How might a stage model of reading development be helpful in the classroom?

Educational Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 727-751

  Hempenstall, Kerry ^a  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 8644266878     PISSN: 01443410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144341042000271737     Document Type: Review

References (124)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Adams, G., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
3. Alexander, J. C. (1998). Reading skill and context facilitation: A classic study revisited. The Journal of Educational Research, 9, 314-318.
4. Alexander, K., Entwisle, D., & Olsen, C. R. (1997). Early schooling and inequality: Socioeconomic disparities in children's learning. London: Palmer Press.
5. Apel, K., & Swank, L. K. (1999). Second chances: Improving decoding skills in the older student. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 231-243.
6. Baker, S. K., Gersten, R., & Keating, T. (2000). When less may be more: A 2-year longitudinal evaluation of a volunteer tutoring program requiring minimal training. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 494-514.
7. Baker, S. K., Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., & Stahl, S. A. (1994). Beginning reading: Educational tools for diverse learners. School Psychology Review, 23, 372-391.
8. Bateman, B. (1991). Teaching word recognition to slow-learning children. Reading, Writing and Learning Disabilities, 7, 1-16.
9. Beck, I. L., & Juel, C. (1992). The role of decoding in learning to read. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (2nd ed., pp.101-123). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
10. Berninger, V. W. (2001, May). A simple story for the simple view of reading instruction. Paper presented at the conference of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Boulder, CO.
11. Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163-197.
12. Binder, C., Haughton, E., & Bateman, B. (2002). Fluency: Achieving true mastery in the learning process (Professional Papers in Special Education). VA: University of Virginia Curry School of Education. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://curry.edschool.virginia.edu/sped/projects/ose/papers/
13. Blachman, B. A. (1991). Early intervention for children's reading problems: Clinical applications of the research in phonological awareness. Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 51-65.
14. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read - A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.
15. Bruck, M. (1990). Word recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439-454.
16. Bruck, M. (1998). Outcomes of adults with childhood histories of dyslexia. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 179-200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Byrne, B. (1991). The role of phonological awareness in reading acquisition. Australian Journal of Reading, 14, 133-139.
18. Carnine, D. (2000). Why education experts resist effective practices (and what it would take to make education more like medicine). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
19. Chall, J. S. (1979). The great debate: Ten years later, with a modest proposal for reading stages. In L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice in early reading (Vol. 1, pp. 29-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Chall, J. S. (1989). Learning to read: The great debate 20 years later - a response to "Debunking the great phonics myth". Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 521-538.
21. Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 703-708.
22. Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
23. Croft, C. (1997). Write to spell in primary classrooms. In Set Special: Language and Literacy. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
24. Crowley, K., Shrager, J., & Siegler, R. S. (1997). Strategy discovery as a competitive negotiation between metacognitive and associative mechanisms. Developmental Review, 17, 462-489.
25. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22, 8-15.
26. Department for Education and Employment. (1998). The national literacy strategy: Framework for teaching. London: Crown.
27. Department for Education and Employment. (2002). The national literacy strategy: The first four years 1998-2002 (OfSTED Report HMI 555). London: Crown.
28. Department of Education, Employment, and Training. (2001). Consistency project: Links between curriculum frameworks in Vic, SA and QLD in English. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.sofweb.vic.edu.au/assess/consist/ englink.htm
29. Ehri, L. C. (1993). How English orthography influences phonological knowledge as children learn to read and spell. In R. J. Scholes (Ed.), Literacy and language analysis (pp.21-43). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Ehri, L. C. (1994). Development of the ability to read words: Update. In R. Ruddell, M. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 323-358). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
31. Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read word by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116-125.
32. Ehri, L. C. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and same, almost. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory and practice across languages (pp. 237-270). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Ehri, L. C. (1998). Presidential address. In J. P. Williams (Ed.), Scientific studies of reading, (Vol. 2, pp. 97-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250-287.
35. Emmitt, M. (1996). Have I got my head in the sand? - Literacy matters. In "Keys to Life" conference proceedings, Early Years of Schooling Conference (pp. 69-75). Melbourne: Directorate of School Education. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.sofweb.vic.edu.au/eys/pdf/proc96.pdf
36. Felton, R. H., & Pepper, P. P. (1995). Early identification and intervention of phonological deficit in kindergarten and early elementary children at risk for reading disability. School Psychology Review, 24, 405-414.
37. Foorman, B. R. (1995). Research on "the Great Debate": Code-oriented versus whole language approaches to reading instruction. School Psychology Review, 24, 376-392.
38. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Beeler, T., Winikates, D., & Fletcher, J. (1997). Early interventions for children with reading problems: Study designs and preliminary findings. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 63-71.
39. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 301-330.
40. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
41. Goodman, K. S. (1973). Miscue analysis: Applications to reading instruction. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
42. Goodman, K. S. (1974). Effective teachers of reading know language and children. Elementary English, 51, 823-828.
43. Goodman, K. S. (1985). Unity in reading. In H. Singer & R.B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 813-840). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
44. Gough, P. B., Alford, J. A., & Holley-Wilcox, P. (1981). Words and contexts. In O. J. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.), Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 85-102.
45. Gough, P. B., & Wren, S. (1998). The decomposition of decoding. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 19-32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Goulandris, N., & Snowling, M. (1995). Assessing reading skills. In E. Funnell & M. Stuart (Eds.), Learning to read: Psychology in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. pp. 93-129.
47. Greenberg, D., Ehri, L. C., & Perin, D. (1997). Are word reading processes the same or different in adult literacy students and third-fifth graders matched for reading level? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 262-275.
48. Gunn, G., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 90-103.
49. Hall, S. H., & Moats, L. C. (1999). Straight talk about reading: How parents can make a difference during the early years. Chicago: Contemporary Books.
50. Harrison, B. (2002). Do we have a literacy crisis? Reading Reform Foundation, 48. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.rrf.org.uk/ do%20we%20have%20a%20literacy%20crisis.htm
51. Hatcher, P., Hulme, C., & Ellis, A. (1994). Ameliorating reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41-57.
52. Hempenstall, K. (1997). The whole language-phonics controversy: An historical perspective. Educational Psychology, 17, 399-418.
53. Hempenstall, K. (1998). Miscue analysis: A critique. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3(4), 32-37.
54. Henry, M. K. (1997). The decoding/spelling continuum: Integrated decoding and spelling instruction from pre-school to early secondary school. Dyslexia, 3, 178-189.
55. Hill, P. (1995). School effectiveness and improvement: Present realities and future possibilities. Deans Research Seminar Series. Inaugural Professorial Lecture, Faculty of Education, Diversity of Melbourne. Retrieved April 11, 1998, from http://www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/Seminars/dean_lec/list.html
56. Howell, K. W., & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
57. Ingersoll, R. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26-37.
58. Jencks, C. S., & Phillips, M. (1998). America's next achievement test. The American Prospect, 9(40). Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.prospect.org/print/V9/40/jencks-c.html
59. Jencks, C. S., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Ginits, H., et al. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
60. Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47, 1475-1490.
61. Jorm, A. F., & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological receding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 103-147.
62. Jorm, A. F., Share, D. L., McLean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Phonological recoding and learning to read: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 201-207.
63. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
64. Juel, C. (1996). What makes literacy tutoring effective. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 268-289.
65. Kamhi, A. G., & Catts, H. W. (1999). Reading development. In H.W. Catts & A.G. Kamhi (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (pp. 25-50). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
66. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
67. Lewis, L., & Paik, S. (2001). Add it up: Using research to improve education for low-income and minority students. Washington: Poverty and Race Research Action Council. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.prrac.org/ additup.pdf
68. Liberman, A. M. (1997). How theories of speech affect research in reading and writing. In B.A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1-33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
70. Lovett, M. W., & Steinbach, K. A. (1997). The effectiveness of remedial programs for reading disabled children of different ages: Does the benefit decrease for older children? Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 189-209.
71. Lyon, G. R. (1998). Overview of reading and literacy initiatives. Statement to Committee on Labor and Human Resources. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/jeffords.htm
72. Lyon, G. R. (2001). Measuring success: Using assessments and accountability to raise student achievement. Subcommittee on Education Reform Committee on Education and the Workforce, US House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.nrrf.org/ lyon_statement3-01.htm
73. Macmillan, B. (2002). An evaluation of the government's Early Intervention Initiative: The Early Literacy Support programme. Reading Reform Foundation Newsletter, 49. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.rrf.org. uk/49%20bonnie%20macmillan%20article.htm
74. Manzo, K. K. (2002). Some educators see reading rules as too restrictive. Education Week, 21(23), 23-24. Retrieved June 4, 2002 from http://www.edweek. org/ew/newstory. cfm?slug=23read.h21
75. Marks, G. N., & Ainley, J. (1997). Reading comprehension and numeracy among junior secondary school students in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
76. Mastropieri, M. A., Leinart, A. W., & Scruggs, T. E. (1999). Strategies to increase reading fluency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 278-283, 292.
77. Mather, N., & Goldstein, S. (2001). Reading fluency. In Learning disabilities and challenging behaviors: A guide to intervention and classroom management (pp. 235-242). Baltimore MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
78. Mathes, P. G., Howard, J. K., Allen, S. H., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Peer-assisted learning strategies for first-grade readers: Responding to the needs of diverse learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 62-83.
79. Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81-102.
80. Moats, L. C. (1998). Teaching decoding. American Educator, 1-9.
81. Morais, J., Alegria, J., & Content, A. (1987). The relationship between segmental analysis and alphabetic literacy: An interactive view. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 7, 1-24.
82. th, Austin, Texas.
83. Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-330.
84. Nation, K., Allen, R., & Hulme, C. (2001). The limitations of orthographic analogy in early reading development: Performance on the clue-word task depends on phonological priming and elementary decoding skill, not the use of orthographic analogy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 75-94.
85. National Institute for Literacy. (1998). Facts sheets. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.nifl.gov/nifl/facts/reference.html
86. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www. nationalreadingpanel.org
87. Newman, J. M. (1985). Using children's books to teach reading. In J. M. Newman (Ed.), Whole language: Theory and use (pp. 55-64). Portsmouth, NJ: Heinemann.
88. Nicholson, T. (1991). Do children read words better in context or in lists? A classic study revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 444-450.
89. Orr, E. (1994). Australia's literacy challenge: The importance of education in breaking the poverty cycle for Australia's disadvantaged families. Camperdown, NSW: The Smith Family, Research and Training Department.
90. Osborn, J. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (2001). Vocabulary acquisition: Direct teaching and indirect learning. Basic Education Online Edition, 46(3). Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.c-b-e.org/be/iss0111/a2osborn.htm
91. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-562). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
92. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-74. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from www.psychologicalscience.org/newsresearch/publications/ journals/pspi2_2.html
93. Richards, T. L., Dager, S. R., Corina, D., Serafini, S., Heide, A. C., Steury, K., et al. (1999). Dyslexic children have abnormal brain lactate response to reading-related language tasks. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 20, 1393-1398.
94. Sanders, W., & Rivers, J. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
95. Savage, R., Stuart, M., & Hill, V. (2001). The role of scaffolding errors in reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal and a correlational study. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 1-13.
96. Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1995). Getting ready for inclusion: Is the stage set? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 169-179.
97. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 155-168.
98. Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L. G., & Dickinson, C. C. (1996). Reading and spelling difficulties in high school students: Causes and consequences. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 267-294.
99. Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Katz, L., Stuebing, K.K., Fletcher, J.M., Brady, S., et al. (1999). Comprehension and decoding: Patterns of association in children with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 69-94.
100. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological receding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
101. Share, D. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education, 1, 1-57.
102. Shaywitz, S. E., Fletcher, J. M., Holahan, J. M., Shneider, A. E., Marchione, K. E., Stuebing, K. K., et al. (1999). Persistence of dyslexia: The Connecticut longitudinal study at adolescence. Pediatrics, 104, 1351-1339.
103. Simmons, D. C., Gunn, B., Smith, S. B., & Kame'enui, E. J. (1995). Phonological awareness: Application of instructional design. LD Forum, 19(2), 7-10.
104. Singh, N. N., Deitz, D. E. D., & Singh, J. (1992). Behavioural approaches. In N. N. Singh & I. L. Beale (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Nature, theory, and treatment. New York: Springer-Verlag. 270-301.
105. Smith, F. (1973). Psychology and reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
106. Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.rand.org/publications/mr/mr1465/
107. Snow, C. E., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (Eds). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Report of the National Research Council. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/reading/
108. Spear-Swerling, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). The road not taken. An integrative theoretical model of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 91-103.
109. Spector, J. (1995). Phonemic awareness training: Application of principles of direct instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 11, 37-51.
110. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
111. Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity and modularity. Developmental Review, 10, 72-100.
112. Stanovich, K. E. (1993). Does reading make you smarter? Literacy and the development of verbal intelligence. Advances in Child Development and Behaviour, 24, 133-180.
113. Stone, J. E. (2002, Nov). What education's policymakers can learn from the Enron collapse. In Education Consumers ClearingHouse. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www. educationconsumers.com/articles/enron%20ecc.htm
114. Swanson, H. L. (2001). Research on interventions for adolescents with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of outcomes related to higher-order processing. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 331-348.
115. Thompson, G. B., & Nicholson, T. (Eds.). (1998). Learning to read: Beyond phonics and whole language. New York: Teachers College Press.
116. Torgesen, J. K. (1998). Catch them before they fall: Identification and assessment to prevent reading failure in young children. American Educator. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/reading/ torgeson_catchthem.html
117. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R., Rashotte, C., Alexander, A., & Conway, T. (1997). Preventative and remedial interventions for children with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 51-61.
118. Tunmer, W. E., & Hoover, W. A. (1993). Phonological recoding skill and beginning reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 161-179.
119. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
120. Weaver, C. (1988). Reading process and practice: From socio-psycholinguistics to whole language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
121. Weir, R. (1990). Philosophy, cultural beliefs and literacy. Interchange, 21(4), 24-33.
122. Wheldall, K., & Beaman, R. (2000). An evaluation of MULTILIT: 'Making Up Lost Time In Literacy'. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
123. Williams, J. P. (1991). Beginning to read: A critique by literacy professionals and a response by Marilyn Jager Adams. The Reading Teacher, 44, 370-395.
124. Wong, B. Y. L. (2001). Commentary: Pointers for literacy instruction from educational technology and research on writing instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 359-369.