Ritual, Fairness and Truth: The Adversarial and Inquisitorial Models of Criminal Trial

The Trial on Trial Volume 1: Truth and Due Process

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 51-69

  McEwan, Jenny ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85187381649     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. D Cairns, Advocacy and the Making of the Adversarial Criminal Trial 1800-1865 (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998) 32-36.
2. Briefing on the Criminal Justice Bill (Bar Council and the Criminal Bar Association), www. barcouncil.org.uk/documents/BriefingOnTheCriminalJusticeBill Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure Report(Cmnd 8092; London, HMSO, 1981)
3. P Duff, ‘Changing Conceptions of the Scottish Criminal Trial: the Duty to Agree Uncontroversial Evidence’ (this volume).
4. M Damaska, ‘Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Study’ (1973) 121 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 506.
5. S C Thaman, ‘The Jury as a Catalyst for the Reform of Criminal Proceedings in Continental Europe: the Cases of Russia and Spain’ in J F Nijboer and J M Reijntjes (eds), Proceedings of the First World Conference on New Trends in Criminal Investigation (The Hague, Koninklijke Vermande bv/Open University of The Netherlands, 1997).
6. M Cappeletti and B G Garth, Civil Procedure: XVI International Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law (Tübingen, JCB Mohr, 1996) 31-32.
7. O Chase, ‘American Exceptionalism and Comparative Procedure’ (2002) 50 American Journal of Comparative Law 277.
8. D Luban, Lawyers and Justice: an Ethical Study (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1988).
9. M McConville and G Wilson, ‘Preface’, in M McConville and G Wilson (eds), The Handbook of the Criminal Justice Process (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002).
10. J Bennett-Levy, ‘Psychiatric Diagnosis in the Witness Box: a Postscript on the “Yorkshire Ripper” Trial’ (1981) 34 Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 305.
11. E P Evans, The Criminal Prosecution and Capital Punishment of Animals (London, Heinemann, 1906) 18-21.
12. M Damaska, ‘Rational and Irrational Proof Revisited’ (1997) 5 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 25
13. A Engelman, A History of Continental Civil Procedure (ed Robert Millar; Boston, Little Brown, 1927).
14. P Haldar, ‘On the Sacrifice in Criminal Evidence’, in P Rush, S McVeigh and A Young (eds), Criminal Legal Doctrine (Dartmouth, Ashgate, 1997).
15. E Coke, First Part of the Institute of the Laws of England (his Commentary on Littleton) (New York, Legal Classics, Gryphon, 1823) 154 (a).
16. J Jaconelli, ‘What is a Trial’ in M Mulholland and B Pullan (eds), Judicial Tribunals in England and Europe, 1200-1700: the Trial in History, vol 1 (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2003), 22.
17. R A Duff, Trials and Punishments (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986).
18. D Ormerod, ‘Commentary’ [2002] Criminal Law Review 978-79.
19. E E Sward, ‘Values, Ideology and the Evolution of the Adversary System’ (1989) 64 Indiana Law Journal 301, 302.
20. M Dubber, ‘The Criminal Trial and the Legitimation of Punishment’ (this volume).
21. J Thibaut and L Walker, Procedural Justice (Hillside, New Jersey, Erlbaum, 1975)
22. ‘A Theory of Procedure’ (1978) 66 California Law Review 541.
23. H F M Crombag in P J van Koppen and S Penrod (eds), Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice:Psychological Perspectives (New York, Kluwer, 2003).
24. E A Lind and T R Tyler, The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (London, Plenum, 1988).
25. A Sanders, J Creaton, S Bird and L Weber, Victims with Learning Disabilities: Home Office Research Findings 44 (London, HMSO, 1996).
26. R Penman, ‘Regulation of Discourse in the Adversary Trial’ (1987) 7 Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 3.
27. L Ellison, ‘The Protection of Vulnerable Witnesses in Court: an Anglo-Dutch Comparison’ (1999) 3 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 29.
28. T Bingham, The Business of Judging: Selected Essays and Speeches (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000) 16.
29. G Davies, C Wilson, R Mitchell and J Milsom, Videotaping Children’s Evidence: an Evaluation (London, Home Office, 1995) 33.
30. W T Pizzi, Trials Without Truth (New York and London, NYU Press, 1999)
31. P Danet and P Bogosch, ‘Fixed Fight or Free-For-All: an Empirical Study of Combativeness in the Adversary System of Justice’ (1980) 7 British Journal of Law and Society 36.
32. R Dunstan, ‘Context for Coercion: Analyzing Properties of Courtroom Questions’ (1980) 7 British Journal of Law and Society 61.
33. J McEwan, ‘In Defence of Vulnerable Witnesses: the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999' (2000) 3 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 1.
34. S M Lipsett, American Exceptionality as a Double-Edged Sword (New York, W W Norton, 1996) 33.
35. J McEwan, ‘Special Measures for Witnesses and Victims’ in M McConville and G Wilson, The Handbook of the Criminal Justice Process (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002).
36. L Farmer, ‘Review of D Cairns’ Advocacy and the Making of the Adversarial Criminal Trial 1800-1865 (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998) 32-36.
37. N Jörg, S Field and C Brants in C Harding, P Fennell, N Jörg and B Swart, Criminal Justice in Europe: a Comparative Study (Oxford, Clarendon, 2002) at 43.
38. W A Wagenaar, P J van Koppen, and H M Crombag, Anchored Narratives: the Psychology of Criminal Evidence (Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993).
39. B Schüneman, ‘Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Reform der Hauptverhandlung in Strafsachen’ in H J Kerner, H Kurry and K Sessar (eds), Deutsche Forschungen zur Kriminalitätsentstehen und Kriminalitätskontrolle (Köln, Carl Heymanns, 1983).
40. S Lees, Carnal Knowledge: Rape on Trial (London, Hamish Hamilton, 1996)
41. Z Adler, Rape on Trial, (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987).
42. N Kibble, ‘The Sexual History Provisions’ [2000] Criminal Law Review 274.
43. J McEwan, ‘The Rape Shield Askew R v A’ (2002) 5 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 257.
44. P J van Koppen and S Penrod, ‘Adversarial or Inquisitorial: Comparing Systems’ in P J van Koppen and S Penrod (eds), Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice: Psychological Perspectives (New York and Dordrecht, Kluwer/Plenum, 2003).
45. J McEwan, Evidence and the Adversarial Process (2nd edn, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998).
46. J Jackson, ‘Evidence: Legal Perspective’ in R Bull and D Carson (eds), Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts (Chichester, Wiley, 1995).
47. P Roberts, ‘Justice for All Two Bad Arguments (and Several Good Suggestions) for Resisting Double Jeopardy Reform’ (2002) 6 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 197
48. I Dennis, ‘Rethinking Double Jeopardy: Justice and Finality in Criminal Process’ [2000] Criminal Law Review 33.
49. P Roberts, ‘Acquittal Misconduct Evidence and Double Jeopardy Principles: from Sambasivam to Z’ [2000] Criminal Law Review 982.