Approaches to the design of combinatorial libraries

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-20

  Drewry, David H ^a   Stanley Young, S ^a  

^a GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Algorithm; Chemical library; Library design

Indexed keywords

MONOMER; PEPTIDE LIBRARY;

ALGORITHM; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMOMETRICS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LIBRARY; LITERATURE; MATHEMATICAL AND STATISTICAL PROCEDURES; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PARTITION COEFFICIENT; PHARMACOPHORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0344603645     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7439(99)00010-6     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Veber D.F., Drake F.H., Gowen M. The new partnership of genomics and chemistry for accelerated drug development. Curr. Opinion. Chem. Biol. 1:1997;151.
2. Beeley L.J., Duckworth D.M. The impact of genomics on drug design. Drug Discovery Today. 1:1996;474.
3. Hermkens P.H.H., Ottenheijm H.C.J., Rees D.C. Solid-phase organic reactions: II. A review of the literature Nov. 95-Nov. 96. Tetrahedron. 53:1997;5643.
4. Cowley P.M., Rees D.C. Applications of solid-phase synthesis to drug discovery. Curr. Med. Chem. 4:1997;211.
5. Fruchtel J.S., Jung G. Organic chemistry on solid supports. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 35:1996;35.
6. Sheridan R.P., Kearsley S.K. Using a genetic algorithm to suggest combinatorial libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 35:1995;310.
7. Hibbert D.B. Genetic algorithms in chemistry. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 19:1993;277.
8. Weber L. Evolutionary combinatorial chemistry: application of genetic algorithms. Drug Discovery Today. 3:1998;379.
9. Parrill A.L. Evolutionary and genetic methods in drug design. Drug Discovery Today. 1:1996;514.
10. Zheng W., Cho S.J., Tropsha A. Rational combinatorial library design: 1. Focus-2D: a new approach to the design of targeted combinatorial chemical libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38:1998;251.
11. Salemme F.R., Spurlino J., Bone R. Serendipity meets precision: the integration of structure-based drug design and combinatorial chemistry for efficient drug discovery. Structure. 5:1997;319.
12. Li J., Murray C.W., Waszkowycz B., Young S.C. Targeted molecular diversity in drug discovery: integration of structure-based design and combinatorial chemistry. Drug Discovery Today. 3:1998;105.
13. Kick E.K., Roe D.C., Skillman A.G., Liu G., Ewing T.J.A., Sun Y., Kuntz I.D., Ellman J.A. Structure-based design and combinatorial chemistry yield low nanomolar inhibitors of cathepsin D. Chemistry and Biology. 4:1997;297.
14. Weber L., Wallbaum S., Broger C., Gubernator K. Optimization of the biological activity of combinatorial libraries by a genetic algorithm. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 34:1995;2280.
15. Zuckermann R.N., Martin E.J., Spellmeyer D.C., Stauber G.B., Shoemaker K.R., Kerr J.M., Figliozzi G.M., Goff D.A., Siani M.A., Simon R.J., Banville S.C., Brown E.G., Wang L., Richter L.S., Moos W.H. Discovery of nanomolar ligands for 7-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors from a diverse N-(substituted)glycine peptoid library. J. Med. Chem. 37:1994;2678.
16. Rice R.L., Rusnak J.M., Yokokawa F., Yokokawa S., Messner D.J., Boynton A.L., Wipf P., Lazo J.S. A targeted library of small-molecule, tyrosine, and dual-specificity phosphatase inhibitors derived from a rational core design and random side chain variation. Biochemistry. 36:1997;15965.
17. Smith D.A., Jones B.C., Walker D.K. Design of drugs involving the concepts and theories of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. Med. Res. Rev. 16:1996;243.
18. Navia M.A., Chaturvedi P.R. Design principles for orally bioavailable drugs. Drug Discovery Today. 1:1996;179.
19. Chan O.H., Stewart B. Physicochemical and drug-delivery considerations for oral drug bioavailability. Drug Discovery Today. 1:1996;461.
20. Lipinski C.A., Lombardo F., Dominy B.W., Feeney P.J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 23:1997;3.
21. Fecik R.A., Frank K.E., Gentry E.J., Menon S.R., Mitscher L.A., Telikepalli H. The search for orally active medications through combinatorial chemistry. Med. Res. Rev. 18:1998;149.
22. Potter T., Matter H. Random or rational design? Evaluation of diverse compound subsets from chemical structure databases. J. Med. Chem. 41:1998;478.
23. P.C. Jurs, S.L. Dixon, L.M. Egloff, Representations of Molecules, in: H. van de Waterbeemd (Ed.), Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design, VCH Publishers, New York, 1995, p. 15.
24. Lewis R.A., Mason J.S., McLay I.M. Similarity measures for rational set selection and analysis of combinatorial libraries: the Diverse Property-Derived (DPD) approach. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37:1997;599.
25. Leo A. Calculating log Poct from structures. Chem. Rev. 93:1993;1281.
26. B.D. Weininger, CLOGP, Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Irvine, CA, 1994.
27. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Santa Fe, NM 87501.
28. Daylight Software Manual: Theory, Daylight Chemical Informations Systems: Santa Fe, NM 87501 (Daylight daymodels software).
29. L.H. Hall, L.B. Kier, The molecular connectivity chi indexes and kappa shape indexes in structure-property modeling, in: K.B. Lipkowitz, D.B. Boyd (Eds.), Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 2, VCH Publishers, New York, NY, 1991, pp. 367-421.
30. L.H. Hall, Molconn-X, Hall Associates Computing, 2 Davis Street, Quincy, MA 02170.
31. Andrews P.R., Craik D.J., Martin J.L. Functional group contributions to drug-receptor interactions. J. Med. Chem. 27:1984;1648.
32. Maccs II, Molecular Design, 14600 Catalina St., San Leandro, CA 94577, (510)895-1313.
33. Unity Chemical Information Software, Tripos Associates, 1699 S. Hanley Rd., Suite 303, St. Louis, MO 63144, 1-800-323-2960.
34. Daylight Chemical Information Software, Daylight Chemical Information, 18500 Von Karman, #450, Irvine, CA, (714)476-0451.
35. Carhart R.E., Smith D.H., Venkataraghavan R. Atom pairs as molecular features in structure-activity studies: definition and applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 25:1985;64.
36. Nilakantan R., Bauman N., Dixon J.S., Venkataraghavan R. Topological torsions: a new molecular descriptor for SAR applications. Comparison with other descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 27:1987;82.
37. Sheridan R.P., Venkataraghavan R. New methods in computer-aided drug design. Acc. Chem. Res. 20:1987;322.
38. Kearsley S.K., Sallamack S., Fluder E.M., Andose J.D., Mosley R.T., Sheridan R.P. Chemical similarity using physicochemical property descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:1996;118.
39. R.S. Pearlman, Novel software tools for addressing chemical diversity at URL http://www.netsci.org/Science/Combichem/feature08.html.
40. Burden F.R. Molecular identification numbers for substructure searches. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 29:1989;225.
41. E.J. Martin, D.C. Spellmeyer, R.E. Critchlow Jr., J.M. Blaney, Does combinatorial chemistry obviate computer-aided drug design? in: K.B. Lipkowitz, D.B. Boyd (Eds.), Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 10, VCH Publishers, New York, 1997, p. 75.
42. Martin E.J., Blaney J.M., Siani M.A., Spellmeyer D.C., Wong A.K., Moos W.H. Measuring diversity: experimental design of combinatorial libraries for drug discovery. J. Med. Chem. 38:1995;1431.
43. Blaney J.M., Martin E.J. Computational approaches for combinatorial library design and molecular diversity analysis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1:1997;54.
44. Sheridan R.P., Miller M.D., Underwood D.J., Kearsley S.K. Chemical similarity using geometric atom pair descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:1996;128.
45. Kearsley S.K., Underwood D.J., Sheridan R.P., Miller M.D. Flexibases: a way to enhance the use of molecular docking methods. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design. 8:1994;565.
46. Matter H. Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases: a validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional molecular descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 40:1997;1219.
47. Cramer R.D., Clark R.D., Patterson D.E., Ferguson A.M. Bioisosterism as a molecular diversity descriptor: steric fields of single 'topomeric' conformers. J. Med. Chem. 39:1996;3060.
48. Todeschini R., Moro G., Boggia R., Bonati L., Cosentino U., Lasagni M., Pitea D. Modeling and prediction of molecular properties. Theory of grid-weighted holistic invariant molecular (G-WHIM) descriptors. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 36:1997;65.
49. Good A.C., Kuntz I.D. Investigating the extension of pairwise distance pharmacophore measures to triplet-based descriptors. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design. 9:1995;373.
50. Pickett S.D., Mason J.S., McLay I.M. Diversity profiling and design using 3D pharmacophores: Pharmacophore-derived queries (PDQ). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:1996;1214.
51. Brown R.D., Martin Y.C. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:1996;572.
52. Martin Y.C., Bures M.G., Brown R.D. Validated descriptors for diversity measurements and optimization. Pharm. Pharmacol. Commun. 4:1998;147.
53. Brown R.D., Martin Y.C. The information content of 2D and 3D structural descriptors relevant to ligand-receptor binding. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37:1997;1.
54. Patterson D.E., Cramer R.D., Ferguson A.M., Clark R.D., Weinberger L. Neighborhood behavior: a useful concept for validation of 'Molecular Diversity' descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 39:1996;3049.
55. Gillet V.J., Willett P., Bradshaw J. The effectiveness of reactant pools for generating structurally-diverse combinatorial libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37:1997;731.
56. Good A.C., Lewis R.A. New methodology for profiling combinatorial libraries and screening sets: cleaning up the design process with HARPick. J. Med. Chem. 40:1997;3926.
57. Agrafiotis D.K. Stochastic algorithms for maximizing molecular diversity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37:1997;841.
58. Brown R.D., Martin Y.C. Designing combinatorial library mixtures using a genetic algorithm. J. Med. Chem. 40:1997;2304.
59. Dunbar J.B. Jr. Cluster based selection. Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design. 7/8:1997;51.
60. L. Kaufman, P.J. Rousseeuw, Finding Groups in Data. An Introduction to Cluster Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1990.
61. Barnard J.M., Downs G.M. Clustering of chemical structures on the basis of two-dimensional similarity measures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 32:1992;644.
62. Jarvis R.A., Patrick E.A. Clustering using a similarity measure based on shared nearest neighbors. IEEEE Trans. Comput. C. 22:1973;1025.
63. Ward J.H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Statistical Assoc. 58:1963;236.
64. Guenoche A., Hansen P., Jaumard B. Efficient algorithms for divisive hierarchical clustering with diameter criterion. J. Classif. 8:1991;5.
65. Willett P., Winterman V. A comparison of some measures for the determination of inter-molecular structural similarity. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 5:1986;18.
66. Holliday J.D., Ranade S.S., Willett P. A fast algorithm for selecting sets of dissimilar molecules from large chemical databases. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 14:1995;501.
67. Downs G.M., Willett P. Similarity searching and clustering of chemical-property databases using molecular property data. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 34:1994;1094.
68. Reynolds C.H., Druker R., Pfahler L.B. Lead discover using stochastic cluster analysis (SCA): a new method for clustering structurally similar compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38:1998;305.
69. Mason J.S., Pickett S.D. Partition-based selection. Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design. 78:1997;85.
70. Cummins D.J., Andrews C.W., Bentley J.A., Cory M. Molecular diversity in chemical databases: comparison of medicinal chemistry knowledge bases and databases of commercially available compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:1996;750.
71. Ashton M.J., Jaye M.C., Mason J.S. New perspectives in lead generation: II. Evaluating molecular diversity. Drug Discovery Today. 1:1996;71.
72. Lajiness M.S. Dissimilarity-based compound selection techniques. Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design. 7/8:1997;65.
73. Pickett S.D., Luttmann C., Guerin V., Laoui A., James E. DIVSEL and COMPLIB - strategies for the design and comparison of combinatorial libraries using pharmacophoric descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38:1998;144.
74. Chapman D. The measurement of molecular diversity: a three-dimensional approach. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 10:1996;501.
75. Ferguson A.M., Patterson D.E., Garr C.D., Underiner T.L. Designing chemical libraries for lead discovery. J. Biomolecular Screening. 1:1996;65.
76. H. Matter, D. Lassen, Compound libraries for lead discovery, Chimica Oggi/Chemistry Today (1996) 9.
77. Clark R.D. OptiSim: an extended dissimilarity selection method for finding diverse representative subsets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37:1997;1181.
78. Hudson B.D., Hyde R.M., Rahr E., Wood J. Parameter based methods for compound selection from chemical databases. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 15:1996;285.
79. Hodes L. Clustering a large number of compounds: 1. Establishing the method on an initial sample. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 29:1989;66.
80. T. Lundstedt, S. Clementi, G. Cruciani, M. Pastor, N. Kettaneh, P. Andersson, A. Linusson, M. Sjostrom, S. Wold, B. Norden, Intelligent combinatorial libraries, in: H. van de Waterbeemd, B. Testa, G. Folkers (Eds.), Computer-Assisted Lead Finding and Optimization, Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta and Wiley-VCH, 1997, p. 191.
81. Turner D.B., Tyrell S.M., Willett P. Rapid quantification of molecular diversity for selective database acquisition. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37:1997;18.
82. Boyd S.M., Beverley M., Norskov L., Hubbard R.E. Characterizing the geometric diversity of functional groups in chemical databases. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 9:1995;417.
83. Zemroch P.J. Cluster analysis as an experimental design generator, with application to gasoline blending. Technometrics. 28:1986;39.
84. SAS/QC Software, Usage and Reference, Version 6, 1st edn., Vol. 1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 1995.
85. Higgs R.E., Bemis K.G., Watson I.A., Wikel J.H. Experimental designs for selecting molecules from large chemical databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37:1997;861.
86. Cummins D.J., Andrews C.W., Bentley J.A., Cory M. Molecular diversity in chemical databases: comparison of medicinal chemistry knowledge bases and databases of commercially available compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:1996;750. Also Refs. 18 and 19 from the partitioning section.
87. Hodes L., Feldman A. Clustering a large number of compounds: 3. The limits of classification. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 31:1991;347.
88. S.S. Young, M. Farmen, A. Rusinko III, Random versus rational: Which is better for general compound screening? Network Sci. [Electronic Publication] 2 (1996), available URL: http://www.awod.com/netsci/Issues/Aug96/feature3.html.