Checkpoints controlling mitosis

BioEssays

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 351-363

  Clarke, Duncan J ^a   Giménez Abián, Juan F ^b  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA TOPOISOMERASE (ATP HYDROLYSING);

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; DNA DAMAGE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA TOPOISOMERASES, TYPE II; HUMANS; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; S PHASE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 0343618673     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200004)22:4<351::AID-BIES5>3.0.CO;2-W     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Skibbens RV, Hieter P. Kinetochores and the checkpoint mechanism that monitors for defects in the chromosome segregation machinery. Annu Rev Genet 1998;32:307-337.
2. Rhind N, Russell P. Mitotic DNA damage and replication checkpoints in yeast. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1998;10:749-758.
3. Elledge SJ. Cell cycle checkpoints: presenting an identity crisis. Science 1996;274:1664-1672.
4. Rudner AD, Murray AW. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1996;8:773-780.
5. Weinert T. DNA damage checkpoints update: getting molecular. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1998;8:185-193.
6. Allen JB, Zhou Z, Siede W, Friedberg EC, Elledge SJ. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev 1994;8:2401-2415.
7. Rao PN, Johnson RT. Mammalian cell fusion: studies on the regulation of DNA synthesis and mitosis. Nature 1970;225:159-162.
8. Yamamoto A, Guacci V, Koshland D. Pds1p is required for faithful execution of anaphase in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 1996;133 85-97.
9. Cohen-Fix O, Peters JM, Kirschner MW, Koshland D. Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev 1996;1C: 3081-3093.
10. Cohen-Fix O, Koshland D. The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997 94 14361-14366.
11. Ciosk R, Zachariae W, Michaelis C, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Nasmyth K. An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell 1998;93:1067-1076.
12. Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 1997;91: 35-45.
13. Uhlmann F, Nasmyth K. Cohesion between sister chromatids must be established during DNA replication Curr Biol 1998;8:1095-1101.
14. Uhlmann F, Lottspeich F, Nasmyth K. Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature 1999;400:37-42.
15. Funabiki H, Kumada K, Yanagida M. Fission yeast Cut1 and Cut2 are essential for sister cnromatid separation, concentrate along the metaphase spindle and form large complexes. EMBO J 1996;15: 6617-6628.
16. Zou H, McGarry TJ, Bernal T, Kirschner MW. Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis. Science 1999; 285:418-422.
17. Weinert TA, Hartwell LH. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in S. cerevisiae. Science 1988;241:317-322.
18. Lydall D, Weinert T. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science 1995;270:1488-1491.
19. Gardner R, Putnam CW, Weinert T. RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast. EMBO J 1999; 18:3173-3185.
20. Garvik B, Carson M, Hartwell L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 1995;15:6128-6138.
21. Lee SE, Moore JK, Holmes A, Umezu K, Kolodner RD, Haber JE. Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 1998;94:399-409.
22. Longhese MP, Paciotti V, Fraschini R, Zaccarini R, Plevani P, Lucchini G. The novel DNA damage checkpoint protein ddc1p is phosphorylated periodically during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage in budding yeast. EMBO J 1997;16:5216-5226.
23. Weinert TA, Kiser GL, Hartwell LH. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev 1994;8:652-665.
24. Paciotti V, Lucchini G, Plevani P, Longhese MP. Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeas: DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p. EMBO J 1998;17:4199-4209.
25. Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, Tetzlaff M, Elledge S. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by Chk1 and Rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 1999;286:1166-1171.
26. Sun Z, Fay DS, Marini F, Foiani M, Stern DF. Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoin: pathways. Genes Dev 1996;10:395-406.
27. Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu O, Wang B, Elledge SJ. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kirases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 1996;271:357-360.
28. Emili A. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 1998;2:183-189.
29. Sun Z, Hsiao J, Fay DS, Stern DF. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 1998; 281:272-274.
30. Huang M, Zhou Z, Elledge SJ. The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor. Cell 1998;94:595-605.
31. Savitsky K, Bar SA, Gilad S, Rotman G, Ziv Y, Vanagaite L, Tagle DA, Smith S, Uziel T, Sfez S, et al. A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to Pl-3 kinase. Science 1995;268:1749-1753.
32. Matsuoka S, Huang M, Elledge SJ. Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science 1998;282:1893-1897.
33. Kastan MB, Zhan Q, el DW, Carrier F, Jacks T, Walsh WV, Plunkett BS, Vogelstein B, Fornace AJ. A mammalian cell cycle checkpoint pathway utilizing p53 and GADD45 is defective in ataxia-telangiectasia. Cell 1992; 71:587-597.
34. Wright JA, Keegan KS, Herendeen DR, Bentley NJ, Carr AM, Hoekstra MF. Concannon P. Protein kinase mutants of human ATR increase sensitivity to UV and ionizing radiation and abrogate cell cycle checkpoint control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:7445-7450.
35. Sanchez Y, Wong C, Thoma RS, Richman R, Wu Z, Piwnica WH, Elledge SJ. Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25. Science 1997;277: 1497-1501.
36. Peng CY, Graves PR, Thoma RS, Wu Z, Shaw AS, Piwnica WH. Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phos-phorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216. Science 1997;277: 1501-1505.
37. Tibbetts RS, Brumbaugh KM, Williams JM, Sarkaria JN, Cliby WA, Shieh SY, Taya Y, Prives C, Abraham RT. A role for ATR in the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53. Genes Dev 1999;13:152-157.
38. Banin S, Moyal L, Shieh S, Taya Y, Anderson CW, Chessa L, Smorodinsky NI, Prives C, Reiss Y, Shiloh Y, Ziv Y. Enhanced phosphorylation of p53 by ATM in response to DNA damage. Science 1998;281:1674-1677.
39. Canman CE, Lim DS, Cimprich KA, Taya Y, Tamai K, Sakaguchi K, Appella E, Kastan MB, Siliciano JD. Activation of the ATM kinase by ionizing radiation and phosphorylation of p53. Science 1998;281: 1677-1679.
40. Cortez D, Wang Y, Qin J, Elledge S. Requirement of ATM-dependent phosphorylation of Brca1 in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks Science 1999;286:1162-1166.
41. Xu X, Weaver Z, Linke SP, Li C, Gotay J, Wang XW, Harris CC, Ried T, Deng CX. Centrosome amplification and a defective G2-M cell cycle checkpoint induce genetic instability in BRCA1 exon 11 isoform-deficient cells. Mol Cell 1999;3:389-395.
42. Bunz F, Dutriaux A, Lengauer C, Waldman T, Zhou S, Brown JP, Sedivy JM, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Requirement for p53 and p21 to sustain G2 arrest after DNA damage. Science 1998;282:1497-1501.
43. Chan TA, Hermeking H, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. 14-3-3Sigma is required to prevent mitotic catastrophe after DNA damage. Nature 1999;401:616-620.
44. Hermeking H, Lengauer C, Polyak K, He TC, Zhang L, Thiagalingam S, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. 14-3-3 Sigma is a p53-regulated inhibitor of G2/M progression. Mol Cell 1997;1:3-11.
45. Carney JP, Maser RS, Olivares H, Davis EM, Le BM, Yates JR, Hays L, Morgan WF, Petrini JH. The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell 1998;93:477-486.
46. Navas TA, Zhou Z, Elledge SJ. DNA polymerase epsilon links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint Cell 1995;80:29-39.
47. Sugimoto K, Shimomura T, Hashimoto K, Araki H, Sugino A, Matsumoto K. Rfc5, a small suburit of replication factor C complex, couples DNA replication and mitosis in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:7048-7052.
48. Araki H, Leem SH, Phongdara A, Sugino A. Dpb11, which interacts with DNA polymerase II(epsilon) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has a dual role in S-phase progression and at a cell cycle checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:11791-11795.
49. Wang H, Elledge SJ, DRC1, DNA replication and checkpoint protein 1, functions with DPB11 to control DNA replication and the S-phase checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:3824-3829.
50. Santocanale C, Diffley JF. A Mec1-and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 1998;395: 615-618.
51. Tanaka T, Nasmyth K. Association of RPA with chromosomal replication origins requires an mcm protein, and is regulated by rad53, and cyclinand Dbf4-dependent kinases. EMBO J 1998;17:5182-5191.
52. Clarke DJ, Segal M, Mondesert G, Reed SI. The Pds1 anaphase inhibitor and Mec1 kinase define distinct checkpoints coupling S phase with mitosis in budding yeast. Curr Biol 1999;9:365-368.
53. Blat Y, Kleckner N. Cohesins bind to preferential sites along yeast chromosome III, with differential regulation along arms versus the centric region. Cell 1999;98:249-259.
54. Downes CS, Clarke DJ, Mullinger AM, Giménez-Abián JF, Creighton AM, Johnson RT. A topoisomerase II-dependent G2 cycle checkpoint in mammalian cells. Nature 1994;372:467-470.
55. Giménez-Abián JF, Clarke DJ, Mullinger AM, Downes CS, Johnson RT. A postprophase topoisonerase II-dependent chromatid core separation step in the formation of metaphase chromosomes. J Cell Biol 1995;131: 7-17.
56. Uemura T, Ohkura H, Adachi Y, Morino K, Shiozaki K, Yanagida M. DNA topoisomerase II is required for condensation and separation of mitotic chromosomes in S. pombe. Cell 1987;50:917-925.
57. Holm C, Goto T, Wang JC, Botstein D. DNA topoisomerase II is required at the time of mitosis in yeast. Cell 1985;41:553-563.
58. Nicklas RB. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 1997;275: 632-637.
59. Reder CL, Schultz A, Cole R, Sluder G. Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J Cell Biol 1994;127:1301-1310.
60. Li R, Murray AW. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 1991;66:519-531.
61. Taylor SS, McKeon F. Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell 1997;89:727-735.
62. Hyman AA, Karsenti E. Morphogenetic properties of microtubules and mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 1996;84:401-410.
63. Rieder CL, Cole RW, Khodjakov A, Sluder G. The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores J Cell Biol 1995;130:941-948.
64. Wells WA, Murray AW. Aberrantly segregating centromeres activate the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 1996;133: 75-84.
65. Gorbsky GJ, Ricketts WA. Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J Cell Biol 1993;122: 1311-1321.
66. McIntosh JR. Structural and mechanical control of mitotic progression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1991;56:613-619.
67. Nicklas RB, Ward SC, Gorbsky GJ. Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. J Cell Biol 1995;130:929-939.
68. Callan HG, Jacobs PA. The meiotic process in Mantis religiosa L. Males. J Genet 1957;55:200-217.
69. Waters JC, Chen RH, Murray AW, Gorbsky GJ, Salmon ED, Nicklas RB. Mad2 binding by phosphorylated kiretochores links error detection and checkpoint action in mitosis. Curr Biol 1999;9:649-652.
70. Rieder CL, Khodjakov A, Paliulis LV, Fortier TM, Cole RW, Sluder G. Mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells with two spindles implications for the metaphase/anaphase transition checkpoint and cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:5107-5112.
71. Hoyt MA, Totis L, Roberts BT. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 1991;66: 507-517.
72. Weiss E, Winey M. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplicalion gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint. J Cell Biol 1996;132:111-123.
73. Waters JC, Chen RH, Murray AW, Salmon ED. Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule atlachment, not tension. J Cell Biol 1998;141:1181-1191.
74. Hardwick KG, Weiss E, Luca FC, Winey M, Murray AW. Activation of the budding yeast spindle assembly checkpoint without mitotic spindle disruption. Science 1996;273:953-956.
75. Hardwick KG, Murray AW. Mad1p, a phosphoprotein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 1995;131: 709-720.
76. Li Y, Gorbea C, Mahaffey D, Rechsteiner M, Benezra R. MAD2 associates with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex and inhibits its activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:12431-12436.
77. Hwang LH, Lau LF, Smith DL, Mistrot CA, Hardwick KG, Hwang ES, Amon A, Murray AW. Budding yeast Cdc20, a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 1998;279:1041-1044.
78. Nasmyth K Separating sister chromatids Trends Biochem Sci 1999; 24:98-104.
79. Chen RH, Waters JC, Salmon ED, Murray AW. Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores. Science 1996;274:242-246.
80. Fesquet D, Fitzpatrick PJ, Johnson AL, Kramer KM, Toyn JH. Johnston LH. A Bub2p-dependent spindle checkpoint pathway regulates the Dbf2p kinase in budding yeast EMBO J 1999;18:2424-2434.
81. Alexandru G, Zachariae W, Schleiffer A, Nasmyth K. Sister chromatid separation and chromosome re-duplication are regulated by different mechanisms in response to spindle damage. EMBO J 1999;18: 2707-2721.
82. Fraschini R, Formenti E, Lucchini G, Piatti S. Budding yeast Bub2 is localized at spindle pole bodies and activates the mitotic checkpoint v a a different pathway from Mad2 J Cell Biol 1999;145:979-991.
83. Li R. Bifurcation of the mitotic checkpoint pathway in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:4989-4994.
84. Toczyski DP, Galgoczy DJ, Hartwell LH CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint Cell 1997;90: 1097-1106.
85. Minshull J, Straight A, Rudner AD, Dernburg AF, Belmont A, Murray AW. Protein phosphatase 2A regulates MPF activity and sister chromatid cohes on in budding yeast. Curr Biol 1996;6:1609-1620.