On-line time pressure manipulations L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions

Task-Based Language Teaching

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages 27-62

  Wang, Zhan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85150196578     PISSN: 1877346X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/tblt.5.02wan     Document Type: Chapter

References (101)

1. Ahmadian, M.J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, fluency, and complexity of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35–59.
2. Anderson, J.R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Anderson, J.R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Anderson, J.R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M.D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036–1060.
5. Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: OUP.
6. Baddeley, A.D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208.
7. Bell, H. (2003). Using frequency lists to assess L2 texts. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Swansea.
8. Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In D. Willis & J. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 134–146). London: Heinemann.
9. Bygate, M. (1999). Task as context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language. System, 27(1), 33–48.
10. Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate et al., (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.
11. Bygate, M., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
14. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.
15. Cortina, J.M., & Nouri, H. (2000). Effect size for ANOVA Designs. State University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–129. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–83.
17. De Jong, N. & Perfetti, C.A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61, 533–568.
18. Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M.L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47, 173–210.
19. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: CUP.
20. Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474−507.
21. Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 1–20.
22. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: OUP.
23. Ellis, R. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP.
25. Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in l2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509.
26. Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: OUP.
27. Foster, P. (1996). Doing the task better: How planning time influences students’ performance. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 126–135). Oxford: Heinemann.
28. Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.
29. Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, J. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354−75.
30. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324.
31. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching research, 3, 185–214.
32. Gass, S., Mackey, A., Álvarez-Torres, M.J., & Fernández-García, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549–581.
33. Gilabert, R. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. IRAL, 45, 215–240.
34. Guará-Tavares, M.G. (2008). Pre-task planning, working memory capacity and L2 speech performance. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.
35. Hinkel, E. (2004). TOEFL test strategies with practice tests (3rd ed.) Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s.
36. Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473.
37. Hulstijn, J.H., & Hulstijn, W. (1984). Grammatical errors as a function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 34, 23–43.
38. Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Kawauchi, C. (2005). The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of leaners with low and high intermediate L2 proficiency. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
40. Kello, C.T, & Plaut, D. (2003). Strategic control over rate of processing in word reading: A computational investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 207–232.
41. Kello, C.T. (2004). Control over the time course of cognition in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 942–955.
42. Kello, C.T., & Plaut, D.C. (2000). Strategic control in word reading: Evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 719–750.
43. Kello, C., Plaut, D., & MacWhinney, B. (2000). The task-dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: An empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(3), 340–360.
44. Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258.
45. Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Kroll, J.F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.
47. Lashley, K.S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L.A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112–146). New York, NY: Wiley.
48. Levelt, W.J.M, Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
49. Levelt, W.J.M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 33, 41–103.
50. Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
51. Levelt, W.J.M. (1993). Language use in normal speakers and its disorders. In G. Blanken, J. Dittmann, H. Grimm, J.C. Marshall, & C–W. Wallesch, (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies (pp. 1–15). Berlin: De Gruyter.
52. Levelt, W.J.M. (1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: OUP.
53. Levelt, W.J.M. (2001). Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98(23), 13464–13471.
54. Long M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: CUP.
55. Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221–50.
56. Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2001). Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). Harlow: Longman.
57. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2002). Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 85–104.
59. Meara, P., & Bell, H. (2001). P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect, 16(3), 5–19.
60. Meehl, P.E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244.
61. Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83–108.
62. Meyer, D.E., & Gordon, P.C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 3–26.
63. Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization, Language Teaching Research, 12, 11–37.
64. Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578.
65. Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528.
66. Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148.
67. Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: CUP.
68. Richards, B.J., & Malvern, D.D. (1998). A new research tool: Mathematical modelling in the measurement of vocabulary diversity (Award reference no. R000221995). Final Report to the Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon, UK.
69. Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 99–140.
70. Robinson, P. (2011). Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61(Suppl. 1), 1–36.
71. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249–284.
72. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
74. Sangarun, J. (2005). The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 111–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
75. Sawaki, Y., Stricker, L.J., & Oranje, A.H. (2009). Factor structure of the TOEFL internet-based test. Language Testing, 26(1), 5–30.
76. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
77. Schneider, W., & Chein, J.M. (2003). Controlled & automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 27, 525–559.
78. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A.S., & Levelt, W.J.M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102.
79. Seidenberg, M.S. (1997). Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science, 275, 1599–1603.
80. Shiffrin, R.M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing, II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190.
81. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.
82. Skehan, P. (2009a). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.
83. Skehan, P. (2009b). Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. In H. Daller, D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton, B. Richards, & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: The interface between theory and application (pp. 107–124). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
84. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task-based learning. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 16–33.
85. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49, 93–120.
86. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2005). Strategic and online planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193–218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
87. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing research. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, & I. Vedder, (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching (pp. 263–284). Brussels: Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and Arts.
88. Skehan, P., Bei, X., Li, Q., & Wang, Z. (2012). The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 170–187.
89. Squire, L.R. (1987). Memory and brain. Oxford: OUP.
90. Tajima, M. (2003). The effects of planning on oral performance of Japanese as a foreign language. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University.
91. Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58, 439–473.
92. Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
93. Ullman, M.T. (2001a). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), 37–69.
94. Ullman, M.T. (2001b). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 105–122.
95. Ullman, M.T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270.
96. Ullman, M.T. (2008). The role of memory systems in disorders of language. In B. Stemmer & H.A. Whitaker (Eds.), Handbook of the neuroscience of language (pp. 189–198). Oxford: Elsevier.
97. Ullman, M.T., Pancheva, R., Love, T., Yee, E., Swinney, D., & Hickok, G. (2005). Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia. Brain and Language, 93(2), 185–238.
98. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301.
99. Wendel, J. (1997). Planning and second language narrative production. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Temple University, Japan.
100. Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14, 85–106.
101. Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The Effects of pre-task planning and online planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologicoral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–2.