The efficacy of orthographic rime, grapheme-phoneme correspondence, and implicit phonics approaches to teaching decoding skills

Scientific Studies of Reading

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 327-349

  Christensen, Carol A ^a   Bowey, Judith A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744575947     PISSN: 10888438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0904_1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bookbinder, G. E. (2002). Salford Sentence Reading Test. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
3. Bowey, J. A. (1994). Phonological sensitivity in novice readers and non-readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 134-159.
4. Bowey, J. A. (1999). The limitations of orthographic rime analogies in beginners' word reading: A reply to Goswami (1999). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 220-231.
5. Bowey, J. A., & Hansen, J. (1994). The development of orthographic rimes as units of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 465-488.
6. Bowey, J. A., & Underwood, N. (1996). Further evidence that orthographic rime usage in nonword reading increases with word-level reading proficiency. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 526-562.
7. Bowey, J. A., Vaughan, L., & Hansen, J. (1998). Beginning readers' use of orthographic analogies in word reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 108-133.
8. Brown, G. D. A., & Deavers, R. P. (1999). Units of analysis in nonword reading: Evidence from children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 208-242.
9. Bruck, M., & Treiman, R. (1992). Learning to pronounce words: The limitations of analogies. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 374-388.
10. Bryant, P. E., Maclean, M., Bradley, L., & Grassland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26, 429-438.
11. Clay, M. M. (1979). The early detection of reading difficulties. London: Heinemann.
12. Coltheart, V., & Leahy, J. (1992). Children's and adults' reading of nonwords: Effects of regularity and consistency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18,118-729.
13. Dahl, K. L., Scharer, P. L., Lawson, L. L., & Grogan, P. R. (1999). Phonics instruction and student achievement in whole language first-grade classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 312-341.
14. Ehri, L. C., & Robbins, C. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 12-26.
15. Goswami, U. (1986). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73-83.
16. Goswami, U. (1988). Orthographic analogies and reading development. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 239-268.
17. Goswami, U. (1990). Phonological priming and orthographic analogies in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 323-340.
18. Goswami, U. (1993). Toward an interactive analogy model of reading development: Decoding vowel graphemes in beginning reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 443-475.
19. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Haskell, D. W., Foorman, B. R., & Swank, P. R. (1992). Effects of three orthographic/phonological units on first-grade reading. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 40-49.
21. Kane, S. (1999). Teaching decoding without destroying the story. Reading Teacher, 52, 770-772.
22. Levy, B. A., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Beginning word recognition: Benefits of training by segmentation and whole words methods. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 359-387.
23. McCandliss, B., Beck, I., Sandak, R., & Perfetti, C. (2003). Focusing attention on decoding for children with poor reading skills: Design and preliminary tests for word building intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 75-104.
24. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of National Reading Panel: Reports of Subgroups. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
25. Savage, R. S. (1997). Do children need concurrent prompts in order to use lexical analogies in reading? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 235-246.
26. Savage, R. S., & Stuart, M. (1998). Sublexical inferences in beginning reading: Medial vowel digraphs as functional units of transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69, 85-108.
27. Seymour, P. H. K., & Elder, L. (1986). Beginning reading without phonology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 1-36.
28. Torgesen, J. K., Morgan, S. T., & Davis, C. (1992) Effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 364-370.
29. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1997). Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 217-234.
30. Treiman, R., Goswami, U., & Brück, M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 559-567.
31. Wise, B. W., & Olson, R. K. (1995). Computer-based phonological awareness and reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 99-122.