Dialogic activity structures for project-based learning environments

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 431-466

  Polman, Joseph L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10844265247     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_3     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel (C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Trans.). In M. Holquist (Ed.). The dialogic imagination (pp. 259-422). Austin: University of Texas Press.
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres (V. McGee. Trans.). In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.). Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60-102). Austin: University of Texas.
3. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Bruce, B. C., & Rubin, A. (1993). Electronic quills: A situated evaluation of using computers for writing in classrooms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.
8. Bruer, J. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Bruner, J. (1963). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
11. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing groupwork. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004/this issue). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students' relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 467-498.
14. Davis, O. L., Yeager, E. A., & Foster, S. J. (2001). Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
15. Dewey, J. (1901). The situation as regards the course of study. Journal of the Proceedings and Addresses of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the National Education Association, 7, 332-348.
16. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
17. Doyle, W. (1979). Classroom tasks and students' abilities. In P. L. Peterson & H. L. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 183-209). Berkeley, CA: McCutcheon.
18. Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4, 37-73.
19. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 105-122.
20. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
21. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483.
22. Forman, E. A., & Ansell, E. (2002). Orchestrating the multiple voices and inscriptions of a mathematics classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 251-274.
23. Fuson, K., & Smith, S. (1998, April). The chalkboard activity structure as a facilitator of helping, understanding, discussing, and reflecting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
24. Gordin, D., Polman, J. L., & Pea, R. D. (1994). The climate visualizer: Sense-making through scientific visualization. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3, 203-226.
25. Guzdial, M. (1995, April). Artifacts of learning: A perspective on students' learning processes and strategies through their learning products. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
26. Harris, J. (1998). Virtual architecture: Designing and directing curriculum-based telecomputing. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
27. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 433-475.
28. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research & Development, 1, 65-94.
30. Kolodner, J. L., & Gray, J. (2003). Understanding the affordances of ritualized activity structures for project-based classrooms. Unpublished manuscript.
31. Kolodner, J. L., Gray, J. T, & Fasse, B. B. (2003). Promoting transfer through case-based reasoning: Rituals and practices in Learning by Design™ classrooms. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 3, 119-170.
32. Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C. M., & Berger, C. F. (1998). Teaching children science: A project-based approach. Boston, McGraw-Hill.
33. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-64.
34. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36. Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Carpenter, S., & Penner, D. (2000). The inter-related development of inscriptions and conceptual understanding, In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms (pp. 251-278). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
37. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
38. Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 273-290.
39. Macbeth, D. (2003). Hugh Mehan's Learning Lessons reconsidered: On the differences between the naturalistic and critical analysis of classroom discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 239-280.
40. Mehan, H. (1978). Structuring school structure. Harvard Education Review, 48, 32-64.
41. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coastal Services Center. (2003). United States spatial databases. Retrieved January 19, 2003. from http://www.csc.noaa.gov/products/alabama/htm/ metaus.htm
43. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
44. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984). Social constraints in laboratory and classroom tasks. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 172-193). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
47. Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
48. O'Connor, M., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussions. In D. Hicks (Ed.). Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63-103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. O'Neill, D. K. (2001). Knowing when you've brought them in: Scientific genre knowledge and communities of practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 223-264.
50. O'Neill, D. K., & Polman, J. L. (2004). Why educate "little scientists?" Examining the potential of practice-based scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 234-266.
51. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
52. Pea, R. D. (1993). The collaborative visualization project. Communications of the ACM, 36(5), 60-63.
53. Pea, R. D. (1994). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 285-299.
54. Philips, S. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence. In C. B. Cazden, V. P. John. & D. Hymes (Eds.). Functions of language in the classroom (pp. 370-394). New York: Teachers College Press.
55. Polman, J. L. (2000). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry. New York: Teachers College Press.
56. Polman, J. L. (2004). The perils and promise of afterschool programs on school territory. Afterschool Matters, 3, 3-12.
57. Polman, J. L., & Pea, R. D. (2001). Transformative communication as a cultural tool for guiding inquiry science. Science Education, 85, 223-238.
58. Reiser, B. J., Tabak, L, Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, T. J. (2001). BGuILE: strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty five years of progress (pp. 263-305). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
59. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 209-229.
60. Rommetveit, R. (1979). On the architecture of intersubjectivity. In R. Rommetveit & R. M. Blakar (Eds.), Studies of language, thought, and verbal communication (pp. 93-107). London: Academic.
61. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235-276.
62. Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 61-94.
63. Roth, W.-M. (1996). Knowledge diffusion* in a Grade 4/5 classroom during a unit on civil engineering: An analysis of a classroom community in terms of its changing resources and practices. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 170-220.
64. Roth, W.-M., McGinn, M. K., Woszczyna, C., & Boutonné. S. (1999). Differential participation during science conversations: The interaction of focal artifacts, social configuration, and physical arrangements. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 293-347.
65. Ruopp, R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, M. (Eds.). LabNet: Toward a community of practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
66. Sandoval, W. A., Daniszewski, K., Spillane, J. P., & Reiser, B. J. (1999, April). Teachers' discourse strategies for supporting learning through inquiry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
67. Saxe, G. B. (2002). Children's developing mathematics in collective practices: A framework for analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 275-300.
68. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37-68.
69. Schön, D. A. (1982). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
70. Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: Volume 2. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 183-213). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
71. Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004/this issue). The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding, Cognition and Instruction, 22, 393-429.
72. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 529-552.
74. Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (2000, July). Design for learning conversations in primary science. Paper presented at the III Conference for Sociocultural Research, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
75. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-37.
76. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
78. Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.