The Distinctiveness of Domestic Abuse: A Freedom-Based Account

Defining Crimes: Essays on The Special Part of the Criminal Law

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Tadros, Victor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Criminal law; Criminal offence; Domestic abuse; Freedom; Violence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919626031     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199269228.003.0006     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. J Horder 'Rethinking Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person' (1994) 14 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 335;
2. J Gardner 'Rationality and the Rule of Law in Offences Against the Person' (1994) Cambridge Law Journal 502.
3. N Lacey, C Wells and O Quick, Rethinking Criminal Law: Texts and Materials (3rd ed., London: Butterworths, 2003), 629-37.
4. R B Felson and J Ackerman, 'Arrest for Domestic and other Assaults' (2001) 39 Criminology 655.
5. L Ellison, 'Prosecuting Domestic Violence without Victim Participation' (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 834.
6. L Feder, 'Police Handling of Domestic and Nondomestic Assault Calls: Is There a Case for Discrimination' (1998) Crime and Delinquency 335.
7. S M Okin, 'Gender, the Public, and the Private', in D Held (ed.) Political Theory Today (Oxford: Polity Press, 1991);
8. N Lacey, 'Theory into Practice? Pornography and the Public/Private Dichotomy', in her Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal Theory (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998).
9. J Stubbs, 'Domestic Violence and Women's Safety: Feminist Challenges to Restorative Justice', in H Strang and J Braithwaite (eds), Restorative justice and Family Violence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
10. C Mirrlees-Black, Domestic Violence: Findings from a New British Crime Survey Self-Completion Questionnaire (London: HMSO, 1999).
11. K Stark, 'From Bartered Woman Syndrome to Coercive Control' (1995). 58 Albany Law Review 1973.
12. D Coker, "Crime Control and Feminist Law Reform in Domestic Violence Law: A Critical Review" (2001) 4 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 800.
13. P Pettit, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 55.
14. J Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972), 143.
15. R E Dobash, R P Dobash, K Cavanagh and R Lewis, Research Evaluation of Programmes for Violent Men (Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit, 1996).
16. C Hoyle and A Sanders, 'Police Response to Domestic Violence: From Victim Choice to Victim Empowerment?' (2000) 40 British Journal of Criminology 14.
17. B J Sturgis and M Sullivan, 'Battered Woman Syndrome, Expert Testimony, and the Distinction between Justification and Excuse'(1994) University of Illinois I aw Review 45;
18. D I. Faigman and A J Wright, 'The Battered Woman Syndrome in the Age of Science' (1997) 39 Arizona Law Review 67.
19. A M Coughlin, 'Excusing Women' (1994) 82 California Law Review 1;
20. J Dressier, 'Battered Women Who Kill Their Sleeping Tormentors', in S Shute and A P Simester (eds), Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
21. A J Ashworth, Principles of Criminal Law (4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 89-90
22. N Lacey, 'In Search of the Responsible Subject: History, Philosophy and the Social Sciences in Criminal Law Theory' (2001) 64 Modern Law Review 350.
23. 'The System of the Criminal Law' (2002) 22 Legal Studies 448.
24. J Gardner and S Shute, 'The Wrongness of Rape' in J Horder (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (4rh series, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
25. A L Bogg and J Stanton-Ife, 'Protecting the vulnerable: legality, harm and theft' (2003) 23 Legal Studies 402.
26. D Husak, 'The Nature and Justifiability of Nonconsummate Offenses' (1995) 37 Arizona Law Review 151.
27. V Tadros and S Tierney, 'The Presumption of Innocence and the Human Rights Act' (2004) 67 Modem Law Review 402.
28. J Temkin, Rape and the Legal Process (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002):
29. A V Sheehan and D J Dickson, Criminal Procedure (2nd ed., London: LexisNexis, 2003), 122-3.