Faculty-librarian relationships in the information literacy context: A content analysis of librarians' expressed attitudes and experiences

Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 65-87

  Julien, Heidi ^a   Given, Lisa M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344100126     PISSN: 1195096X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Blandy, S. G. 1989. Building alliances: General education and library skills in a community college. The Reference Librarian 24: 57-73.
2. Bodi, S. 1992. Collaboration with faculty in teaching critical thinking: The role of librarians. Research Strategies 10(2): 69-76.
3. -. 1990. Teaching effectiveness and bibliographic instruction: The relevance of learning styles. College and Research Libraries 51(2): 113-19.
4. Bruce, C. 2001. Faculty-librarian partnerships in Australian higher education: critical dimensions. Reference Services Review 29(2): 106-15.
5. Burr, V. 1995. An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.
6. Cannon, A. 1994. Faculty survey on library research instruction. Research Quarterly 33(4): 524-41.
7. Cardwell, C. 2001. Faculty: An essential resource for reference librarians. The Reference Librarian 73: 253-63.
8. Carlson, D. and R.H. Miller. 1984. Librarians and teaching faculty: Partners in bibliographic instruction. College and Research Libraries 45: 483-91.
9. Chelton, M. K. 1997. Adult-adolescent service encounters: The library context. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University.
10. Chiste, Katherine Beaty, A. Glover, and G. Westwood. 2000. Infiltration and entrenchment: Capturing and securing information literacy territory in academe. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 26(3): 202-08.
11. Davies, B., and R. Harré. 1990. Positioning: the discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(1): 43-63.
12. Dorner, J. L., S. E. Taylor, and K. Hodson-Carlton. 2001. Faculty-librarian collaboration for nursing information literacy: A tiered approach. Reference Services Review 29(2): 132-40.
13. Drueke, J. 1992. Active learning in the University library instruction classroom. Research Strategies 10(2): 77-83.
14. Eliot, R 1989. The view from square one: Librarian and teaching faculty collaboration on a new interdisciplinary course in world civilizations. The Reference Librarian 24: 87-99.
15. Farber, E. 1999. Faculty-librarian cooperation: A personal retrospective. Reference Services Review 27(3): 229-34.
16. Feinberg, R., and C. King. 1988. Short-term library skill competencies: Arguing for the achievable. College and Research Libraries 49(1): 24-28.
17. Feldman, D., and S. Sciammarella. 2000. Both sides of the looking glass: Librarian and teaching faculty perceptions of librarianship at six community colleges. College and Research Libraries 61(6): 491-98.
18. Given, L. M. 2000. The social construction of the 'mature student' identity: Effects and implications for academic information behaviours. Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario.
19. -. 2002. Discursive constructions in the university context: Social positioning theory and mature undergraduates' information behaviours. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research: Studies of Information Seeking in Context 3: 127-41.
20. Gonzales, R. 2001. Opinions and experiences of university faculty regarding library research instruction: Results of a web-based survey at the University of Southern Colorado. Library and Information Science Research 18: 191-201.
21. Hanson, M. 1993. The library as laboratory for interdisciplinary studies. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 21: 222-28.
22. Hardesty, L. 1999. Reflections on 25 years of library instruction: Have we made progress? Reference Services Review 27(3): 242-46.
23. Harré, R., and L. van Langenhove, eds. 1999. Positioning theory: moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Iannuzzi, R 1998. Faculty development and information literacy: Establishing campus partnerships. Reference Services Review 26(3/4): 97-102.
25. Julien, H. 2000. Information literacy instruction in Canadian academic libraries: Longitudinal trends and international comparisons. College and Research Libraries 61(6): 510-23.
26. Julien, H., and S. Boon. 2002. From the front line: Information literacy instruction in Canadian academic libraries. Reference Services Review 30(2): 143-49.
27. Larson, C. M. 1998. "What I want in a faculty member": A reference librarian's perspective. Reference and User Services Quarterly 37(3): 259-61.
28. Leckie, G. J. 1996. Desperately seeking citations: Uncovering faculty assumptions about the undergraduate research process. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 22(3): 201-08.
29. Leckie, G. J., and A. Fullerton. 1999. Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: Faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices. College and Research Libraries 60(1): 9-29.
30. McKenzie, P. J., and R. F. Carey. 2000. 'What's wrong with that woman?' - Positioning theory and information-seeking behaviour. In CAIS 2000: Dimensions of a global information science: Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science, ed. A. Kublik. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta. Available: http://www.slis.ualberta.ca/cais2000/mckenzie. htm
31. Ren, Wen-Hua. 2000. Attending to the relational aspects of the faculty citation search. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 26(2): 119-123.
32. Shotter, J. 1989. Social accountability and the social construction of 'you.' In J. Shatter & K. J. Gergen, eds., Texts of Identity (133-51). London: Sage.
33. Snavely, L, and N. Cooper. 1997. Competing agendas in higher education: Finding a place for information literacy. Reference and User Services Quarterly 37(1): 53-62.
34. Spitzer, A. M. 1989. Bringing an interdisciplinary world view to English 101 - The library's involvement. The Reference Librarian 24: 113-21.
35. Stahl, A. D. 1997. "What I want in a librarian": One new faculty member's perspective. Reference and User Services Quarterly 37(2): 133-35.
36. Stein, L. L., and J. M. Lamb. 1998. Not just another BI: Faculty-librarian collaboration to guide students through the research process. Research Strategies 16(1): 29-39.
37. Sugarman, T. S., and C. Demetracopoulos. 2001. Creating a web research guide: Collaboration between liaisons, faculty and students. Reference Services Review 29(2): 150-56.
38. Tuominen, K., and R. Savolainen. 1996. A social constructionist approach to the study of information use as discursive action. In Information seeking in context: Proceedings of an international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts, ed. P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, and B. Dervin. London: Taylor Graham, 81-96.
39. van Langenhove, L., and R. Harré. 1999. Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré and L. van Langenhove, eds., Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (14-31). Oxford: Blackwell.
40. Warmkessel, M. Markoff and F. M. Carothers. 1993. Collaborative learning and bibliographic instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 19(1): 4-7.
41. Winner, M. C. 1998. Librarians as partners in the classroom: An increasing imperative. Reference Services Review 26(1): 25-30.
42. Zhang, W. 2001. Building partnerships in liberal arts education: Library team teaching. Reference Services Review 29(2): 141-49.