Aberrantly segregating centromeres activate the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 133, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 75-84

  Wells, William A E ^b   Murray, Andrew W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENE MUTATION; MINICHROMOSOME; MITOSIS; MITOSIS INHIBITION; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; PEDIGREE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; YEAST CELL;

CELL CYCLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MUTATION; PLASMIDS; YEASTS;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 0029912971     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.133.1.75     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aparicio, O.M., B.L Billington, and D.E. Gottschling. 1991. Modifiers of position effect are shared between telomeric and silent mating-type loci in S. cerevisiae Cell. 66:1279-1287
2. Bernat, R L , G.G. Borisy, N.F Rothfield, and W.C Earnshaw. 1990. Injection of anticentromere antibodies in interphase disrupts events required for chromosome movement at mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 111:1519-1533.
3. Cassimeris, L., C.L. Rieder, and E D Salmon. 1994. Microtubule assembly and kinetochore directional instability in vertebrate monopolar spindles: implications for the mechanism of chromosome congression. J. Cell Sci. 107:285-297.
4. Chelbowicz-Sledziewska, E., and A.Z. Sledziewska. 1985. Construction of multicopy yeast plasmids with regulated centromere function. Gene (Amst.). 39: 25-31.
5. Clarke, L., and J. Carbon 1980. Isolation of a yeast centromere and construction of functional small circular chromosomes. Nature (Lond.). 287:504-509.
6. Dani, G.M., and V.A. Zakian. 1983. Mitotic and meiotic stability of linear plasmids in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 80:3406-3410.
7. Ferguson, B.M., and W.L. Fangman. 1992. A position effect on the time of replication origin activation in yeast. Cell 68.333-339
8. Futcher, B., and J Carbon 1986. Toxic effects of excess cloned centromeres. Mol Cell. Biol. 6:2213-2222.
9. Glotzer, M., A.W. Murray, and M.W. Kirschner. 1991. Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature (Lond.). 349:132-138.
10. Guacci, V., E. Hogan, and D. Koshland. 1994. Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 125:517-530.
11. Hartwell, L.H., and T.A. Weinert. 1989. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science (Wash. DC). 246:629-634.
12. Hartwell, L.H., and M.B Kastan. 1994. Cell cycle control and cancer. Science (Wash. DC). 266:1821-1828
13. Hershko, A., D. Ganoth, J. Pehrson, R.E. Palazzo, and L.H. Cohen. 1991. Methylated ubiquitin inhibits cyclin degradation in clam embryo extracts. J. Biol. Chem. 266:16376-16379.
14. Hieter, P., C. Mann, M. Snyder, and R.W. Davis. 1985. Mitotic stability of yeast chromosomes: a colony colour assay that measures nondisjunction and chromosome loss. Cell. 40:381-392.
15. Hill, A., and K. Bloom. 1987. Genetic manipulation of centromere function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:2397-2405.
16. Holloway, S.L., M. Glotzer, R.W. King, and A.W. Murray. 1993. Anaphase is initiated by proteolysis rather than by the inactivation of MPF. Cell. 73: 1393-1402.
17. Hoyt, M.A., L. Totis, and B.T. Roberts. 1991. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 66:507-517.
18. Koshland, D., L Rutledge, H M. Fitzgerald, and L.H. Hartwell. 1987. A genetic analysis of dicentric minichromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. 48: 801-812.
19. Kung, A.L., S.W. Sherwood, and R.T. Schimke. 1990. Cell line-specific differences in the control of cell cycle progression in the absence of mitosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:9553-9557.
20. Li, R., and A.W. Murray. 1991. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 66:519-531.
21. Li, X., and R.B. Nicklas 1995. Mitotic forces control a cell cycle checkpoint. Nature (Lond.). 373:630-632.
22. Murray, A.W. 1994. Cell cycle checkpoints. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6:872-876.
23. Murray, A.W 1995. The genetics of cell cycle checkpoints. Curr. Opin. Genet. 5:5-11.
24. Murray, A.W., and J.W. Szostak. 1983a. Construction of artificial chromosomes in yeast. Nature (Lond). 305:189-193.
25. Murray, A.W., and J.W Szostak. 1983b. Pedigree analysis of plasmid segregation in yeast. Cell. 34:961-970.
26. Murray, A.W., and J.W. Szostak. 1985. Chromosome segregation in mitosis and meiosis. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 1:289-315.
27. Murray, A.W., and J.W. Szostak. 1986. Construction and behavior of circularly permuted and telocentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3166-3172.
28. Murray, A.W., N.P. Schultes, and J.W. Szostak. 1986. Chromosome length controls mitotic chromosome segregation in yeast. Cell 45:529-536.
29. Neff, M.W., and D.J. Burke. 1992. A delay in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle that is induced by a dicentric chromosome and dependent upon mitotic checkpoints. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:3857-3864.
30. Nicklas, R.B., and C.A. Koch. 1969. Chromosome manipulation III. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis J. Cell Biol 43.40-50.
31. Nicklas, R.B., S.C. Ward, and G.J. Gorbsky. 1995. Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 130:929-939.
32. Raghuraman, M.K., B.J. Brewer, and W.L. Fangman. 1994. Activation of a yeast replication origin near a double-stranded DNA break. Genes Dev. 8: 554-562.
33. Rieder, C.L., and S.P. Alexander. 1990. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J. Cell Biol. 110:81-95.
34. Rieder, C.L., and R.E. Palazzo 1992. Colcemid and the mitotic cell cycle. J. Cell Sci. 102:387-392
35. Rieder, C.L., and E.D. Salmon. 1994. Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 124:223-233.
36. Rieder, C.L., R.W. Cole, A. Khodjakov, and G. Sluder. 1995. The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 130:941-948.
37. Rieder, C.L., E.A. Davison, L.C.W. Jensen, L. Cassimeris, and E.D. Salmon. 1986. Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and the half-spindle. J. Cell Biol. 103:581-591.
38. Rieder, C.L., A. Schultz, R. Cole, and O. Sluder. 1994. Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J. Cell Biol. 127:1301-1310.
39. Roberts, R.T., K.A. Farr, and M.A. Hoyt. 1994. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint gene BUB1 encodes a novel protein kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol 14: 8282-8291.
40. Runge, K.W., R.J. Wellinger, and V A. Zakian. 1991. Effects of excess centromeres and excess telomeres on chromosome loss rates. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 2919-2928.
41. Sandell, L.L., and V.A. Zakian. 1993. Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss. Cell. 75:729-739.
42. Sherman, F., G. Fink, and C. Lawrence. 1974. Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
43. Skibbens, R.V., V.P. Skeen, and E.D. Salmon. 1993. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 122:859-875.
44. Sluder, G., F.J. Miller, and K. Spanjian. 1986. The role of spindle microtubules in the timing of the cell cycle in echinoderm eggs. J. Exp. Zool. 238:325-336
45. Sluder, G., F.J. Miller, E.A. Thompson, and D.E. Wolf. 1994. Feedback control of the metaphase-anaphase transition in sea urchin zygotes: role of matoriented chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 126:189-198.
46. Smith, D.R , A.P. Smyth, and D.T Moir. 1990. Amplification of large artificial chromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87:8242-8246.
47. Spencer, F., and P. Hieter. 1992. Centromere DNA mutations induce a mitotic delay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89:8908-8912.
48. Tomkiel, J., C.A. Cooke, H. Saitoh, R.L. Bernat, and W.C. Earnshaw. 1994. CENP-C is required for maintaining proper kinetochore size and for a timely transition to anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 125:531-545.
49. Weinert, T.A., and L.H. Hartwell. 1988. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science (Wash. DC). 241:317-322.