Opinions and experiences of university faculty regarding library research instruction. Results of a web-based survey at the University of Southern Colorado

Research Strategies

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 191-201

  Gonzales, Rhonda ^a  

^a Malik and Seeme Hasan School of Business   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035786389     PISSN: 07343310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0734-3310(02)00090-3     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Amstutz, D. (1997). University faculty and information literacy: who teaches the students? Research Strategies, 15 (1), 18-25.
2. Cannon, A. (1994). Faculty survey on library research instruction. RQ, 33 (4), 524-541.
3. Hardesty, L. (1990). Faculty and the library: the undergraduate experience. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
4. Matz, C. M. (1999). Administration of web versus paper surveys: mode effects and response rates. Doctoral dissertation, School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
5. Maynard, J. E. (1990). A case study of faculty attitudes toward library instruction: the Citadel experience. Reference Services Review, 18 (2), 67-76.
6. Thomas, J. (1994). Faculty attitudes and habits concerning library instruction: how much has changed since 1982? Research Strategies, 12 (4), 209-223.
7. Thomas, J., & Ensor, P. (1984). The university faculty and library instruction. RQ, 23 (4), 431-437.