Stochastic algorithms for maximizing molecular diversity

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 841-851

  Agrafiotis, Dimitris K ^a  

^a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000191614     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci9700337     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Bone, R. F.; Salemme, F. R.; Soll, R. M. System and method of automatically generating chemical compounds with desired properties. United States Patent 5,463,564, 1995.
2. Graybill, T. L.; Agrafiotis, D. K.; Bone, R.; Illig, C. R.; Jaeger, E. P.; Locke, K. T.; Lu, T.; Salvino, J. M.; Soll, R. M.; Spurlino, J. C.; Subasinghe, N.; Tomczuk, B. E.; Salemme, F. R. Enhancing the drug discovery process by integration of high-throughput chemistry and structure-based drug design. In Molecular Diversity and Combinatorial Chemistry: Libraries and Drug Discovery; Chaiken, I. M., Janda, K. D., Eds.; ACS Conference Proceeding Series, 1996; pp 16-27.
3. Willett, P. Similarity and Clustering in Chemical Information Systems; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1987.
4. Downs, G. M.; Willett, P. Clustering in chemical structure databases for compound selection. In Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design, H. van der Waterbeemd, Ed., VCH: Weinheim, 1994; pp 111-130.
5. Downs, G. M.; Willett, P.; Fisanick, W. Similarity searching and clustering in large databases using molecular property data. J. Chem. Info. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 1094-1102.
6. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Info. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.
7. Lajiness, M. S.; Johnson, M. A.; Maggiora, G. M. Implementing drug screening programs using molecular similarity methods. In QSAR: Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships in Drug Design; Fauchere, J. L., Ed.; A. R. Liss: New York, 1989; pp 173-176.
8. Johnson, M.; Lajiness, M. S.; Maggiora, G. M. Molecular similarity: a basis for designing drug screening programs. Fauchere, J. L., Ed.; A. R. Liss, New York, 1989; pp 167-171.
9. Polinsky, A.; Feinstein, R. D.; Shi, S.; Kuki, A. LiBrain: software for automated design of exploratory and targeted combinatorial libraries. In Molecular Diversity and Combinatorial Chemistry: Libraries and Drug Discovery; Chaiken, I. M., Janda, K. D., Eds.; ACS Conference Proceeding Series, 1996; pp 219-232.
10. Holliday, J. D.; Willett, P. Definitions of dissimilarity for dissimilarity based compound selection. In press.
11. Turner, D. B.; Tyrrell, S. M.; Willett, P. Rapid quantification of molecular diversity for selective database acquisition. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 18-22.
12. Cummins, D. J.; Andrews, C. W.; Bentley, J. A.; Cory, M. Molecular diversity in chemical databases: comparison of medicinal chemistry knowledge bases and databases of commercially available compounds. J. Chem. Info. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 750-763.
13. Pearlman, R. S. Novel tools for addressing chemical diversity. Network Science 1996, hhtp://www.awod.com/netsci/issues.
14. Martin, E. J.; Blaney, J. M.; Siani, M. A.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Wong, A. K.; Moos, W. H. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1431-1436.
15. Lin, S. K. Molecular diversity assessment: logarithmic relations of information and species diversity and logarithmic relations of entropy and indistinguishability after rejection of Gibbs paradox of entropy mixing. Molecules 1996, 1, 57-67.
16. Agrafiotis, D. K. On the use of information theory for assessing molecular diversity. J. Chem. Info. Comput. Sci. In press.
17. Martin, E. J.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Critchlow, R. E.; Blaney, J. M. Does combinatorial chemistry obviate computer-aided drug design? In Reviews in Computational Chemistry; Lipkowitz, K. B., Boyd, D. B., Eds.; VCH: New York, 1997; Vol. 10.
18. Martin, Y. C.; Brown, R. D.; Bures, M. G. Quantifying diversity. In Combinatorial Chemistry and Molecular Diversity; Kerwin, J. F., Gordon, E. M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York. In press.
19. Agrafiotis, D. K. Molecular Diversity. In Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons: in press.
20. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Jaeger, E. P. Manuscript in preparation.
21. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. The information content of 2D and 3D structural descriptors to ligand-receptor binding. J. Chem. Info. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 1-9.
22. Patterson, D. E.; Cramer, R. D.; Ferguson, A. M.; Clark, R. D.; Weinberger, L. E. Neighborhood behavior: a useful concept for validating molecular diversity descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 3049-3059.
23. Delaney, J. S. Assessing the ability of chemical similarity measures to discriminate between active and inactive compounds. Molecular Diversity 1995, 1, 217-222.
24. Sammon, J. W. A non-linear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Trans. Comp. 1969, C-18, 401-409.
25. Barlow, T. W., Richards, W. G. A novel representation of protein structure. J. Mol. Graphics 1995, 13, 373-376.
26. Agrafiotis, D. K. A new method for analyzing protein sequence relationships based on Sammon maps. Protein Science 1997, 6, 287-293.
27. Kruscal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a non-metric hypothesis. Phychometrika 1964, 29, 1-27.
28. Kruskal, J. B. Non-metric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Phychometrika 1964, 29, 115-129.
29. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Lobanov, V. S. Unpublished results.
30. Scott, D. W. Multivariate Density Estimation; Wiley Interscience: New York, 1992.
31. Wegman, E. J. Hyperdimensional data analysis using parallel coordinates. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 1990, 85, 664-675.
32. Agrafiotis, D. K. The Mt toolkit: an object-oriented C++ class library for molecular simulations. Copyright 3-Dimensional Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: 1994-1997.
33. RogueWave Software; Corvallis, OR.
34. Box, G. E. P.; Muller, M. E.; Marsaglia, G. Annals. Math. Stat. 1958, 28, 610.
35. Sadowski, J.; Wagener, M.; Gasteiger, J. Assessing similarity and diversity in combinatorial libraries by spatial autocorrelation functions and neural networks. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34(23), 2674-2677.