). Cambridge. England: Cambridge University Press.
63. Smith, C., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. G. (2000). Sixth-grade students' epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 349-422.
64. Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 761-784.
65. Spitulnik, M. W., & Krajcik, J. (1998, April). Teaching with Model-It: One teacher's use of instructional strategies to promote inquiry. Paper presented at the 1998 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
66. Stone, C. A. (1993). What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In C. A. Stone (Ed.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 169-183). New York: Oxford University Press.
67. Strom, D., Kemeny, V., Lehrer, R., & Forman, E. (2001). Visualizing the emergent structure of children's mathematical argument. Cognitive Science, 25, 733-773.
68. Tabak, I. E. (1999). Unraveling the development of scientific literacy: Domain-specific inquiry support in a system of cognitive and social interactions. (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(12), 4323A.
69. Tabak, I. (2002). Teacher as monitor, mentor or partner: Uncovering participant structures involved in supporting student-directed inquiry. In T. Satwicz (Ed.). Keeping learning complex: The proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (pp. 466-472). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
70. Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305-336.
71. Tabak, I., & Reiser, B. J. (1997). Complementary roles of software-based scaffolding and teacher-student interactions in inquiry learning. In N. Enyedy (Ed.), Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning '97 (pp. 289-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
72. Tabak, I., & Reiser, B. J. (1999, April). Steering the course of dialogue in inquiry-based science classrooms. Paper presented at the 1999 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
73. Tabak, I., Reiser, B. J., Sandoval, W. A., Leone, T. J., & Steinmuller, F. (2001). BGuILE: The Galapagos Finches - The struggle for survival [Computer software]. In J. R. Jungek (Ed.), The BioQuest Library VI. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Academic Press.
74. Tabak, I., Smith, B. K., Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (1996). Combining general and domain-specific strategic support for biological inquiry. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: Third international conference, its '96 (pp. 288-296). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
75. Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (2000). Studying and understanding the instructional contexts of classrooms: Using our past to forge our future. Educational Psychologist, 35, 69-85.
76. Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind: A sociogenetic approach to personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77. van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 159-190.
78. van Zee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 227-269.
79. Weiner, J. (1994). The beak of the Finch: A story of evolution in our time. New York: Knopf.
80. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-37.
81. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
82. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
84. Wertsch, J. V., & Polman, J. L. (2001). The intuitive mind and knowledge about history. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: Student and teacher learning (pp. 57-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
85. Wertsch, J. V., & Rupert, L. J. (1993). The authority of cultural tools in a sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 227-239.
86. Wertsch, J. V., & Stone, C. A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky's account of the genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.). Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 162-179). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
87. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
88. Wortham, S. E. F. (1996). Mapping participant deictics: A technique for discovering speakers' footing. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 331-348.
89. Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning. Developmental Review, 20, 99-149.