The Development and Teaching of Word Recognition Skill

Handbook of Reading Research: Volume IV

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 405-431

  Tunmer, William E ^a   Nicholson, Tom ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145844043     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203840412-22     Document Type: Chapter

References (135)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Adams, M.J. (1991). Why not phonics and whole language? In W. Ellis (Ed.), All language and the creation of literacy (pp. 40-53). Baltimore, MD: Orton Society.
3. Adams, M. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific research. Reading and Writing, 5, 113-139.
4. Akamatsu, N. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Japanese-English bilinguals. In M. Joshi & P.G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 481-496). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bergeron, B. S. (1990). What does the term Whole Language mean? Constructing a definition from the literature. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 301-329.
6. Blachman, B. A. (2000). Phonological awareness. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 483-502). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Bowey, J. A. (2005). Predicting individual differences in learning to read. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 155-172). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8. Byrne, B. (1992). Studies in the acquisition procedure for reading: Rationale, hypotheses, and data. In P. B. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 1-34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Byrne, B. (2002). The process of learning to read: A framework for integrating research and educational practice. In R. Stainthorpe & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Learning and teaching reading. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II; Psychological Aspects of Education - Current Trends, 1, 29-43.
10. Byrne, B. (2005). Theories of learning to read. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading:A handbook (pp. 104-119). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
11. Byrne, B., Freebody, P., & Gates, A. (1992). Longitudinal data on the relations of word-wording strategies to comprehension, reading time, and phonological awareness. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 141-151.
12. Calfee, R., & Drum, P. (1986). Research on teaching reading. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 804-849). New York: Macmillan.
13. Cambourne, B. (1988). The whole story: Natural learning and the acquisition of literacy in the classroom. Auckland, New Zealand: Ashton Scholastic.
14. Carroll, J. M., Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., & Stevenson, J. (2003). The development of phonological awareness in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 39, 913-923.
15. Castle, J. M., Riach, J., & Nicholson, T. (1994). Getting offto a better start in reading and spelling: The effects of phonemic awareness instruction within a whole language program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 350-359.
16. Catts, H. W., Fey, M., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities:Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 331-361.
17. Chall, J. S. (1967/1983/1996). Learning to read: The great debate. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
18. Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2001). Does success in the Reading Recovery program depend on developing proficiency in phonological processing skills? A longitudinal study in a whole language instructional context. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 141-176.
19. Christensen, C. A., & Bowey, J. A. (2005). The efficacy of orthographic rime, grapheme-phoneme correspondence, and implicit phonics approaches to teaching decoding skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 327-349.
20. Clay, M. M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties (3rd ed.). Auckland, New Zealand:Heinemann.
21. Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Auckland, New Zealand:Heinemann.
22. Clay, M. M. (1998). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Auckland, New Zealand:Heinemann.
23. Connelly, V., Johnston, R., & Thompson, G. B. (2001). The effects of phonics instruction on the reading comprehension of beginning readers. Reading and Writing, 14, 423-457.
24. Conner, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B. J., Schatschneider, C., & Underwood, P. (2007). Algorithmguided individualized reading instruction. Science, 315, 464-465.
25. Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Katch, L. E. (2004). Beyond the reading wars: Exploring the effect of child-instruction interactions on growth in early reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 305-336.
26. Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Petrella, J. N. (2004). Effective reading comprehension instruction:Examining child X instruction interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 682-698.
27. Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Slominski, L. (2006). Preschool instruction and children’s literacy skill growth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 665-689.
28. Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Underwood, P. S. (2007). A second chance in second grade: The independent and cumulative impact of first- and second-grade reading instruction and students’ letter-word reading skill growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 199-233.
29. Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K., & Share, D. (2002). Orthographic learning during reading:Examining the role of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 185-199.
30. Denton, C. A., & Mathes, P. G. (2003). Intervention for struggling readers: Possibilities and challenges. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 229-251). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
31. Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107-143). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
32. Ehri, L. C. (1997). Sight word learning in normal readers and dyslexics. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading intervention and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 163-189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135-154). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
34. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250-287.
35. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S. Hughes, M., & Moody, S. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605-619.
36. Elbro, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (2004). Early identification. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy (pp. 339-359). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
37. Fletcher-Flinn, C. M., & Thompson, G. B. (2004). A mechanism of implicit lexicalized phonological recoding used concurrently with underdeveloped explicit letter-sound skills in both precocious and normal reading development, Cognition, 90, 303-335.
38. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
39. Foulin, J. N. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18, 129-155.
40. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99.
41. Gillon, G. T. (2004). Phonological awareness: From research to practice. New York: Guilford.
42. Goldenberg, C. (2001). Making schools work for low-income families in the 21st century. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 211-231). New York: Guilford Press.
43. Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6, 126-135.
44. Goodman, K. S. (1986). What’s whole in whole language: A parent-teacher guide. Portsmouth, N.H:Heinemann.
45. Goswami, U. (2001). Early phonological development and the acquisition of literacy. In S. B. Neuman & D. K Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 111-125). New York: Guilford.
46. Gough, P. B. (1983). Context, form and interaction. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 203-211). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47. Gough, P. B. (1993). The beginning of decoding. Reading and Writing, 5, 181-192.
48. Gough, P. B. (1996, February). A pox on both your houses. Paper presented to symposium on integrated direct instruction in reading, sponsored by the Language Arts Foundation of America and Oklahoma City Schools, Oklahoma City.
49. Gough, P. B., & Hillinger, M. L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 179-196.
50. Gough, P. B., Juel, C., & Griffith, P. L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 35-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Gough, P. B., Juel, C., & Roper-Schneider, D. (1983). A two-stage model of initial reading acquisition. In J. A. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.), Searches for meaning in reading/language processing and instruction (pp. 207-211). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
52. Gough, P. B., & Walsh, M. A. (1991). Chinese, phoenicians, and the orthographic cipher. In S. A. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 199-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Greaney, K. T., & Ryder, J. (2005). Evidence of phonological-based word identification deficits among children with difficulties. Set: Research information for teachers, 1, 2-6.
54. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
55. Hatcher, P. J., Goetz, K., Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., Gibbs, S., & Smith, G. (2006). Evidence for the effectiveness of the Early Literacy Support programme. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 351-367.
56. Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Explicit phonological training combined with reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 338-358.
57. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
58. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127-160.
59. Huey, E. B. (1908/1979). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Quinlan, P. (1991). Connectionism and learning to read: Steps toward a phonologically plausible model. Reading and Writing, 3, 159-168.
61. Iversen, S. A., & Tunmer, W. E., (1993). Phonological processing skill and the Reading Recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 112-125.
62. Iversen, S., Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2005). The effects of varying group size on the Reading Recovery approach to preventative early intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 456-472.
63. Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C. & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719-729.
64. Jeynes, W. H., & Littell, S. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of studies examining the effect of whole language instruction on the literacy of low-SES students. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 21-33.
65. Jorm, A., & Share, D. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 103-147.
66. Juel, C. (1991). Beginning reading. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 759-788). New York: Longman.
67. Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1985). Reading and spelling strategies of first-grade children. In J. A. Niles & R. Lalik (Eds.), Issues in literacy: A research perspective (pp. 306-309). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
68. Juel, C., & Minden-Cupp, C. (2000). Learning to read words: Linguistic units and instructional strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 458-492.
69. Korat, O., Klein, P., & Segal-Drori, O. (2007). Maternal mediation in book reading, home literacy environment, and children’s emergent literacy: A comparison between two social groups. Reading and Writing, 20, 361-398.
70. Leach, J. M., Scarborough, H. S., & Rescorla, L. (2003). Late-emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 211-224.
71. Liberman, A. M. (1999). The reading researcher and the reading teacher need the right theory of speech. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 95-112.
72. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
73. Liberman, I. Y., & Liberman, A. M. (1992). Whole language versus code emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading acquisition. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 343-366). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. Lyon, G. R., & Moats, L. C. (1997). Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 578-588.
75. Masonheimer, P., Drum, P., & Ehri, L. C. (1984). Does environmental print identification lead children into word reading? Journal of Reading Behaviour, 16, 257-272.
76. Mathes, P. G., Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J., Francis, D. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148-182.
77. Morris, D., Tyner, T., & Perney, J. (2000). Early steps: Replicating the effects of a first-grade reading intervention program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 681-693.
78. Morrison, F. J., & Cooney, R. (2002). Parenting and academic achievement: Multiple paths to early literacy. In J. Borkowski, S. Ramey Landesman, & M. Bristol-Power (Eds.), Parenting and the child’s world:Influences on academic achievement and social-emotional development (pp. 141-160). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
79. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 International Report. Boston: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
80. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Kennedy, A. M., & Foy, P. (2007). PIRLS 2006 International Report. Boston:International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
81. Muter, V., & Snowling, M. (1998). Concurrent and longitudinal predictors of reading: The role of metalinguistic and short-term memory skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 320-335.
82. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read. An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Child Health and Human Development.
83. Nicholson, T. (1991). Do children read words better in context or in lists? A classic study revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 444-450.
84. Nicholson, T. (1997). Closing the gap on reading failure: Social background, phonemic awareness, and learning to read. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 381-407). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
85. Nicholson, T. (1999). Literacy in the family and society. In G. B. Thompson & T. Nicholson (Eds.), Learning to read: Beyond phonics and whole language (pp. 1-22). New York: Teachers College Press.
86. Nicholson, T. (2000). Reading the writing on the wall: Debates, challenges and opportunities in the teaching of reading. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
87. Nicholson, T. (2002). The social and political contexts of reading: Contempory literacy policy in Aotearoa New Zealand. In P. Adams & H. Ryan (Eds.), Learning to read in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 22-50). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
88. Nicholson, T. (2003). Risk factors in learning to read. In B. Foorman (Ed), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 165-193). Timonium, MD: York Press.
89. Oakhill, J., & Beard, R. (1999). Reading development and the teaching of reading. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
90. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
91. Perfetti, C. A. (1991). The psychology, pedagogy, and politics of reading. Psychological Science, 2, 70-76.
92. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
93. Phillips, B. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2005). Social correlates of emergent literacy. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 173-187). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
94. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Harper Perennial.
95. Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford Press.
96. Pressley, M., Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2006). The state of educational intervention research as viewed through the lens of literacy instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1-19.
97. Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 235-357.
98. Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97-110). New York: Guilford.
99. Scarborough, H. (2005). Developmental relationships between language and reading: Reconciling a beautiful hypothesis with some ugly facts. In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 3-24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
100. Sénéchal, M. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 59-87.
101. Shankweiler, D., & Crain, S. (1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach. Cognition, 24, 139-168.
102. Shankweiler, D., & Fowler, A. E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing, 17, 483-515.
103. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
104. Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95-129.
105. Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267-298.
106. Smith, F. (1978). Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
107. Smith, J. W. A., & Elley, W. B. (1994). Learning to read in New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand: Longman Paul.
108. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
109. Snow, C. E., & Juel, C. (2005). Teaching children to read: What do we know about how to do it? In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 501-520). Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
110. Stanovich, K. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
111. Stanovich, K. (1984). The interactive-compensatory model of reading: A confluence of developmental, experimental and educational psychology. Remedial and Special Education, 5, 11-19.
112. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 340-406.
113. Stanovich, K. E. (1994). Constructivism in reading education. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 259-274.
114. Stanovich, K. E. (1996). Toward a more inclusive definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 2, 154-166.
115. Tan, A., & Nicholson, T. (1997). Flashcards revisited: Training poor readers to read words faster improves their comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 276-288.
116. Thompson, G. B., Cottrell, D., & Fletcher-Flinn, C. (1996). Sublexical orthographic-phonological relations early in the acquisition of reading: The knowledge sources account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 190-222.
117. Thompson, G. B., & Fletcher-Flinn, C. M. (2006). Lexicalised implicit learning in reading acquisition: The Knowledge Sources theory. In C. M. Fletcher-Flinn & G. M. Haberman (Eds.), Cognition and language:Perspectives from New Zealand (pp. 141-156). Bowen Hills, Queensland: Australian Academic Press.
118. Thompson, G. B., Fletcher-Flinn, C. M., & Cottrell, D. S. (1999). Learning correspondences between letters and phonemes without explicit instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 21-50.
119. Torgesen, J. K. (2004). Lessons learned from research on interventions for students who have difficulty learning to read. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 355-382). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
120. Torgesen, J. K. (2005). Recent discoveries on remedial interventions for children with dyslexia. In M.J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 521-537). Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
121. Tracey, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2006). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models. New York: Guilford.
122. Tunmer, W. E. (2008). Recent developments in reading intervention research: Introduction to the Special Issue. Reading and Writing, 21, 299-316.
123. Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W. (1998). Language prediction skill, phonological recoding ability and beginning reading. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorder (pp. 33-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
124. Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2002). The relation of beginning readers’ reported word identification strategies to reading achievement, reading-related skills, and academic self-perceptions. Reading and Writing, 15, 341-358.
125. Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2006). Metalinguistic abilities, phonological recoding skills, and the use of sentence context in beginning reading development: A longitudinal study. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 617-635). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
126. Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W., & Prochnow, J. E. (2003). Preventing negative Matthew effects in at-risk readers: A retrospective study. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties:Bringing science to scale (pp. 121-163). Timonium, MD: York Press.
127. Tunmer, W.E., Chapman, J. W., & Prochnow, J. E. (2004). Why the reading achievement gap in New Zealand won’t go away: Evidence from the PIRLS 2001 international study of reading achievement. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 39, 127-145.
128. Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W., & Prochnow, J. E. (2006). Literate cultural capital at school entry predicts later reading achievement: A seven year longitudinal study. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 41, 183-204.
129. Tunmer, W. E., & Greaney, K. T. (2010). Defining dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 229-243.
130. Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2009). Cultural relativism and literacy education: Explicit teaching based on specific learning needs is not deficit theory. In R. Openshaw & E. Rata (Eds.), The politics of conformity in New Zealand (pp. 154-190). Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson.
131. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Jaccard, J. (2003). Toward distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as primary sources of difficulty in learning to read: A two year follow-up of difficultto- remediate and readily remediated poor readers. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 73-120). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
132. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R. S., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
133. Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from prereaders to readers. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 11-29). New York:Guilford Press.
134. Xue, Y., & Meisels, S. J. (2004). Early literacy instruction and learning in kindergarten: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study - kindergarten class of 1998-1999. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 191-229.
135. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3-29.