Recognizing chromosomes in trouble: Association of the spindle checkpoint protein Bub3p with altered kinetochores and a unique defective centromere

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 18, 2003, Pages 6406-6418

  Kerscher, Oliver ^a,c   Crotti, Luciana B ^a   Basrai, Munira A ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; NOCODAZOLE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BUB3P; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL NUCLEUS; CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; IMAGING; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; WILD TYPE;

BASE SEQUENCE; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL NUCLEUS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; KINETOCHORES; LUMINESCENT PROTEINS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NOCODAZOLE; PROTEIN KINASES; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASES; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

FUNGI; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0043193852     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.18.6406-6418.2003     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adams, A., D. E. Gottschling, C. A. Kaiser, and T. Stearns. 1997. Methods in yeast genetics, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
2. Basu, J., E. Logarinho, S. Herrmann, H. Bousbaa, Z. Li, G. K. Chan, T. J. Yen, C. E. Sunkel, and M. L. Goldberg. 1998. Localization of the Drosophila checkpoint control protein Bub3 to the kinetochore requires Bub1 but not Zw10 or Rod. Chromosoma 107:376-385.
3. Bernard, P., K. Hardwick, and J. P. Javerzat. 1998. Fission yeast bub1 is a mitotic centromere protein essential for the spindle checkpoint and the preservation of correct ploidy through mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 143:1775-1787.
4. Brady, D. M., and K. G. Hardwick. 2000. Complex formation between Mad1p, Bub1p and Bub3p is crucial for spindle checkpoint function. Curr. Biol. 10:675-678.
5. Breeden, L. L. 1997. Alpha-factor synchronization of budding yeast. Methods Enzymol. 283:332-341.
6. Burgess, S., and N. Kleckner. 1999. Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governed by three layers of organization. Genes Dev. 13: 1871-1883.
7. Cahill, D. P., et al. 1998. Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature 392:300-303.
8. Campbell, M. S., G. K. Chan, and T. J. Yen. 2001. Mitotic checkpoint proteins HsMAD1 and HsMAD2 are associated with nuclear pore complexes in interphase. J. Cell Sci. 114:953-963.
9. Castillo, A. R., J. B. Meehl, G. Morgan, A. Schutz-Geschwender, and M. Winey. 2002. The yeast protein kinase Mps1p is required for assembly of the integral spindle pole body component Spc42p. J. Cell Biol. 156:453-465.
10. Cheeseman, I. M., D. G. Drubin, and G. Barnes. 2002. Simple centromere, complex kinetochore: linking spindle microtubules and centromeric DNA in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 157:199-203.
11. Chen, R. H., A. Shevchenko, M. Mann, and A. W. Murray. 1998. Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 143:283-295.
12. Chen, R. H., J. C. Waters, E. D. Salmon, and A. W. Murray. 1996. Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores. Science 274:242-246.
13. Chen, R. H., D. M. Brady, D. Smith, A. W. Murray, and K. G. Hardwick. 1999. The spindle checkpoint of budding yeast depends on a tight complex between the Mad1 and Mad2 proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 10:2607-2618.
14. Ciosk, R., W. Zachariae, C. Michaelis, A. Shevchenko, M. Mann, and K. Nasmyth. 1998. An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell 93:1067-1076.
15. Daum, J. R., N. Gomez-Ospina, M. Winey, and D. J. Burke. 2000. The spindle checkpoint of Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to separable microtubule-dependent events. Curr. Biol. 10:1375-1378.
16. Elliott, S., M. Knop, G. Schlenstedt, and E. Schiebel. 1999. Spc29p is a component of the Spc110p subcomplex and is essential for spindle pole body duplication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:6205-6210.
17. Farr, K. A., and M. A. Hoyt. 1998. Bub1p kinase activates the Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle assembly checkpoint. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2738-2747.
18. Fraschini, R., E. Formenti, G. Lucchini, and S. Piatti. 1999. Budding yeast Bub2 is localized at spindle pole bodies and activates the mitotic checkpoint via a different pathway from Mad2. J. Cell Biol. 145:979-991.
19. Fraschini, R., A. Beretta, L. Sironim, A. Musacchio, G. Lucchini, and S. Piatti. 2001. Bub3 interaction with Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20 is mediated by WD40 repeats and does not require intact kinetochores. EMBO J. 20:6648-6659.
20. Fraschini, R., A. Beretta, G. Lucchini, and S. Piatti. 2001. Role of the kinetochore protein Ndc10 in mitotic checkpoint activation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Genet. Genomics 266:115-125.
21. Goh, P. Y., and J. V. Kilmartin. 1993. NDCIO: a gene involved in chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 121:503-512.
22. Goshima, G., and M. Yanagida. 2000. Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast. Cell 100:619-633.
23. Hardwick, K. G., E. Weiss, F. C. Luca, M. Winey, and A. W. Murray. 1996. Activation of the budding yeast spindle assembly checkpoint without mitotic spindle disruption. Science 273:953-956.
24. Hardwick, K. G., R. C. Johnston, D. L. Smith, and A. W. Murray. 2000. MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p. J. Cell Biol. 148:871-882.
25. He, X., D. R. Rines, C. W. Espelin, and P. K. Sorger. 2001. Molecular analysis of kinetochore-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. Cell 106: 195-206.
26. Hoyt, M. A., L. Totis, and B. T. Roberts. 1991. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66:507-517.
27. Hyland, K. M., J. Kingsbury, D. Koshland, and P. Hieter. 1999. Ctf19p: a novel kinetochore protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a potential link between the kinetochore and mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 145:15-28.
28. Ikui, A. E., K. Furuya, M. Yanagida, and T. Matsumoto. 2002. Control of localization of a spindle checkpoint protein, Mad2, in fission yeast. J. Cell Sci. 115:1603-1610.
29. Iouk, T., O. Kerscher, R. J. Scott, M. A. Basrai, and R. W. Wozniak. 2002. The yeast nuclear pore complex functionally interacts with components of the spindle assembly checkpoint J. Cell Biol. 159:807-819.
30. Irniger, S. 2002. Cyclin destruction in mitosis: a crucial task of Cdc20. FEBS Lett. 532:7-11.
31. Kitagawa, K., R. Abdulee, P. K. Bansal, G. Cagney, S. Fields, and P. Hieter. 2003. Requirement of Skp1-Bub1 interaction for kinetochore-mediated activation of the spindle checkpoint. Mol. Cell 11:1201-1213.
32. Lauze, E., B. Stoelcker, F. C. Luca, E. Weiss, A. R. Schutz, and M. Winey. 1995. Yeast spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 encodes an essential dual specificity protein kinase. EMBO J. 14:1655-1663.
33. Li, R., and A. W. Murray. 1991. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66:519-531.
34. Li, Y., and R. Benezra. 1996. Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2. Science 274:246-248.
35. Martinez-Exposito, M. J., K. B. Kaplan, J. Copeland, and P. K. Sorger. 1999. Retention of the BUB3 checkpoint protein on lagging chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:8493-8498.
36. Meluh, P. B., and D. Koshland. 1997. Budding yeast centromere composition and assembly as revealed by in vivo cross-linking. Genes Dev. 11:3401-3412.
37. Millband, D. N., and K. G. Hardwick. 2002. Fission yeast Mad3p is required for Mad2p to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex and localizes to kinetochores in a Bub1p-, Bub3p-, and Mph1p-dependent manner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:2728-2742.
38. Millband, D. N., L. Campbell, and K. G. Hardwick. 2002. The awesome power of multiple model systems: interpreting the complex nature of spindle checkpoint signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 12:205-209.
39. Musacchio, A., and K. G. Hardwick. 2002. The spindle checkpoint: structural insights into dynamic signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:731-741.
40. Panzeri, L., L. Landonio, A. Stotz, and P. Philippsen. 1985. Role of conserved sequence elements in yeast centromere DNA. EMBO J. 4:1867-1874.
41. Pearson, C. G., P. S. Maddox, E. D. Salmon, and K. Bloom. 2001. Budding yeast chromosome structure and dynamics during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 152: 1255-1266.
42. Pereira, G., T. Hofken, J. Grindlay, C. Manson, and E. Schiebel. 2000. The Bub2p spindle checkpoint links nuclear migration with mitotic exit. Mol. Cell 6:1-10.
43. Roberts, B. T., K. A. Farr, and M. A. Hoyt. 1994. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint gene BUB1 encodes a novel protein kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:8282-8291.
44. Sharp-Baker, H., and R. H. Chen. 2001. Spindle checkpoint protein Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, and CENP-E, independently of its kinase activity. J. Cell Biol. 153:1239-1250.
45. Sherman, F., G. R. Fink, and J. B. Hicks. 1986. Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
46. Spencer, F., S. L. Gerring, C. Connelly, and P. Hieter. 1990. Mitotic chromosome transmission fidelity mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 124:237-249.
47. Spencer, F., and P. Hieter. 1992. Centromere DNA mutations induce a mitotic delay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 8908-8912.
48. Sudakin, V., G. K. Chan, and T. J. Yen. 2001. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154:925-936.
49. Tavormina, P. A., and D. J. Burke. 1998. Cell cycle arrest in cdc20 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is independent of Ndc10p and kinetochore function but requires a subset of spindle checkpoint genes. Genetics 148:1701-1713.
50. Taylor, S. S., E. Ha, and F. McKeon. 1998. The human homologue of Bub3 is required for kinetochore localization of Bub1 and a Mad3/Bub1-related protein kinase. J. Cell Biol. 142:1-11.
51. Toyoda, Y., K. Furuya, G. Goshima, K. Nagao, K. Takahashi, and M. Yanagida. 2002. Requirement of chromatid cohesion proteins rad21/scc1 and mis4/scc2 for normal spindle-kinetochore interaction in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 12:347-358.
52. Warren, C. D., D. M. Brady, R. C. Johnston, J. S. Hanna, K. G. Hardwick, and F. Spencer. 2002. Distinct chromosome segregation roles for spindle checkpoint proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 13:3029-3041.
53. Weiss, E., and M. Winey. 1996. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 132:111-123.
54. Wigge, P. A., O. N. Jensen, S. Holmes, S. Soues, M. Mann, and J. V. Kilmartin. 1998. Analysis of the Saccharomyces spindle pole by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry. J. Cell Biol. 141:967-977.
55. Winey, M., and E. T. O'Toole. 2001. The spindle cycle in budding yeast. Nat. Cell. Biol. 1:E23-E27.