Closed-loop identification of an industrial robot containing flexibilities

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 291-300

  Östring, Måns ^a   Gunnarsson, Svante ^a   Norrlöf, Mikael ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Flexible arms; Identification; Robotics

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; FEEDBACK CONTROL; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS;

MECHANICAL FLEXIBILITIES;

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS;

ROBOT;

EID: 0037358202     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0661(02)00114-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aberger, M. (2000). Effects of nonlinearities in black box identification of an industrial robot, Tech. Rep. LiTH-ISY-R-2322, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, SE-581 83. Linköping, Sweden.
2. Albu-Schäffer, A., & Hirzinger, G. (2001). Parameter identification and passivity based joint control for a 7 dof torque controlled lightweight robot. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE conference on robotics & automation. Seoul, Korea.
3. Aström, K. J., & Wittenmark, B. (1984). Computer controlled systems: Theory and design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Berglund, E., & Hovland, G. (2000). Automatic elasticity tuning of industrial robot manipulators. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE conference on decision and control. Sydney, Australia.
5. Dépincé, P. (1998). Parameters identification of flexible robots. IEEE Proceedings on Robotics and Automation, 1116-1121.
6. ElMaraghy, W.H., ElMaraghy, H.A., Zaki, A., & Massoud, A. (1994). A study on the design and control of robot manipulators with flexibilities. In: Fourth IFAC symposium on robot control. Capri, Italy.
7. Forssell, U., & Ljung, L. (1999). Closed-loop identification revisited. Automatica, 35, 1215-1241.
8. Gautier, M., & Poignet, P. (2001). Extended Kalman filtering and weighted least squares dynamic identification of robot. Control Engineering Practice, 9, 1361-1372.
9. Grotjahn, M., Daemi, M., & Heimann, B. (2001). Friction and rigid body identification of robot dynamic. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 38, 1889-1902.
10. Johansson, R., Robertsson, A., Nilsson, K., & Verhaegen, M. (2000). State-space system identification of robot manipulator dynamics. Mechatronics, 10, 403-418.
11. Kozlowski, K. (1998). Modelling and identification in robotics. Berlin: Springer.
12. Ljung, L. (1999). System identification: Theory for the user (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
13. Ljung, L. (2000). System identification toolbox-user's guide. Sherborn, MA, USA: The MathWorks Inc.
14. Nissing, D., & Polzer, J. (2000). Parameter identification of a substitution model for a flexible link. System Identification Symposium SYSID 2000.
15. Norrlöf, M. (2000). Iterative learning control analysis, design and experiments. Ph.D. thesis, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
16. Norrlöf, M., Tjärnström, F., Östring, M., & Aberger, M. (2002). Modeling and identification of a mechanical industrial manipulator. In: IFAC World congress. Barcelona, Spain.
17. Östring, M., Gunnarsson, S., & Norrlöf, M., 2001. Closed loop identification of physical parameters of an industrial robot. In: Proceedings of the 32nd international symposium on robotics. Seoul, Korea.
18. Pham, M., Gautier, M., & Poignet, P. (2001). Identification of joint stiffness with bandpass filtering. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE international conference on robotics & automation. Seoul, Korea.
19. Pintelon, R., & Schoukens, J. (2001). System identification: A frequency domain approach. Somerset, NJ: IEEE Press and John Wiley & Sons.
20. Söderström, T., & Stoica, P. (1989). System identification. Prentice-Hall International, Hemel Hemptstead, Hertfordshire.
21. Swevers, J., Ganseman, C., Tükel, D., Schutter, J. D., & Brussel, H. V. (1997). Optimal robot excitation and identification. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 13, 730-740.
22. Wang, Q.-G., Bi, Q., & Zou, B. (1996). Parameter identification of continuous-time mechanical systems without sensing acceleration. Computers in Industry, 28, 207-217.